Modeling and optimizing by the response surface methodology of the Pb(II)-removing effectiveness from a soil by electrokinetic remediation

References

• Acar, Y. B., and A. N. Alshawabkeh. 1993. Principles of electrokinetic remediation. Environ. Sci. Technol 27:2638–47. doi:10.1021/es00049a002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ait Ahmed, O., Z. Derriche, M. Kameche, A. Bahmani, H. Souli, P. Dubujet, and J. M. Fleureau. 2016. Electro-remediation of lead contaminated kaolinite: An electro-kinetic treatment. Chem. Eng. Process 100:37–48. doi:10.1016/j.cep.2015.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcántara, M. T., J. Gómez, M. Pazos, and M. A. Sanromán. 2012. Electrokinetic remediation of lead and phenanthrene polluted soils. Geoderma 173–174:128–33. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asadollahfardi, G., M. S. Sarmadi, M. Rezaee, A. Khodadadi-Darban, M. Yazdani, and J. M. Paz-Garcia. 2021. Comparison of different extracting agents for the recovery of Pb and Zn through electrokinetic remediation of mine tailings. J. Environ. Manage. 279:111728. 1-12 doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asce, M., C. Chaparro, and R. Saichek. 2003. Iodide-enhanced electrokinetic remediation of mercury-contaminated soils. J. Environ. Eng. ASCE 129:1137–48. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2003)129:12(1137).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahemmat, M., M. Farahbakhsh, and M. Kianirad. 2016. Humic substances-enhanced electroremediation of heavy metals contaminated soil. J. Hazard. Mater 312:307–18. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.03.038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baraud, F., M. C. Fourcade, S. Tellier, and M. Astruc. 1997. Modelling of decontamination rate in an electrokinetic soil processing. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem 68:105–21. doi:10.1080/03067319708030485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekkar Djelloul Sayah, Z., A. Mekki, F. Delaleux, O. Riou, and J.-F. Durastanti. 2019. Response surface methodology as a powerful tool for the synthesis of polypyrrole-doped organic sulfonic acid and the optimization of its thermoelectric properties. J. Electron. Materi 48:3662–75. doi:10.1007/s11664-019-07124-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameselle, C., S. Gouveia, D. Akretche, and B. Belhadj. 2013. Advances in Electrokinetic Remediation for the Removal of Organic Contaminants in Soils. In Organic Pollutants - Monitoring, Risk and Treatment M., Nageeb Rashed ed. (Rijeka: InTech); 209–229. ISBN 978-953-51-0948-8. doi:10.5772/54334. English
   Google Scholar
• Cang, L., G.-P. Fan, D.-M. Zhou, and Q.-Y. Wang. 2013. Enhanced-electrokinetic remediation of copper–pyrene co-contaminated soil with different oxidants and pH control. Chemosphere 90:2326–31. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.10.062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Z. Shen, Y. Lei, B. Ju, W. Wang, X. Chen, Z. Shen, Y. Lei, B. Ju, and W. Wang. 2006. Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of Cd and Pb spiked soil coupled with cation exchange membrane. Soil Res 44:523–29. doi:10.1071/SR05117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gharibzadeh, F., R. R. Kalantary, and M. Golshan. 2018. Optimization of influencing parameters on phenanthrene removal efficiency in soil washing process by using response surface methodology. Soil Sedim. Contam 27:46–59. doi:10.1080/15320383.2017.1405381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guaracho, V. V., N. M. S. Kaminari, M. J. J. S. Ponte, and H. A. Ponte. 2009. Central Composite experimental design applied to removal of lead and nickel from sand. J. Hazard. Mater 172:1087–92. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamed, J., Y. B. Acar, and R. J. Gale February . 1991. PB(II) removal from kaolinite by electrokinetics. J. Geotech. Eng English 117 2 :241–71. https://trid.trb.org/view/352030 28 February 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Hanay, O., H. Hasar, and N. N. Kocer. 2009. Effect of EDTA as washing solution on removing of heavy metals from sewage sludge by electrokinetic. J. Hazard. Mater 169:703–10. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.04.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrada, R. A., A. Medel, F. Manríquez, I. Sirés, and E. Bustos. 2016. Preparation of IrO2-Ta2O5|Ti electrodes by immersion, painting and electrophoretic deposition for the electrochemical removal of hydrocarbons from water. J. Hazard. Mater. 319:102–10. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.02.076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iannelli, R., M. Masi, A. Ceccarini, M. B. Ostuni, R. Lageman, A. Muntoni, D. Spiga, A. Polettini, A. Marini, and R. Pomi. 2015. Electrokinetic remediation of metal-polluted marine sediments: Experimental investigation for plant design. Electrochim. Acta 181:146–59. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2015.04.093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO11265, 1995. Soil quality-determination of the specific electrical conductivity. https://www.iso.org/standard/19243.html.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, M. S. , et al. 2011. eds. Environmental Pollution. Biomanagement of Metal-Contaminated Soils, 183 Environmental Pollution. 1 20. Dordrecht: Springer Dordrecht; 518. ISBN:978-94-007-1913-2. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1914-9.
   Google Scholar
• Li, C., H. Hou, J. Yang, S. Liang, Y. Shi, R. Guan, Y. Hu, X. Wu, J. Hu, and L. Wang. 2019. Comparison of electrokinetic remediation on lead-contaminated kaolinite and natural Soils. CLEAN – Soil, Air, Water 47:1800337. doi:10.1002/clen.201800337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Q. Y., Y. B. Zhang, D. F. Zhao, and C. C. Zhao. 2012. Bioremediation condition optimization of hydrocarbon in soil using response surface methodology by microbial consortium KL9-1. Adv. Mat. Res 518–523:2073–78.
   Google Scholar
• NF X 31 103. 1994.Soil quality- measurement of ph in water – electrometric method
   Google Scholar
• Ng, Y.-S., B. Sengupta, and M. Hashim. 2015. Effects of operating parameters on the performance of washing–electrokinetic two stage process as soil remediation method for lead removal, Sep. Purif. Technol 156:403–13. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2015.10.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourbaix, M. 1974. Atlas of electrochemical equilibria in aqueous solutions. Houston, Texas: National Assoc. of Corrosion Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Pourfadakari, S., S. Jorfi, A. Roudbari, A. Javid, S. S. Talebi, S. K. Ghadiri, and N. Yousefi. 2021. Optimization of electro-kinetic process for remediation of soil contaminated with phenanthrene using response surface methodology. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res 28:1006–17. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-10495-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy, K. R., and C. Cameselle, eds. 2009. Electrochemical remediation technologies for polluted soils, sediments and groundwater. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, B. E., P. C. Carriere, J. C. Thompson, and J. H. Hatfield. 1996. Electronic (EK) remediation of a contaminated soil at several Pb concentrations and applied voltages. J. Soil Contam 5:95–120. doi:10.1080/15320389609383517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, A., A. Mota, M. Soares, C. Castro, J. Araújo, and J. Carvalho. 2018. Lead (II) removal from contaminated soils by electrokinetic remediation coupled with modified eggshell waste. Key Eng. Mater 777:256–61. www.scientific.net/KEM.777.256.
   Google Scholar
• Ryu, B. G., G.-Y. Park, J.-W. Yang, and K. Baek. 2011. Electrolyte conditioning for electrokinetic remediation of As, Cu, and Pb-contaminated soil. Sep Purif. Technol 79:170–76. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2011.02.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu, S.-R., E.-K. Jeon, and K. Baek. 2016. A combination of reducing and chelating agents for electrolyte conditioning in electrokinetic remediation of As-contaminated soil. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng 70:252–59. doi:10.1016/j.jtice.2016.10.058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salahi, A., I. Noshadi, R. Badrnezhad, B. Kanjilal, and T. Mohammadi. 2013. Nano-porous membrane process for oily wastewater treatment: Optimization using response surface methodology. J. Environ. Chem. Eng 1:218–25. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2013.04.021.
   Google Scholar
• Salmanzadeh, M., A. Hartland, C. H. Stirling, M. R. Balks, L. A. Schipper, C. Joshi, and E. George. 2017. Isotope tracing of long-term cadmium fluxes in an agricultural soil. Environ. Sci. Technol 51:7369–77. doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b00858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torabi, M. S., G. Asadollahfardi, M. Rezaee, and N. B. Panah. 2021. Electrokinetic removal of Cd and Cu from mine tailing: EDTA enhancement and voltage intensity effects. J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 25:05020007. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzundal, C. B., F. Mert Balci, B. Ulgut, and Ö. Dag. 2017. Lyotropic liquid crystalline mesophase of Sulfuric acid–nonionic surfactant stabilizes lead(II) oxide in sulfuric acid concentrations relevant to lead acid batteries. ACS Omega 2:3785–91. doi:10.1021/acsomega.7b00833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, Y. S., J. A. Zhai, and A. W. Wang. 2020. Response surface method analysis on electro-enhanced technique for remediation of cadmium contaminated soil. Mater. Sci. Forum 980:502–11. www.scientific.net/MSF.980.502.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, L., X. Xu, H. Li, N. Wang, N. Guo, and H. Yua. 2016. Development of novel assisting agents for the electrokinetic remediation of heavy metal-contaminated kaolin. Electrochim. Acta 218:140–48. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2016.09.121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, T., H. Zou, M. Ji, X. Li, L. Li, and T. Tang. 2014. Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of lead-contaminated soil by complexing agents and approaching anodes. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int 21:3126–33. doi:10.1007/s11356-013-2274-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar