A Current Injection Approach for Minimum Loss Solution

References

• “IEEE standard for interconnecting distributed resources with electric power systems - Amendment 1,” IEEE Std. 1547a-2014 (Amendment IEEE Std. 1547-2003), pp. 1–16, May 2014.
   Google Scholar
• I. Džafić, B. C. Pal, M. Gilles, and S. Henselmeyer, “Generalized π Fortescue equivalent admittance matrix approach to power flow solution,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 193–202, Jan. 2014. DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2279755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.-H. Chen, M.-S. Chen, K.-J. Hwang, P. Kotas, and E. A. Chebli, “Distribution system power flow analysis-a rigid approach,” IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1146–1152, Jul. 1991. DOI:10.1109/61.85860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. S. Cheng, and D. Shirmohammadi, “A three-phase power flow method for real-time distribution system analysis,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 671–679, May 1995. DOI:10.1109/59.387902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Džafić, R. A. Jabr, E. Halilovic, and B. C. Pal, “A sensitivity approach to model local voltage controllers in distribution networks,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1419–1428, May 2014. DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2290813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Ou, Y. Xue, and X.-P. Zhang, “Iterative DC optimal power flow considering transmission network loss,” Elec. Power Compo. Syst., vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 955–965, 2016. DOI:10.1080/15325008.2016.1147104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. H. Low, “Convex relaxation of optimal power flow - part I: Formulations and equivalence,” IEEE Trans. Control Network Syst., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 15–27, Mar. 2014. DOI:10.1109/TCNS.2014.2309732.
   Google Scholar
• S. H. Low, “Convex relaxation of optimal power flow - part II: Exactness,” IEEE Trans. Control Network Syst., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 177–189, 2014. Jun. DOI:10.1109/TCNS.2014.2323634.
   Google Scholar
• X. Kuang, B. Ghaddar, J. Naoum-Sawaya, and L. F. Zuluaga, “Alternative LP and SOCP hierarchies for ACOPF problems,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 2828–2836, Jul. 2017. DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2016.2615688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. A. Jabr, “Radial distribution load flow using conic programming,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1458–1459, Aug. 2006. DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2006.879234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Farivar, and S. H. Low, “Branch flow model: Relaxations and convexification - part I,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 2554–2564, Aug. 2013. DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2255317.
   Google Scholar
• M. Farivar, and S. H. Low, “Branch flow model: Relaxations and convexification - part II,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 2565–2572, Aug. 2013. DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2255318.
   Google Scholar
• J. Lavaei, and S. H. Low, “Zero duality gap in optimal power flow problem,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 92–107, Feb. 2012. DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2011.2160974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. A. Jabr, “Exploiting sparsity in SDP relaxations of the OPF problem,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 1138–1139, May 2012. DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2011.2170772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. A. Jabr, and I. Džafić, “Sensitivity-based discrete coordinate-descent for Volt/VAr control in distribution networks,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 4670–4678, Nov. 2016. DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2512103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Roytelman, and J. M. Palomo, “Volt/VAR control in distribution systems,” pp. 195–225, 2016. Available: http://digital-library.theiet.org/content/books/10.1049/pbpo075e_ch8
   Google Scholar
• R. A. Jabr, I. Džafić, and I. Huseinagić, “Real time optimal reconfiguration of multiphase active distribution networks,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 6829–6839, Nov. 2018. DOI:10.1109/TSG.2017.2724766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Carden, and D. Popovic, “Closed-loop Volt/Var optimization: Addressing peak load reduction,” IEEE Power Energy Mag., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 67–75, Mar. 2018. DOI:10.1109/MPE.2017.2780962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Wirtinger, “Zur formalen theorie der funktionen von mehr komplexen veranderlichen,” Math. Ann., vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 357–376, 1927. DOI:10.1007/BF01447872.
   Google Scholar
• K. Kreutz-Delgado, 2009.“The complex gradient operator and the CR-calculus,” ArXiv e-prints, arXiv:0906.4835v1.
   Google Scholar
• R. D. Zimmerman, C. E. Murillo-Sánchez, and R. J. Thomas, “MATPOWER: Steady-state operations, planning, and analysis tools for power systems research and education,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 12–19, Feb. 2011. DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2051168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. F. Tinney, “Compensation methods for network solutions by optimally ordered triangular factorization,” IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst., vol. PAS-91, no. 1, pp. 123–127, Jan. 1972. DOI:10.1109/TPAS.1972.293321.
   Google Scholar
• R. Baldick, Applied Optimization: Formulation and Algorithms for Engineering Systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• R. A. Jabr. “A current injection approach for minimum loss solution - Data and result files,” https://www.dropbox.com/s/m41qgpnrhmj9gr5/MinLoss_PF.zip?dl=0. Accessed: Apr. 15, 2018.
   Google Scholar