Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow Incorporating Flexible Alternating Current Transmission Systems: Application of a Wavelet-Oriented Evolutionary Algorithm

References

• E. Naderi, M. Pourakbari-Kasmaei, and H. Abdi, “An efficient particle swarm optimization algorithm to solve optimal power flow problem integrated with FACTS devices,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 80, pp. 243–262, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2019.04.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Akdag, “A developed honey badger optimization algorithm for tackling optimal power flow problem,” Electric Power Components Syst., vol. 50, pp. 331–48, 2022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Azadi and H. Abdi, “A hybrid PSO-GA approach to investigate optimal power flow in a hybrid energy system based on emission level,” Electric Power Components and Systems, vol. 50, no. 1–2, pp. 81–99, 2022. DOI: 10.1080/15325008.2022.2135646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Papi Naidu, G. Balasubramanian, and B. Venkateswararao, “Optimal power flow control optimization problem incorporating conventional and renewable generation sources: a review,” Int. J. Ambient Energy, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1119–1150, 2023. DOI: 10.1080/01430750.2022.2163287.
   Google Scholar
• J. Kardos, D. Kourounis, O. Schenk, and R. Zimmerman, “BELTISTOS: a robust interior point method for large-scale optimal power flow problems,” Electric Power Syst. Res., vol. 212, pp. 108613, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2022.108613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Pourakbari-Kasmaei, M. Lehtonen, M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M. Marzband, and J. R. S. Montovani, “Optimal power flow problem considering multiple-fuel options and disjoint operating zones: a solver-friendly MINLP model,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 113, pp. 45–55, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.05.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Naderi, M. Pourakbari-Kasmaei, and M. Lehtonen, “Transmission expansion planning integrated with wind farms: a review, comparative study, and a novel profound search approach,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 115, pp. 105460, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.105460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Bai, K. Y. Lee, and I. Eke, “Optimal power flow considering global voltage stability based on a hybrid modern heuristic technique,” IFAC-Papers OnLine, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 413–418, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.07.072.
   Google Scholar
• M. Moeini-Aghtaei, A. Abbaspour, M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad, and E. Hajipour, “A decomposed solution to multiple-energy carriers optimal power flow,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 707–716, 2014. DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2283259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U. Guvenc, S. Duman, H. T. Kahraman, S. Aras, and M. Kati, “Fitness–distance balance based adaptive guided differential evolution algorithm for security-constrained optimal power flow problem incorporating renewable energy sources,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 108, pp. 107421, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Warid, “Optimal power flow using the AMTPG-Jaya algorithm,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 91, pp. 106252, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Chen, J. Qian, Z. Zhang, and S. Li, “Application of modified pigeon-inspired optimization algorithm and constraint-objective sorting rule on multi-objective optimal power flow problem,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 92, pp. 106321, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. R. Narimani, R. Azizipanah-Abarghooee, B. Zoghdar-Moghadam-Shahrekohne, and K. Gholami, “A novel approach to multi-objective optimal power flow by a new hybrid optimization algorithm considering generator constraints and multi-fuel type,” Energy, vol. 49, pp. 119–136, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.09.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Bhamidi and S. Shanmugavelu, “Multi-objective harmony search algorithm for dynamic optimal power flow with demand side management,” Electr. Power Components Syst., vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 692–702, 2019. DOI: 10.1080/15325008.2019.1627599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Rani and T. Malakar, “A reactive power reserve constrained optimum reactive power dispatch using coronavirus herd immunity optimizer,” Electr. Power Components Syst., vol. 50, no. 4–5, pp. 223–244, 2022. DOI: 10.1080/15325008.2022.2136287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. K. Avvari and D. M. Vinod Kumar, “A new hybrid evolutionary algorithm for multi-objective optimal power flow in an integrated WE, PV, and PEV power system,” Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 214, pp. 108870, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2022.108870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Mishra, S. P. Singh, and J. Rokadia, “Optimal power flow in the presence of wind power using modified cuckoo search,” IET Generat. Trans. Distrib., vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 615–626, 2015. DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2014.0285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Naderi, M. Pourakbari-Kasmaei, F. V. Cerna, and M. Lehtonen, “A novel hybrid self-adaptive heuristic algorithm to handle single- and multi-objective optimal power flow problems,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 125, pp. 106492, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.106492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. E. Syllignakis and F. D. Kanellos, “A PSO optimal power flow (OPF) method for autonomous power systems interconnected with HVDC technology,” Electr. Power Components Syst., vol. 49, no. 1–2, pp. 67–78, 2021. DOI: 10.1080/15325008.2021.1937389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Chen, M. L. Bo, and Y. Zhu, “Multi-hive bee foraging algorithm for multi-objective optimal power flow considering the cost, loss, and emission,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 60, pp. 203–220, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.02.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Acha, C. R. Fuerte-Esquivel, H. Ambriz-Pérez, and C. Angeles-Camacho, FACTS: Modeling and Simulation in Power Networks, 1st ed. Enlgand: John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• P. Acharjee, “Optimal power flow with UPFC using security constrained self-adaptive differential evolutionary algorithm for restructured power system,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 76, pp. 69–81, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.09.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Prasad and V. Mukherjee, “A novel symbiotic organisms search algorithm for optimal power flow of power system with FACTS devices,” Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 79–89, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jestch.2015.06.005.
   Google Scholar
• B. Mahdad, K. Srairi, and T. Bouktir, “Optimal power flow for large-scale power system with shunt FACTS using fast parallel GA,” Electro-Technical Conference, the 14th IEEE Mediterranean, 669–676, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• R. S. Wibowo, T. P. Fathurrodli, O. Penangsang, and A. Soeprijanto, Security Constrained Optimal Power Flow with FACTS Devices Using Bender Decomposition. Bangkok, Thailand: TENCON, 1–5, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• B. V. Rao and G. V. Nagesh Kumar, “Optimal power flow by BAT search algorithm for generation reallocation with unified power flow controller,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 68, pp. 81–88, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.12.057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. P. Singh, V. Mukherjee, and S. P. Ghosal, “Particle swarm optimization with an aging leader and challengers algorithm for optimal power flow problem with FACTS devices,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 64, pp. 1185–1196, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. B. Edward, N. Rajasekar, K. Sathiyasekar, N. Senthilnathan, and R. Sarjila, “An enhanced bacterial foraging algorithm approach for optimal power flow problem including FACTS devices considering system load ability,” ISA Trans., vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 622–28, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2013.04.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. S. Rao and K. Vaisakh, “Multi-objective adaptive clonal selection algorithm for solving optimal power flow considering multi-type FACTS devices and load uncertainty,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 23, pp. 286–297, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.06.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Basu, “Multi-objective optimal power flow with FACTS devices,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 903–910, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2010.08.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. M. Huang and Y. C. Huang, “Hybrid optimisation method for optimal power flow using flexible AC transmission system devices,” IET Generat. Trans. Distrib., vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 2036–2045, 2014. DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2014.0096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Madhusudhana-Rao, S. Sundeep, and S. RadhaKrishna-Reddy, “Optimal Power Flow Controlling with TCSC Using Expert System,” International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Intelligent Systems (SEISCON), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, 379–383. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• K. P. Wong, J. Yuryevich, and A. Li, “Evolutionary-programming-based load flow algorithm for systems containing unified power flow controllers,” IEE Proc. Gener. Transm. Distrib., vol. 150, no. 4, pp. 441–446, 2003. DOI: 10.1049/ip-gtd:20030405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. V. Suresh and S. Sivangarju, “Analysis and effect of multi-fuel and practical constraints on economic load dispatch in the presence of unified power flow controller using UDTPSO,” Ain Shams Eng. J., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 803–817, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.asej.2014.12.011.
   Google Scholar
• M. Ghasemi, S. Ghavidel, S. Rahmani, A. Roosta, and H. Falah, “A novel hybrid algorithm of imperialist competitive algorithm and teaching learning algorithm for optimal power flow problem with non-smooth cost functions,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 29, pp. 54–69, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2013.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. G. Hingorani and L. Gyugyi, Understanding FACTS: Concepts and Technology of Flexible AC Transmission Systems. Piscataway, NJ: Wiley-IEEE Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• E. V. Larsen, C. Bowler, B. Damsky, and S. Nilsson, “Benefits of thyristor controlled series compensation,” International Conference on Large High Voltage Electric Systems (CIGRE), Paris, France, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• L. Gyugyi, “A unified power flow control concept for flexible AC transmission system,” IEE Proc. C Gener. Transm. Distrib. UK, vol. 139, no. 4, pp. 323–33, 1992. DOI: 10.1049/ip-c.1992.0048.
   Google Scholar
• K. Pandiarajan and C. K. Babulal, “Fuzzy harmony search algorithm based optimal power flow for power system security enhancement,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 78, pp. 72–79, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.11.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Abaci and V. Yamacli, “Differential search algorithm for solving multi-objective optimal power flow problem,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 79, pp. 1–10, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.12.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. R. Bhowmik and A. K. Chakraborty, “Solution of optimal power flow using non-dominated sorting multi objective opposition based gravitational search algorithm,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 64, pp. 1237–1250, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.09.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. B. Park, Y. W. Jeong, J. R. Shin, and Y. K. Lee, “An improved particle swarm optimization for non-convex economic dispatch problems,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 25, pp. 156–166, 2010. DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2030293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Vaisakh and L. R. Srinivas, “A genetic evolving ant direction DE for OPF with non-smooth cost functions and statistical analysis,” Energy, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 3155–3171, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.03.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. M. Eusuff, K. Lansey, and F. Pasha, “Shuffled frog-leaping algorithm: a memetic meta-heuristic for discrete optimization,” Eng. Optim., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 129–154, 2006. DOI: 10.1080/03052150500384759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Sedighizadeh, M. Sarvi, and E. Naderi, “Multi-objective optimal power flow with FACTS devices using shuffled frog leaping algorithm,” Int. Rev. Electr. Eng., vol. 6, pp. 1794–1801, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• A. Azizivahed, H. Narimani, E. Naderi, M. Fathi, and M. R. Narimani, “A hybrid evolutionary algorithm for secure multi-objective distribution feeder reconfiguration,” Energy, vol. 138, pp. 355–373, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, “Particle swarm optimization,” IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, 1942–1948, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• E. Naderi, A. Azizivahed, H. Narimani, M. Fathi, and M. R. Narimani, “A comprehensive study of practical economic dispatch problems by a new hybrid evolutionary algorithm,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 61, pp. 1186–1206, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2017.06.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Naderi, H. Narimani, M. Fathi, and M. R. Narimani, “A novel fuzzy adaptive configuration of particle swarm optimization to solve large-scale optimal reactive power dispatch,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 53, pp. 441–456, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2017.01.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Yuan, A. Su, Y. Yuan, H. Nie, and L. Wang, “An improved PSO for dynamic load dispatch of generators with valve-point effects,” Energy, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 67–74, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2008.09.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Yuan, L. Wang, Y. Yuan, Y. Zhang, B. Cao, and B. Yang, “A modified differential evolution approach for dynamic economic dispatch with valve-point effects,” Energy Conver. Manag., vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 3447–3453, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2008.08.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. H. Ling, C. W. Yeung, K. Y. Chan, H. H. C. Iu, and F. H. F. Leung, “A new hybrid particle swarm optimization with wavelet theory based mutation operation,” IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2007), Singapore, Sep. 25–28, 1977–1984, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• A. Azizivahed, A. Arefi, E. Naderi, H. Narimani, M. Fathi, and M. R. Narimani, “An efficient hybrid approach to solve bi-objective multi-area dynamic economic emission dispatch problem,” Electr. Power Components Syst., vol. 48, no. 4–5, pp. 485–500, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/15325008.2020.1793830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Azizivahed, E. Naderi, H. Narimani, M. Fathi, and M. R. Narimani, “A new bi-objective approach to energy management in distribution networks with energy storage systems,” IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 56–64, 2018. DOI: 10.1109/TSTE.2017.2714644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Narimani, A. Azizivahed, E. Naderi, M. Fathi, and M. R. Narimani, “A practical approach for reliability-oriented multi-objective unit commitment problem,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 85, pp. 105786, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Kumar and S. R. Samantaray, “Implementation of multi-objective seeker-optimization-algorithm for optimal planning of primary distribution systems including DSTATCOM,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 77, pp. 439–449, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.11.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Ghasemi, S. Ghavidel, M. M. Ghanbarian, H. R. Massrur, and M. Gharibzadeh, “Application of imperialist competitive algorithm with its modified techniques for multi-objective optimal power flow problem: a comparative study,” Inf. Sci., vol. 281, pp. 225–247, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2014.05.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. G. Montoya, R. Baños, C. Gil, A. Espín, A. Alcayde, and J. Gómez, “Minimization of voltage deviation and power losses in power networks using Pareto optimization methods,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 695–703, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2010.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Ghasemi, “A fuzzified multi objective interactive honey bee mating optimization for environmental/economic power dispatch with valve point effect,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 49, pp. 308–321, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.01.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Niknam and H. Doagou-Mojarrad, “Multi-objective economic/emission dispatch by multi-objective θ-particle swarm optimization,” IET Generat. Trans. Distrib., vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 363–377, 2012. DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2011.0698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Niknam, A. Kavousifard, and J. Aghaei, “Scenario-based multi-objective distribution feeder reconfiguration considering wind power using adaptive modified particle swarm optimization,” IET Renew. Power Gener., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 236–47, 2012. DOI: 10.1049/iet-rpg.2011.0256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matpower Toolbox. [Online]. Available: http://www.pserc.cornell.edu/matpower/matpower.html. Accessed: May 1, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• W. Ongsakul and P. Bhasaputra, “Optimal power flow with FACTS devices by TS/SA approach,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 851–857, 2002. DOI: 10.1016/S0142-0615(02)00006-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Sayah and K. Zaher, “Modified differential evolution algorithm for optimal power flow with non-smooth cost functions,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 3036–3042, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2008.06.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Alsac and B. Stott, “Optimal load flow with steady-state security,” IEEE Trans. Power App. Syst., vol. PAS-93, no. 3, pp. 745–751, 1974. DOI: 10.1109/TPAS.1974.293972.
   Google Scholar
• J. Yuryevich and K. P. Wong, “Evolutionary programming based optimal power flow algorithm,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1245–1250, 1999. DOI: 10.1109/59.801880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. A. Abido, “Optimal power flow using tabu search algorithm,” Electr. Power Components Syst., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 469–483, 2002. DOI: 10.1080/15325000252888425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. A. Roa-Sepulveda and B. J. Pavez-Lazo, “A solution to the optimal power flow using simulated annealing,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 47–57, 2003. DOI: 10.1016/S0142-0615(02)00020-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Bouktir, L. Slimani, and B. Mahdad, “Optimal power dispatch for largescale power system using stochastic search algorithms,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 28, pp. 1–10, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• A. G. Bakirtzis, P. N. Biskas, C. E. Zoumas, and V. Petridis, “Optimal power flow by enhanced genetic algorithm,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 229–236, 2002. DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2002.1007886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Saini, D. K. Chaturvedi, and A. K. Saxena, “Optimal power flow solution: a GA-fuzzy system approach,” Int. J. Emerging Electr. Power Syst., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–21, 2006. DOI: 10.2202/1553-779X.1091.
   Google Scholar
• L. Slimani and T. Bouktir, “Economic power dispatch of power system with pollution control using multi objective ant colony optimization,” Int. J. Comput. Intell. Res., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 145–53, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• A. L. Costa and A. Simões Costa, “Energy and ancillary service dispatch through dynamic optimal power flow,” Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 77, no. 8, pp. 1047–1055, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2006.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Rosales Hernandez and T. Hiyama, “Minimization of voltage deviations, power losses and control actions in a transmission power system,” International Conference on Intelligent System Applications to Power Systems (ISAP), Curitiba, Brazil, 1–5, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• S. Surender Reddy, P. R. Bijwe, and A. R. Abhyankar, “Faster evolutionary algorithm based optimal power flow using incremental variables,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 54, pp. 198–210, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.07.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. A. Abou El Ela, M. A. Abido, and S. R. Spea, “Optimal power flow using differential evolution algorithm,” Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 80, pp. 875–85, 2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Surender-Reddy and C. Srinivasa-Rathnam, “Optimal power flow using glowworm swarm optimization,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 80, pp. 128–39, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. A. Abido, “Optimal power flow using particle swarm optimization,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 563–571, 2002. DOI: 10.1016/S0142-0615(01)00067-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. L. Lai, J. T. Ma, R. Yokoyama, and M. Zhao, “Improved genetic algorithms for optimal power flow under both normal and contingent operation states,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 287–292, 1997. DOI: 10.1016/S0142-0615(96)00051-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Sanjeev and D. K. Chaturvedi, “Optimal power flow solution using fuzzy evolutionary and swarm optimization,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 47, pp. 416–423, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.11.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. R. Adaryani and A. Karami, “Artificial bee colony algorithm for solving multi-objective optimal power flow problem,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 53, pp. 219–230, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.04.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. G. Risi, F. Riganti-Fulginei, and A. Laudani, “Modern techniques for the optimal power flow problem: state of the art,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 17, pp. 6387, 2022. DOI: 10.3390/en15176387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CONOPT Solver. [Online]. Available: https://www.gams.com/latest/docs/S_CONOPT.html.
   Google Scholar
• GAMS Documentation Center. [Online]. Available: https://www.gams.com/latest/docs/.
   Google Scholar
• E. Naderi, H. Narimani, M. Pourakbari-Kasmaei, F. V. Cerna, M. Marzband, and M. Lehtonen, “State-of-the-art of optimal active and reactive power flow: a comprehensive review from various standpoints,” Processes, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1319, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/pr9081319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar