A Survey of Korean Elementary Teachers’ Perceptions of and In-Service Needs for Gifted Education

References

• Birkett, N. J. (1986), Selecting a number of responses categories for a Likert-type scale, Presented at the annual meeting of the American Statistical Association, Section on Survey methods.
   Google Scholar
• Bransky, T. (1987). Specific program Information: A key to attitudes about the gifted education program. Gihed Child Ouarteirly, 31, 29–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breen, M. J. (1979), Teacher interest and student attitude toward four areas of elementary school curriculum. Education, 100 (1), 63–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, L. N. (1992). The needs assessment: Who needs it? Roeper Review, 15, 64–66.
   Google Scholar
• Buell, M. J. Hallam, R. & Gamel-Mccormick, M. (1999). A survey of general and special education teachers’ perceptions and inservice needs concerning inclusion, International Journal of Disability, Development and Education. 46 (2), 143–156.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, C., Cooper, C., & Glascock, R. (2003). Preparing teachers to develop and enhance talent: The position of national education organizations. (ERIC Document Services No. ED477882)
   Google Scholar
• Cashion, M., & Sullenger, K. (2002). “Contact us next year”: Tracing teachers’ use of gifted practices, Roeper Review, 23, 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, D. W. (2001). Characteristics and competencies of teachers of gifted learners: The Hong Kong teacher perspective. Roeper Review, 23, 197–202.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, S. H., Kim, H. W., Park, S. I., & Chung. H. C., (2002). Development of a five year (2003-2007) national plan on gifted education. (CR 2002-56). Seoul: Korean Educational Development Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, Kim, H. W. Seo, H. A., & Chung, H. C. (2004). The Results report of teachers inservice training for gifted education. (Technical Report RM 2004-3). Seoul: Korean Educational Development Institute. Retrieved October 9, 2006, from http://public.kedi.re.kr/Report/LuPublic/GzPubViw.php?PageNum=1&S_Part=A00&SKey=op¿A&PINum0=4050&pcPart=A00&PcCode=000401&S.Kind=TR.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Copenhaver, R. W., & Mclntyre, D. J. (1992). Teachers’ perception of gifted students. Roeper Review, 14, 151–153.
   Google Scholar
• Cox. J. A., Daniel, N.. & Boston, B. (1985), Educating able learners: Programs and promising practices. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer, R. H. (1991), The education of gifted children in the United States: A Del phi study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35. 84–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramond, B., & Martin, C. E. (1987). Inservice and preservice teachers’ attitudes toward the academically brilliant. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 15–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croft, L. J. (2002). Teachers of the gifted: Gifted teachers. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 558–571). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, J. A., & Dobbs, C. (1987). Goals of a teacher training program for teachers of the gifted. Roeper Review, 9, 170–171.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, J. (1996). Meeting state mandates for gifted and talented: lowa teacher preparation programs, Roeper Review, 19. 41–43.
   Google Scholar
• Dettmer, P., & Landrum, M. (Eds.), (1998). Staff development: The key to effective gifted education programs. Washington, DC: The National Association for Gifted Children.
   Google Scholar
• Drechsel, B., Prenzel, M.. & Kramer, K. (2001). How teachers perceive motivation in vocational education classrooms: An intervention study. In K.Ann Renninger (Chair), Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle.
   Google Scholar
• Feldhusen, J. (1999), Educating teachers for work with talented youth. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed, pp. 547–552). Boston: AHyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Feldhusen, J. F., & Hansen, J. B. (1988). Teachers of the gifted: Preparation and supervision. Gifted Education International, 5 (2), 84–89.
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, M., & Keilty, B. (2004). Rural and suburban cluster grouping: Reflections on staff development as a component of program success. Roeper Review, 26, 147–155.
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, M. & Owen. S. V., (1999). An Investigation of total school flexible cluster grouping on identification, achievement, and classroom practices. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 224–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenlaw, M. J., & Mclntosh, M. E. (1988). Educating the gifted: A source book. Chicago: IL: American Library Association.
   Google Scholar
• Gross. M. U.M., (1994). Changing teacher attitudes to gifted students through inservice training. Giftedand Talented lntemauonal, 9 (1), 15–21.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, J. O., Seo H. A., Kim, J. J., Jeong. T. H., Kim, J. H., &. Pyun, E. J. (2001). Developing a cyber system of teachers ’ inservice training programs for gifted education (CR2001-36). Seoul: Korean Educational Development Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Gubbíns, E. J., Westberg, K. L. Reis, S. M., Dinnocenti, S. T., Carol, L., Muller, L. M., Park, S. Emerick, L. J. Maxfield, L. R., & Burns, D. (2002). Implementing a professional development model using gifted education strategies with all students (ERIC Document Services No. ED481293)
   Google Scholar
• Hanninen, G. E. (1988). A study of teacher training in gifted education. Roeper Review, 10. 139–144.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. F., & Feldhusen, J. (1994), Comparison of trained and untrained teachers of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 115–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Friedman, R., & Others (1984). Professional Training for Teachers of the Gifted and Talented, ERIC Digest ED262525. Retrieved October 9, 2006, from http://www.ericdigests.org/pre-923/talented.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1980), Improving inservice training: The messages of research. Educational Leadership, 37, 379–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce, B., Showers, B., and Rolheiser-Bennett, C. (1987). Staff development and student learning; A synthesis of research on models of teaching. Educational Leadership, 45, 11–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalantan, A. N. (1991), The effects of in-service training on Bahraini teachers’ perceptions of giftedness. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54 (05), 1279A. (UMI No, 9221545)
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H. W. (2004). Identification of giftedness. Educational Development, 31 (4), 89–94. Seoul: Korean Educational Development Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. Y., Cramond, B., & Lee, J. Y. (2004). Korean teachers’ attitudes toward academic brilliance. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 42–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J. F., & Hoy, A. W. (2006). Interested instructors: A composite portrait of individual differences and effectiveness, Teaching and Teacher Education 22, 303–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, F. (1980). Inservice for teachers of academically talented students. Gifted Child Today. January/February. 41–44.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers, E. (1984). A study of concerns of classroom teachers regarding a resource room for the gifted. Roeper Review, 7, 32–36.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. J. (2003). Characteristics of effective teachers of gifted students: Teacher background and personality styles of students Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 272–281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, S. K. (1987). Student teachers’ attitudes toward gifted students. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 112–114.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, J. L. (1976). Helping teachers growth professionally. Educational Leadership, 34. 194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston. C. C., & Colman, A. M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories In rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104. 1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowley, J. L. (2003). Teacher effectiveness in the education of gifted students: A comparison of trained, trainee and untrained teachers of gifted and talented students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 65 (06), 266A (UMI No. 0806611)
   Google Scholar
• Schlichter, C. L., & Olenchak, F. R., (1992). Identification of insenrvice needs among schoolwide enrichment schools. Roeper Review 14, 159–162.
   Google Scholar
• Sonnenberg, M., & Perryman, L. B. (1985). Addressing the perceived needs of regular classroom teachers in teaching the gifted student. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED266561)
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, P., & Gallagher, J. J. (1986). Project TARGET: A need assessment approach to gifted education inservice Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 114–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitlock, S., & DuCette, J. (1989). Outstanding and average teachers of the gifted: A comparative study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 3, 15–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitton, D. (1997). Regular classroom practices with gifted students in grades 3 and 4 in New South Wales. Australia. Gifted Education International, 12 (1), 34–38.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, K. S. (1996). Teachers’ perspectives for developing programming for the gifted handicapped. Dissertation Abstracts International, 57 (07), 2971 A ( UMI No. 9639379)
   Google Scholar