Visitor perceptions of the outcomes of personal interpretation in Alberta’s Provincial Parks

References

• Ainley, M., & Ainley, J. (2011). Student engagement with science in early adolescence: The contribution of enjoyment to students’ continuing interest in learning about science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 4–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1989). Attitude structure and behavior. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Beckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 241–274). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta‐analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., & Falk, J. (2011). Visitors’ learning for environmental sustainability: Testing short- and long-term impacts of wildlife tourism experiences using structural equation modelling. Tourism Management, 32(6), 1243–1252. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2010.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., & Sutherland, L. A. (2011). Visitors’ memory of wildlife tourism: Implications for the design of powerful interpretive experiences. Tourism Management, 32(4), 770–779. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2010.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrie, E., & Knapp, D. (1998). Ecology versus issue interpretation: The analysis of two different messages. Journal of Interpretation Research, 3(1), 21–38.
   Google Scholar
• Coghlan, A., & Kim, A. K. (2012). Interpretive layering in nature-based tourism: A simple approach for complex attractions. Journal of Ecotourism, 11(3), 173–187.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, D. N. (1998). Written appeals for attention to low-impact messages on wilderness trailside boards: Experimental evaluations of effectiveness. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 16(1), 65–79.
   Google Scholar
• Deshpande, A., & Verma, V. (2013). Effect of laughter therapy on happiness and life satisfaction among elderly. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(1), 153.
   Google Scholar
• Ham, S. H. (2009). From interpretation to protection: Is there a theoretical basis? Journal of Interpretation Research, 14(2), 49–57.
   Google Scholar
• Ham, S. H., & Weiler, B. (2007). Isolating the role of on-site interpretation in a satisfying experience. Journal of Interpretation Research, 12(2), 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hassed, C. (2001). How humour keeps you well. Australian Family Physician, 30(1), 25–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hinton, C., Miyamoto, K., & Della‐Chiesa, B. (2008). Brain research, learning and emotions: Implications for education research, policy and practice. European Journal of Education, 43(1), 87–103. doi:10.1111/j.1465-3435.2007.00336.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintzman, D. L. (1976). Repetition and memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 10, 47–91.
   Google Scholar
• Hofman, K., & Hughes, K. (2018). Protecting the Great Barrier Reef: Impact of a conservation documentary and post-viewing strategies on long-term conservation behaviour. Environmental Education Research, 24(4), 521–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, K., Packer, J., & Ballantyne, R. (2011). Using post-visit action resources to support family conservation learning following a wildlife tourism experience. Environmental Education Research, 17(3), 307–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hvenegaard, G. T. (2017). Visitors’ perceived impacts of interpretation on knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral intentions at Miquelon Lake Provincial Park, Alberta, Canada. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 17(1), 79–90. doi:10.1177/1467358416634157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hvenegaard, G. T., & Shultis, J. (2016). The role of interpretation. In P. Dearden, R. Rollins, & M. Needham (Eds.), Parks and protected areas in Canada: Planning and management (4th ed., pp. 141–169). Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• IBM Corporation. (2010). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 19.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, A. K., Airey, D., & Szivas, E. (2011). The multiple assessment of interpretation effectiveness: Promoting visitors’ environmental attitudes and behavior. Journal of Travel Research, 50(3), 321–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlejohn, K., Needham, M. D., Szuster, B. W., & Jordan, E. J. (2016). Pre-trip expectations and post-trip satisfaction with marine tour interpretation in Hawaii: Applying the norm activation model. The Journal of Environmental Education, 47(3), 202–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louv, R. (2008). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. New York, NY: Algonquin Books of Chapel Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Macklin, E. K., Hvenegaard, G. T., & Johnson, P. E. (2010). Improvisational theater games for children in park interpretation. Journal of Interpretation Research, 15(1), 7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, R. E. (2011). Studies in outdoor recreation: Search and research for satisfaction (3rd ed.). Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University.
   Google Scholar
• Marion, J. L., & Reid, S. E. (2007). Minimising visitor impacts to protected areas: The efficacy of low impact education programmes. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 15(1), 5–27.
   Google Scholar
• Mora, C. F. (2000). Foreign language acquisition and melody singing. ELT Journal, 54(2), 146–152. doi:10.1093/elt/54.2.146
   Google Scholar
• Moscardo, G., & Pearce, P. L. (1986). Visitor centers and environmental interpretation: An exploration of the relationships among visitor enjoyment, understanding and mindfulness. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6(2), 89–108.
   Google Scholar
• Nisker, J., Martin, D. K., Bluhm, R., & Daar, A. S. (2006). Theatre as a public engagement tool for health-policy development. Health Policy, 78(2–3), 258–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packer, J. (2006). Learning for fun: The unique contribution of educational leisure experiences. Curator: The Museum Journal, 49(3), 329–344. doi:10.1111/j.2151-6952.2006.tb00227.x
   Google Scholar
• Powell, R. B., & Ham, S. H. (2008). Can ecotourism interpretation really lead to pro-conservation knowledge, attitudes and behaviour? Evidence from the Galapagos Islands. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 16(4), 467–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Province of Alberta. (2000). Provincial Parks Act, revised statutes of Alberta 2000, Chapter P-35. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Queen’s Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, C. E., & Rickson, R. E. (1976). Environmental knowledge and attitudes. The Journal of Environmental Education, 8(1), 10–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, Q., & Folta, E. (2016). Evaluating environmental interpretation with mixed method. Journal of Interpretation Research, 21(2), 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Rossiter, K., Kontos, P., Colantonio, A., Gilbert, J., Gray, J., & Keightley, M. (2008). Staging data: Theatre as a tool for analysis and knowledge transfer in health research. Social Science & Medicine, 66(1), 130–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schliephack, J., Moyle, B., & Weiler, B. (2013). Visitor expectations of contact with staff at a protected site. Annals of Leisure Research, 16(2), 160–174.
   Google Scholar
• Skibins, J. C., Powell, R. B., & Stern, M. J. (2012). Exploring empirical support for interpretation’s best prices. Journal of Interpretation Research, 17(1), 25–44.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995). The new ecological paradigm in social-psychological context. Environment and Behavior, 27(6), 723–743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, M. J., & Powell, R. B. (2013). What leads to better visitor outcomes in live interpretation? Journal of Interpretation Research, 18(2), 9–43.
   Google Scholar
• Tarlton, J. L., & Ward, C. J. (2006). The effect of thematic interpretation on a child's knowledge of an interpretive program. Journal of Interpretation Research, 11(1), 7–33.
   Google Scholar
• Tilden, F. (1977). Interpreting our heritage (3rd ed.). Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, P. G. (2013). Theorising visitor learning in ecotourism. Journal of Ecotourism, 12(1), 15–32. doi:10.1080/14724049.2012.742093
   Google Scholar
• Wanzer, M. B., & Frymier, A. B. (1999). The relationship between student perceptions of instructor humor and students’ reports of learning. Communication Education, 48(1), 48–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wearing, S., & Neil, J. (2009). Ecotourism: Impacts, potentials and possibilities? Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Weiler, B., & Ham, S. H. (2010). Development of a research instrument for evaluating the visitor outcomes of face-to-face interpretation. Visitor Studies, 13(2), 187–205.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, P. A., & Matthews, C. (2015). Building a culture of conservation: Research findings and research priorities on connecting people to nature in parks. Parks Journal, 21(2), 11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Zeppel, H. (2008). Education and conservation benefits of marine wildlife tours: Developing free-choice learning experiences. The Journal of Environmental Education, 39(3), 3–18. doi:10.3200/JOEE.39.3.3-18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar