REFERENCES
- Adlong, W. (2013). Rethinking the Talloires Declaration. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 14(1), 56–70. doi:10.1108/14676371311288958
- Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., … Wittrock, M.C. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Longman.
- Biggs, J.B. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32, 347–364.
- Bloom, B.S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals—Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: McKay.
- Bloom, B.S., Hastings, J.T., & Madaus, G.F. (1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
- Buissink-Smith, N., Mann, S., & Shephard, K. (2011). How do we measure affective learning in HE? Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 5, 101–114.
- Council of the European Union. (2010, November 18–19). Council conclusions on education for sustainable development. 3,046th Education, Youth, Culture and Sport Council meeting, Brussels, Belgium. Retrieved from http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/educ/117839.pdf
- Draper, S. (2005). Taxonomies of learning aims and objectives: Bloom, neo-Bloom, and criticisms. Retrieved http://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/∼steve/best/bloom.html
- Entman, R.M. (1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.
- European Commission. (2013). Improving the quality of teaching and learning in Europe's HE institutions. European Commission High Level Group on the Modernization of HE Report. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/education/library/reports/modernization_en.pdf
- Facione, P.A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction: Research findings and recommendations. Newark, DE: American Philosophical Association.
- Fisher, W.R. (1984). Narration as human communication paradigm: The case of public moral argument. Communication Monographs, 51, 1–22.
- Gamson, W.A., & Lasch, K.E. (1983). The political culture of social welfare policy. In S.E. Spiro & E. Yuchtman-Yaar (Eds.), Evaluating the welfare state (pp. 397–415). New York, NY: Academic Press.
- Hargreaves, T. (2012). Questioning the virtues of pro-environmental behaviour research: Towards a phronetic approach. Geoforum, 43, 315–324.
- Huitt, W., & Cain, S. (2005). An overview of the conative domain. Educational Psychology Interactive. Retrieved from http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/brilstar/chapters/conative.pdf
- Krathwohl, D., Bloom, B., & Masia. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook II: The affective domain. New York, NY: David McKay Co.
- Lakoff, G. (2006). Thinking points: Communicating our American values and vision. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
- Lackoff, G. (2010). Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 70–81.
- Mogensen, F., & Schnack, K. (2010). The action competence approach and the “new” discourses of education for sustainable development, competence and quality criteria. Environmental Education Research, 16(1), 59–74.
- O’Neill, G., & McMahon, T. (2005). Student-centred learning: What does it mean for students and lecturers? In G. O’Neill, S. Moore, & B. McMullin (Eds.), Emerging issues in the practice of university learning and teaching (pp. 27–36). Dublin, Ireland: AISHE.
- Österbergh, R., & Kronlid, D (2011). Crossing boundaries: An analytical look at Cemus' educational model. In M. Hald (Ed.), Transcending boundaries (pp. 65–77). Uppsala, Sweden: Cemus.
- Quality Assurance Agency (QAA) & HE Academy. (2013). Education for sustainable development (draft guidance for UK HE providers, for consultation). Retrieved from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/Publications/InformationAndGuidance/Ps/ESD-guidance-consultation.aspx
- Quality Assurance Agency (QAA) & HE Academy. (2014). Education for sustainable development: Guidance for UK HE providers. Retrieved from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/Publications/InformationAndGuidance/Pages/education-for-sustainable-development-guidance.aspx
- Shephard, K. (2008). HE for sustainability: Seeking affective learning outcomes. International Journal for Sustainability in HE 9, 1, 87–98.
- Sterling, S. (2011). The Future-Fit Framework. Retrieved from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/education-for-sustainable-development
- UN Conference on Environment and Development. (1992). Agenda 21. Retrieved from http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.Print.asp?DocumentID=52&ArticleID=4415&l=en
- UNESCO. (2003). Education for sustainable development. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/education/tlsf/extras/img/DESDbriefWhatisESD.pdf
- Vardi, I. (2013). Developing students’ critical thinking in the HE class. Milperra, NSW: HERDSA.