Multi-Objective Optimal DG Placement Approach Using Analytical Hierarchy Process

References

• T. Adefarati and R. C. Bansal, “Reliability, economic and environmental analysis of a microgrid system in the presence of renewable energy resources,” Appl. Energy, vol. 236, pp. 1089–1114, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Jurasz et al., “A review on the complementarity of renewable energy sources: Concept, metrics, application and future research directions,” Solar Energy, vol. 195, pp. 703–724, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.11.087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Muhtadi et al., “Distributed energy resources based microgrid: Review of architecture, control, and reliability,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 2223–2235, 2021. DOI: 10.1109/TIA.2021.3065329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Salah et al., “Comprehensive review on the decision-making frameworks referring to the distribution network operation problem in the presence of distributed energy resources and microgrids,” Int. J. Elect. Power Energy Syst., vol. 115, p. 105466, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. R. Sinsel, R. L. Riemke and V. H. Hoffmann, “Challenges and solution technologies for the integration of variable renewable energy sources—A review,” Renewable Energy, vol. 145, pp. 2271–2285, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. M. Ismael, S. H. A. Aleem, A. Y. Abdelaziz and A. F. Zobaa, “State-of-the-art of hosting capacity in modern power systems with distributed generation,” Renewable Energy, vol. 130, pp. 1002–1020, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Bajaj and A. K. Singh, “Grid integrated renewable DG systems: A review of power quality challenges and state-of-the-art mitigation techniques,” Int. J. Energy Res., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 26–69, 2020. DOI: 10.1002/er.4847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. A. Bagherian and K. Mehranzamir, “A comprehensive review on renewable energy integration for combined heat and power production,” Energy Convers. Manage., vol. 224, p. 113454, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.-E. Razavi, et.al., “Impact of distributed generation on protection and voltage regulation of distribution systems: A review,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., vol. 105, pp. 157–167, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Selim, S. Kamel and F. Jurado, “Efficient optimization technique for multiple DG allocation in distribution networks,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 86, p. 105938, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Sarangi, B. K. Sahu and P. K. Rout, “Distributed generation hybrid AC/DC microgrid protection: A critical review on issues, strategies, and future directions,” Int. J. Energy Res., vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 3347–3364, 2020. DOI: 10.1002/er.5128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Diahovchenko et al., “Progress and challenges in smart grids: distributed generation, smart metering, energy storage and smart loads,” Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Electr. Eng., vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 1319–1333, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s40998-020-00322-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. V. Vidyanandan and B. Kamath, “Grid integration of renewables: Challenges and solutions,” ijprvd, pp. 150–158, 2022. DOI: 10.18311/ijprvd/2021/29662.
   Google Scholar
• M. P. Ha, M. Nazari-Heris, B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo and H. Seyedi, “A hybrid genetic particle swarm optimization for distributed generation allocation in power distribution networks,” Energy, vol. 209, p. 118218, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Thakur and J. Jiang, “Optimal location and size of DG for enhancing loading margin and reducing system loss,” Power Soc. General Meet., Vancouver, BC, pp. 1–5, 21–25 July, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• H. A. Maruthi Prasanna, M. V. Likith Kumar, D. T. Ananthapadmanabha, “Genetic algorithm based optimal allocation of a distributed generator in a radial distribution feeder,” 2014 IEEE Int. Conf. Circuit, Power Comput. Technol., Nagercoil, pp. 184–190, 20–21 March, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• R. Samuel Zulpo, R. C. Leborgne and A. S. Bretas, “Optimal location and sizing of distributed generation based on power losses and voltage deviation,” 2014 IEEE PES Transm. Distrib. Conf. Expo., Medellin, Latin America, pp. 1–5, 10–14 September, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• M. H. Moradi and M. Abedinie, “A combination of genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization for optimal DG location and sizing in distribution systems,” IPEC, 2010 Conf., pp. 858–862, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• S. Elsaiah, M. Benidris and J. Mitra, “Analytical approach for placement and sizing of distributed generation on distribution systems,” IET Gener., Transm. Distrib., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1039–1049, 2014. DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2013.0803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Kansal, V. Kumar and B. Tyagi, “Hybrid approach for optimal placement of multiple DGs of multiple types in distribution networks,” Int. J. Elect. Power Energy Syst., vol. 75, pp. 226–235, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. C. V. Suresh and J. B. Edward, “A hybrid algorithm based optimal placement of DG units for loss reduction in the distribution system,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 91, p. 106191, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Arabi Nowdeh et al., “Fuzzy multi-objective placement of renewable energy sources in distribution system with objective of loss reduction and reliability improvement using a novel hybrid method,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 77, pp. 761–779, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2019.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Onlam et al., “Power loss minimization and voltage stability improvement in electrical distribution system via network reconfiguration and distributed generation placement using novel adaptive shuffled frogs leaping algorithm,” Energies, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 553, 2019. DOI: 10.3390/en12030553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Kumar, K. K. Mandal and N. Chakraborty, “Optimal DG placement by multi-objective opposition based chaotic differential evolution for techno-economic analysis,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 78, pp. 70–83, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2019.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Ali, K. Mahmoud and M. Lehtonen, “Maximizing hosting capacity of uncertain photovoltaics by coordinated management of OLTC, VAr sources and stochastic EVs,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 127, p. 106627, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.106627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. S. Abbas, A. A. Abou El-Ela, R. A. El-Sehiemy and K. K. Fetyan, “Assessment and enhancement of uncertain renewable energy hosting capacity with/out voltage control devices in distribution grids,” IEEE Syst. J., pp. 1–9, 2022. DOI: 10.1109/JSYST.2022.3180779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Dent, L. F. Ochoa and G. P. Harrison, “Network distributed generation capacity analysis using OPF with voltage step constraints,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 296–304, 2010. DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2030424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. F. Ochoa, A. Keane and G. P. Harrison, “Minimizing the reactive support for distributed generation: Enhanced passive operation and smart distribution networks,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 2134–2142, 2011. DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2011.2122346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Keane et al., “Enhanced utilization of voltage control resources with distributed generation,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 252–260, 2011. DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2037635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. F. Ochoa, C. J. Dent and G. P. Harrison, “Distribution network capacity assessment: Variable DG and active networks,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 87–95, 2010. DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2031223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Ransikarbum, R. Pitakaso and N. Kim, “A decision-support model for additive manufacturing scheduling using an integrative analytic hierarchy process and multi-objective optimization,” Appl. Sci., vol. 10, no. 15, p. 5159, 2020. DOI: 10.3390/app10155159.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Han, R. Zhou, Z. Geng, J. Bai, B. Ma and J. Fan, “A novel data envelopment analysis cross-model integrating interpretative structural model and analytic hierarchy process for energy efficiency evaluation and optimization modeling: Application to ethylene industries,” J. Cleaner Prod., vol. 246, p. 118965, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Gital Durmaz and B. Bilgen, “Multi-objective optimization of sustainable biomass supply chain network design,” Appl. Energy, vol. 272, p. 115259, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. J. Grainger and W. D. Stevenson, Jr., “Power systems analysis,” New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• R. D. Zimmerman and C. E. Murillo-Sanchez, “Matpower 5.1 User's Manual,” Power Systems Engineering Research Center, Mar. 2015, https://matpower.org.
   Google Scholar
• A. Ahmed, M. F. Nadeem, I. A. Sajjad, R. Bo, I. A. Khan and A. Raza, “Probabilistic generation model for optimal allocation of wind DG in distribution systems with time varying load models,” Sustainable Energy, Grids Networks, vol. 22, p. 100358, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.segan.2020.100358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar