Knowledge management in sustainability research projects: Concepts, effective models, and examples in a multi-stakeholder environment

References

• Aeberhard, A., & Rist, S. (2009). Transdisciplinary co-production of knowledge in the development of organic agriculture in Switzerland. Ecological Economics, 68(4), 1171–1181. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.08.008
   Google Scholar
• Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3250961
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, A. T., & Childe, S. J. (2013). Innovation: A knowledge transfer perspective. Production Planning & Control, 24(2–3), 208–225. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2011.647875
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, P. (2009). Die zukünftige Bedeutung von Online-Lernen für lebenslanges Lernen [The coming importance of online leaning for lifelong learning]. In L. J. Issing & P. Klimsa (Eds.), Online-Lernen. Handbuch für Wissenschaft und Praxis [Online learning. Handbook for science and practice] (pp. 503–513). München, Germany: Oldenbourg,.
   Google Scholar
• Berghaus, M. (2011). Luhmann leicht gemacht. Eine Einführung in die Systemtheorie [Luhmann made easy. An introduction to the system theory]. 3rd ed. Köln, Germany: Böhlau.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2004). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burger, D. (2011). Computergestützter organisationaler Wissenstransfer und Wissensgenerierung. Ein Experteninterview basierter Forschungsansatz [Computerized organizational knowledge transfer and knowledge generation. A peer interviewing based approach]. 1st ed. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Busemann, K., & Gscheidle, C. (2011). Web 2.0: Aktive Mitwirkung verbleibt auf niedrigem Niveau. Ergebnisse der ARD/ZDF Onlinestudie 2011 [Active participation remains at a low level. Results of the online survey by ARD/ZDF 2011]. Media Perspektiven, 7–8, 360–369.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., & Schofield, N. (2006). The getting of knowledge—Guide to funding and managing applied research. Land & Water Australia (LWA). Retrieved from http://lwa.gov.au/products/pk071243
   Google Scholar
• Cash, D. W., Borck, J. C., & Patt, A. G. (2006). Countering the loading-dock approach to linking science and decision making: Comparative analysis of El Nino/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) Forecasting Systems. Science, Technology & Human Values, 31(4), 465–494. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0162243906287547
   Google Scholar
• Cash, D. W., Clark, W. C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N. M., Eckley, N., Guston, D. H., Mitchell, R. B. (2003). Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(14), 8086–8091. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231332100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CWA 14924–Part 1–5. (2004). European guide to good practice in knowledge management—Part 1–5. Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization (CEN).
   Google Scholar
• Enengel, B., Muhar, A., Penker, M., Freyer, B., Drlik, S., & Ritter, F. (2012). Co-production of knowledge in transdisciplinary doctoral theses on landscape development—An analysis of actor roles and knowledge types in different research phases. Landscape and Urban Planning, 105(1–2), 106–117. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.004
   Google Scholar
• Frankenberger, E., & Birkhofer, H. (1995, November). Creativity in design practice—Empirical investigations in industry. In W. E. Eder (Ed.), International Workshop: Engineering Design and Creativity (pp. 16–18). Pilsen, Czech Republic: State Scientific Library.
   Google Scholar
• Garvin, D. A. (1993). Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 78–91.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., Limoges, H., Nowotny, H., Schwartzmann, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge—The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Godemann, J. (2008). Knowledge integration: A key challenge for transdisciplinary cooperation. Environmental Education Research, 14(6), 625–641. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504620802469188
   Google Scholar
• Grießhammer, R., Jahn, T., Korbun, T., Kraemer, R. A., Leggewie, C., Renn, O., Zahrnt, A. (2012). Understanding—evaluating—shaping. Transdisciplinary knowledge for a sustainable society. Retrieved from http://www.fona.de/mediathek/pdf/soef-Memorandum_2012_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hanschitz, R.-C., Schmidt, E., & Schwarz, G. (2009). Transdisziplinarität in Forschung und Praxis: Chancen und Risiken partizipativer Prozesse (1st ed.) [Transdisciplinarity in research and practice: Opportunities and threats of participated processes]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Hasler Roumois, U. (2007). Studienbuch Wissensmanagement. Grundlagen der Wissensarbeit in Wirtschafts-, Non-Profit- und Public-Organisationen [Knowledge Management – A students' handbook. Principles of knowledge work in business, nonprofit, and public organizations]. Zürich, Switzerland: Orell Füssli.
   Google Scholar
• Hessels, L. K., & van Lente, H. (2008). Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda. Research Policy, 37(4), 740–760. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.008
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch Hadorn, G., Bradley, D., Pohl, C., Rist, S., & Wiesmann, U. (2006). Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research. Ecological Economics, 60(1), 119–128. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.002
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch Hadorn, G., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Joye, D., Pohl, C., … Zemp, E. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschulrektorenkonferenz (HRK) (Eds.). (2010). HRK-Handreichungen. Herausforderung Web 2.0. Beiträge zur Hochschulpolitik 11/2010 [HRK-Recommendation. Challenge Web 2.0. Contributions to the higher education policy 11/2010]. Retrieved from http://www.hrk.de/fileadmin/redaktion/hrk/02-Dokumente/02–06-Hochschulsystem/Hochschulpakt/Endfassung_Handreichung_Web_2.0_01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jantsch, E. (1970). Inter- and Transdisciplinary University: A systems approach to education and innovation. Policy Sciences, 1(1), 403–428. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00145222
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. L., & Hrynkow, S. (2011). Funding agencies and transdisciplinary research. In M. Kirst, N. Schaefer-McDaniel, S. Hwang, & P. O'Campo (Eds.), Converging disciplines (pp. 149–160). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N., Blackey, H., Fitzgibbon, K., & Chew, E. (2010). Get out of MySpace! Computers & Education, 54(3), 776–782. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.008
   Google Scholar
• Kahnwald, N. (2012). Informelles Lernen in virtuellen Gemeinschaften. Nutzungspraktiken zwischen Information und Partizipation [Informal learning in virtual communities. Practices in use of information and participation]. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Kahnwald, N., Albrecht, S., Herbst, S., Stark, A., Weller, A., & Köhler, T. (2010). Informal learning in formal contexts? An empirical assessment of the potential role of PLEs in higher education. Retrieved from http://pleconference.citilab.eu
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, D. B., Köhler, T., Weith, T., Gaasch, N., Rogga, S., Strauss, C., & Zscheischler, J. (2012). Informations- und Wissensmanagement im nachhaltigen Landmanagement. Konzeptionelle Grundlagen für die umsetzungsorientierte Forschung [Information and knowledge management in Sustainable Land Management. Conceptual principles for the implementation-oriented research]. Discussion paper, ZALF, Müncheberg. Retrieved from http://d-nb.info/1025695089/34
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, A., & Kasztler, A. (2009). Differences in publication and dissemination practices between disciplinary and transdisciplinary science and the consequences for research evaluation. Science and Public Policy. 36(3), 215–227. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/030234209×427121
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. T. (2008). Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. A literature review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(2S), 116–123. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.010
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, T., Kahnwald, N., & Reitmaier, M. (2008). Lehren und Lernen mit Multimedia und Internet [Teaching and learning with multimedia and internet]. In B. Batinic & M. Appel (Eds.), Medienpsychologie. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, T., Neumann, J., & Saupe, V. (2010). Organisation des Online-Lernens [Organization of online learning]. In L. J. Issing & P. Klimsa (Eds.), Online-Lernen. Ein Handbuch für das Lernen mit Internet [Online learning. A handbook for internet-based learning] (pp. 229–242). München, Germany: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, D. Z. (2000). Organizational learning and the transfer of knowledge: An investigation of quality improvement. Organization Science, 11(6), 630–647. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.6.630.12535
   Google Scholar
• Lyytimäki, J., Assmuth, T., & Hildén, M. (2009). Communicating chemical risks for social learning: Findings from an expert opinion survey. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 8(3–4), 174–183. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15330150903269308
   Google Scholar
• Mauser, W., Klepper, G., Rice, M., Schmalzbauer, B. S., Hackmann, H., Leemans, R., & Moore, H. (2013). Transdisciplinary global change research: The co-creation of knowledge for sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(3–4), 420–431. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.001
   Google Scholar
• McKeown, R., & Day, B.A. (2015). The United Nations decade of education for sustainable development: What it accomplished and where next? Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 14(2), 65–66. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2015.1016855
   Google Scholar
• Millar, C. C. J. M., & Choi, C. J. (2003). Advertising and knowledge intermediaries: Managing the ethical challenges of intangibles. Journal of Business Ethics, 48(3), 267–277. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25075183
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), 27–43. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033–2909.103.1.27
   Google Scholar
• Muthusamy, S. K., & White, M. A. (2005). Learning and knowledge transfer in strategic alliances: A social exchange view. Organization Studies, 26(3), 415–441. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0170840605050874
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. How Japanese companies create the dynamics of information. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, K. (2011). Wissensorientierte Unternehmensführung. Wertschöpfung durch Wissen [Knowledge management. Added value through knowledge]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Gabler Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2003). Introduction: ‘Mode 2’ revisited: The new production of knowledge. Minerva, 41(3), 179–194. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1025505528250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2012). Knowledge networks and markets in the life sciences. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Paulin, D., & Suneson, K. (2012). Knowledge transfer, knowledge sharing and knowledge barriers—Three blurry terms in KM. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(1), 81–91.
   Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259–280. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468–2370.2007.00225.x
   Google Scholar
• Pohl, C. (2008). From science to policy through transdisciplinary research. Environmental Science & Policy, 11(1), 46–53. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468–2370.2007.00225.x
   Google Scholar
• Polk, M., & Knutsson, P. (2008). Participation, value rationality and mutual learning in transdisciplinary knowledge production for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 14(6), 643–653. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504620802464841
   Google Scholar
• Probst, G., Raub, S., & Romhardt, K. (2006). Wissen managen. Wie Unternehmen ihre wertvollste Ressource optimal nutzen [Manage knowledge. How companies use their most valuable resource optimally]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Betriebswirtschaftlicher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Rogga, S., Weith, T., & Müller, K. (2012). Inter- und Transdisziplinarität im Nachhaltigen Landmanagement. Definitionsansätze, Potenziale und Handlungsrahmen [Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in Sutainable Land Management. Definition approaches, capabilities and framework]. Discussion paper, ZALF, Müncheberg. Retrieved from http://d-nb.info/1025031741/34
   Google Scholar
• Römer, A., Weißhahn, G., Hacker, W., Pache, M., & Lindemann, U. (2001). Effort-saving product representations in design—Results of a questionnaire survey. Design Studies, 22(6), 473–491.
   Google Scholar
• Rubenstein-Montano, B., Liebowitz, J., Buchwalter, J., McCaw, D., Newman, B., & Rebeck, K. (2001). A systems thinking framework for knowledge management. Decision Support Systems, 31(1), 5–16. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167–9236(00)00116–0
   Google Scholar
• Saywell, D., & Cotton, A. (1999). Spreading the word: Practical guidelines for research dissemination strategies. Loughborough , UK: Water, Engineering and Development Centre (WEDC), Loughborough University.
   Google Scholar
• Schartinger, D., Rammer, C., Fischer, M. M., & Froehlich, J. (2002). Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: Sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy, 31(3), 303–328. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048–7333(01)00111–1
   Google Scholar
• Schulmeister, R. (2008). Gibt es eine Net Generation? Widerlegung einer Mystifizierung [Is there a net generation? Refuting a mystification]. In S. Seehusen, U. Lucke, & S. Fischer (Eds.), DeLFI 2008: Die 6. E-Learning Fachtagung Informatik der Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V (pp. 15–28). Bonn, Germany: Gesellschaft für Informatik.
   Google Scholar
• Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization (1st ed.). New York, NY: Doubleday/Currency.
   Google Scholar
• Stiftung Warentest. (2011). E-Learning. Elektronisches Lernen heute–von Lernsoftware auf CD-ROM bis zu sozialen Medien. Leitfaden Weiterbildung [E-Learning. Electronic learning today – from educational software on CD-ROM to social media. Guide training]. Berlin, Germany: Stiftung Warentest.
   Google Scholar
• The Federal Government. (2012). National sustainable development strategy. Retrieved from http://www.bundesregierung.de/Content/DE/_Anlagen/Nachhaltigkeit-wiederhergestellt/2012–06–07-fortschrittsbericht-2012-englisch-barrierefrei.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
   Google Scholar
• Tress, G., Tress, B., & Fry, G. (2005). Clarifying integrative research concepts in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology, 20(4), 479–493. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980–004–3290–4
   Google Scholar
• Visser, W. (1994). Organisation of design activities: Opportunistic, with hierarchical episodes. Interacting with Computers, 6(3), 239–274. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0953–5438%2894%2990015–9
   Google Scholar
• Weigel, M., James, C., & Gardner, H. (2009). Learning: Peering backward and looking forward in the digital era. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(1), 1–18. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/ijlm.2009.0005
   Google Scholar
• Wohlgemuth, A. (1993). Moderation in Organisationen [Facilitation in organizations]. Stuttgart, Germany: Haupt.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, A. (1993). Wer moderieren will, muß Maß nehmen und Maß geben [Who wants to moderate, has to take the measurements and to provide tailor-made solutions]. In A. Wohlgemuth (Ed.), Moderation in Organisationen [Facilitation in organizations] (pp. 17–53). Stuttgart, Germany: Haupt.
   Google Scholar
• Zscheischler, J., & Rogga, S. (2015). Transdisciplinarity in land use science—A review of concepts, empirical findings and current practices. Futures, 65, 28–44. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.005
   Google Scholar