Impact of Professional Development Programs for Teachers of the Gifted

References

• Ackerman, P.L., Beier, M., & Bowen, K. R. (2002). What we really know about our abilities and our knowledge. Personality and Individual Differences, 33 (4), 587–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Haj, M. (1995). Kinship and modernization in developing societies: The emergence of instrumentalized kinship. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 26, 311–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.), (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, J. A., & Banks, C. A. McGee (2009). Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (7th Ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, D. (2001). Characteristics and competencies of teachers of gifted learners: The Hong Kong perspective. Roeper Review, 23, 197–201.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B. (2002). Growing- up gifted, (6th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merill Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• College of William and Mary (2004). Center for Gifted Education. Masters program in gifted education. Williamsburg, VA: U.S.A. Retrieved February 20th, 2007, from http://cfge.vm.edu/masters.php
   Google Scholar
• Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted. (1999). The 1998-99 state of the states gifted and talented report. Denver, CO: Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted.
   Google Scholar
• Cramond, B. (2005). Developing creative thinking. In F. Karnes, & S. Bean (Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted and talented (pp. 313–352). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Croft, L. J. (2003). Teachers of the gifted: gifted teachers. In N. Colangelo, & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education, (3rd Ed., pp. 60–74). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Division for Gifted Education (2008/2009). Participation in gifted programs. The Ministry of Education, Jerusalem. Retrieved February, 29, 2009, from: http://www.education.gov.il/gifted/. (Hebrew)
   Google Scholar
• Eilam, B. (2002)."Passing Through" a western-democratic teacher education: The case of Israeli Arabs. Teacher College Record, 104 (8), 1656–1701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilam, B. (2003). Jewish and Arab teacher trainees’ orientations toward teaching-learning processes. Teacher Education, 14 (2), 169–186.
   Google Scholar
• Eilam, B. & Vidergor, H. E. (2011). Gifted Israeli students’ perceptions of teachers’ desired characteristics: A case of cultural orientation. Roeper Review, 33 (2), 86–96.
   Google Scholar
• Feldhusen, J. F. (1997). Educating teachers for work with talented youth. In N. Colangelo, & G. A. Davis. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education, (2nd ed., pp. 547–552). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Feldhusen, J. F., & Dai, D. Y. (1997). Gifted students’ attitudes and perceptions of gifted label, special programs and peer relations. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 9 (10), 15–20.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S. (1997). Problem-based learning: Where did it come from, what does it do, and where is it going? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 332–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J., & Harridine, C. C. (1997). Gifted students in the classroom. Roeper Review, 19 (3), 132–136.
   Google Scholar
• Goodlad, J. I., Klein, M. F., & Tye, K. A. (1979). The domains of curriculum and their study. In J. I. Goodlad & Associates, Curriculum Inquiry: The study of curriculum practice (pp.43–76). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. B., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1994). Comparison of trained and untrained teachers of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38 (3), 115–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsen, S., VanTassel-Baska, J., & Robinson, A. (2008). Using the national gifted education standards for university teacher preparation programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Crowin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnsen, S., & Goree, K. (2005). Teaching gifted students through independent study. In F. Karnes, & S. Bean (Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted and talented (pp. 379–408). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karnes, A. F., Stephens, K. R., & Whorton, J. E. (2000). Certification and specialized competencies for teachers in gifted education programs. Roeper Review, 22 (3), 201.
   Google Scholar
• Kitano, M. K., Lewis, R. B., Lynch, E. W., & Graves, A. W. (1996). Teaching in a multicultural classroom: Teacher education’s perspectives. Equality and Excellence in Education, 29 (3), 70–77.
   Google Scholar
• Mar’l, S. K. (1974). School and society in the Arab village in Israel. Studies in Education, 4, 85–104. (Hebrew).
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. J. (2003). Characteristics of effective teachers of gifted students: teacher background and personality styles of students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47 (4), 272–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2004). Steering committee report on the advancement of gifted education. Jerusalem, Israel. (Hebrew)
   Google Scholar
• Northern Kentucky University (NKU) (2009). Gifted and talented education endorsement. Retrieved August, 23, from http://coehs.nku.edu/docs/GiftedTalentedEndors.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ohio State University: College of Education and Human Ecology (2007). M.A. degree in special education: Specialization in gifted education. Retrieved August, 23, from: http://www.coe.ohio-state.edu/PAES/newacademic/speced/gifted.htm
   Google Scholar
• Oyserman, D. (1993). The lens of personhood: Viewing the self and others in multicultural society. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65 (5), 993–1009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227.
   Google Scholar
• Pyryt, M. C. (2003). Technology and the gifted. In N. Colangelo, & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education, (3rd Edition, pp.582–589). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Rowley, J. L. (2003). Teacher effectiveness in the education of gifted students:A comparison of trained, trainee and untrained teachers of gifted and talented students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1973). The practical: Translation into curriculum. School Review, 81, 501–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1978). Education and the structure of discipline. In I. Westbury, & N. J. Wilkof (Eds.), Science curriculum and liberation: Selective assays (pp. 229–272). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, C. M. (1995). A comparison study of student attitudes and perceptions in homogeneous and heterogeneous classrooms. Roeper Review, 17 (4), 234–238.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, P. M., Marsh, J. A., & Adelman, N. E. (1998). Evaluation of NSF’s Statewide Systemic Initiatives (SSI) Program: The SSIs’ impacts on classroom practice. Menlo Park, CA: SRI.
   Google Scholar
• Stepien, W. J., & Pyke, S. L. (1997). Designing problem-based learning units. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20 (4), 380–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park. CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Tassel-Baska, J. (2005). Gifted programs and services: What are the nonnegotiables? Practice into Theory, 44 (2), 90–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Tassel-Baska, J., & Johnsen, S. K. (2007). Teacher education standards for the field of gifted education: A vision of coherence for personnel preparation in the 21st century. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51 (2), 182–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Tassel-Baska, J., Quek, C., & Feng, A. X. (2007). The development and use of structure teacher observation scale to assess differentiated best practice. Roeper Review, 29 (2), 84–92.
   Google Scholar
• VanTassel-Baska, J., Avery, L. D., Little, C., & Hughes, C. (2000). An evaluation of the implementation of curriculum innovation: The impact of the William and Mary units on schools. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 244–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vialle, W. & Quigley, S. (2002). Does the teacher of the gifted need to be gifted? Gifted and Talented International, 17 (2), 85–90.
   Google Scholar
• Vidergor, H. E. (2010). Teachers of the gifted in Israel: Cognitive aspects of professional development programs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Haifa, Israel.
   Google Scholar
• Vidergor, H. E., & Eilam, B. (2010). Curriculum transformation: The Israeli teacher certification in gifted education. Gifted and talented International, 25 (2), 29–51.
   Google Scholar
• Vidergor, H. E., & Eilam, B. (2011). Israeli Teachers’ Perceptions of Learning and Teaching of Gifted Students: A Case of Cultural Orientation. Roeper Review, 33 (4).
   Google Scholar
• Vidergor, H. E., & Reiter, S. (2008). Frameworks for nurturing gifted students in Israel: Satisfaction with school. Gifted and Talented International, 23 (1), 38–49.
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 45–69.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, I. R., Montgomery, D. L., Ridgway, C. J., & Bond, S. L. (1998). Local systemic change through teacher enhancement: Year three cross-site repori. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
   Google Scholar
• Zorman, R., Rachmel, S., & Shaked, I. (2004). Principles for developing unique programs for gifted students. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education, The Division for Gifted and Excellent Students (Hebrew).
   Google Scholar