A Critical Review of Discrete Soil Sample Data Reliability: Part 2—Implications

References

• Association of American Feed Control Officials (AAFCO). 2015. GOODSamples: Guidance on Obtaining Defensible Samples. Champaign, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, R., Peard, J., and Heskett, M. 2016. A critical review of discrete soil sample reliability: Part 1—Field study results. Soil Sediment Cont. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15320383.2017.1244171
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Resources Management. 2008. Sampling and Analysis Plan Amendment Former Pepe´ekeo Sugar Company property, Hakalau, Hawaii. Prepared for Aloha Green Inc. Hilo, HI,.
   Google Scholar
• Groundswell Technologies, Inc. 2013. Groundswell Technologies Contouring Web Application and API. Santa Barbara, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Hadley, P. W. and Petrisor, I. G. 2013. Incremental sampling, challenges and opportunities for environmental forensics. Environ. Forensics 14, 109–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadley, P. W. and Sedman, R. M. 1992. How hot is that spot? J. Soil Cont. 3, 217–225.
   Google Scholar
• Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH), Office of Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response. 2011. Screening for Environmental Concerns at Sites with Contaminated Soil and Groundwater. Honolulu, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH), Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response. 2012. Hawaiian Islands Soil Metal Background Evaluation. Honolulu, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH), Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response. 2015a. Small-Scale Variability of Discrete Soil Sample Data, Part 1: Field Investigation Of Discrete Sample Variability. Honolulu, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH), Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response. 2015b. Small-Scale Variability of Discrete Soil Sample Data, Part 2: Causes and Implications for Use in Environmental Investigations. Honolulu, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH), Office of Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response. 2016. Technical Guidance Manual. Honolulu, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Interstate Technology Regulatory Council (ITRC). 2012. Incremental Sampling Methodology. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, G. Y. and Wong, D. W. 2008. An adaptive inverse-distance weighting spatial interpolation technique for computers. Geosciences 34 (9), 1044–1055.
   Google Scholar
• Minnitt, R. C. A., Rice, P. M. and Spangenberg, C. 2007. Part 1: Understanding the components of the fundamental sampling error: A key to good sampling practice. J. South. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 107, 505–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitard, F. F. 1993. Pierre Gy's Sampling Theory and Sampling Practice. New York: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pitard, F. F. 2005. Sampling correctness—A comprehensive guideline. Proceedings of Sampling and Blending Conference, Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia, May 9–12, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Pitard, F. F. 2009. Theoretical, practical and economic difficulties in sampling for trace constituents. Proceedings of the 4th World Conference on Sampling and Blending, The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Cape Town, October 19–23, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, C. A. and Hewitt, A. D. 2005. A methodology for assessing sample representativeness. Environ. Forensics 6, 71–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulgin, A. I. and Duhaas, L. 2008. Evaluation of HMA treatment to allow for reuse of waste ash as landfill daily cover. Prepared for H-Power, Inc. Honolulu, HI, October 30, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Environmental and Munitions Center of Expertise. 2009. Interim Guidance 09-02: Implementation of Incremental Sampling (IS) of Soil for the Military Munitions Response Program. Huntsville, AL.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Office of Toxic Substances. 1985. Verification of PCB Spill Cleanup by Sampling and Analysis. Washington, DC ( EPA-560/5-85·026).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Office of Toxic Substances. 1986. Field Manual for Grid Sampling of PCB Spill Sites to Verify Cleanups. Washington, DC ( EPA-560/5-86·017).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 1987. Data Quality Objectives for Remedial Response Activities. Washington, DC ( EPA/540/G-87/003).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Office of Remedial Response. 1988. Superfund Exposure Assessment Manual. Washington, DC ( EPA/540/1-881001).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Office of Policy, Planning, and Evaluation. 1989a. Methods for Evaluating the Attainment of Cleanup Standards, Volume 1: Soils and Solid Media. Washington, DC ( EPA/230/U2-89/042).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory. 1989b. Soil Sampling Quality Assurance User's Guide. Washington, DC ( EPA/600/8-69/046).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Office of Policy, Planning, and Evaluation. 1989c. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Volume I, Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part A). Washington, DC ( EPA/540/1-89/002).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Office of Policy, Planning, and Evaluation. 1989d. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Volume II, Environmental Evaluation Manual. Washington, DC ( EPA/540/1-89/001).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory. 1990. A Rationale for the Assessment of Errors in the Sampling of Soils. Washington, DC ( EPA/800/4-90/013).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Office of Research and Development. 1991. Guidance for Data Usability in Risk Assessment (Part A). Washington, DC ( EPA/540/R-92/003).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. 1992a. A Supplemental Guidance to RAGS: Calculating the Concentration Term. Washington, DC ( EPA 9285.7-081).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Office of Research and Development. 1992b. Preparation of Soil Sampling Protocols: Sampling Techniques and Strategies. Washington, DC ( EPA/600/R-92/128).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), National Exposure Research Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, Technology Support Center. 1999. Correct Sampling Using the Theories of Pierre Gy. Washington, DC ( Fact Sheet 197CMB98.FS-14).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection (USEPA), Office of Environmental Information. 2002a. Guidance on Environmental Data Verification and Data Validation. Washington, DC ( EPA/240/R-02/004).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection (USEPA), Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 2002b. Calculating Upper Confidence Limits for Exposure Point Concentrations at Hazardous Waste Sites. Washington, DC ( OSWER 9285.6-10).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 2005. Guidance on Surface Soil Cleanup at Hazardous Waste Sites (peer review draft). Washington, DC ( EPA 9355.0-91).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), National Center for Environmental Assessment, Integrated Risk Information System. 2011a. IRIS Glossary. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development. 2011b. Exposure Factors Handbook. Washington, DC ( EPA/600/R-09/052F).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Office of Research and Development. 2013. ProUCL Version 5.0.00, User Guide. Washington, DC ( EPA/600/R-07/041).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Superfund. 2014. Hot Spots: Incremental Sampling Methodology (ISM) FAQs. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Superfund. 2015. Screening Levels for Chemical Contaminants. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2014. Geochemical and Mineralogical Maps for Soils of the Conterminous United States. Reston, VA ( Open-File Report 2014-1082).
   Google Scholar