Kernel Function Selection for FISVDD Applied to Outliers Detection Application for Energy Time Series Datasets

References

• M. Çolak and E. Irmak, “A state-of-the-art review on electric power systems and digital transformation,” Electric Power Components and Systems, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 1089–1112, 2023. DOI: 10.1080/15325008.2023.2189760.[Mismatch
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Mohamed and J. Cavallaro, “Design and implementation of an FPGA-based DNN architecture for real-time outlier detection,” Journal of Signal Processing Systems, vol. 51, pp. 845–861, 2023. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11265-023-01835-1.
   Google Scholar
• M. H. Bhuyan, D. K. Bhattacharyya and J. K. Kalita, “A multi-step outlier-based anomaly detection approach to network-wide traffic,” Information Sciences, vol. 348, pp. 243–271, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2016.02.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U. K. Gupta, R. P. Singh, and P. K.Goswami, “Harmonic distortions in smart devices: a comprehensive discussion on challenges of conventional and future smart IoT devices,” Electric Power Components and Systems, vol. 51, no. 20, pp. 2588–2602, 2023. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15325008.2023.2210561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. dos Santos Costa, et al., “Data analysis techniques applied to distribution systems: a systematic mapping study,” Electric Power Components and Systems, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 452–467, 2023. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15325008.2023.2175927.
   Google Scholar
• P. R. Jeyaraj, E. Rajan Samuel Nadar and L. Mihet-Popa, “Deep-block network for cyberattack mitigation and assessment in smart grid power system with resilience indices,” Electric Power Components and Systems, pp. 1–17, 2023. DOI: 10.1080/15325008.2023.2268073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Melgar-García, D. Gutiérrez-Avilés, C. Rubio-Escudero and A. Troncoso, “A novel distributed forecasting method based on information fusion and incremental learning for streaming time series,” Information Fusion, vol. 95, pp. 163–173, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2023.02.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Shah, et al. “Entropy-based grid approach for handling outliers: a case study to environmental monitoring data,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 30, pp. 125138–125157. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-023-26780-1.
   Google Scholar
• A. Dairi, F. Harrou, B. Bouyeddou, S. M. Senouci, Y. Sun. Semi-supervised deep learning-driven anomaly detection schemes for cyber-attack detection in smart grids. in Power Systems Cybersecurity. Power Systems, H. Haes Alhelou, N. Hatziargyriou, and Z. Y. Dong, Eds. Cham: Springer, 2023. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-20360-2_11.
   Google Scholar
• D. Babu and R. Bharathi Kumar, “Investigation on voltage stability in a distributed generation power grid influenced by PMSG and DFIG based wind energy conversion system,” Electric Power Components and Systems, pp. 1–18, 2023. DOI: 10.1080/15325008.2023.2298271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Ghiasi, et al., “A comprehensive review of cyber-attacks and defense mechanisms for improving security in smart grid energy systems: past, present and future,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 215, pp. 108975, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2022.108975.
   Google Scholar
• H. Jiang, H. Wang, W. Hu, D. Kakde and A. Chaudhuri, “Fast Incremental SVDD Learning Algorithm with the Gaussian Kernel,” AAAI, vol. 33, no. 01, pp. 3991–3998, 2019. DOI: 10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33013991.
   Google Scholar
• A. A. Habib, et al., “False data injection attack in smart grid cyber physical system: issues, challenges, and future direction,” Computers and Electrical Engineering, vol. 107, pp. 108638, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2023.108638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Liao, et al., “A new bandwidth selection criterion for using SVDD to analyze hyperspectral data,” in Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery XXIV, 2018, pp. 60. DOI: 10.1117/12.2314964.
   Google Scholar
• D. Kakde, et al., “Peak criterion for choosing Gaussian kernel bandwidth in Support Vector Data Description,” in IEEE International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management (ICPHM), Dallas, TX, USA: IEEE, 2017, pp. 32–39. DOI: 10.1109/ICPHM.2017.7998302.
   Google Scholar
• K. Feng, J. Ji, Q. Ni, “A novel adaptive bandwidth selection method for Vold–Kalman filtering and its application in wind turbine planetary gearbox diagnostics”, Structural Health Monitoring, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 1027–1048, 2023. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/14759217221099966.
   Google Scholar
• A. Chaudhuri, et al., “The trace kernel bandwidth criterion for support vector data description,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 111, pp. 107662, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2020.107662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Al-Behadili, A. Grumpe, L. Migdadi and C. Wohler, “Semi-supervised learning using incremental support vector machine and extreme value theory in gesture data,” in 2016 UKSim-AMSS 18th International Conference on Computer Modelling and Simulation (UKSim). Cambridge, United Kingdom: IEEE, 2016, pp. 184–189. DOI: 10.1109/UKSim.2016.5.
   Google Scholar
• G. Yin, Y.-T. Zhang, Z.-N. Li, G.-Q. Ren and H.-B. Fan, “Online fault diagnosis method based on Incremental Support Vector Data Description and Extreme Learning Machine with incremental output structure,” Neurocomputing, vol. 128, pp. 224–231, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2013.01.061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Kavzoglu and I. Colkesen, “A kernel functions analysis for support vector machines for land cover classification,” International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 352–359, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2009.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.-S. Jeong and R. Jayaraman, “Support vector-based algorithms with weighted dynamic time warping kernel function for time series classification,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 75, pp. 184–191, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2014.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Wang, Z. Xu, W. Lu and X. Zhang, 2003. Determination of the spread parameter in the Gaussian kernel for classiÿcation and regression.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Shao and Q. Jiang, “A new class of bessel kernel functions for support vector machine,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 5357–5364, 2024. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10381694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Li, X. Liu, J. Dai, J. Chen and H. Fujita, “Measures of uncertainty based on Gaussian kernel for a fully fuzzy information system,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 196, pp. 105791, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2020.105791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.-T. Lin and C.-J. Lin, 2003, “A study on sigmoid kernels for SVM and the training of non-PSD kernels by SMO-type methods,” Neural Computation.
   Google Scholar
• M. Ester, H.-P. Kriegel and X. Xu, n.d. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise.
   Google Scholar
• N. Gholizadeh, H. Saadatfar and N. Hanafi, “K-DBSCAN: an improved DBSCAN algorithm for big data,” The Journal of Supercomputing, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 6214–6235, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s11227-020-03524-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. T. Liu, K. M. Ting and Z.-H. Zhou, “Isolation Forest,” in 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. Pisa, Italy: IEEE, 2008, pp. 413–422. DOI: 10.1109/ICDM.2008.17.
   Google Scholar
• I. Amalou, N. Mouhni and A. Abdali, “Multivariate time series prediction by RNN architectures for energy consumption forecasting,” Energy Reports, Technologies and Materials for Renewable Energy, Environment and Sustainability, vol. 8, pp. 1084–1091, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.07.139.
   Google Scholar
• J. Chung, C. Gulcehre, K. Cho and Y. Bengio, 2014. Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1412.3555.
   Google Scholar