Advanced Machine Learning-Driven Security and Anomaly Identification in Inverter-Based Cyber-Physical Microgrids

References

• Z. Li, F. Yu and Q. Guan, “Advanced machine learning techniques for intrusion detection in inverter-based microgrids: An LSTM-GBM hybrid approach,” Proceedings of the First International Conference on Cyber-Energy Systems and Intelligent Energy, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• O. A. Beg, A. A. Khan, W. U. Rehman and A. Hassan, “A review of AI-based cyber-attack detection and mitigation in microgrids,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 22, pp. 7644, 2023. DOI: 10.3390/en16227644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Jamil, Q. S. Qassim, F. A. Bohani, M. Mansor and V. K. Ramachandaramurthy, “Predictive maintenance of cyber-physical microgrid systems using LSTM and gradient boosting machines,” Appl. Sci., vol. 11, no. 21, pp. 9812, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/app11219812.
   Google Scholar
• D. Liu, et al., “Enhancing microgrid cybersecurity with deep reinforcement learning and gradient boosting machines,” Front. Energy Res., vol. 11, pp. 1163053, 2023. DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2023.1163053.
   Google Scholar
• F. MinUllah, A. Ullah and N. Khan, “Deep learning assisted anomaly detection in inverter-based cyber-physical microgrids: A CNN-LSTM approach,” Hindawi Complexity, pp. 15, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• T. Alquthami, M. Zulfiqar, M. Kamran, A. H. Milyani and M. B. Rasheed, “Intelligent threat detection and mitigation in inverter-based microgrids: a hybrid CNN-GBM approach,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 48419–48433, 2022. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3171270.
   Google Scholar
• M. Alazab, S. Khan, S. S. R. Krishnan, Q.-V. Pham, M. P. K. Reddy and T. R. Gadekallu, “Optimizing cyber-physical microgrid security using quadratic regression models and gradient boosting machines,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 85454–85463, 2020. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2991067.
   Google Scholar
• A. Bhattacharya, D. Misra and S. Ghosh, “Securing inverter-based microgrid systems: a comprehensive review of advanced machine learning approaches,” Mater. Today: Proc., vol. 49 2021.
   Google Scholar
• A. Safari, H. K. Gharehbagh, M. Nazari-Heris and A. Oshnoei, “Real-time threat assessment and response in inverter-based microgrids with CNN-LSTM and GBM,” Front. Energy Res., vol. 11, pp. 1275686, 2023. DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2023.1275686.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Zhang, et al., “Artificial intelligence in cyber security: research advances, challenges, and opportunities,” Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 1029–1053, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s10462-021-09976-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Yamasaki, Junior, R. Z. Freire, L. O. Seman, S. F. Stefenon, V. C. Mariani and L. dos Santos Coelho, Junior, “Cyber-physical microgrid security assessment using gradient boosting machines and LSTM models,” Elect. Power Energy Syst., vol. 155, pp. 109579, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2023.109579.
   Google Scholar
• O. Ibrahim, M. S. Bakare and T. I. Amosa, “Hybrid CNN-LSTM and GBM model for real-time cyber threat detection in inverter-based microgrids,” Energy Conversion Manage., vol. 10, pp. 100354, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• M. S. Bakare, A. Abdulkarim, M. Zeeshan and A. N. Shuaibu, “Cybersecurity risk assessment and mitigation in inverter-based microgrids: a quadratic regression model and GBM approach,” Energy Informatics, vol. 6, no. 4, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• U. Singh, M. Rizwan, M. Alaraj and I. Alsaidan, “Machine learning driven anomaly detection system for inverter-based microgrids using CNN and LSTM models,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 16, pp. 5196, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/en14165196.
   Google Scholar
• R. Trivedi and S. Khadem, “Enhancing cyber-physical microgrid security through advanced machine learning techniques: a comparative analysis of CNN, LSTM, and GBM models,” Energy Reports, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• K. Lee, S. Lee and D. Jung, “Deep reinforcement learning for cyber-physical microgrid security: A CNN-LSTM-GBM hybrid approach,” Energies, vol. 15, pp. 2600, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• A. Tived, “Machine learning-based intrusion detection system for inverter-based microgrids: a comparative study of CNN, LSTM, and GBM models,” Master Sci. Thesis, KTH Ind. Engineering Manage, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Y. S. Afridi, K. Ahmad and L. Hassan, “Machine learning enhanced cybersecurity measures for inverter-based cyber-physical microgrids using gradient boosting machines,” Int. J. Energy Res., 2022.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Y. S. Afridi, K. Ahmad and L. Hassan, “Machine learning approaches for cybersecurity in inverter-based microgrids: a comparative review of CNN, LSTM, and GBM models,” Int. J. Energy Res., vol. 46, no. 15, pp. 21619–21642, 2022. DOI: 10.1002/er.7100.
   Google Scholar
• M. K. Albasri, K. Mahmood and A. Zaharim, “Secure control mechanisms for inverter-based microgrids using LSTM-GBM and CNN models,” Energies, vol. 15, pp. 4835, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• J. Liu, Y. Zhou, H. Yang and H. Wu, “Efficient threat detection and response system for inverter-based microgrids: a CNN-LSTM-GBM approach,” Appl. Energy, vol. 321, pp. 119394, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119394.
   Google Scholar
• M. S. Bakare, A. Abdulkarim and M. Zeeshan, “Adaptive threat response mechanisms for inverter-based microgrids: a deep learning and GBM approach,” Energy Informatics, vol. 6, no. 4, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• P. Ashok Babu, J. L. Mazher Iqbal, S. Siva Priyanka, M. Jithender Reddy, G. Sunil Kumar and R. Ayyasamy, “Power control and optimization for power loss reduction using deep learning in microgrid systems,” Electric Power Components Syst., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 219–232, 2024. DOI: 10.1080/15325008.2023.2217175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Senthil Kumar, et al., “Optimizing solar power plant efficiency through advanced analytical framework and comparative analysis,” IFS, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 4995–5011, 2024. DOI: 10.3233/JIFS-235578.
   Google Scholar
• A. Sulaiman, et al., “Machine learning-based cyber defense system for inverter-based microgrids using gradient boosting machines,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 19, pp. 8016, 2023. DOI: 10.3390/s23198016.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D. Upadhyay, P. Garg, S. M. Aldossary, J. Shafi and S. Kumar, “Anomaly detection and response system for inverter-based microgrids: a hybrid LSTM-GBM approach,” Electronics, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 309, 2023. DOI: 10.3390/electronics12020309.
   Google Scholar
• E. Naderi and A. Asrari, “Experimental validation of a remedial action via hardware-in-the-loop system against cyberattackstargeting a lab-scale PV/wind microgrid,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 4060–4072, 2023. DOI: 10.1109/TSG.2023.3253431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. A. Khan, O. A. Beg, M. Alamaniotis and S. Ahmed, “Intelligent anomaly identification in cyber-physical inverter-based systems,” Electric Power Syst. Res., vol. 193, pp. 107024, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2021.107024.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Zahraoui, et al., “Integrated machine learning framework for cybersecurity in inverter-based microgrids: a quadratic regression model and GBM approach,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 19, pp. 10492, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/su131910492.
   Google Scholar
• S. Suprabhath Koduru, V. S. P. Machina and S. Madichetty, “Cyber attacks in cyber-physical microgrid systems: a comprehensive review,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 4573, 2023. DOI: 10.3390/en16124573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. A. Jarrahi, H. Samet and T. Ghanbari, “Novel change detection and faultclassification scheme for ac microgrids,” IEEE Syst. J., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1–12, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Eling, M. Elvedi and G. Falco, “The economic impact of extreme cyber risk scenarios,” N. Am. Actuar. J., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1–15, 2022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar