Identifying High Academic Potential in Canadian Aboriginal Primary School Children

References

• Baldwin, A. Y., & Vialle, W. (Eds.). (1999). The many faces of giftedness: Lifting the masks. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2003). Self-efficacy. The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bowd, A. D. (2003). Identification and assessment of gifted and talented youth particularly in northern, rural and isolated communities. Thunder Bay, ON: Centre of Excellence for Children and Adolescents with Special Needs, Lakehead University.
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. E. (1981). Teacher praise: A functional analysis, Review of Educational Research, 51, 5–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budoff, M. (1987). Measures for assessing learning potential. In C. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic Assessment (pp. 173–195), New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, C. M., & Mclntire, J. (1994). Identifying outstanding talent in American Indian and Alaska Native students. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education (Javits Gifted and Talented Education Program, Office of Educational Research and Improvement).
   Google Scholar
• Chaffey, G. W. (2002). Identifying Australian Aboriginal children with high academic potential using dynamic testing. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of New England, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Chaffey, G. W., Bailey, S. B., & Vine, K. W. (2003). Identifying high academic potential in Australian Aboriginal children using dynamic testing. The Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 12 (1), 42–55.
   Google Scholar
• Chaffey, G. W. McCluskey, K. W., & Halliwell, G. (2005). Using Coolabah Dynamic Assessment to identify Canadian Aboriginal children with high potential: A cross-cultural comparison. Gifted and Talented International, 20 (2), 50–59.
   Google Scholar
• Craven, R. G., Marsh, H. W., & Debus, R. L. (1991). Effects of internally focused feedback and attributional feedback on enhancement of academic self-concept, Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 17–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., & Furby, L. (1970) How we should measure change — or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 74, 68–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1982). Learning, ‘flow’, and happiness. In R. Gross (Ed.), Invitation to life long learning (pp. 167–187). Chicago: Follet.
   Google Scholar
• de Lemos, M. M. (1989). Standard Progressive Matrices. Australian Manual, Hawthome: Jenkin Buxton Printers Pty Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Embretson, S. E. (1987). Toward development of a psychometric approach. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic Assessment (pp. 141–170), New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feldhusen, J. F. (1995). Talent identification and development in education (TIDE) (2nded.). Sarasota, FL: Centre for Creative Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Future Problem Solving Program. (2003). Future problem solving program: Opening doors to standards. Lexington, KY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Frasier, M. M. (1989). Identification of gifted Black students: Developing new perspectives. In C. J. Maker & S. W. Schiever (Eds.), Critical Issues in Gifted Education: Defensible Programs for Cultural and Ethnic Minorities (Vol. II, pp. 213–225), Austin, Texas: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Dynamic testing, Psychological Bulletin, 124 (1), 75–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, M. U. M. (1989). The pursuit of excellence or the search for intimacy? The forced-choice dilemma of gifted youth, Roeper Review, 11 (4), 189–194.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, S. G., Dorval, K. B., & Treffinger, D. J. (2000). Creative approaches to problem solving: A framework for change (2nd ed.) Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
   Google Scholar
• Kanevsky, L. (1992). The learning game. In P. Klein & A. J. Tannenbaum (Eds.). To be young and gifted (pp. 204–241). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Kanevsky, L. (2000). Dynamic assessment of gifted students. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International Handbook of Giftedness and Talent (pp. 283–295), New York: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, A. S. (1994). Intelligence testing with the WISC-III. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kitano, M. K., & Kirby, D. F. (1986). Gifted Education: A Comprehensive View, Boston: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Lidz, C. S. (Ed.). (1987).Dynamic assessment. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Lidz, C. S. (1997). Dynamic assessment approaches. In D. S. Flanagan, Genshaft, J. L., & Harrison, P. L. (Ed.), Contemporary intellectual assessment (pp. 281–296). New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lovaglia, M. J., Thompkins, D., Lucas, J., & Thye, S. (2000). The shadow of the future: How negative expectations cloud test performance. Paper presented at the Fifth Biennial Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, D. J. (1988). Raven’s Matrices in the identification of giftedness. Roeper Review, 10, 159–162.
   Google Scholar
• McCluskey, K. W. (2000). Lines in the sand: Are students with difficulties being forced from our schools? Reaching Today’s Youth, 4 (4), 28–33.
   Google Scholar
• McCluskey, K. W., Baker, P. A., O’Hagan, S. C., & Treffinger, D. J. (Eds.) (1995). Lost prizes: Talent development and problem solving with at-risk students. Sarasota, FL: Center for Creative Learning.
   Google Scholar
• McCluskey, K. W., & Torrance, E. R. (2003). Mentoring: One pathway to aboriginal talent development. In K. W. McCluskey & A. M. Mays (Eds.), Mentoring for talent development (pp. 178–195). Sioux Falls, SD: Reclaiming Youth International, Augustana College.
   Google Scholar
• McCluskey, K. W., & Treffinger, D. J. (1998). Nurturing talented but troubled children and youth. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 6 (4), 215–219, 226.
   Google Scholar
• McCluskey, K. W., & Treffinger, D. J. (Eds.). (2002). Enriching teaching and learning for talent development. Sarasota, FL: Center for Creative Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. (2003). Gifted and talented children with special educational needs: Double exceptionality. London, England: David Fulton Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard. Jr., T. J., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., Halpern, D. F., Loehlin, J. C., Perloff, R., Sternberg, R. J., & Urbina, S. (1996). Intelligence: Known and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51 (2), 77–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogbu, J. U. (1994). Understanding cultural diversity and learning. The Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 17 (4), 355–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S. (1994). Schools for talent development: A practical plan for total school improvement. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S., & Park, S. (2000). Gifted dropouts: The who and the why. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44 (4), 261–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saccuzzo, D. P., Johnson, N. E., &Guertin, T. L. (1994). Identifying underrepresented disadvantaged gifted and talented children: A multifaceted approach (Vols. 1 & 2). San Diego: San Diego State University.
   Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., & Graham, T. (1997). Helping gifted students develop metacognitive awareness, Roeper Review, 20, 4–8.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, J., Mallett, K., Greene, J., & Simard, F. (2002). Aboriginal education in Winnipeg inner city high schools. Winnipeg, Manitoba: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.
   Google Scholar
• Sisk, D. (1993). Systemic training educational programs for under-served pupils (Project Step-UP). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J., Le Rose, B., & Clasen, R. E. (1991).Underrepresentation of minority students in gifted programs: Yes! It matters, Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 81–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Social Planning Council of Winnipeg. (1999). Note on aboriginal youth educational attainment levels. Winnipeg, MB.
   Google Scholar
• Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69 (5), 797–811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Giftedness as developing expertise: A theory of the interface between high abilities and achieved excellence, High Ability Studies, 12 (2), 159–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonemah, S. A. (1992). Gifted and talented American Indian students and Alaska Native students. In P. Cahape & C. B. Howley (Eds.), Indian nations at risk: Listening to the people (pp. 81–85). Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1977). Discovery and nurturance of giftedness in the culturally different. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P., Goff, K., & Satterfield, N. B. (1998). Multicultural mentoring of the gifted and talented. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P., & Torrance, J. P. (1978). The 1977-78 future problem-solving program: Interscholastic competition and curriculum project. Journal of Creative Behavior, 12, 87–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treffinger, D. J. (1998). From gifted education to programming for talent development. Phi Delta Kappan, 79 (10), 752–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzuriel, D., & Feuerstein, R. (1992). Dynamic group assessment for prescriptive teaching: Differential effects of treatments. In H. C. Haywood & D. Tzuriel (Eds.), Interactive Assessment (pp. 187–206), New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education (1991). National education longitudinal study (NELS:88) on gifted and talented education. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar