Trends in Research into Gifted and Talented Education in England

References

• Achter, J. A., Benbow C. P., & Lubinski, D. (1997). Rethinking multipotentiality among the intellectually gifted: A critical review and recommendations. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41, 5–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beardon, T., Jared, L., & Way, J. (1999). Mathematics enrichment for gifted students – NRICH, the online maths club. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 8 (2), 20–26.
   Google Scholar
• Benbow, C. P. & Stanley, J. C. (1996). Inequity in equity: How “equity” can lead to inequity for high potential students. Psychology Public Policy, and Law, 2, 258–272.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia (2001). The education of gifted children, Senate Employment, Workplace Relations, Small Business and Education References Committee Inquiry into the Education of Gifted and Talented Children, Canberra: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Employment (1997). Excellence in schools. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Skills (2002). Schools achieving success. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Eyre, D. (1997). Able children in ordinary schools. London: Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Eyre, D. (1999). Provision in ordinary schools: 10 years of Oxfordshire LEA’s policy and practice. Gifted and Talented International, 14, 12–20.
   Google Scholar
• Eyre, D., & Lowe, H. (Eds.) (2002). Curriculum provision for gifted pupils in the secondary school. London: David Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Eyre, D., & Marjoram, T. (1990). Enriching and extending the national curriculum. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Eyre, D., & McClure, L. (Eds.). (2001). Curriculum provision for gifted pupils in the primary school. London: David Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. (1995a). Current thinking on the development of talent. In J. Freeman, P. Span, & H. Wagner (Eds.) Actualising talent (pp. 3–19). London: Cassell Education.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. (1995b). Towards a policy of actualising talent. In J. Freeman, P. Span, & H. Wagner (Eds.) Actualising talent (pp. 174–191). London: Cassell Education.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. (1998). Educating the very able: Current international research. London: Office for Standards in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Geake, J. G. (2000). Gifted education: Why all the fuss? An evolutionary speculation. Department of Learning and Educational Development, The University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Geake, J. G. (2001). Submission 5 to the Senate Employment, Workplace Relations, Small Business and Education References Committee Inquiry into the Education of Gifted and Talented Children, The education of gifted children. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Haier, R. J., & Benbow, C. P. (1995). Sex differences and lateralisation in temporal lobe glucose metabolism during mathematical reasoning. Developmental Neuropsychology, 11, 405–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Her Majesty’s Inspector of Schools. (1992). Education observed: The education of very able children in maintained schools. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons (1999a). Third special report of the Education and Employment Committee, Highly able children. London: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons (1999b). Fourth special report of the Education and Employment Committee, Highly able children. London: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K., & Simons, H. (1999). Online mathematics enrichment: An evaluation of the NRICH project. Southampton: University of Southampton.
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, M. (1991). The dream of equal opportunity in education. In M. Goodall & B. Culhane (eds.) Teaching strategies for a clever country (pp. 11–16). Melbourne: The Australian Association for the Education of the Gifted and Talented.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, H. (2002). Excellence for all: Able pupils in urban secondary schools. Support for Learning, 17, 88–94.
   Google Scholar
• Torres, M. Martinez (2001, July). Social stands against conceptual innovations in giftedness. Paper presented at the 14th Biennial Conference of the World Council for Gifted and Talented Children, Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. (2000). Combating literacy difficulties in able underachievers. In D. Montgomery (Ed.), Able underachievers (pp. 127–149). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• O’Boyle, M. W., Benbow, C. P., & Alexander, J. E. (1995). Sex differences, hemispheric laterality, and associated brain activity in the intellectually gifted. Developmental Neuropsychology, 11, 415–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office for Standards in Education. (2001). Providing for gifted and talented pupils: An evaluation of Excellence in Cities and other grant funded projects. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Winner, E. (1996). Gifted children: Myths and realities. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar