Road to collaboration: Experiential learning theory as a framework for environmental education program development

References

• Association for Experiential Education (AEE). (2012). What is experiential education? Retrieved from https://www.aee.org/what-is-ee
   Google Scholar
• Angrosino, M. V., & Mays de Pérez, K. A. (2000). Rethinking observation: From method to context. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 673–702). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Behrendt, M., & Franklin, T. (2014). A review of research on school field trips and their value in education. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 9(3), 235–245.
   Google Scholar
• Bratman, G. N., Daily, G. C., Levy, B. J., & Gross, J. J. (2015). The benefits of nature experience: Improved affect and cognition. Landscape and Urban Planning, 138, 41–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Colburn, A. (2000). Constructivism: Science education’s “grand unifying theory”. The Clearing House, 74(1), 9–12. doi:10.1080/00098655.2000.11478630
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, S. K., Passmore, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Learning on zoo field trips: The interaction of the agendas and practices of students, teachers, and zoo educators. Science Education, 94, 122–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Miranda, M. A. (2004). The grounding of a discipline: Cognition and instruction in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14(1), 61–77. doi:10.1023/B:ITDE.0000007363.44114.3b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWitt, J., & Storksdieck, M. (2008). A short review of school field trips: Key findings from the past and implications for the future. Visitor Studies, 11(2), 181–197. doi:10.1080/10645570802355562
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Collier Books. doi:10.1086/ahr/70.1.96
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, J., Morris, M., O’Donnell, L., Reid, A., Rickinson, M., & Scott, W. (2006). Engaging and learning with the outdoors—The final report of the outdoor classroom in a rural context action research project. Slough, Berkshire, UK: National Foundation for Education Research.
   Google Scholar
• Eaton, S. E. (2010). Formal, non-formal and nonformal learning: The case of literacy, essential skills, and language learning in Canada. Calgary: Eaton International Consulting Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst, J. (2014). Early childhood educators’ use of natural outdoor settings as learning environments: An exploratory study of beliefs, practices, and barriers. Environmental Education Research, 20(6), 735–752. doi:10.1080/13504622.2013.833596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, C. M., Buddle, C. M., & Soluk, L. (2014). The value of introducing natural history field research into undergraduate curricula: A case study. Bioscience Education, doi:10.11120/beej.2014.00023
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J., & Dierking, L. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitors experiences and the making of meaning. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, J. T. (2001). Experiential learning: A theoretical critique from five perspectives. ERIC Information Series No. 385.
   Google Scholar
• Gribbons, B., & Herman, J. (1997). True and quasi-experimental designs. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 5(14), 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, J. G., & Klebba, J. M. (2011). Experiential learning: A course design process for critical thinking. American Journal of Business Education (AJBE), 4(12), 1–12. doi:10.19030/ajbe.v4i12.6608
   Google Scholar
• Hester, J. (2017). How much are trees worth to megacities? Retrieved from https://www.citylab.com/environment/2017/08/how-much-are-trees-worth-to-megacities/537972/
   Google Scholar
• Jose, S., Patrick, P. G., & Moseley, C. (2017). Experiential learning theory: The importance of outdoor classrooms in environmental education. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 7(3), 269–284. doi:10.1080/21548455.2016.1272144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp, D. (2000). Memorable experiences of a science field trip. School Science and Mathematics, 100(2), 65–72. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb17238.x
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193–212. doi:10.5465/amle.2005.17268566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2012). Experiential learning theory. In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 1215–1219). Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning as the science of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. G. (1992). The practicality of theory. Journal of Experiential Education, 15(2), 24–28. doi:10.1177/105382599201500204
   Google Scholar
• Kossack, A., & Bogner, F. X. (2012). How does a one-day environmental education programme support individual connectedness with nature? Journal of Biological Education, 46(3), 180–187. doi:10.1080/00219266.2011.634016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krepel, W. J., & Duvall, C. R. (1981). Field trips: A guideline for planning and conducting educational experiences. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kyndt, E., Dochy, F., & Nijs, H. (2009). Learning conditions for non-formal and nonformal workplace learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 21(5), 369–383. doi:10.1108/13665620910966785
   Google Scholar
• Lonergan, N. & Andreson, L. (1988). Field-based education: Some theoretical considerations. Higher Education Research and Development, 7(63), 77.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, S. C. (2003). The influence of outdoor schoolyard experiences on students' environmental knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and comfort levels. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 15(2), 51–63. doi:10.1007/BF03173843
   Google Scholar
• Meredith, J. E., Fortner, R. W., & Mullins, G. W. (1997). Model of affective learning for nonformal science education facilities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(8), 805–818. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199710)34:8<805::AID-TEA4>3.3.CO;2-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michie, M. (1998). Factors influencing secondary science teachers to organise and conduct field trips. Australian Science Teacher’s Journal, 44, 43–50.
   Google Scholar
• Miglietta, A. M., Belmonte, G., & Boero, F. (2008). A summative evaluation of science learning: A case study of the marine biology museum “Pietro Parenzan” (South East Italy). Visitor Studies, 11(2), 213–219. doi:10.1080/10645570802355984
   Google Scholar
• Moseley, C., Desjean-Perrotta, B., & Utley, J. (2010). The draw-an-environment test rubric (DAET-R): Exploring preservice teachers’ mental models of the environment. Journal of Environmental Education Research, 16(2), 189–208. doi:10.1080/13504620903548674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North American Association for Environmental Education. (2004). Guidelines for the preparation and professional development of environmental educators. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Orion, N., & Hofstein, A. (1994). Factors that influence learning during a scientific field trip in a natural environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(10), 1097–1119. doi:10.1002/tea.3660311005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1966). The psychology of intelligence. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams, and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Palmberg, I. E., & Kuru, K. (2000). Outdoor activities as a basis for environmental responsibility. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(4), 32–36. doi:10.1080/00958960009598649
   Google Scholar
• Pedretti, E. G. (2002). T. Kuhn meets T. Rex: Critical conversations and new directions in science centers and science museums. Studies in Science Education, 37(1), 1–42. doi:10.1080/03057260208560176
   Google Scholar
• Pratton, J., & Hales, L. W. (2015). The effects of active participation on student learning. The Journal of Educational Research, 79(4), 210–215. doi:10.1080/00220671.1986.10885679
   Google Scholar
• Prokop, P., Tuncer, G., & Kvasnicak, R. (2007). Short-term effects of field programme on students’ knowledge and attitude toward biology: A Slovak experience. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(3), 247–255. doi:10.1007/s10956-007-9044-8
   Google Scholar
• Rickinson, M., Dillon, J., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2004). A review of research on outdoor learning. Shrewsbury, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research and King's College London.
   Google Scholar
• Rennie, L. J., Feher, E., Dierking, L. D., & Falk, J. H. (2003). Toward an agenda for advancing research on science learning in out‐of‐school settings. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 112–120. doi:10.1002/tea.10067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storksdieck, M. (2001). Differences in teachers’ and students’ museum field-trip experiences. Visitor Studies Today, 4(1), 8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Tal, R. (2004). Using a field trip to a wetland as a guide for conceptual understanding in environmental education: A case study of a pre-service teacher’s research. Chemistry Education: Research & Practice, 5(2), 127–142. doi:10.1039/B4RP90016B
   Google Scholar
• Tal, T., & Morag, O. (2009). Reflective practice as a means for preparing to teach outdoors in an ecological garden. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(3), 245–262. doi:10.1007/s10972-009-9131-1
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1992). Action research in higher education: Examples and reflections. London, UK: Kogan Page Limited.
   Google Scholar