What can hospitality educators learn from students about effective teaching and learning at the beginning of an asynchronous, online class?

References

• Abrami, P. C. (1989). How should we use student ratings to evaluate teaching? Research in Higher Education, 30(2), 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, J. V. (1997). Student evaluations: The ratings game. Inquiry, 1(1), 10–16. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ591701
   Google Scholar
• Ahmadi, M., Helms, M. M., & Raiszadeh, F. (2001). Business students’ perceptions of faculty evaluations. International Journal of Educational Management, 15(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540110366097
   Google Scholar
• Bangert, A. W. (2006). The development of an instrument for assessing online teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(3), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.2190/B3XP-5K61-7Q07-U443
   Google Scholar
• Bangert, A. W. (2008). The development and validation of the student evaluation of online teaching effectiveness. Interdisciplinary Journal of Practice, Theory, and Applied Research, 25(1–2), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380560802157717
   Google Scholar
• Barron, P. E., & Arcodia, C. (2002). Linking learning style preferences and ethnicity: International students studying hospitality and tourism management in Australia. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 1(2), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.3794/johlste.12.25
   Google Scholar
• Basow, S. A. (1995). Student evaluations of college professors: When gender matters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(4), 656–665. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.4.656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basow, S. A., & Martin, J. L. (2012). Bias in student evaluations. In M.E. Kite (Ed.), Effective evaluation of teaching: A guide for faculty and administrators (pp. 40–49). Society for the Teaching of Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Beecham, R. (2009). Teaching quality and student satisfaction: Nexus or simulacrum? London Review of Education, 7(1), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460902990336
   Google Scholar
• Berg, B. L. (1989). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Boring, A., Ottoboni, K., & Stark, P. B. (2016). Student evaluations of teaching (mostly) do not measure teaching effectiveness. Retrieved from Science Open Research, https://doi.org/10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-EDU.AETBZC.v1
   Google Scholar
• Braga, M., Paccagnella, M., & Pellizzari, M. (2014). Evaluating students’ evaluations of professors. Economics of Education Review, 41(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2014.04.002
   Google Scholar
• Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CAST. (2023). About universal design for learning. Retrieved March 23, 2023, from https://www.cast.org/impact/universal-design-for-learning-udl
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., & Hoshower, L. B. (2003). Student evaluation of teaching effectiveness: An assessment of student perception and motivation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930301683
   Google Scholar
• Clayson, D. (2022). The student evaluation of teaching and likability: What the evaluations actually measure. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(2), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1909702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantinou, C., & Wijnen-Meijer, M. (2022). Student evaluations of teaching and the development of a comprehensive measure of teaching effectiveness for medical schools. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03148-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, S. R., Mosyjowski, E. A., Oprea, S. L., Huang-Saad, A., & Seifert, C. M. (2016). College students’ views of creative process instruction across disciplines. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.07.002
   Google Scholar
• Davis, N. L., Gough, M., & Taylor, L. L. (2019). Online teaching: Advantages, obstacles and tools for getting it right. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 19(3), 256–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313220.2019.1612313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, M., DeFranco, A., & Draper, J. (2020). Are all student evaluation scores created equally? Identifying factors that hospitality administrators should consider when assessing student feedback. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 26, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2020.100246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deale, C. S. Learning preferences instead of learning styles: A case study of hospitality management students’ perceptions of how they learn best and implications for teaching and learning. (2019). International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(13), 11. Article. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2019.130211
   Google Scholar
• Deale, C. S. (2021). A team approach to using student feedback to enhance teaching and learning. International Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 14(2), published online at. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/.
   Google Scholar
• Deale, C. S., & White, B. J. (2012). Hospitality Students’ and Instructors’ Perceptions of a Sense of Community and Learning in Online Classes: Do they see eye to eye? Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 24(2–3), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2012.10696664
   Google Scholar
• Deming, E. (2000). Out of the crisis. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Draus, P. J., Curran, M. J., & Trempus, M. S. (2014). The influence of instructor-generated video content on student satisfaction with and engagement in asynchronous online classes. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 240–254. https://jolt.merlot.org/vol10no2/draus_0614.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eom, S. B., Wen, H. J., & Ashill, N. (2006). The determinants of students’ perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An empirical investigation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2006.00114.x
   Google Scholar
• Flaherty, C. (2018, May-June). Teaching Eval Shake-Up. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved rom https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2018/05/22/most-institutions-say-they-value-teaching-how-they-assess-it-tells-different-story
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, N. (2012). The case against learning styles. Vark-Learn. Retrieved from http://www.vark-learn.com/wp-content/up-loads/2014/08/The-Case-Against-Learning-Styles.pd
   Google Scholar
• Gelber, K., Brennan, K., Duriesmith, D., & Fenton, E. (2022). Gendered mundanities: Gender bias in student evaluations of teaching in political science. Australian Journal of Political Science, 57(2), 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2022.2043241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goza, B. K. (1993). Graffiti needs assessment: Involving students in the first class session. Journal of Management Education, 17(1), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/105256299301700109
   Google Scholar
• Granat, B. M. (2018). Course/Faculty Assessment (CFA): A student team approach to course and faculty assessment. Medical Science Educator, 28(1), 439–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-018-0553-2
   Google Scholar
• Green, A. J., & Sammons, G. E. (2014). Student learning styles: Assessing active learning in the hospitality learners model. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 26(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2014.880617
   Google Scholar
• Hawk, T. F., & Shah, A. J. (2007). Using learning style instruments to enhance student learning. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 5(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2007.00125.x
   Google Scholar
• Heffernan, T. (2022). Sexism, racism, prejudice, and bias: A literature review and synthesis of research surrounding student evaluations of courses and teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(1), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1888075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennington, B. (2023, January 18). Tips for creating an engaging asynchronous online learning environment. Wiley University Services. Retrieved January 22, 2023, from https://universityservices.wiley.com/asynchronous-learning-environment-tips/
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, S. M., & Talbot, D. M. (2001). Understanding student evaluations. College Teaching, 49(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567550109595842
   Google Scholar
• Hoefer, P., Yurkiewicz, J., & Byrne, J. C. (2012). The association between students’ evaluation of teaching and grades. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 10(1), 447–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2012.00345.x
   Google Scholar
• Hornstein, H. A., & Law, H. F. E. (2017). Student evaluations of teaching are an inadequate assessment tool for evaluating faculty performance. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1–8, 130401. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1304016
   Google Scholar
• Huston, T. (2005). Report: Empirical Research on the Impact of Race and Gender in the Evaluation of Teaching. Seattle University, Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning website. Retrieved March 10, 2017, from
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, P., & Shulman, L. S. (1999). The scholarship of teaching: New elaborations, new developments. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 31(5), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091389909604218
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, H. (2016, October 12). KISS: Rules of engagement. SecEd, Retrieved from. http://www.sec-ed.co.uk/best-practice/kiss-rules-of-engagement/
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, M., Silver, N., Lavaque-Manty, D., & Meizlish, D. (Eds.). (2013). Using reflection and metacognition to improve student learning. Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, M. (2012). Student evaluations of teaching effectiveness: Considerations for Ontario universities. Toronto, Council of Ontario Universities, COU #866. https://cou.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Academic-Colleagues-Paper-Student-Evaluations-of-Teaching-Effectiveness.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kwan, K. P. (1999). How fair are student ratings in assessing the teaching performance of university teachers? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(2), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293990240207
   Google Scholar
• La Lopa, J., & Wray, M. (2015). Debunking the matching hypothesis of learning style theorists in hospitality education. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 27(1), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2015.1064317
   Google Scholar
• Lashley, C. (1999). On making silk purses: Developing reflective practitioners in hospitality management education. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 11(4), 180–185. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596119910263586
   Google Scholar
• Lashley, C., & Barron, P. (2006). The learning style preferences of hospitality and tourism students: Observations from an international and cross-cultural study. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 25(4), 552–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2005.03.006
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, J. W. (2018, May-June). Student evaluations of teaching are not valid: It is time to stop using SET scores in personnel decisions. American Association of University Professors. Retrieved from https://www.aaup.org/article/student-evaluations-teaching-are-not-valid#.XjrwRCN7m70
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. J., Kim, S. S., & Lo, A. (2008). Perceptions of hospitality and tourism students towards study motivations and preferences: A study of Hong Kong students. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 7(2), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.3794/johlste.72.178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. G., McKeachie, W. J., & Kim, Y. C. (2003). College student intrinsic and/or extrinsic motivation and learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 13(3), 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(02)00092-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud, K. (2012). Systematic text condensation: A strategy for qualitative analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 40(8), 795–805. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494812465030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1989). Designing qualitative research. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Middaugh, M. F. (2010). Planning and assessment in higher education: Demonstrating institutional effectiveness (1st ed.). Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118269572
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, S. M., & Groat, L. N. (1998). Student learning styles and their implications for teaching. Occasional paper #10. Center for Research on Learning and Teaching, University of Michigan. Retrieved from https://crlte.engin.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2013/06/occ_paper10.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Newton, P. M., & Miah, M. (2017, March 27). Evidence-based higher education-is the learning styles “myth” important? Frontiers in Psychology. Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00444/full
   Google Scholar
• Newton, P. M., & Salvi, A. (2020). How common is belief in the learning styles neuromyth, and does it matter? A pragmatic systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 5(602451), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.602451
   Google Scholar
• Okoye, K., Arrona-Palacios, A., Camacho-Zuñiga, C., Achem, J. A. G., Escamilla, J., & Hosseini, S. (2022). Towards teaching analytics: A contextual model for analysis of students’ evaluation of teaching through text mining and machine learning classification. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 3891–3933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10751-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Loughlin, V. D. (2006). A ‘how-to’ guide for developing a publishable scholarship of teaching project. Advances in Physiological Education, 30(1), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00027.2005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poole, G., & Simmons, N. (2013). Contributions of the scholarship of teaching and learning to quality enhancement in Canada. In Gordon, G. & Lance, R. (Eds.) Enhancing quality in higher education (pp. 118–128). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, L. D. (2010). The role of perceived race and gender in the evaluation of college teaching on RateMyProfessors.Com. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 3(3), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovai, A. P. (2001). Building classroom community at a distance: A case study. Educational Technology Research & Development, 49(4), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovai, A. P. (2002). Development of an instrument to measure classroom community. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(1), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00102-1
   Google Scholar
• Scagnoli, N. I., Choo, J., & Tian, J. (2019). Students’ insights on the use of video lectures in online classes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 399–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seldin, P. (1985). Current practices in evaluating business school faculty. Center for Applied Research, Lubin School of Business, Pace University.
   Google Scholar
• Shaari, A. S., Yusoffb, N. M., Ghazalic, I. M., Osmand, R. H., & Dzahire, N. F. M. (2014). The relationship between lecturer’s teaching style and students’ academic engagement. Procedia, 118(10), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Spooren, B., Brockx, B., & Mortelmans, D. (2013). On the validity of student evaluation of teaching the state of the art. Review of Educational Research, 83(4), 598–590. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313496870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spooren, P., Mortelmans, D., & Denekin, J. (2007). Student evaluation of teaching quality in higher education: Development of an instrument based on 10 Likert scales. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(6), 667–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930601117191
   Google Scholar
• Stark, P. B., & Freishtat, R. (2014). An evaluation of course evaluations. ScienceOpen, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-EDU.AOFRQA.v1
   Google Scholar
• Titsworth, B. S., Mazer, J. P., Goodboy, A. K., Bolkan, S., & Myers, S. A. (2015). Two meta-analyses exploring the relationship between teacher clarity and student learning. Communication Education, 64(1), 385–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2015.1041998
   Google Scholar
• The University of Kansas. (n.d.) Engaging online instructional activities. Flexible Teaching. Retried March 23, 2023, from https://flexteaching.ku.edu/engaging-students-creatively-online
   Google Scholar
• University of Washington. (n.d.). Gathering student feedback. Center for Teaching and Learning. Retrieved March 22, 2023, from https://teaching.washington.edu/topics/assessing-and-improving-teaching/gathering-student-feedback/
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2021, March 8). Exemptions (2018 requirements). Office for Human Research Protections. Retrieved June 11, 2023, from https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/45-cfr-46/common-rule-subpart-a-46104/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Uttl, B., White, C. A., & Gonzalez, D. W. (2017). Meta-analysis of faculty’ teaching effectiveness: Student evaluation of teaching ratings and student learning not related. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 54(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.08.007
   Google Scholar
• Wachtel, H. K. (1998). Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: A brief review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(2), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293980230207
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, T. C. (1995). Student evaluation of teaching: Some cautions and suggestions. Teaching Sociology, 64(1), 64–68. https://doi.org/10.2307/1319382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983488
   Google Scholar
• Weimer, M. (2013, January 9). First day of class activities that create a climate for learning. Faculty Focus. https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/course-design-ideas/first-day-of-class-activities-that-create-a-climate-for-learning
   Google Scholar
• Weimer, M. (2017, July 19). First day of class activities that create a climate for learning. Faculty Focus. (note—this was published a second time because it was one of the most popular articles in the Faculty Focus). https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/course-design-ideas/first-day-of-class-activities-that-create-a-climate-for-learning/
   Google Scholar
• Witherby, A. E., & Tauber, S. K. (2019). The current status of students’ note-taking: Why and how do students take notes? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(2), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, R. E. (2006). Student evaluations of faculty: Concerns raised in the literature, and possible solutions. College Student Journal, 40(1), 417–422.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. L., & Jenkins-Guarnieri, M. A. (2012). Student evaluations of teaching: Combining the meta-analyses and demonstrating further evidence for effective use. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(6), 683–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.563279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yale University. (n.d.). Mid-Semester Student Feedback. Poorvu Center for Teaching and Learning. Retrieved March 22, 2023, from https://poorvucenter.yale.edu/Mid-semester-Feedback
   Google Scholar
• Yunker, P. J., & Yunker, J. A. (2003). Are student evaluations of teaching valid? Evidence from an analytical business core course. Journal of Education for Business, 78(6), 313–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832320309598619
   Google Scholar