Selection of Load Resistance for Boost Converters with Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithm in Thermoelectric Generators

References

• M. Hamid Elsheikh, et al., “A review on thermoelectric renewable energy: principle parameters that affect their performance,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 30, pp. 337–355, Feb. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Ma, M. A. Fazilati, A. Sedaghat, D. Toghraie and P. Talebizadehsardari, “Natural convection energy recovery loop analysis, part I: energy and exergy studies by varying inlet air flow rate,” Heat Mass Transfer., vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 1685–1695, May 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00231-019-02766-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. M. Omer, “Focus on low carbon technologies: the positive solution,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 2331–2357, Dec. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2007.04.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. S. Hewawasam, A. S. Jayasena, M. M. M. Afnan, R. A. C. P. Ranasinghe and M. A. Wijewardane, “Waste heat recovery from thermo-electric generators (TEGs),” Energy Rep., vol. 6, pp. 474–479, Feb. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2019.11.105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Jouhara, N. Khordehgah, S. Almahmoud, B. Delpech, A. Chauhan and S. A. Tassou, “Waste heat recovery technologies and applications,” Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog., vol. 6, pp. 268–289, Jun. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsep.2018.04.017.
   Google Scholar
• A. R. M. Siddique, S. Mahmud and B. V. Heyst, “A review of the state of the science on wearable thermoelectric power generators (TEGs) and their existing challenges,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 73, pp. 730–744, Jun. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. He, G. Zhang, X. Zhang, J. Ji, G. Li and X. Zhao, “Recent development and application of thermoelectric generator and cooler,” Appl. Energy, vol. 143, pp. 1–25, Apr. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Yeler and M. F. Koseoglu, “Energy efficiency and transient-steady state performance comparison of a resistance infant incubator and an improved thermoelectric infant incubator,” Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J., vol. 31, pp. 101055, Jul. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jestch.2021.09.001.
   Google Scholar
• M. R. A. Bhuiyan, H. Mamur, M. A. Üstüner and Ö. F. Dilmaç, “Current and future trend opportunities of thermoelectric generator applications in waste heat recovery,” Gazi Univ. J. Sci., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 896–915, Sep. 2022. DOI: 10.35378/gujs.934901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Mamur, M. A. Üstüner and M. R. A. Bhuiyan, “Future perspective and current situation of maximum power point tracking methods in thermoelectric generators,” Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess, vol. 50, pp. 101824, Mar. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Twaha, J. Zhu, Y. Yan, B. Li and K. Huang, “Performance analysis of thermoelectric generator using dc-dc converter with incremental conductance based maximum power point tracking,” Energy Sustain. Dev., vol. 37, pp. 86–98, Apr. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.esd.2017.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.-H. Chen and Y.-X. Lin, “Performance comparison of thermoelectric generators using different materials,” Energy Proc., vol. 158, pp. 1388–1393, Feb. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.339.
   Google Scholar
• E. H. Houssein, B. E. Helmy, H. Rezk and A. M. Nassef, “An efficient orthogonal opposition-based learning slime mould algorithm for maximum power point tracking,” Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 3671–3695, Mar. 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s00521-021-06634-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Attar, H. Lee and G. J. Snyder, “Optimum load resistance for a thermoelectric generator system,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 226, pp. 113490, Dec. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. E. Ahmad, A. H. Numan and D. Y. Mahmood, “A comparative study of perturb and observe (P&O) and ıncremental conductance (INC) PV MPPT techniques at different radiation and temperature conditions,” ETJ, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 376–385, 2022. DOI: 10.30684/etj.v40i2.2189.
   Google Scholar
• A. Montecucco and A. R. Knox, “Maximum power point tracking converter based on the open-circuit voltage method for thermoelectric generators,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 828–839, 2015. DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2014.2313294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Rezk, A. G. Olabi, R. M. Ghoniem and M. A. Abdelkareem, “Optimized fractional maximum power point tracking using bald eagle search for thermoelectric generation system,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 4064, Jan. 2023. DOI: 10.3390/en1610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Wu, K. Sun, J. Zhang and Y. Xing, “A TEG efficiency booster with buck–boost conversion,” J. Elec Mater., vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 1737–1744, Jul. 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s11664-012-2407-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. A. Ebrahim and R. G. Mohamed, "Comparative study and simulation of different maximum power point tracking (MPPT) techniques using fractional control & grey wolf optimizer for grid connected PV system with battery," in Electric Power Conversion, M. Găiceanu, Ed. IntechOpen, 2019. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.82302.
   Google Scholar
• N. Jaswanth and G. RaamDheep, “Thermoelectric maximum power point tracking by artificial neural networks,” Soft Comput., vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 4041–4050, Apr. 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s00500-023-07948-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. G and S. N. Singh, “Selection of non-isolated DC-DC converters for solar photovoltaic system,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 76, pp. 1230–1247, Sep. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Kokyay, E. Kilinc, F. Uysal, H. Kurt, E. Celik and M. Dugenci, “A prediction model of artificial neural networks in development of thermoelectric materials with innovative approaches,” Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1476–1485, Dec. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jestch.2020.04.007.
   Google Scholar
• P. M. Markowski, “Multilayer thick-film thermoelectric microgenerator based on LTCC technology,” MI, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 155–161, Jan. 2016. DOI: 10.1108/MI-05-2016-0038.
   Google Scholar
• H. Mamur and R. Ahiska, “A review: thermoelectric generators in renewable energy,” Int. J. Renew. Energy Res. IJRER, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 128–136, Mar. 2014. DOI: 10.20508/ijrer.v4i1.1040.g6256.
   Google Scholar
• M. F. Remeli, L. Tan, A. Date, B. Singh and A. Akbarzadeh, “Simultaneous power generation and heat recovery using a heat pipe assisted thermoelectric generator system,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 91, pp. 110–119, Feb. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Mamur and R. Ahiska, “Application of a DC–DC boost converter with maximum power point tracking for low power thermoelectric generators,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 97, pp. 265–272, Jun. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.03.068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Yamada, K. Kimura, T. Hanamoto, T. Ishiyama, T. Sakaguchi and T. Takahashi, “A novel MPPT control method of thermoelectric power generation with single sensor,” Appl. Sci., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 545–558, Jun. 2013. DOI: 10.3390/app3020.
   Google Scholar
• M. A. Üstüner, H. Mamur and S. Taşkın, “Modeling and validation of the thermoelectric generator with considering the change of the Seebeck effect and internal resistance,” Turk. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 2688–2706, Jan. 2022. DOI: 10.55730/1300-0632.3963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Kamran, M. Mudassar, M. R. Fazal, M. U. Asghar, M. Bilal and R. Asghar, “Implementation of improved Perturb & Observe MPPT technique with confined search space for standalone photovoltaic system,” J. King Saud Univ. - Eng. Sci., vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 432–441, Nov. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jksues.2018.04.006.
   Google Scholar
• H. Mamur and Y. Çoban, “Detailed modeling of a thermoelectric generator for maximum power point tracking,” Turk J. Elec. Eng. Comp. Sci., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 124–139, Jan. 2020. DOI: 10.3906/elk-1907-166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. S. Tey and S. Mekhilef, “Modified incremental conductance MPPT algorithm to mitigate inaccurate responses under fast-changing solar irradiation level,” Sol. Energy, vol. 101, pp. 333–342, Mar. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2014.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. V. Rajani and V. J. Pandya, “Simulation and comparison of perturb and observe and incremental conductance MPPT algorithms for solar energy system connected to grid,” Sadhana, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 139–153, 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s12046-014-0312-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Esram and P. L. Chapman, “Comparison of photovoltaic array maximum power point tracking techniques,” IEEE Trans. On Energy Convers., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 439–449, Jun. 2007. DOI: 10.1109/TEC.2006.874230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Laird, H. Lovatt, N. Savvides, D. Lu and V. G. Agelidis, “Comparative study of maximum power point tracking algorithms for thermoelectric generators,” 2008 Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference, 2008, pp. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• M. A. Ebrahim, H. A. AbdelHadi, H. M. Mahmoud, E. M. Saied and M. M. Salama, “Optimal design of MPPT controllers for grid connected photovoltaic array system,” Int. J. Emerg. Electr. Power Syst., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 511–517, Oct. 2016. DOI: 10.1515/ijeeps-2016-0077.
   Google Scholar
• K. Vanchinathan, K. R. Valluvan, C. Gnanavel and C. Gokul, “Numerical simulation and experimental verification of fractional-order PIλ controller for solar PV fed sensorless brushless DC motor using whale optimization algorithm,” Electr. Power Compon. Syst., vol. 50, no. 1-2, pp. 64–80, Jan. 2022. DOI: 10.1080/15325008.2022.2135644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar