The Importance of Challenging Tasks for Mathematically Gifted Students

References

• Australian Education Council (1991). A national statement on mathematics for Australian schools. Melbourne, Victoria: Curriculum Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Betts, G. T., & Neihart, M. (1986). Implementing self-directed learning models for the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 174–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A. L. (1998). What human beings do when they behave intelligently and how they can become more so. In Q. M. Ling & H. W. Kam (Eds.), Going beyond the surface curriculum: Thinking processes (pp. 399–408). Singapore: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Damarin, S. (2000). The mathematically able as a marked category. Gender and Education 12, 69–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diezmann, C. M., & English, L. D. (2001). Promoting the use of diagrams as tools for thinking. In A. A. Cuoco (Ed.), 2001 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Yearbook: The role of representation in school mathematics (pp. 77–89). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Diezmann, C. M., & Watters, J. J. (1997). Bright but bored: Optimising the environment for gifted children. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 22 (2), 17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Diezmann, C. M., & Watters, J. J. (2000). Catering for mathematically gifted elementary students: Learning from challenging tasks. Gifted Child Today, 23 (4), 14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Diezmann, C. M., & Watters, J. J. (2001). The collaboration of mathematically gifted students on challenging tasks. Journal for the Education of the Gifted. 25, 7–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, W. (1983). Academic work. Review of Educational Research, 53, 159–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, W. (1988). Work in mathematics classes: The context of students’ thinking during instruction. Educational Psychologist, 23, 167–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henningsen, M., & Stein, M. K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 524–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson. K. Human, P., Murray, H., Olivier, A., & Wearne, D. (1996). Problem solving as a basis for reform in curriculum and instruction: The case of mathematics. Educational Researcher, 25 (4). 12–21.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. L. (1983). Identifying and teaching mathematically gifted elementary school students. Arithmetic Teacher 30 (5). 25–26. 55-56.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. (2000). Teaching mathematics to gifted students in a mixed-ability classroom. ERIC Dijsst E591. [http://ericec.org/digests/e594.html. Accessed 24 June 2002.]
   Google Scholar
• Leinhardt, G. (1990). Capturing craft knowledge. Educational Researcher. 19 (2), 18–25.
   Google Scholar
• MacGillivray, H. (2000). Submission to the Australian science capability review. [http://www.industry.gov.au/scicncc/review/ChanceSubmissionsReviewSubs/sub60AMSCmaths.docAccessed22March2002]
   Google Scholar
• Metz, K. E. (1995). Reassessment of developmental constraints on children’s science instruction. Review of Educational Research 65, 93–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston. VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Rimm, S. B. (1997) Underachievement syndrome: A national epidemic. In N. Colangelo & G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed.) (pp. 416–437). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Romberg, T. A. (1994). Classroom instruction that fosters mathematical thinking and problem solving. In A. H. Schocnfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking and problem solving (pp. 287–304). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1992). The use of scaffolds for teaching higher-level cognitive strategies. Educational Leadership. 49 (7). 26–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheffield, L. J. (1999). Developing mathematically promising students. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, E. A., & Stein, M. K. (1996). The QUASAR project: The “Revolution of the possible” in mathematics instructional reform in urban middle schools. Urban Education, 30, 476–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal. 33, 455–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Horvarth, J. A. (1995). A prototype view of expert teaching. Educational Researcher. 24 (6), 9–17.
   Google Scholar
• VanTassel-Baska, J. (2003). What matters in curriculum for gifted learners: Reflections on theory, research and practice. In N. Colangelo & G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed.) (pp. 174–183). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar