Increasing teacher confidence in teaching and technology use through vicarious experiences within an environmental education context

References

• Albion, P. R. (2001). Some factors in the development of self-efficacy beliefs for computer use among teacher education students. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(3), 321–347.
   Google Scholar
• American Forest Foundation. (2014). Project learning tree: Mission, goals, and governance. Retrieved from https://www.plt.org/mission-goals-governance
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bautista, N. U. (2011). Investigating the use of vicarious and mastery experiences in influencing early childhood education majors' self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22, 333–349.
   Google Scholar
• Bebell, D., O'Dwyer, L. M., Russell, M., & Hoffmann, T. (2010). Concerns, considerations, and new ideas for data collection and research in educational technology studies. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(1), 29–52.
   Google Scholar
• Bleicher, R. E., & Lindgren, J. (2005). Success in science learning and preservice science teaching self-efficacy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16, 205–225.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D., & Warschauer, M. (2006). From the university to the elementary classroom: Students' experiences in learning to integrate technology in instruction. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(3), 599–621.
   Google Scholar
• Brzycki, D., & Dudt, K. (2005). Overcoming barriers to technology use in teacher preparation programs. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 619–641.
   Google Scholar
• Bullock, D. (2004). Moving from theory to practice: An examination of the factors that preservice teachers encounter as the attempt to gain experience teaching with technology during filed placement experiences. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(2), 211–237.
   Google Scholar
• Council for Environmental Education. (2014). Project WILD. Retrieved from http://www.projectwild.org/
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research in Technology Education, 42(3), 255–284.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M., & Stiegelbauer, S. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York, NY: OISE/Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers' educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1499–1509.
   Google Scholar
• International Society for Technology in Education. (2008). National educational technology standards for students. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/20-14_ISTE_Standards-T_PDF.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jarrett, O. S. (1999). Science interest and confidence among preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 11(1), 49–59.
   Google Scholar
• Judge, S., & O'Bannon, B. (2008). Faculty integration of technology in teacher preparation: Outcomes of a development model. Technology, pedagogy and education, 17(1), 17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, C., Kim, M. K., Lee, C., Spector, J. M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 76–85.
   Google Scholar
• Kind, S. (2009). A conflict in your head: An exploration of trainee science teachers' subject matter knowledge development and its impact on teacher self-confidence. International Journal of Science Education, 31(11), 1529–1562.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, J., Gong, Y., & Cuper, P. (2008). Technology, transfer and teaching: The impact of a single technology course on preservice teachers' computer attitudes and ability. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(4), 385–410.
   Google Scholar
• Lumpe, A.T., & Chambers, E. (2001). Assessing teachers' context beliefs about technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(1), 93–197.
   Google Scholar
• Maddox, J. E. (2011). Self-efficacy: The power of believing you can. In S. Lopez & C. Snyder (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 335–344). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayo, N. B., Kajs, L. T., & Tanguma, J. (2005). Longitudinal study of technology training to prepare future teachers. Educational Research Quarterly, 29(1), 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teacher College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Kereluik, K. (2009). The song remains the same: Looking back to the future of educational technology. TechTrends, 54(5), 48–53.
   Google Scholar
• Moseley, C. (2000). Teaching for environmental literacy. The Clearing House, 74(1), 23–24.
   Google Scholar
• O'Hearn, G.T. (1972). Environmental education: The new scientific literacy. NASSP Bulletin, 56(360), 21–27.
   Google Scholar
• Orr, D. W. (1992). Ecological literacy: Education and the transition to a postmodern world. Albany, NY: Suny Press.
   Google Scholar
• Redmann, D. H., & Kotrlik, J. W. (2004). Analysis of technology integration in the teaching-learning process in selected career and technical education programs. Journal of Vocational Education Research, 29(1), 3–25.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, S. M., Morrison, G. R., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Educational technology research past and present: Balancing: rigor and relevance to impact school learning. Contemporary Educational Technology, 1(1), 17–35.
   Google Scholar
• Smarkola, C. (2007). Technology acceptance predictors among student teachers and experienced classroom teachers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 37(31), 65–82.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, S. R. (2011). The preservice technology training experiences of novice teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(1), 39–47.
   Google Scholar
• Tanguma, J., Underwood, D., & Mayo, N. (2004, February). A validation study of the Technology and Teaching Efficacy Scale. Southeast Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Dallas, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Thieman, G. Y. (2008). Using technology as a tool for learning and developing 21st century citizenship skills: An examination of the NETS and technology use by preservice teachers with their K-12 students. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(4), 342–366.
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 944–956.
   Google Scholar
• Wachira, P., & Keengwe, J. (2011). Technology integration barriers: Urban school mathematics teacher's perspectives. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(1), 17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, W., & Piper, D. (2003). The relationship between leadership, self-efficacy, computer experience, attitudes, and teachers' implementation of computers in the classroom. In C. Crawford, D. Willis, R. Carlsen, I. Gibson, K. McFerrin, J. Price, & R. Weber (Eds.), Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology in Teacher Education (pp. 1057–1060). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., & Bryant, F. L. (2007). Can teacher technology integration training alone lead to high levels of technology integration? A qualitative look at teacher's technology integration after state mandated technology training. Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 5(1), 53–62.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, G., Zhang, Z., & Li, Y. (2011). Are secondary preservice teachers well prepared to teach with technology? A case study from China. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(6), 943–960.
   Google Scholar