Performance Analysis of Novel Solar PV Array Configurations with Reduced Tie Interconnection to Extract Maximum Power under Partial Shading

References

• B. Yang, et al., “Dynamic leader based collective intelligence for maximum power point tracking of PV systems affected by partial shading condition,” Energy Convers. Manage., vol. 179, pp. 286–303, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.10.074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. H. F. Alves, G. A. de Deus Junior, E. G. Marra and R. P. Lemos, “Automatic fault classification in photovoltaic modules using Convolutional Neural Networks,” Renewable Energy, vol. 179, pp. 502–516, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.07.070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. R. Satpathy and R. Sharma, “Reliability and losses investigation of photovoltaic power generators during partial shading,” Energy Convers. Manage., vol. 223, p. 113480, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. R. Reisi, M. H. Moradi and S. Jamasb, “Classification and comparison of maximum power point tracking techniques for photovoltaic system: a review,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., vol. 19, pp. 433–443, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Bhatnagar and R. K. Nema, “Maximum power point tracking control techniques: state-of-the-art in photovoltaic applications,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., vol. 23, pp. 224–241, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Belluardo, P. Ingenhoven, W. Sparber, J. Wagner, P. Weihs and D. Moser, “Novel method for the improvement in the evaluation of outdoor performance loss rate in different PV technologies and comparison with two other methods,” Solar Energy, vol. 117, pp. 139–152, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2015.04.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. C. Teo, R. H. Tan, V. H. Mok, V. K. Ramachandaramurthy and C. Tan, “Impact of partial shading on the PV characteristics and the maximum power of a photovoltaic string,” Energies, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 1860, 2018. DOI: 10.3390/en11071860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Ibrahim and N. Anani, “Variations of PV module parameters with irradiance and temperature,” Energy Proc., vol. 134, pp. 276–285, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.617.
   Google Scholar
• H. El Achouby, M. Zaimi, A. Ibral and E. M. Assaid, “New analytical approach for modelling effects of temperature and irradiance on physical parameters of photovoltaic solar module,” Energy Convers. Manage., vol. 177, pp. 258–271, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.09.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Dhimish, “Assessing MPPT techniques on hot-spotted and partially shaded photovoltaic modules: comprehensive review based on experimental data,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 1132–1144, 2019. DOI: 10.1109/TED.2019.2894009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Hariharan, M. Chakkarapani, G. S. Ilango and C. Nagamani, “A method to detect photovoltaic array faults and partial shading in PV systems,” IEEE J. Photovoltaics, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1278–1285, 2016. DOI: 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2016.2581478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. A. K. Niazi, Y. Yang and D. Sera, “Review of mismatch mitigation techniques for PV modules,” IET Renewable Power Gener., vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 2035–2050, 2019. DOI: 10.1049/iet-rpg.2019.0153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Dhimish and G. Badran, “Current limiter circuit to avoid photovoltaic mismatch conditions including hot-spots and shading,” Renewable Energy, vol. 145, pp. 2201–2216, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Murugesan, P. W. David, P. Murugesan and P. Periyasamy, “Battery based mismatch reduction technique for partial shaded solar PV system,” Energy, vol. 272, pp. 127063, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Li, F. Wang, F. Feng and B. Wei, “Hot spot detection of photovoltaic module based on distributed fiber Bragg grating sensor,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 13, pp. 4951, 2022. DOI: 10.3390/s22134951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Bakır, F. A. Kuzhippallil and A. Merabet, “Automatic detection of deteriorated photovoltaic modules using IRT images and deep learning (CNN, LSTM) strategies,” Eng. Fail. Anal., vol. 146, p. 107132, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Ghosh, S. K. Singh and V. K. Yadav, “Experimental investigation of hotspot phenomenon in PV arrays under mismatch conditions,” Solar Energy, vol. 253, pp. 219–230, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2023.02.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Saiprakash, A. Mohapatra, B. Nayak, T. S. Babu and H. H. Alhelou, “A novel benzene structured array configuration for harnessing maximum power from PV array under partial shading condition with reduced number of cross ties,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 129712–129726, 2022. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3228049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Nagadurga, P. V. R. L. Narasimham, V. S. Vakula, R. Devarapalli and F. P. G. Márquez, “Enhancing global maximum power point of solar photovoltaic strings under partial shading conditions using chimp optimization algorithm,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 14, p. 4086, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/en14144086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Raina and S. Sinha, “A comprehensive assessment of electrical performance and mismatch losses in bifacial PV module under different front and rear side shading scenarios,” Energy Convers. Manage., vol. 261, pp. 115668, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. S. Yadav and V. Mukherjee, “Conventional and advanced PV array configurations to extract maximum power under partial shading conditions: a review,” Renewable Energy, vol. 178, pp. 977–1005, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. F. Jalil, S. Khatoon, R. Aman, S. Hameed and R. C. Bansal, “Alternate panel interchange technique to improve the power production of PV array operating under various shading situations,” Int. J. Modell. Simul., vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 849–863, 2023. DOI: 10.1080/02286203.2022.2127054.
   Google Scholar
• M. Premkumar, U. Subramaniam, T. S. Babu, R. M. Elavarasan and L. Mihet-Popa, “Evaluation of mathematical model to characterize the performance of conventional and hybrid PV array topologies under static and dynamic shading patterns,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 3216, 2020. DOI: 10.3390/en13123216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. R. Pendem and S. Mikkili, “Modeling, simulation, and performance analysis of PV array configurations (series, series-parallel, bridge-linked, and honey-comb) to harvest maximum power under various partial shading conditions,” Int. J. green Energy, vol. 15, no. 13, pp. 795–812, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/15435075.2018.1529577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Saiprakash, A. Mohapatra, B. Nayak and S. R. Ghatak, “Analysis of partial shading effect on energy output of different solar PV array configurations,” Mater. Today: Proc., vol. 39, pp. 1905–1909, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• V. Jha and U. S. Triar, “A detailed comparative analysis of different photovoltaic array configurations under partial shading conditions,” Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst., vol. 29, no. 6, p. e12020, 2019. DOI: 10.1002/2050-7038.12020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Sagar, D. Pathak, P. Gaur and V. Jain, “A Su Do Ku puzzle based shade dispersion for maximum power enhancement of partially shaded hybrid bridge-link-total-cross-tied PV array,” Solar Energy, vol. 204, pp. 161–180, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2020.04.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, L., Dougal, R. A., Liu, S., & Iotova, A. P. (2009). Parallel-connected solar PV system to address partial and rapidly fluctuating shadow conditions. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 56(5), 1548–1556. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2008.2011296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Balato, L. Costanzo and M. Vitelli, “Series–Parallel PV array re-configuration: maximization of the extraction of energy and much more,” Appl. Energy, vol. 159, pp. 145–160, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. A. Mansur, M. R. Amin and K. K. Islam, “Performance comparison of mismatch power loss minimization techniques in series-parallel PV array configurations,” Energies, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 874, 2019. DOI: 10.3390/en12050874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Ramabadran and B. Mathur, “Effect of shading on series and parallel connected solar PV modules,” Mod. Appl. Sci., vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 32–41, 2009. DOI: 10.5539/mas.v3n10p32.
   Google Scholar
• A. Ingle, D. I. Sangotra, R. B. Chadge and P. Thorat, “Module configurations in photovoltaic system: a review,” Mater. Today: Proc., vol. 4, no. 14, pp. 12625–12629, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• V. C. Chavan and S. Mikkili, “Repositioning of series-parallel, total-cross-tide, bridge-link, and honey-comb PV array configurations for maximum power extraction,” IETE J. Res., pp. 1–13, 2021. DOI: 10.1080/03772063.2021.1986151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Hamdi, D. Saigaa and M. Drif, “Modeling and simulation of photovoltaic array with different interconnection configurations under partial shading conditions for fill factor evaluation,” in 2014 International Renewable and Sustainable Energy Conference (IRSEC), pp. 2–31, IEEE, Oct., 2014. DOI: 10.1109/IRSEC.2014.7059896.
   Google Scholar
• A. A. Desai and S. Mikkili, “Comprehensive analysis of conventional and hybrid PV configurations under partial shading conditions to mitigate mismatching loss and optimize the output power,” J. Control Autom. Electr. Syst., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 483–504, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s40313-021-00800-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. K. Bonthagorla and S. Mikkili, “Performance investigation of hybrid and conventional PV array configurations for grid-connected/standalone PV systems,” CSEE J. Power Energy Syst., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 682–695, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. M. Ajmal, T. S. Babu, V. K. Ramachandaramurthy, D. Yousri and J. B. Ekanayake, “Static and dynamic reconfiguration approaches for mitigation of partial shading influence in photovoltaic arrays,” Sustainable Energy Technol. Assess., vol. 40, p. 100738, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2020.100738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. V. Chandrakant and S. Mikkili, “A typical review on static reconfiguration strategies in photovoltaic array under non-uniform shading conditions,” CSEE J. Power Energy Syst., 2020.
   Google Scholar
• B. Yang, et al., “PV arrays reconfiguration for partial shading mitigation: recent advances, challenges and perspectives,” Energy Convers. Manage., vol. 247, p. 114738, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. C. Chavan and S. Mikkili, “Effect of PV array positioning on mismatch and wiring losses in static array reconfiguration,” IETE J. Res., pp. 1–13, 2021. DOI: 10.1080/03772063.2021.1986151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. A. Bapurao, S. Mikkili and P. K. Bonthagorla, “A review on static reconfiguration techniques of solar PV to mitigate Mismatch loss and minimize partial shading effect,” IETE J. Res., pp. 1–31, 2021. DOI: 10.1080/03772063.2021.1987992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. K. Bonthagorla and S. Mikkili, “A novel fixed PV array configuration for harvesting maximum power from shaded modules by reducing the number of cross-ties,” IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 2109–2121, 2021. DOI: 10.1109/JESTPE.2020.2979632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Shongwe and M. Hanif, “Comparative analysis of different single-diode PV modeling methods,” IEEE J. Photovoltaics, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 938–946, 2015. DOI: 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2015.2395137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar