Threat or challenge? Teacher beliefs about gifted students and their relationship to teacher motivation

References

• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Awanbor, D. (1991). Teachers and their gifted children in the classroom: A perceptual analysis. Gifted Education International, 7, 82–84. doi:10.1177/026142949100700208
   Google Scholar
• Bain, S. K., Choate, S. M., & Bliss, S. L. (2006). Perceptions of developmental, social, and emotional issues in giftedness: Are they realistic? Roeper Review, 29, 41–48. doi:10.1080/02783190609554383
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Baudson, T. G., & Preckel, F. (2013). Teachers' implicit personality theories about the gifted: An experimental approach. School Psychology Quarterly, 28, 37–46. doi:10.1037/spq0000011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudson, T. G., & Preckel, F. (2016). Teachers’ conceptions of gifted and average-ability students on achievement relevant dimensions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60, 212–225. doi:10.1177/0016986216647115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, G. (1978). The mad genius debate. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137–164). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, J., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 225–296). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwers, A., & Tomic, W. (2000). A longitudinal study of teacher burnout and perceived self-efficacy in classroom management. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 239–253. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(99)00057-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A. (2015). CFA with equality constraints, multiple groups, and mean structures. In T. A. Brown (Ed.), Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed., pp. 206–286). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Brunner, M., Nagy, G., & Wilhelm, O. (2012). A tutorial on hierarchically structured constructs. Journal of Personality, 80, 796–846. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00749.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busse, T. V., Dahme, G., Wagner, H., & Wieczerkowski, W. (1986a). Teacher perceptions of highly gifted students in the United States and West Germany. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 55–60. doi:10.1177/001698628603000202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busse, T. V., Dahme, G., Wagner, H., & Wieczerkowski, W. (1986b). Factors underlying teacher perceptions of highly gifted students: A cross-cultural study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 903–915. doi:10.1177/001316448604600410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456–466. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 709–725). Macmillan, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., & Steca, P. (2003). Efficacy beliefs as determinants of teachers’ job satisfaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 821–832. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students’ academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 473–490. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Alessandri, G., Gerbino, M., & Barbaranelli, C. (2011). The contribution of personality traits and self‐efficacy beliefs to academic achievement: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 78–96. doi:10.1348/2044-8279.002004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrington, N. (1993). Australian adolescent attitudes towards academic brilliance. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 2, 10–15. Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/neil_carrington/2/
   Google Scholar
• Carrington, N. G., & Bailey, S. T. (2000). How do pre-service teachers view gifted students? Evidence from a NSW study. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 9, 18–22. Retrieved from http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=200010794;res=IELAPA
   Google Scholar
• Cashion, M., & Sullenger, K. (2000). Contact us next year: Tracing teachers’ use of gifted practices. Roeper Review, 23, 18–21. doi:10.1080/02783190009554056
   Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, M. W. L. (2009). Constructing approximate confidence intervals for parameters with structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 267–294. doi:10.1080/10705510902751291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copenhaver, R. W., & McIntyre, D. J. (1992). Teachers’ perception of gifted students. Roeper Review, 14, 151–153. doi:10.1080/02783199209553411
   Google Scholar
• Cortina, K. S., & Thames, M. H. (2013). Teacher education in Germany. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers (pp. 49–62). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cramond, B., & Martin, C. E. (1987). Inservice and pre-service teachers’ attitudes toward the academically brilliant. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 15–19. doi:10.1177/001698628703100103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidov, E., Meuleman, B., Cieciuch, J., Schmidt, P., & Billiet, J. (2014). Measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 55–75. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deaux, K., & LaFrance, M. (1998). Gender. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, 4th ed., pp. 788–827). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Decker, A.-T., Kunter, M., & Voss, T. (2015). The relationship between quality of discourse during teacher induction classes and beginning teachers’ beliefs. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30, 41–61. doi:10.1007/s10212-014-0227-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endepohls-Ulpe, M. (2004). Wie stellen Grundschullehrkräfte sich hochbegabte Schüler/innen vor? – Der Einfluss persönlicher Erfahrung in der Unterrichtung Hochbegabter [Primary school teachers’ images of a gifted pupil – Effects of personal experience in teaching gifted children]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 51, 126–135. Retrieved from http://www.reinhardt-verlag.de/de/einzelheft/5181/Hochbegabtenfoerderung_auf_dem_Pruefstand/
   Google Scholar
• Fiedler, E. D. (1999). Gifted children: The promise of potential/the problems of potential. In V. Schwean & D. Saklofske (Eds.), Handbook of psychosocial characteristics of exceptional children (pp. 401–441). New York, NY: Kluwer/Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Fives, H., & Buehl, M. M. (2012). Spring cleaning for the “messy” construct of teachers’ beliefs: What are they? Which have been examined? What can they tell us? In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors (Vol. 2, pp. 471–495). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Lüdtke, O., Pekrun, R., & Sutton, R. E. (2009). Emotional transmission in the classroom: Exploring the relationship between teacher and student enjoyment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 705–716. doi:10.1037/a0014695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freund-Braier, I. (2009). Persönlichkeitsmerkmale [Personality characteristics]. In D. H. Rost (Ed.), Hochbegabte und hochleistende Jugendliche [Gifted and high-achieving youth] (pp. 161–210). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J. J. (1990). Editorial: The public and professional perception of the social and emotional status of gifted children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 202–211. doi:10.1177/016235329001300302
   Google Scholar
• Geake, J. G., & Gross, M. U. M. (2008). Teachers’ negative affect toward academically gifted students: An evolutionary psychological study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 217–231. doi:10.1177/0016986208319704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodnough, K. (2001). Changing teacher beliefs about giftedness and differentiation practices. Gifted and Talented International, 16, 115–121. doi:10.1080/15332276.2001.11672973
   Google Scholar
• Gross, M. U. M. (1994). Changing teacher attitudes to gifted students through inservice training. Gifted and Talented International, 9, 15–21. doi:10.1080/15332276.1994.11672784
   Google Scholar
• Gross, M. U. M. (1999). Inequity in equity: The paradox of gifted education in Australia. Australian Journal of Education, 43, 87–103. doi:10.1177/000494419904300107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guskin, S. L., Peng, C. J., & Simon, M. (1992). Do teachers react to multiple intelligences? Effects of teachers’ stereotypes on judgment and expectancies for students with diverse patterns of giftedness/talent. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 32–37. doi:10.1177/001698629203600108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hachfeld, A., Hahn, A., Schroeder, S., Anders, Y., & Kunter, M. (2015). Should teachers be colorblind? How multicultural and egalitarian beliefs differentially relate to aspects of teachers’ professional competence for teaching in diverse classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 48, 44–55. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2015.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hachfeld, A., Schroeder, S., Anders, Y., Hahn, A., & Kunter, M. (2012). Multikulturelle Überzeugungen. Herkunft oder Überzeugung? Welche Rolle spielen der Migrationshintergrund und multikulturelle Überzeugungen für das Unterrichten von Kindern mit Migrationshintergrund? [Multicultural beliefs. Cultural background or cultural beliefs? What role do immigration background and multicultural beliefs play for teaching children with immigrant backgrounds?]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 26, 101–120. doi:10.1024/1010-0652/a000064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. B., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1994). Comparison of trained and untrained teachers of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 115–121. doi:10.1177/001698629403800304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayduk, L. A. (1987). Structural equation modeling with LISREL: Essentials and advances. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University.
   Google Scholar
• Hellmich, F., Görel, G., & Schwab, S. (2016). Einstellungen und Motivation von Lehramtsstudentinnen und -studenten in Bezug auf den inklusiven Unterricht in der Grundschule. Ein Vergleich zwischen Deutschland und Österreich [Pre-service teachers’ attitudes and motivation in relation to inclusive education in primary school – A comparison between Germany and Austria]. Empirische Sonderpädagogik, 1, 67–85. Retrieved from https://www.pedocs.de/volltexte/2016/11855/pdf/ESP_2016_1_Hellmich_ua_Einstellungen_und_Motivation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM Corp. (2015). IBM SPSS Statistics for Macintosh (Version 23) [Computer software]. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Issa, A. (2016). Subjektive Theorien von Lehrkräften über Hochbegabte [Teachers’ subjective theories about the gifted] ( Unpublished Bachelor’s Thesis). Trier, Germany: University of Trier.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S., & Myhill, D. (2004). ‘Troublesome boys’ and ‘compliant girls’: Gender identity and perceptions of achievement and underachievement. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25, 547–561. doi:10.1080/0142569042000252044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36, 409–426. doi:10.1007/BF02291366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, M. M., Goetz, T., Becker, E., Morger, V., & Hensley, L. (2014). Feeling and showing: A new conceptualization of dispositional teacher enthusiasm and its relation to students’ interest. Learning and Instruction, 33, 29–38. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, M. M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., Goetz, T., & Frenzel, A. C. (2016). Teacher enthusiasm: Reviewing and redefining a complex construct. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 743–769. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9354-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klassen, R. M., Tze, V. M., Betts, S. M., & Gordon, K. A. (2011). Teacher efficacy research 1998–2009: Signs of progress or unfulfilled promise? Educational Psychology Review, 23, 21–43. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9141-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klieme, E., & Leutner, D. (2006). Kompetenzmodelle zur Erfassung individueller Lernergebnisse und zur Bilanzierung von Bildungsprozessen. Beschreibung eines neu eingerichteten Schwerpunktprogramms der DFG [Models of competencies for assessment of individual learning outcomes and the evaluation of educational processes: Description of a newly established DFG priority program]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 52, 876–903. URN: urn: nbn:de:0111-opus-44936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokkinos, C. M., Panayiotou, G., & Davazoglou, A. M. (2004). Perceived seriousness of pupils’ undesirable behaviours: The student teachers’ perspective. Educational Psychology, 24, 109–120. doi:10.1080/0144341032000146458
   Google Scholar
• Kronborg, L., & Plunkett, M. (2012). Examining teacher attitudes and perceptions of teacher competencies required in aselective high school. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 21, 33–46.
   Google Scholar
• Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., & Neubrand, M. (Eds.). (2013). Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers: Results from the COACTIV project. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kunter, M., Frenzel, A. C., Nagy, G., Baumert, J., & Pekrun, R. (2011). Teacher enthusiasm: Dimensionality and context specificity. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 289–301. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunter, M., & Holzberger, D. (2014). Loving teaching: Research on teachers’ intrinsic orientation. In P. W. Richardson, S. A. Karabenick, & H. M. Watt (Eds.), Teacher motivation: Theory and practice (pp. 83–99). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 805–820. doi:10.1037/a0032583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunter, M., Tsai, Y.-M., Klusmann, U., Brunner, M., Krauss, S., & Baumert, J. (2008). Students’ and mathematics teachers’ perceptions of teacher enthusiasm and instruction. Learning and Instruction, 18, 468–482. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, Y. (1990). Teachers’ attitudes and perspectives on educational provisions for “gifted” and “talented” children in New South Wales, Australia and Essex, England. Gifted Education International, 6, 174–181. doi:10.1177/026142949000600311
   Google Scholar
• Lassig, C. J. (2009). Teachers’ attitudes towards the gifted: The importance of professional development and school culture. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 18, 32–42. Retrieved from https://eprints.qut.edu.au/32480/1/32480.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-Y., Cramond, B., & Lee, J. (2004). Korean teachers’ attitudes toward academic brilliance. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 42–53. doi:10.1177/001698620404800105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Larkin, K. C. (1987). Comparison of three theoretically derived variables in predicting career and academic behavior: Self-efficacy, interest congruence, and consequence thinking. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 293–298. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.34.3.293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J. F., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2006). Interested instructors: A composite portrait of individual differences and effectiveness. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 303–314. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of. Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Morin, A. J. S., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2010). A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22, 471–491. doi:10.1037/a0019227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Morin, A. J. S., & Trautwein, U. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students’ evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 439–476. doi:10.1080/10705510903008220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L., Burns, R., & Schonlau, M. (2009). Mental disorders among gifted and nongifted youth: A selected review of the epidemiologic literature. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 31–41. doi:10.1177/0016986209352684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matheis, S. (2015). Einstellungen und ansichten lehramtsstudierender gegenüber hochbegabung: eine interkulturelle vergleichsstudie [pre-service teachers’ attitudes and beliefs toward giftedness: A cross-country comparison] (unpublished master’s thesis). Trier, Germany: University of Trier.
   Google Scholar
• Matheis, S., Keller, L., Kronborg, L., Schmitt, M., & Preckel, F. (2018). Do stereotypes strike twice? Giftedness and genderstereotypes in teachers’ beliefs about student characteristics in Australia. Manuscript submitted for publication
   Google Scholar
• McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2007). What predicts teachers’ attitudes towards the gifted? Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 246–255. doi:10.1177/0016986207302719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milfont, T. L., & Fischer, R. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3, 111–121. doi:10.21500/20112084.857
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. R. (1997). Matching motivational strategies with organizational contexts. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 19, pp. 57–149). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
   Google Scholar
• Morris-Rothschild, B. K., & Brassard, M. R. (2006). Teachers’ conflict management styles: The role of attachment styles and classroom management efficacy. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 105–121. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2002). Teachers’ beliefs and behaviors: What really matters? Journal of Classroom Interaction, 37, 3–15. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23870407
   Google Scholar
• Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30–38. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.38.1.30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• National Association for Gifted Children. (2009). Nurturing social and emotional development of gifted children. Retrieved from https://www.nagc.org/sites/default/files/PositionStatement/AffectiveNeedsPositionStatement.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Needham, V. (2012). Primary teachers’ perceptions of the social and emotional aspects of gifted and talented education ( Published Master’s Thesis). Retrieved from www.giftedchildren.org.nz/apex
   Google Scholar
• Neihart, M. (1999). The impact of giftedness on psychological well-being. What does the empirical literature say? Roeper Review, 22, 10–17. doi:10.1080/02783199909553991
   Google Scholar
• Neihart, M., Reis, S. M., Robinson, N. M., & Moon, S. M. (2002). The social and emotional development of gifted children. What do we know? Waco, TX: Prufrock.
   Google Scholar
• Ojanen, S., & Freeman, J. (1994). The attitudes and experiences of headteachers, class-teachers and highly-able pupils towards the education of the highly able in Finland and Britain. Savonlinna, Finland: University of Joensuu.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332. doi:10.3102/00346543062003307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, F., & Kronborg, L. (2014). Challenging secondary teachers to examine beliefs and pedagogy when teaching highly able students in mixed-ability health education classes. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 23, 15–27.
   Google Scholar
• Plunkett, M., & Kronborg, L. (2011). Learning to be a teacher of the gifted: The importance of examining opinions and challenging misconceptions. Gifted and Talented International, 26, 31–46. doi:10.1080/15332276.2011.11673587
   Google Scholar
• Preckel, F., Baudson, T. G., Krolak-Schwerdt, S., & Glock, S. (2015). Gifted and maladjusted? Implicit attitudes and automatic associations related to gifted children. American Educational Research Journal, 52, 1160–1184. doi:10.3102/0002831215596413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula, T. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 102–106). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, D., Kunter, M., Lüdtke, O., Klusmann, U., Anders, Y., & Baumert, J. (2013). How different mentoring approaches affect beginning teachers’ development in the first years of practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 166–177. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimm, S. B., Siegle, D. B., & Davis, G. A. (2018). Education of the gifted and talented (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Rizza, M. G., & Morrison, W. F. (2003). Uncovering stereotypes and identifying characteristics of gifted students and students with emotional/behavioral disabilities. Roeper Review, 25, 74–77. doi:10.1080/02783190309554202
   Google Scholar
• Rost, D. H. (1993). Persönlichkeitsmerkmale hochbegabter Kinder [Personality characteristics of gifted children]. In D. H. Rost (Ed.), Lebensumweltanalyse hochbegabter Kinder [Analyzing the living environment of the gifted] (pp. 105–137). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Rumanyika, A. (2016). Lehrereinstellungen gegenüber Hochbegabten in Luxemburg [Teachers’ attitudes toward gifted students in Luxembourg]. ( Unpublished Bachelor’s Thesis). Trier, Germany: University of Trier.
   Google Scholar
• Sahin, N., & Düzen, E. (1994). The ‘gifted child’ stereotype among university students and elementary school teachers. In E. A. Hany & K. A. Heller (Eds.), Competence and responsibility. The third European conference of the European council of high ability (Vol. 1, pp. 142–143). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, A. (2016). Einflüsse auf die Einstellungen über Hochbegabung [Impacts on attitudes toward giftedness] ( Unpublished Bachelor’s Thesis). Trier, Germany: University of Trier.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz, G. S., & Schwarzer, R. (2000). Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung von Lehrern: Längsschnittbefunde mit einem neuen Instrument [Perceived self-efficacy of teachers: Longitudinal findings with a new instrument]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 14, 12–25. doi:10.1024//1010-0652.14.1.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2017). Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 565–600. doi:10.1037/bul0000098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (2002). Das Konzept der Selbstwirksamkeit [The concept of self-efficacy]. In M. Jerusalem & D. Hopf (Eds.), Selbstwirksamkeit und Motivationsprozesse in Bildungsinstitutionen [Self-efficacy and motivational processes within educational institutions] (pp. 28–53). Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1175860
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–23. doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2007). Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors, perceived collective teacher efficacy, and teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 611–625. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenkamp, J. B. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 78–90. doi:10.1086/209528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. (2005). Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Tirri, K. A., & Adams, A. M. (2000). A cross-cultural study of teachers’ attitudes toward gifted children and programs for gifted children. Gifted and Talented International, 15, 103–115. doi:10.1080/15332276.2000.11672939
   Google Scholar
• Tirri, K. A., Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Adams, A. M., Yuen, M., & Lau, P. S. (2002). Cross-cultural predictors of teachers’ attitudes toward gifted education: Finland, Hong Kong, and the United States. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26, 112–131. doi:10.1177/016235320202600203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travers, C. J., & Cooper, C. L. (1996). Teachers under pressure: Stress in the teaching profession. London, GB: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783–805. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unesco. (2009). Policy guidelines on inclusion in education. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0017/001778/177849e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vaivre-Douret, L. (2011). Developmental and cognitive characteristics of ‘high-level potentialities’ (highly gifted) children. International Journal of Pediatrics, (2011, 1–14. doi:10.1155/2011/420297
   Google Scholar
• Voss, T., Kleickmann, T., Kunter, M., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers: Results from the COACTIV project (pp. 249–271). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., & Wang, X. (Eds.). (2012). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus. West Sussex, UK: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Weinert, F. E. (2001). A concept of competence: A conceptual clarification. In D. S. Rychen & L. H. Salganik (Eds.), Defining and selecting key competencies (pp. 45–65). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.
   Google Scholar
• Wolters, C. A., & Daugherty, S. G. (2007). Goal structures and teachers’ sense of efficacy: Their relation and association to teaching experience and academic level. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 181–193. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar