References
- Aulls, M. W., & Shore, B. M. (2008). Inquiry in education, volume I: The conceptual foundations for research as a curricular imperative. New York, NY: Erlbaum.
- Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Chae, Y., & Gentry, M. (2011). Gifted and general high school students’ perceptions of learning and motivational constructs in Korea and the United States. High Ability Studies, 22, 103–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2011.577275
- City-Data.com. (2013). Quebec, Canada. Retrieved from http://www.city-data.com/canada/Quebec-Index.html.
- Clark, C., & Shore, B. M. (2004). Educating students with high ability (rev. ed.). Paris, France: UNESCO.
- CMHC–Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation. (2013). Comparing neighbourhoods-Montreal. Retrieved from http://www.cmhc-schl.gc.ca/en/co/buho/sune/sune_004.cfm.
- Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (1998). Education of the gifted and talented (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
- Diezmann, C. M., & Watters, J. J. (2001). The collaboration of mathematically gifted students on challenging tasks. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 25, 7–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320102500102
- Dunn, R., Dunn, K., & Price, G. (2000). Learning style inventory: Grades 3–12. Lawrence, KS: Price Systems.
- European Commission, Directorate-General for Research, Directorate L–Science, Economy and Society. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/report-rocard-on-science-education_en.pdf
- Feldhusen, J. F., & Moon, S. M. (1992). Grouping gifted students: Issues and concerns. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 63–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629203600202
- French, L. R., Walker, C. L., & Shore, B. M. (2011). Do gifted students really prefer to work alone? Roeper Review, 33, 145–159. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2011.580497
- Hijzen, D., Boekaerts, M., & Vedder, P. (2006). The relationship between the quality of cooperative learning, students’ goal preferences, and perceptions of contextual factors in the classroom. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47, 9–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00488.x
- Johnson, C., & Engelhard, G. (1992). Gender, academic achievement, and preferences for cooperative, competitive and individualistic learning among African American adolescents. Journal of Psychology, 126, 385–392. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1992.10543371
- Kanevsky, L. S. (1999). Tool kit for curriculum differentiation. Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada: Simon Fraser University (Faculty of Education). A 2013 version is available from http://www.sfu.ca/~kanevsky/PFL2/Tool%20Kit%202013%20complete.pdf
- Kanevsky, L. S. (2011). Deferential differentiation: What types of differentiation do students want? Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 279–299. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986211422098
- Krefting, L. (1991). Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 214–222. doi:https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.45.3.214
- Matthews, M. (1992). Gifted students talk about cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 50(2), 48–50. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational_leadership.aspx
- Melser, N. A. (1999). Gifted students and cooperative learning: A study of grouping strategies. Roeper Review, 21, 315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199909553983
- Mills, C. J., & Durden, W. G. (1992). Cooperative learning and ability grouping: An issue of choice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 11–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629203600103
- Mönks, F. J., & Katzko, M. W. (2005). Giftedness and gifted education. In R. J. Sternberg, & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 187–200). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- NCSS–National Council for the Social Studies. (1994). Expectations of excellence: Curriculum standards for social studies. Alexandria, VA: Author.
- NCTM–National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school. Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
- Neber, H., Finsterwald, M., & Urban, N. (2001). Cooperative learning with gifted and high-achieving students: A review and meta-analyses of 12 studies. High Ability Studies, 12, 199–214. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130120084339
- Nelson, S. M. (1995). The voices of students in cooperative learning: Academically gifted and their classroom peers ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC.
- NGA–National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf
- NRC–National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Nural, B. (2001). Multiple t-tests or ANOVA (analysis of variance)? Turkish Respiratory Journal, 2, 21–22. Retrieved from http://www.turkishrespiratoryjournal.com/
- Orbell, J., & Dawes, R. (1981). Social dilemmas. In G. M. Stephenson & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Progress in applied social psychology (vol. 1, pp. 37–65). Chichester, England: Wiley.
- Owens, L., & Barnes, J. (1982). The relationships between cooperative, competitive, and individualized learning preferences and students’ perceptions of classroom learning atmosphere. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 182–200. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312019002182
- Owens, L., & Barnes, J. (1992). Learning Preference Scales: Handbook and test master set. Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia: ACER (Australian Council for Educational Research).
- Patrick, H., Bangel, N. J., Jeon, K., & Townsend, M. A. R. (2005). Reconsidering the issue of cooperative learning with gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29, 90–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320502900105
- Peterson, J. S. (2009). Myth 17: Gifted and talented individuals do not have unique social and emotional needs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 280–282. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209346946
- Rayneri, L. J., Gerber, B. L., & Wiley, L. P. (2006). The relationship between classroom environment and the learning style preferences of gifted middle school students and the impact on levels of performance. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50, 104–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620605000203
- Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2009). Myth 1: The gifted and talented constitute one single homogeneous group and giftedness is a way of being that stays in the person over time and experiences. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 233–235. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209346824
- Renzulli, J. S. (2002). Emerging conceptions of giftedness: Building a bridge to the new century. Exceptionality, 10, 67–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327035EX1002_2
- Robinson, A. (1991). Cooperative learning and the academically talented student (RBDM 9106). Retrieved from http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/nrcgt/robinsoa.html
- Robinson, A., Shore, B. M., & Enersen, D. L. (2006). Best practices in gifted education: An evidence-based guide. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
- Saunders-Stewart, K. S., Walker, C. L., & Shore, B. M. (2013). How do parents and teachers of gifted students perceive group work in classrooms? Gifted and Talented International, 28, 99–106.
- Schapiro, M., Schneider, B. H., Shore, B. M., Margison, J. A., & Udvari, S. J. (2009). Competitive goal orientations, quality, and stability in gifted and other adolescents’ friendships: A test of Sullivan’s theory about the harm caused by rivalry. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 71–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986208330566
- Shore, B. M. (2000). Metacognition and flexibility: Qualitative differences in how the gifted think. In R. C. Friedman & B. M. Shore (Eds.), Talents unfolding: Cognition and development (pp. 167–187). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 43–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0004
- Stout, J. A. (1993). The use of cooperative learning with gifted students: A qualitative study. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 800. Retrieved from http://www.proquest.com/en-US/default.shtml
- VanTassel-Baska, J. (2003). What matters in curriculum for gifted learners: Reflections on theory, research and practice. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 174–18). Boston, MA: Pearson.
- VanTassel-Baska, J., Landrum, M. S., & Peterson, K. (1992). Cooperative learning and gifted students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 2, 405–414. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00952357
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society (M. Cole, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Walker, C. L., Shore, B. M., & French, L. R. (2011). A theoretical context for examining students’ preference across ability levels for learning alone or in groups. High Ability Studies, 22, 119–141. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2011.576082
- Willard-Holt, C., Weber, J., Morrison, K. L., & Horgan, J. (2013). Twice-exceptional learners’ perspectives on effective learning strategies. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57, 247–262. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986213501076
- Winebrenner, S. (2001). Teaching gifted kids in the regular classroom: Strategies and techniques every teacher can use to meet the academic needs of the gifted and talented (rev. ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Author. Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/31702229_Teaching_Gifted_Kids_in_the_Regular_Classroom__Strategies_and_Techniques_Every_Teacher_Can_Use_to_Meet_the_Academic_Needs_of_the_Gifted_and_Talented__S._Winebrenner__ed._de_Pamela_Espeland