Performance Feedback, Target-Setting, and Data Manipulation in a Multi-Goal Situation: Evidence from Chinese Cities

References

• Anessi-Pessina, E., & Sicilia, M. (2020). Do top managers’ individual characteristics affect accounting manipulation in the public sector? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(3), 465–484. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muz038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baekgaard, M., Lastra-Anadón, C. X., Serritzlew, S., & Sønderskov, K. M. (2024). Gaming over: Quasi-experimental evidence on the effect of competition on gaming. Public Performance & Management Review, 47(1), 89–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2024.2302389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsky, A. (2008). Understanding the ethical cost of organizational goal-setting: A review and theory development. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9481-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belle, N., & Cantarelli, P. (2017). What causes unethical behavior? A meta-analysis to set an agenda for public administration research. Public Administration Review, 77(3), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benaine, S. L., & Kroll, A. (2020). Explaining effort substitution in performance systems: The role of task demands and mission orientation. Public Management Review, 22(6), 813–835. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1604794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, G., & Hood, C. (2006). What’s measured is what matters: targets and gaming in the English public health care system. Public Administration, 84(3), 517–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00600.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattaneo, M. D., Idrobo, N., & Titiunik, R. (2024). A practical introduction to regression discontinuity designs: Extensions. Elements in quantitative and computational methods for the social sciences. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S. (2024). Performance feedback, blame avoidance, and data manipulation in the public sector: evidence from China’s official city air quality ranking. Public Management Review, 26(7), 1871–1891. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2171098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S., & Jia, K. (2022). Bringing in horizontal strategic interactions: Local governments’ bandwagon strategy and its implications for performance management. International Public Management Journal, 25(4), 600–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2020.1797964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S., & Jia, K. (2023). How local governments prioritize multiple conflicting goals: beyond the sole-goal perspective. Public Administration, 101(2), 522–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S., Jia, K., & Chan, K. N. (2024). When blame avoidance meets transparency: local governments’ bandwagon strategy in environmental information disclosure in China. Local Government Studies, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2024.2329584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Jiang, H., & Ling, J. (2024). Addressing multitasking problems through promotion incentives: An empirical study of local governments in China. Public Performance & Management Review, 47(3), 654–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2024.2302390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Jin, G. Z., Kumar, N., & Shi, G. (2013). The promise of Beijing: Evaluating the impact of the 2008 Olympic Games on air quality. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 66(3), 424–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2013.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheon, O. (2020). How do performance gaps shape managerial strategy? The role of sector-differences in U.S. nursing homes. International Public Management Journal, 24(6), 846–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2020.1815917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, J., Dahlmann, C. M., Mathiasen, A. H., Moynihan, D. P., & Petersen, N. B. G. (2018). How do elected officials evaluate performance? Goal preferences, governance preferences, and the process of goal reprioritization. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(2), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, Y. H., & Rainey, H. G. (2005). Goal ambiguity and organizational performance in U.S. federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(4), 529–557. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courty, P., & Marschke, G. (2007). Making government accountable: Lessons from a federal job training program. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 904–916. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00777.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice–Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Du, J., & Yi, H. (2022). Target-setting, political incentives, and the tricky trade-off between economic development and environmental protection. Public Administration, 100(4), 923–941. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, J., & Yi, H. (2023). Environmental target and government performance in China. Public Performance & Management Review, 46(4), 793–819. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2023.2196974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenkopf, G. (2009). Negative weights for performance measures. International Public Management Journal, 12(3), 332–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490903103284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, J. (2015). Pernicious manipulation of performance measures in China’s cadre evaluation system. The China Quarterly, 223, 618–637. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741015000806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, J. (2021). Mitigating pernicious gaming in performance management in China: Dilemmas, strategies and challenges. Public Performance & Management Review, 44(2), 321–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1775662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrish, E. (2016). The impact of performance management on performance in public organizations: A meta-analysis. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 48–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghanem, D., & Zhang, J. (2014). Effortless Perfection:’ Do Chinese cities manipulate air pollution data? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 68(2), 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2014.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. A. (2023). Does performance information receive political attention? Public Administration Review, 83(4), 763–774. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, J., & Bromiley, P. (2007). Incentives to cheat: The influence of executive compensation and firm performance on financial misrepresentation. Organization Science, 18(3), 350–367. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinterleitner, M., & Sager, F. (2017). Anticipatory and reactive forms of blame avoidance: of foxes and lions. European Political Science Review, 9(4), 587–606. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773916000126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoechle, D. (2007). Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 7(3), 281–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0700700301
   Google Scholar
• Holm, J. M. (2018). Successful problem solvers? Managerial performance information use to improve low organizational performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(3), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S. (2019). A behavioral model of public organizations: Bounded rationality, performance feedback, and negativity bias. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S. (2020). Performance management meets red tape: Bounded rationality, negativity bias, and resource dependence. Public Administration Review, 80(6), 932–945. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S., Kim, S. H., & Son, J. (2020). Bounded rationality, blame avoidance, and political accountability: how performance information influences management quality. Public Management Review, 22(8), 1240–1263. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1630138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2006). Gaming in targetworld: The targets approach to managing British public services. Public Administration Review, 66(4), 515–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00612.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2010). The blame game: Spin, bureaucracy, and self-preservation in government. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2012). Public management by numbers as a performance-enhancing drug: two Hypotheses. Public Administration Review, 72(s1), S85–S92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02634.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, R., Zhu, P., Somers, M., & Bloom, H. (2012). A practical guide to regression discontinuity. MDRC.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, J. (2018). Making bureaucracy work: patronage networks, performance incentives, and economic development in China. American Journal of Political Science, 62(4), 982–999. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsen, Å., Solholm, K., & Tufte, P. A. (2024). Performance measurement system design as link between strategy formulation and performance information use in public sector organizations. Public Performance & Management Review, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2024.2360158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, A., & Vogel, D. (2021). Why public employees manipulate performance data: Prosocial impact, job stress, and red tape. International Public Management Journal, 24(2), 164–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2021.1874579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D. S., & Lemieux, T. (2010). Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(2), 281–355. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.48.2.281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J. (2015). The paradox of performance regimes: Strategic responses to target regimes in Chinese local government. Public Administration, 93(4), 1152–1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., & Chen, S. (2024). Multilevel power structure and local compliance with government transparency mandates: evidence from China’s environmental transparency reform. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 90(1), 82–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523231167081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., & Ma, X. (2024). Government-to-government peer pressure and air pollution: Causal evidence from an environmental ranking policy in China. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 222, 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2024.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Lei., Yang, Z., & Song, S. (2021). Does ranking stimulate government performance? Evidence from China’s key environmental protection cities. Social Indicators Research, 158(2), 699–725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02722-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C., & Kong, D. (2021). Does political incentive shape governments’ disclosure of air pollution information? China Economic Review, 69, 101659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, L., & Li, Q. (2024). Target and performance: Evidence from China’s air quality management. Public Performance & Management Review, 47(1), 174–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2023.2282704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, L. (2016). Performance Feedback, government goal-setting and aspiration level adaptation: Evidence from Chinese provinces. Public Administration, 94(2), 452–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., Favero, N., & Zhu, L. (2015). Performance gaps and managerial decisions: A Bayesian decision theory of managerial action. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1221–1246. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizrahi, S., & Minchuk, Y. (2023). Performance management, gaming and regulatory monitoring: A theoretical model and applications. Public Management Review, 25(6), 1152–1168. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.2007668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson-Crotty, S., Nicholson-Crotty, J., & Fernandez, S. (2017). Performance and management in the public sector: Testing a model of relative risk aversion. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 603–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, P. A. (2014). Learning from performance feedback: Performance information, aspiration levels, and managerial priorities. Public Administration, 92(1), 142–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, P. A., & Baekgaard, M. (2015). Performance information, blame avoidance, and politicians’ attitudes to spending and reform: Evidence from an experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), 545–569. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierre, J., & de Fine Licht, J. (2021). Collaborative gaming: When principals and agents agree to game the system. Public Administration, 99(4), 711–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford, A., & Meier, K. J. (2015). Managerial goals in a performance-driven system: Theory and empirical tests in higher education. Public Administration, 93(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salge, T. O. (2011). A behavioral model of innovative search: Evidence from public hospital services. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(1), 181–210. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, M. E., Ordonez, L., & Douma, B. (2004). Goal setting as a motivator of unethical behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 422–432. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn, H., & Bae, K. B. (2018). Do public employees “Game” performance budgeting systems? Evidence from the program assessment rating tool in Korea. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(5), 458–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016689322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, X., Wang, Y., & Yi, H. (2023). Data manipulation through patronage networks: Evidence from environmental emissions in China. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(2), 342–356. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muac019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. (2020). Public officials’ gaming of performance measures and targets: The nexus between motivation and opportunity. Public Performance & Management Review, 44(2), 272–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1744454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. (2021). Causes of gaming in performance management. In Handbook on performance management in the public sector (pp. 82–95)Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Terman, J. N., & Yang, K. (2016). Reconsidering gaming in an accountability relationship: The case of minority purchasing in Florida. Public Performance & Management Review, 40(2), 281–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2016.1177560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Voet, J., & Lems, E. (2022). Decision-makers’ generation of policy solutions amidst negative performance: Invention or rigidity? Public Administration Review, 82(5), 931–945. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, J. L. (2014). Juking the stats? Authoritarian information problems in China. British Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123414000106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z. (2017). Government work reports: Securing state legitimacy through institutionalization. The China Quarterly, 229, 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741016001521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, R. K. (1986). The politics of blame avoidance. Journal of Public Policy, 6(4), 371–398. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00004219
   Google Scholar
• Wei, W., Wang, C., Zhai, W., & Li, W. (2023). “Honor list” and “shame roll”: Quasi-experimental evidence of the effect of performance feedback under political control. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(1), 122–138. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muac011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, P. (2021). Target interactions and target aspiration level adaptation: How do government leaders tackle the “environment-economy” nexus? Public Administration Review, 81(2), 220–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, P., Liu, D., & Lyu, S. (2024). Leadership mobility and target adaptation: Does previous target achievement matter? Public Performance & Management Review, 47(1), 204–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2023.2259367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, L., & Rutherford, A. (2019). Managing the Gaps: How Performance Gaps Shape Managerial Decision Making. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(5), 1029–1061. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2019.1568886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar