3,440
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A Critical Review of Discrete Soil Sample Data Reliability: Part 1—Field Study Results

, &

References

  • AMEC. 2009. Facility closure plan, Waipahu Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator. Prepared for City and County of Honolulu, Department of Environmental Services, Honolulu, HI.
  • AMEC. 2013. Remedial Investigation Report, Environmental Hazard Evaluation—Former Waipahu Incinerator Facility, Waipahu, Hawaii. Prepared for City and County of Honolulu, Department of Environmental Services, Honolulu, HI.
  • American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 1998. Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils. West Conshohocken, PA ( Designation: D 422-63).
  • Bernard, N. D., and Orcutt, A. M. 1983. Dynamic Processes of Hilo Bay. University of Hawaii, Marine Option Program.
  • Revise to: Brewer, R., Peard, J., and Heskett, M. 2016. A critical review of discrete soil sample reliability: Part 2—Implications. Soil Sediment Cont. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15320383.2017.1244172
  • Clausen, J. L., Georgian, T., Bednar, A., Perron, N., Bray, A., Tuminello, P., Gooch, G., Mulherin, N., Gelvin, A., Beede, M., Saari, S., Jones, W., and Tazik, S. 2013. Demonstration of Incremental Sampling Methodology for Soil Containing Metallic Residues. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS ( EDRC TR-13-9).
  • Cutler, W. C. 2011. Bioaccessible arsenic in soils of the Island of Hawaii. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawaii-Manoa, Department of Geology and Geophysics, Honolulu, HI.
  • Cutler, W. C., Brewer, R. C., El-Kadi, A., Hue, N. V., Niemeyer, P. G., Peard, J., and Ray, C. 2013. Bioaccessible arsenic in soils of former sugar cane plantations, Island of Hawaii. Sci. Total Environ. 442, 177–188.
  • Cutler, W. C., Hue, N., Ortiz-Escobar, M. E., and Martin, T. 2006. Approaches to reduce bioaccessible arsenic in Hawaii soils. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds, Monterey, CA, May 2006.
  • Element Environmental. 2011. Final Project Report Phase II Confirmatory Sampling 84-acre Former Voice of America site, Maili, Oahu, Hawaii. Prepared for U.S. Coast Guard, Honolulu, HI.
  • Gilbert, R. O. 1987. Statistical Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, Inc.
  • Goodman, J. 2001. Water Drops: Cohesion and Adhesion. Appalachian State University. Available at: http://www.appstate.edu/∼goodmanjm/rcoe/asuscienceed/background/waterdrops/waterdrops.html (accessed 10/1/2014).
  • Hadley, P. W., and Bruce, M. L. 2013. On representativeness. Environ. Forensics 14, 109–120.
  • Hallacher, L. E., Kho, E. B., Benard, N. D., Orcutt, A. M., Dudley, W. C., and Hammond, T. M. 1985. Distribution of arsenic in the sediments and biota of Hilo Bay, Hawaii. Pacific Sci. 39 (3), 266–273.
  • Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH), Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response. 2011. Update to Soil Action Levels for Inorganic Arsenic and Recommended Soil Management Practices. Honolulu, HI, November 2011.
  • Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH), Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response. 2012. Hawaiian Islands Soil Metal Background Evaluation. Honolulu, HI.
  • Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH), Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response. 2013. DU-MI Investigation of Arsenic Contamination in Waiakea Pond Sediments. Honolulu, HI.
  • Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH), Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response. 2015a. Small-Scale Variability of Discrete Soil Sample Data, Part 1: Field Investigation of Discrete Sample Variability. Honolulu, HI.
  • Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH), Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response. 2015b. Small-Scale Variability of Discrete Soil Sample Data, Part 2: Causes and Implications for Use in Environmental Investigations. Honolulu, HI.
  • Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH), Office of Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response. 2016. Technical Guidance Manual. Honolulu, HI.
  • Interstate Technology Regulatory Council (ITRC). 2012. Incremental Sampling Methodology. Washington, DC.
  • Juhasz, A. L., Herde, P., Herde, C., Boland, J., and Smith, E. 2014. Validation of the predictive capabilities of the Sbrc-G in vitro assay for estimating arsenic relative bioavailability in contaminated soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 12962–12969.
  • Minnitt, R. C. A., Rice, P. M., and Spangenberg, C. 2007. Part 1: Understanding the components of the fundamental sampling error: A key to good sampling practice. J. South. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 107, 505–511.
  • Murray, E. J., and Sivakumar, V. 2010. Unsaturated Soils: A Fundamental Interpretation of Soil Behavior. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Pitard, F. F. 1993. Pierre Gy's Sampling Theory and Sampling Practice. New York: CRC Press.
  • Pitard, F. F. 2005. Sampling correctness—A comprehensive guideline. Proceedings of the Sampling and Blending Conference, Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia, May 9–12, 2005.
  • Pitard, F. F. 2009. Theoretical, practical and economic difficulties in sampling for trace constituents. Proceedings of the 4th World Conference on Sampling and Blending, Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Cape Town, October 19–23, 2009.
  • Ramsey, C. A., and Hewitt, A. D. 2005. A methodology for assessing sample representativeness. Environ. Forensics 6, 71–75.
  • Santamarina, J. C. 2001. Soil behavior at the microscale: Particle forces. Proceedings of the Symposium on Soil Behavior and Soft Ground Construction, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, October 5–6, 2001.
  • Silvius, K., Moravcik, P., and James, M. 2005. Hilo watershed based restoration plan. Prepared for Hawaii Department of Health, Polluted Runoff Control.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 1987. Data quality objectives for remedial response activities. Washington, DC. ( EPA/540/G-87/003).
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Office of Policy, Planning, and Evaluation. 1989a. Methods for evaluating the attainment of cleanup standards, volume 1: Soils and solid media. Washington, DC. ( EPA/230/U2-89/042).
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory. 1989b. Soil Sampling Quality Assurance User's Guide. Washington, DC. ( EPA/600/8-69/046).
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory. 1990. A Rationale for the Assessment of Errors in the Sampling of Soils. Washington, DC. ( EPA/800/4-90/013)
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1996. SW846 Methods: Method 3050B, acid Digestion of Sediments, Sludges and Soils. Washington, DC.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2000. SW846 Methods: Method 6010C, Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry. Washington, DC.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Office of Research and Development. 2003. Guidance for Obtaining Representative Laboratory Analytical Subsamples from Particulate Laboratory Samples. Washington, DC. ( EPA/600/R-03/027).
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2006. SW846 methods: Method 8330B, nitroaromatics, Nitramines, and Nitrate Esters by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). Washington, DC.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2007a. SW846 methods: Method 6200—Field Portable x-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry for the Determination of Elemental Concentrations in Soil and Sediment. Washington, DC.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2007b. SW846 methods: Method 3051A, Microwave Assisted Acid Digestion of sediments, Soils and Oils. Washington, DC.