Expanding Views of Creative Science: A Response to Ghassib’s Productivist Industrial Model

References

• Ambrose, D. (1996). Unifying theories of creativity: Metaphorical thought and the unification process. New Ideas in Psychology , 14, 257–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrose, D. (1998). A model for clarification and expansion of conceptual foundations. Gifted Child Quarterly , 42, 77–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrose, D. (2003). Paradigms, mind shifts, and the 21st-century zeitgeist: New contexts for creative intelligence. In D. Ambrose, L. M. Cohen & A. J. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Creative Intelligence: Toward theoretic integration (pp. 11–31). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ambrose, D. (2005). Interdisciplinary expansion of conceptual foundations: Insights from beyond our field. Roeper Review , 27, 137–143.
   Google Scholar
• Ambrose, D. (in press). Expanding visions of creative intelligence: Interdisciplinary perspectives.Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, P., & Payr, S. (Eds.). (1995). Speaking minds: Interviews with twenty eminent cognitive scientists. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Descombes, V. (2001). The mind’s provisions: A critique of cognitivism (S. A. Schwartz, Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feist, G. J. (2006). The psychology of science and the origins of the scientific mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferkiss, V., Bergmann, B., Agarwal, B., & Floro, M. (Eds.). (1993). Nature, technology, and society: The cultural roots of the current environmental crisis. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flannery, T. (2006). The weather makers: The history and future impact of climate change. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garber, M. (2001). Academic instincts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Ghassib, H. B. (2010). Where does creativity fit into a productivist industrial model of knowledge production? Gifted and Talented International , 25 (1), 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, H. E. (1978). Darwin’s “tree of nature” and other images of wide scope. In J. Wechsler (Ed.), On aesthetics in science (pp. 121–140). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, H. E. (1996). The life space of a scientist: The visionary function and other aspects of Jean Piaget’s thinking. Creativity Research Journal , 9, 251–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber, H. E., & Wallace, D. B. (2001). Creative work: The case of Charles Darwin. American Psychologist , 56, 346–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallyn, F. (Ed.). (2000). Metaphor and analogy in the sciences. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Harmon, J. E. (1994). The uses of metaphor in citation classics from the scientific literature. Technical Communication Quarterly , 3, 179–194.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington, A. (1996). Reenchanted science: Holism in German culture from Wilhelm II to Hitler. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holton, G. (1996). On the art of scientific imagination. Daedalus , 125, 183–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. (in press). What cognitive science brings to ethics. InD. Ambrose & T. L. Cross (Eds.), Morality, ethics, and gifted minds. New York: Springer Science.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 202–251). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. I. (1978). Visualization lost and regained: The genesis of the quantum theory in the period 1913-1927. In J. Wechsler (Ed.), Aesthetics in science (pp. 73–104). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. I. (1986). Imagery in scientific thought: Creating 20th-century physics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. I. (1989). Imagery and intuition in creative scientific thinking: Albert Einstein’s invention of the special theory of relativity. In D. B. Wallace & H. E. Gruber (Eds.), Creative people at work (pp. 171–188). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. I. (1996). Insights of genius: Imagery and creativity in science and art. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinbach, A. (1990). The human motor: Energy, fatigue, and the origins of modernity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, S. (1998). Brains, minds and the world. In S. Rose (Ed.), From brains to consciousness? (pp. 1–17).Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, J. (1992). The creative moment: How science made itself alien to modern culture. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, S. (2007). Undermining science: Suppression and distortion in the Bush Administration Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1990). Metaphors of mind: Conceptions of the nature of intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weschler, J. (Ed.). (1988). On aesthetics in science (2nd ed.). Boston: Birkhauser.
   Google Scholar