Utilizing Metaheuristics to Estimate Wind Energy Integration in Smart Grids With A Comparative Analysis of Ten Distributions

References

• S. Pishgar-Komleh, A. Keyhani and P. Sefeedpari, “Wind speed and power density analysis based on Weibull and Rayleigh distributions (a case study: Firouzkooh county of Iran),” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 42, pp. 313–322, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. C. Morgan, M. Lackner, R. M. Vogel and L. G. Baise, “Probability distributions for offshore wind speeds,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 15–26, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2010.06.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. P. Chang, “Estimation of wind energy potential using different probability density functions,” Appl. Energy, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 1848–1856, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. L. Crutcher and L. Baer, “Computations from elliptical wind distribution statistics,” J. Appl. Meteorol., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 522–530, 1962. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1962)001<0522:CFEWDS>2.0.CO;2.
   Google Scholar
• E. Scerri and R. Farrugia, “Wind data evaluation in the Maltese islands,” Renew. Energy, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 109–114, 1996. DOI: 10.1016/0960-1481(95)00097-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Garcia, J. Torres, E. Prieto and A. De Francisco, “Fitting wind speed distributions: a case study,” Solar Energy, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 139–144, 1998. DOI: 10.1016/S0038-092X(97)00116-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Yilmaz and H. E. Çelik, “A statistical approach to estimate the wind speed distribution: the case of Gelibolu region,” Doğuş Univ. Derg., vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 122–132, 2011. DOI: 10.31671/dogus.2019.227.
   Google Scholar
• I. Mert and C. Karakuş, “A statistical analysis of wind speed data using burr, generalized gamma, and Weibull distributions in Antakya, Turkey,” Turk. J. Elec. Eng. Comp. Sci., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1571–1586, 2015. DOI: 10.3906/elk-1402-66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Alavi, K. Mohammadi and A. Mostafaeipour, “Evaluating the suitability of wind speed probability distribution models: a case of study of east and southeast parts of Iran,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 119, pp. 101–108, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.04.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Wadi, W. Elmasry and F. A. Tamyigit, “Important considerations while evaluating wind energy potential,” J. Fac. Eng. Archit. Gazi Univ., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 947–962, 2023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Wadi and W. Elmasry, “Statistical analysis of wind energy potential using different estimation methods for weibull parameters: a case study,” Electr. Eng., vol. 103, no. 6, pp. 2573–2594, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s00202-021-01254-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Wadi and W. Elmasry, “Modeling of wind energy potential in Marmara region using different statistical distributions and genetic algorithms,” presented at 2021 International Conference on Electric Power Engineering–Palestine (ICEPE-P ), pp. 1–7. IEEE, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• M. Wadi, B. Kekezoglu, M. Baysal, M. R. Tur and A. Shobole, “Feasibility study of wind energy potential in turkey: Case study of catalca district in istanbul,” 2019 2nd International Conference on Smart Grid and Renewable Energy (SGRE). pp. 1–6. IEEE, 2019. DOI: 10.1109/SGRE46976.2019.9021102.
   Google Scholar
• M. Wadi, “An empirical investigation into wind energy modeling: a case study utilizing five distributions and four advanced optimization methods,” in Power Electronics Converters and Their Control for Renewable Energy Applications, A. Fekik, M. Ghanes and H. Denoun, Eds. Forlag: Elsevier, 2023, pp. 237–263.
   Google Scholar
• W. Mohammed, “Five different distributions and metaheuristics to model wind speed distribution,” J. Therm. Eng., vol. 7, no. 14, pp. 1898–1920, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• C. Jung and D. Schindler, “Global comparison of the goodness-of-fit of wind speed distributions,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 133, pp. 216–234, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Wadi, W. Elmasry, A. Shobole, M. R. Tur, R. Bayindir and H. Shahinzadeh, “Wind energy potential approximation with various metaheuristic optimization techniques deployment,” 2021 7th International Conference on Signal Processing and Intelligent Systems (ICSPIS). pp. 1–6. IEEE, 2021. DOI: 10.1109/ICSPIS54653.2021.9729389.
   Google Scholar
• M. Wadi and W. Elmasry, “Comparison of five different distributions based on three metaheuristics to model wind speed distribution,” J. Elect. Syst., vol. 18, pp. 369–390, 2022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Mohammed and W. Elmasry, “A comparative assessment of five different distributions based on five different optimization methods for modeling wind speed distribution,” Gazi Univ. J. Sci., vol. 36, pp. 1–1, 2023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Carta and P. Ramirez, “Analysis of two-component mixture weibull statistics for estimation of wind speed distributions,” Renew. Energy, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 518–531, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2006.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Akpinar and E. K. Akpinar, “Estimation of wind energy potential using finite mixture distribution models,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 877–884, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2009.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Adnan and H. Kiser, “A class of weibull mixtured distributions,” J. Biom. Biostat., vol. 03, no. 02, pp. 135, 2012. DOI: 10.4172/2155-6180.1000135.
   Google Scholar
• M. Franco, N. Balakrishnan, D. Kundu and J.-M. Vivo, “Generalized mixtures of weibull components,” Test, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 515–535, 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s11749-014-0362-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Gómez-Lázaro, et al., “Probability density function characterization for aggregated large-scale wind power based on weibull mixtures,” Energies, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 91, 2016. DOI: 10.3390/en9020091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Hossain, S. Sharma and V. Kishore, “Multi-peak gaussian fit applicability to wind speed distribution,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 34, pp. 483–490, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Rajapaksha and K. Perera, “Wind speed analysis and energy calculation based on mixture distributions in Narakkalliya, Sri Lanka,” J. Natn. Sci. Found. Sri Lanka, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 409, 2016. DOI: 10.4038/jnsfsr.v44i4.8023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Leiva, M. Barros, G. A. Paula and M. Galea, “Influence diagnostics in log-birnbaum–saunders regression models with censored data,” Comput. Stat. Data Anal., vol. 51, no. 12, pp. 5694–5707, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2006.09.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Mohammadi, O. Alavi and J. G. McGowan, “Use of birnbaum-saunders distribution for estimating wind speed and wind power probability distributions: a review,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 143, pp. 109–122, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.03.083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Chiodo, “The burr xii model and its bayes estimation for wind power production assessment,” Int. Rev. Electr. Eng., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 737–751, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• E. Chiodo and P. De Falco, “Inverse burr distribution for extreme wind speed prediction: genesis, identification and estimation,” Elect. Power Syst. Res., vol. 141, pp. 549–561, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2016.08.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Köse, M. Düz, M. T. Güneşer and Z. Recebli, “Estimating wind energy potential with predicting Burr LSM parameters: A different approach,” Sigma J. Eng. Nat. Sci., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 389–404, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• S. Sahmoud, S. Abudalfa and W. Elmasry, “At-odtsa: a dataset of Arabic tweets for open domain targeted sentiment analysis,” IJCDS, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1299–1307, 2022. DOI: 10.12785/ijcds/1101105.
   Google Scholar
• M. R. Tür, A. Erduman, A. Shobole and M. Wadi, “Determining the most appropriate spinning reserve depending on demand,” 2016 IEEE International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications (ICRERA), pp. 1062–1067. IEEE, 2016. DOI: 10.1109/ICRERA.2016.7884497.
   Google Scholar
• M. Tur, S. Ay, M. Wadi and A. Shobole, Obtaining Optimal Spinning Reserve and Unit Commitment considering the Socio-Economic Parameters, Ecres–5,” European Conference on Renewable Energy Systems, Herzegovina, Bosnia, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• B. Hoxha, R. Selimaj and S. Osmanaj, “An experimental study of weibull and rayleigh distribution functions of wind speeds in Kosovo,” TELKOMNIKA, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 2451–2457, 2018. DOI: 10.12928/telkomnika.v16i5.10260.
   Google Scholar
• V. Sohoni, S. Gupta and R. Nema, “A comparative analysis of wind speed probability distributions for wind power assessment of four sites,” Turk. J. Elec. Eng. Comp. Sci., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 4724–4735, 2016. DOI: 10.3906/elk-1412-207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Arikan, O. P. Arslan and E. Cam, “The analysis of wind data with rayleigh distribution and optimum turbine and cost analysis in Elmadag, Turkey,” Istanb. Univ. J. Elect. Electron. Eng., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1907–1912, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• H. Bidaoui, I. E. Abbassi, A. E. Bouardi and A. Darcherif, “Wind speed data analysis using Weibull and Rayleigh distribution functions, case study: five cities northern morocco,” Procedia Manuf., vol. 32, pp. 786–793, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.286.
   Google Scholar
• F. Maleki Jebely, K. Zare and E. Deiri, “Efficient estimation of the pdf and the cdf of the inverse Rayleigh distribution,” J. Stat. Comput. Sim., vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 75–88, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/00949655.2017.1378656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. N. Stefan, “Statistical Distributions Scientific Work, Volume 2: Model Building Model Selection,” JSTOR, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• C. Dalelane and T. Deutschländer, “A robust estimator for the intensity of the poisson point process of extreme weather events,” Weather Clim. Extrem., vol. 1, pp. 69–76, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.wace.2013.07.003.
   Google Scholar
• B. K. Saxena and K. V. S. Rao, “Comparison of weibull parameters computation methods and analytical estimation of wind turbine capacity factor using polynomial power curve model: case study of a wind farm,” Renewables, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 3, 2015. DOI: 10.1186/s40807-014-0003-8.
   Google Scholar
• M. B. H. Kumar, S. Balasubramaniyan, S. Padmanaban and J. B. Holm-Nielsen, “Wind energy potential assessment by weibull parameter estimation using multiverse optimization method: a case study of tirumala region in india,” Energies, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 2158, 2019. DOI: 10.3390/en12112158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Justus, W. Hargraves, A. Mikhail and D. Graber, “Methods for estimating wind speed frequency distributions,” J. Appl. Meteor., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 350–353, 1978. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1978)017<0350:MFEWSF>2.0.CO;2.
   Google Scholar
• M. S. Khan, G. Pasha and A. H. Pasha, “Theoretical analysis of inverse weibull distribution,” WSEAS Trans. Math., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 30–38, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• E. Dokur, M. Kurban and S. Ceyhan, “Wind speed modelling using inverse weibull distrubition: a case study for Bilecik, Turkey,” IJEAT, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 55–59, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• L.-F. Huang, “The nakagami and its related distributions,” WSEAS Trans. Math., vol. 15, pp. 477–85, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• S. Zhang, et al., “Feasibility of using nakagami distribution in evaluating the formation of ultrasound-induced thermal lesions,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 131, no. 6, pp. 4836–4844, 2012. DOI: 10.1121/1.4711005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. El-Gindy and E. S. El-Nashar, “Probability modelling of wind velocity for assessment of wind energy at alexandria coast,” RJASET, vol. 8, no. 18, pp. 2001–2015, 2014. DOI: 10.19026/rjaset.8.1192.
   Google Scholar
• H. Gao, Y. Hou, S. Zhang and M. Diao, “An efficient approximation for nakagami-m quantile function based on generalized opposition-based quantum salp swarm algorithm,” Math. Probl. Eng., vol. 2019, pp. 1–13, vol. 2019. DOI: 10.1155/2019/8291063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Wadi, M. Baysal and A. Shobole, “Reliability and sensitivity analysis for closed-ring distribution power systems,” Electr. Pow. Compo. Syst., vol. 49, no. 6-7, pp. 696–714, 2022. DOI: 10.1080/15325008.2021.2004476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. R. Tur, A. Shobole, M. Wadi and R. Bayindir, Valuation of reliability assessment for power systems in terms of distribution system, a case study,” 2017 IEEE 6th International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications (ICRERA), pp. 1114–1118. IEEE, 2017. DOI: 10.1109/ICRERA.2017.8191227.
   Google Scholar
• N. Balakrishnan and D. Kundu, “Birnbaum-saunders distribution: a review of models, analysis, and applications,” Appl. Stoch. Models Bus Ind., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 4–49, 2019. DOI: 10.1002/asmb.2348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Tsogt, T. Zandraabal, C. Lin, et al., “Diameter and height distributions of natural even-aged pine forests (Pinus sylvestris) in western Khentey, Mongolia,” Taiwan J. Sci., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 29–41, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• N. H. B. Ismail and Z. B. M. Khalid, “Em algorithm in estimating the 2-and 3-parameter burr type iii distributions,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1605, pp. 881–887. American Institute of Physics, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• D. Kumar, “The Burr type XII distribution with some statistical properties,” J. Data Sci., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 509–534, 2021. DOI: 10.6339/JDS.201707_15(3).0008.
   Google Scholar
• C. Kim and W. Kim, “Estimation of the parameters of Burr type III distribution based on dual generalized order statistics,” Sci. World J., vol. 2014, pp. 1–6, vol. 2014. DOI: 10.1155/2014/512039.
   Google Scholar
• M. D. Pant and T. C. Headrick, “A method for simulating Burr type III and type XII distributions through-moments and-correlations,” ISRN Appl. Math., vol. 2013, pp. 1–14, 2013. DOI: 10.1155/2013/191604.
   Google Scholar
• J. H. Holland, et al., Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence. USA: A Bradford Book, 1992,
   Google Scholar
• K. A. De Jong, “Genetic algorithms are not function optimizers,” in Foundations of Genetic Algorithms, vol. 2, D. Whitley, Ed. New York: Elsevier, 1993, pp. 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• M. Wadi and W. Elmasry, “An anomaly-based technique for fault detection in power system networks,” 2021 International Conference on Electric Power Engineering–Palestine (ICEPE-P), pp. 1–6. IEEE, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• M. Wadi, “Fault detection in power grids based on improved supervised machine learning binary classification,” J. Elect. Eng., vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 315–322, 2021. DOI: 10.2478/jee-2021-0044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. A. Coley, An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms for Scientists and Engineers. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• W. Elmasry and M. Wadi, “EDLA-EFDS: a novel ensemble deep learning approach for electrical fault detection systems,” Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 207, pp. 107834, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2022.107834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Eberhart and J. Kennedy, “A new optimizer using particle swarm theory,” MHS’95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science, pp. 39–43. IEEE, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• W. Elmasry, A. Akbulut and A. H. Zaim, “Deep learning approaches for predictive masquerade detection,” Security Commun. Netw., vol. 2018, pp. 1–24, 2018. DOI: 10.1155/2018/9327215.
   Google Scholar
• W. Elmasry and M. Wadi, “Enhanced anomaly-based fault detection system in electrical power grids,” Int. Trans. Elect. Energy Syst., vol. 2022, pp. 1–19, 2022. DOI: 10.1155/2022/1870136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Elmasry, A. Akbulut and A. H. Zaim, “Evolving deep learning architectures for network intrusion detection using a double PSO metaheuristic,” Comput. Netw., vol. 168, pp. 107042, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2019.107042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Elmasry and M. Wadi, “Detection of faults in electrical power grids using an enhanced anomaly-based method,” Arab. J. Sci. Eng., vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 14899–14914, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s13369-022-07030-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Elmasry, A. Akbulut and A. H. Zaim, “A design of an integrated cloud-based intrusion detection system with third party cloud service,” Open Comput. Sci., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 365–379, 2021. DOI: 10.1515/comp-2020-0214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Elmasry, M. Wadi and H. Shahinzadeh, “Two-tier cascaded classifiers to improve electrical power quality,” 2022 26th International Electrical Power Distribution Conference (EPDC), pp. 96–101. IEEE, 2022. DOI: 10.1109/EPDC56235.2022.9817239.
   Google Scholar
• W. Elmasry, A. Akbulut and A. H. Zaim, “Empirical study on multiclass classification-based network intrusion detection,” Comput. Intell., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 919–954, 2019. DOI: 10.1111/coin.12220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Elmasry, A. Akbulut and A. H. Zaim, “Comparative evaluation of different classification techniques for masquerade attack detection,” IJICS, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 187–209, 2020. DOI: 10.1504/IJICS.2020.108848.
   Google Scholar
• M. Cem Kasapbaşi and W. Elmasry, “New lsb-based colour image steganography method to enhance the efficiency in payload capacity, security and integrity check,” Sādhanā, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1–14, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s12046-018-0848-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Sahmoud, W. Elmasry and S. Abudalfa, “Enhancement the security of aes against modern attacks by using variable key block cipher,” Int. Arab. J. e Technol., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 17–26, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• A. Mostafaeipour, “Feasibility study of harnessing wind energy for turbine installation in province of Yazd in Iran,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 93–111, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.05.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. E. Okorie, F. Inambao and Z. Chiguvare, “Evaluation of wind shear coefficients, surface roughness and energy yields over inland locations in Namibia,” Procedia Manuf., vol. 7, pp. 630–638, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2016.12.094.
   Google Scholar
• G. Gualtieri and S. Secci, “Wind shear coefficients, roughness length and energy yield over coastal locations in southern Italy,” Renew. Energy, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 1081–1094, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2010.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. A. Lackner, A. L. Rogers, J. F. Manwell and J. G. McGowan, “A new method for improved hub height mean wind speed estimates using short-term hub height data,” Renew. Energy, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 2340–2347, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2010.03.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. N. Laban, C. M. Maghanga and K. Joash, “Determination of the surface roughness parameter and wind shear exponent of Kisii region from the on-site measurement of wind profiles,” J. Energy, vol. 2019, pp. 1–12, 2019. DOI: 10.1155/2019/8264061.
   Google Scholar
• G. Gualtieri and S. Secci, “Comparing methods to calculate atmospheric stability-dependent wind speed profiles: a case study on coastal location,” Renew. Energy, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 2189–2204, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2011.01.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Ağçay and F. Attay, “Türkiye’nin elektrik enerjisi arz talep dengesinin tespiti, üretim projeksiyonuna yönelik rüzgar elektrik santrali tasar im i res’in kurulum maliyetlerinin ve üretim parametrelerinin analizinin matlab & simulink i˙le yaz ilan programda yap ilmas i,” Master’s thesis, Y ild iz Teknik Üniversitesi, Elektronik Mühendisliği Bitirme Tezi,” 2007.
   Google Scholar
• S. Mathew, Wind Energy: Fundamentals, Resource Analysis and Economics. Berlin: Springer, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• M. Irwanto, N. Gomesh, M. Mamat and Y. Yusoff, “Assessment of wind power generation potential in Perlis, Malaysia,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 38, pp. 296–308, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Gul, N. Tai, W. Huang, M. H. Nadeem and M. Yu, “Assessment of wind power potential and economic analysis at Hyderabad in Pakistan: powering to local communities using wind power,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1391, 2019. DOI: 10.3390/su11051391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. J. Willmott and K. Matsuura, “Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance,” Clim. Res, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 79–82, 2005. DOI: 10.3354/cr030079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. J. Hyndman and A. B. Koehler, “Another look at measures of forecast accuracy,” Int. J. Forecast., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 679–688, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Wadi, W. Elmasry, I. Kucuk and H. Shahinzadeh, “Sensitivity reliability analysis of power distribution networks using fuzzy logic,” 2022 12th International Conference on Computer and Knowledge Engineering (ICCKE), pp. 190–195. IEEE, 2022. DOI: 10.1109/ICCKE57176.2022.9959978.
   Google Scholar
• A. Papoulis and S. U. Pillai, Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes. New York: Tata McGraw-Hill Education, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• T. T. Soong, Fundamentals of Probability and Statistics for Engineers. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• M. Gul, N. Tai, W. Huang, M. H. Nadeem and M. Yu, “Evaluation of wind energy potential using an optimum approach based on maximum distance metric,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1999, 2020. DOI: 10.3390/su12051999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. T. DeCarlo, “On the meaning and use of kurtosis,” Psychol. Methods, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 292–307, 1997. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.2.3.292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Saeidi, M. Mirhosseini, A. Sedaghat and A. Mostafaeipour, “Feasibility study of wind energy potential in two provinces of Iran: north and south Khorasan,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 3558–3569, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.05.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar