Teacher perceptions of gifted and talented certification practices in a Southern California school district: A replication study

References

• Anderson, M. A., & Kleinsasser, M. A. (1987). Will it play in rural America? Staff development realities. ISSN: ERICRIEO.
   Google Scholar
• Anscombe, F. J. (1956). On estimating binomial response relations. Biometrika, 43, 461–464. doi:10.1093/biomet/43.3-4.461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apps, K. A. (2011). Relationships between teachers’ perceptions of gifted program status and instructional choices (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA. UMI Number: 3465945.
   Google Scholar
• Bangel, N., & Calvert, E. (2004). Can gifted education fit in the world of the pre-service teacher?. Understanding Our Gifted, 17(1), 13–16.
   Google Scholar
• Bangel, N., Moon, S., & Copobianco, B. (2010). Preservice teachers’ perceptions and experiences in a gifted education training model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(3), 209–221. doi:10.1177/0016986210369257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, K., Schultz, R., & Weber, C. (2012). A lack of awareness and emphasis in pre-service teaching: Preconceived beliefs about the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Today, 35(1), 18–26. doi:10.1177/1076217511428307
   Google Scholar
• California State Board of Education. (2005, July). Recommended standards for programs for gifted and talented students. Approved October, 2001, Revised July, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Cannaday, J. (2006). Teacher perceptions of gifted and talented certification in a Southern California school district (Doctoral dissertation). Capella University. UMI number: 3238565.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Feldhusen, J. B., & Hansen, J. F. (1994). Comparison of trained and untrained teachers of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38(3), 115–121. doi:10.1177/001698629403800304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosfield. (2002). Gifted all day long. Leadership, 32(1), 16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Green, B. (2013). Choice, challenge, and collaboration: Giving teachers of gifted students what they need in professional development (Unpublished Dissertation). Mercer University, Macon Georgia, USA. UMI Number: 3573432.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, U. M. (2002). Musings: Gifts to the gifted - - Training our teachers. Understanding Our Gifted, 15(1), 25–27.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafson-Mays, A. P. (2006). Middle school teachers personal and professional benefits of CA GATE certification attainment (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA. UMI Number: 3233840.
   Google Scholar
• Haldane, J. B. S. (1940). The mean and variance of the moments of chi-squared when used as a test of homogeneity, when expectations are small. Biometrika, 29, 133–134.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. B., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1994). Comparison of trained and untrained teachers of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38(3), 115–123. doi:10.1177/001698629403800304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disability Education Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446, 118 Stat. 2647. (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan. (2012). Alternative routes to teacher preparation: Gifted education and the political scene. Gifted Child Today, 35(1), 37–41. doi:10.1177/1076217511427510
   Google Scholar
• Karnes, F., & Marquardt, R. (1995). Gifted education and the courts: Teacher certification and employment decisions. Roeper Review, 17(4), 229–231. doi:10.1080/02783199509553668
   Google Scholar
• Karnes, F., Stephens, K., & Whorton, J. (2000). Certification and specialized competencies for teachers in gifted education programs. Roeper Review, 22(3), 201–202. doi:10.1080/02783190009554035
   Google Scholar
• Karnes, F., & Whorton, J. (1996). Teacher certification and endorsement in gifted education: A critical need. Roeper Review, 19(1), 54–56. doi:10.1080/02783199609553788
   Google Scholar
• Klein, A. (2016) Under ESSA, States, districts, to share more power. Education Week. Coram Civic Association. Retrieved October 24, 2017, from http://www.coramcivic.org/resources/Under+ESSA$2C+States$2C+Districts+to+Share+More+Power_010616.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Local Control Funding Formula Overview. (2017). California department of education. Retrieved October 24, 2017, from https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/lcffoverview.asp
   Google Scholar
• Miller, E. M. (2009). The effect of training in gifted education on Elementary classroom teachers’ theory based reasoning about the concept of giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33(1), 65–105. doi:10.1177/016235320903300104
   Google Scholar
• NAGC-CEC. (2013). Teacher preparation standards in gifted education. Retrieved December 12, 2016, from http://www.nagc.org/sites/default/files/standards/NAGC-%20CEC%20CAEP%20standards%20%282013%20final%29.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Association for Gifted Children and Council for the state directors for the gifted (A). (2014-2015). State of the states in gifted education: Policy and practice data. http://www.nagc.org/resourcespublications/gifted-state/2014-2015-state-states-giftededucation. Retrieved December 23, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• National Association for Gifted Children and Council for the state directors for the gifted. (2014 –2015a). State of the states in gifted education: Policy and practice data. Retrieved December 23, 2016, from http://www.nagc.org/resources-publications/gifted-state/2014-2015-state-states-gifted-education
   Google Scholar
• National Association for Gifted Children and Council for the state directors for the gifted. (2014 –2015b). The State of the Nation in Gifted Education: Turning a blind eye: Neglecting the needs of the gifted and talented through limited accountability, oversite, and reporting.
   Google Scholar
• Reis, S. (1994). How schools are short-changing the gifted. Technology Review, 97(3), 38–45.
   Google Scholar
• Sausner, R. (2005). Gifted education; Deceived, denied and in crisis: Why gifted education still matters and what you can do to improve your district’s offerings. District Administration, September, (9), 27–31.
   Google Scholar
• Slatter, C.J. (2008). Talent development for the talent developers: Identifying and developing the qualities of effective teachers of gifted students. Retreived from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED537613
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, J. D. (2007). Policy and practice: A case study of gifted education policy implementation. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 31(2), 131–164. doi:10.4219/jeg-2007-679
   Google Scholar
• Zirkle, P. (2005). The law on gifted. In The national research center on the gifted and talented: Senior scholars series (Reviseded.). University of Connecticut, University of Virginia, Yale University. September issue, National Association for Gifted Children, 228–234.
   Google Scholar