Preaching to the converted? Designing wildlife gardening programs to engage the unengaged

References

• Chamberlain, D. E., Cannon, A. R., & Toms, M. P. (2004). Associations of garden birds with gradients in garden habitat and local habitat. Ecography, 27, 589–600.
   Google Scholar
• Collinge, S. K. (1996). Ecological consequences of habitat fragmentation: Implications for landscape architecture and planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 36(1), 59–77.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, R., & Webber, L. (2004). Enjoying our backyard buddies—Social research informing the practice of mainstream community education for the conservation of urban wildlife. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 20(1), 77–87.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Z. G., Fuller, R. A., Loram, A., Irvine, K. N., Sims, V., & Gaston, K. J. (2009). A national scale inventory of resource provision for biodiversity within domestic gardens. Biological Conservation, 142(4), 761–771.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• French, K., Major, R., & Hely, K. (2005). Use of native and exotic garden plants by suburban nectarivorous birds. Biological Conservation, 121, 545–559.
   Google Scholar
• Grose, M. (2009). Changing relationships in public open space and private open space in suburbs in south-western Australia. Landscape and Urban Planning, 92, 53–63.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, T. (2007). Where have all the gardens gone? An investigation into the disappearance of back yards in the newer Australian suburb. Urban Research Program, Research Paper 13. Brisbane, Australia: Griffith University.
   Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A. (1999). Survey Research. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 537–567.
   Google Scholar
• Loram, A., Tratalos, J., Warren, P. H., & Gaston, K. J. (2007). Urban domestic gardens (X): The extent and structure of the resource in five major cities. Landscape Ecology, 22, 601–615.
   Google Scholar
• Luck, G. (2008). Conserving backyard biodiversity. Science Alert. Retrieved from http://www.sciencealert.com.au/opinions/20081504-17185-2.html
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals' feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 503–515.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie-Mohr, D. (2011). Fostering sustainable behavior: An introduction to community-based social marketing. BC, Canada: New Society Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, K. K., Brown, P. R., & Temby, I. (1999). Attitudes towards possums: A need for education? The Victorian Naturalist, 116(4), 120–127.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, W. L. (2000). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, J., & Matarasso, M. (2005). Targeting behavior: Participatory curriculum development for community-based environmental education in Vietnam. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 4(4), 325337.
   Google Scholar
• Rohde, C. L. E., & Kendle, A. D. (1997). Nature for people. In T. Kendle & S. Forbes (Eds.), Urban nature conservation: Landscape management in the urban countryside (pp. 319–335). London, UK: E & FN Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Rudd, H., Vala, J., & Schaefer. V. (2002). Importance of backyard habitat in a comprehensive biodiversity conservation strategy: A connectivity analysis of urban green spaces. Restoration Ecology, 10(2), 368–375.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, A., Miller, K., & Wescott, G. (2013). Wildlife gardening and connectedness to nature: Engaging the Unengaged. Environmental Values, 22, 483–502.
   Google Scholar
• Trusov, M., Bucklin, R. E., & Pauwels, K. (2009). Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: Findings from an Internet social networking site. Journal of Marketing, 73, 90–102.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2012). World urbanization prospects, the 2011 revision. New York, NY: Author. Retrieved from http://esa.un.org/unup/Wallcharts/urban-rural-areas.pdf
   Google Scholar