A New-Fangled Approach for Optimal Placement of Facts Controllers in a Hybridized System

References

• M. H. Hassan, F. Daqaq, S. Kamel, A. G. Hussien and H. M. Zawbaa, “An enhanced hunter‐prey optimization for optimal power flow with facts devices and wind power integration,” IET,” IET Generation Trans. Dist., vol. 17, no. 14, pp. 3115–3139, 2023. DOI: 10.1049/gtd2.12879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Ebeed, A. Mostafa, M. M. Aly, F. Jurado and S. Kamel, “Stochastic Optimal Power Flow Analysis of power systems with wind/PV/TCSC using a developed Runge Kutta optimizer,” Int. J. Elect. Power Energy Syst., vol. 152, pp. 109250, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2023.109250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. A. Shehata, M. A. Tolba, A. M. El-Rifaie and N. V. Korovkin, “Power System Operation Enhancement using a new hybrid methodology for optimal allocation of facts devices,” Energy Reports, vol. 8, pp. 217–238, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.11.241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. H. Sulaiman and Z. Mustaffa, “Optimal placement and sizing of facts devices for optimal power flow using metaheuristic optimizers,” SSRN J., vol. 8, pp.100145–100157, 2022. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4060614.
   Google Scholar
• J. Lakshmi Priya and S. T. Jaya Christa, “An effective hybridized GWO-BSA for resolving optimal power flow problem with the inclusion of unified power flow controller,” IETE J. Res., vol. 69, no. 7, pp. 4605–4617, 2021. DOI: 10.1080/03772063.2021.1942245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. B. Shafik, H. Chen, G. I. Rashed and R. A. El-Sehiemy, “Adaptive multi objective parallel seeker optimization algorithm for incorporating TCSC devices into Optimal Power Flow Framework,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 36934–36947, 2019. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2905266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Galvani, B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo, M. Nazari-Heris and S. Rezaeian-Marjani, “Optimal allocation of static synchronous series compensator (SSSC) in wind-integrated power system considering predictability,” Electric Power Syst. Res., vol. 191, pp. 106871, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Mostafa, M. Ebeed, S. Kamel and M. A. Abdel-Moamen, “Optimal power flow solution using levy spiral flight equilibrium optimizer with incorporating CUPFC,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 69985–69998, 2021. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3078115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Mahapatra, N. Malik, S. Raj and M. K. Srinivasan, “Constrained optimal power flow and optimal TCSC allocation using hybrid cuckoo search and Ant Lion optimizer,” Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 721–734, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s13198-021-01334-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Alhejji, M. Ebeed Hussein, S. Kamel and S. Alyami, “Optimal power flow solution with an embedded center-node unified power flow controller using an adaptive grasshopper optimization algorithm,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 119020–119037, 2020. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2993762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Mahdad, “Improvement optimal power flow solution considering SVC and TCSC controllers using new partitioned ant lion algorithm,” Electr. Eng., vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 2655–2672, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00202-020-01033-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Duman, “Solution of the optimal power flow problem considering facts devices by using lightning search algorithm,” Iran J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Electr. Eng., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 969–997, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s40998-019-00199-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Azizipanah-Abarghooee, M. R. Narimani, B. Bahmani-Firouzi and T. Niknam, “Modified shuffled frog leaping algorithm for multi-objective optimal power flow with facts devices,” J. Intelligent Fuzzy Syst., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 681–692, 2014. DOI: 10.3233/IFS-120759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. E. Elattar and S. K. ElSayed, “Modified Jaya algorithm for optimal power flow incorporating renewable energy sources considering the cost, emission, power loss and voltage profile improvement,” Energy, vol. 178, pp. 598–609, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Abbasi, E. Abbasi and B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo, “Single and multi-objective optimal power flow using a new differential-based harmony search algorithm,” J Ambient Intell. Human Comput., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 851–871, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s12652-020-02089-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Agrawal, S. K. Bharadwaj and K. C. Muley, “Optimal location of static VAR compensator using evolutionary optimization techniques,” Int. J. Emerging Technol., vol. 11, pp. 245–256, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• H. M. Daealhaq, Y. F. Kfajey and A. S. Tukkee, “Power loss reduction and voltage profile improvement using optimal placement of facts devices,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 1067, no. 1, pp. 12128, 2021. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/1067/1/012128.
   Google Scholar
• S. P. Dash, K. R. Aubhashini and J. K. Satapathy, “Optimal location and parametric settings of FACTS devices based on JAYA blended moth flame optimization for transmission loss minimization in power system,” Microsyst. Technol., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1543–1552, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00542-019-04692-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. M. Kanaan, M. EL-Gazaar and M. A. Mehanna, “Optimal location and sizing of SVC considering system losses, voltage division and system overload,” J. Al-Azhar Univ. Eng. Sector, vol. 15, no. 57, pp. 1040–1051, 2020. DOI: 10.21608/auej.2020.120371.
   Google Scholar
• K. A. Mamdouh, A. A. Shehata and N. V. Korovkin, “Multi-objective voltage control and reactive power optimization based on multi-objective particle swarm algorithm,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 643, no. 1, pp. 12089, 2019. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/643/1/012089.
   Google Scholar
• M. Nadeem, et al., “Optimal placement, sizing and coordination of facts devices in transmission network using whale optimization algorithm,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 753, 2020. DOI: 10.3390/en13030753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. A. Shehata, A. Refaet, M. K. Ahmed and N. V. Kororkin, “Optimal placement and sizing of FACTS devices based on autonomous groups particle swarm optimization technique,” Archives Elect. Eng., vol. 70, pp. 161–172, 2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. P. Biswas, P. Arora, R. Mallipeddi, P. N. Suganthan and B. K. Panigrahi, “Optimal placement and sizing of facts devices for optimal power flow in a Wind Power Integrated Electrical Network,” Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 6753–6774, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00521-020-05453-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Mukherjee and V. Mukherjee, “Solution of optimal power flow with facts devices using a novel oppositional krill herd algorithm,” Int. J. Elect. Power Energy Syst., vol. 78, pp. 700–714, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Prasad and V. Mukherjee, “A novel symbiotic organisms search algorithm for optimal power flow of power system with facts devices,” Engineering Sci. Technol., Int. J., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 79–89, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jestch.2015.06.005.
   Google Scholar
• D. Sh. Wais and W. S. Majeed, “The gravitational search algorithm for incorporating TCSC devices into the system for optimum power flow,” IJECE, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 4678, 2021. DOI: 10.11591/ijece.v11i6.pp4678-4688.
   Google Scholar
• X. Xu, et al., “Stochastic optimal TCSC placement in power system considering high wind power penetration,” IET Generation, Trans. Distrib., vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 3052–3060, 2018. vol DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.1320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Bhattacharyya and V. K. Gupta, “Fuzzy based evolutionary algorithm for reactive power optimization with facts devices,” Int. J. Elect. Power Energy Syst., vol. 61, pp. 39–47, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. H. Hassan, S. Kamel, A. Selim, T. Khurshaid and J. L. Domínguez-García, “A modified rao-2 algorithm for optimal power flow incorporating renewable energy sources,” Mathematics, vol. 9, no. 13, pp. 1532, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/math9131532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Habibollahzadeh, G. X. Luo and A. Semlyen, “Hydrothermal optimal power flow based on a combined linear and nonlinear programming methodology,” IEEE Power Eng. Rev., vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 51–52, 1989. DOI: 10.1109/MPER.1989.4310693.
   Google Scholar
• D. I. Sun, B. Ashley, B. Brewer, A. Hughes and W. F. Tinney, “Optimal power flow by Newton approach,” IEEE Power Eng. Rev, vol. PER-4, no. 10, pp. 39–39, 1984. DOI: 10.1109/MPER.1984.5526285.
   Google Scholar
• Xihui Yan and V. H. Quintana, “Improving an interior-point-based OPF by dynamic adjustments of step sizes and tolerances,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 709–717, 1999. DOI: 10.1109/59.761902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Jia, X. Peng and C. Lang, “Remora optimization algorithm,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 185, pp. 115665, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Ma, Z. Hao and W. Sun, “Enhancing sparrow search algorithm via multi-strategies for continuous optimization problems,” Inform. Processing Manage., vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 102854, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Premkumar, et al., “A reliable optimization framework using ensembled successive history adaptive differential evolutionary algorithm for optimal power flow problems,” IET Generation Trans. Dist., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1333–1357, 2023. DOI: 10.1049/gtd2.12738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Ahmad, N. Javaid, I. A. Niaz, I. Ahmed and M. A. Hashmi, “An orthogonal learning bird swarm algorithm for optimal power flow problems,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 23659–23680, 2023. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3253796.
   Google Scholar
• M. M. Linda and N. K. Nair, “Optimal design of fuzzy based power system stabilizer self-tuned of Robust search algorithm,” Neural Evol. Comput., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 44–48, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• T. A. Sivakumar and M. Mary Linda, “Improving the dynamic performance of grid connected wind farms using modern UPFC,” Microproc. Microsyst., vol. 74, pp. 103015, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.micpro.2020.103015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. M. Linda and N. K. Nair, “Optimal design of multi-machine power system stabilizer using robust ant colony optimization technique,” Trans. Inst. Measurement Control, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 829–840, 2011. DOI: 10.1177/0142331211421520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Abdelkader, M. A. Moussa and E. Mohamed, “FACTS devices optimal placement and parameter setting to improve power network system performance,” Semiconductor Optoelectronics, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 368–386, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• N. Santamaria-Henao, O. D. Montoya and C. L. Trujillo-Rodríguez, “Optimal sitting and sizing of FACTS in distribution networks using the black widow algorithm,” Algorithms, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 225, 2023. DOI: 10.3390/a16050225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. E. Nkan, O. I. Okoro, P. I. Obi, et al., “Application of FACTS devices in multi machine power system network for transient stability enhancement: a case study of the Nigerian 330KV 48 bus system,” 2019 IEEE Africon, 2019. Accra, Ghana, pp. 1–9. DOI: 10.1109/AFRICON46755.2019.9133904.
   Google Scholar
• W. Masamvu and O. Dzobo, “Investigating the optimal location of FACTS devices in power system networks with Renewable energy sources considering uncertainty,” IEEE Africon, 2021. DOI: 10.1109/AFRICON51333.2021.9570923.
   Google Scholar
• I. Marouani, et al., “Optimized FACTS devices for power system enhancement: applications and solving methods,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 9348, 2023. DOI: 10.3390/su15129348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Nusair, F. Alasali, A. Hayajneh and W. Holderbaum, “Optimal placement of FACTS devices and power flow solutions for a power network system integrated with stochastic renewable energy sources using new metaheuristic optimization techniques,” Int. J. Energy Res., vol. 45, no. 13, pp. 18786–18809, 2021. 6997 DOI: 10.1002/er.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar