Connecting creative coursework exposure and college student engagement across academic disciplines

References

• ABET. (2011). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Baltimore, MD: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Alencar, E. M. L. S., & Fleith, D. S. (2004). Creativity in university courses: Perceptions of professors and students. Gifted and Talented International, 19, 24–28. doi:10.1080/15332276.2004.11673029
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367–403. doi:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anaya, G. (1999). College impact on student learning: Comparing the use of self-reported gains, standardized test scores, and college grades. Research in Higher Education, 40(5), 499–526. doi:10.1023/A:1018744326915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2010). Creative thinking VALUE rubric. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/value/rubrics/creative-thinking
   Google Scholar
• Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Baer, J. (2016). Content matters: Why nurturingcreative is so different in different domains. In R. A. Beghetto, & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Creative contradictions in education: Cross disciplinary paradoxes and perspectives (pp. 129–140). Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21924-0_8
   Google Scholar
• Baird, L. (2005). College environments and climates: Assessments and their theoretical assumptions. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 10, 507–537.
   Google Scholar
• Baloche, L. (1994). Creativity and cooperation in the elementary music classroom. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 28(4), 255–264. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1994.tb00732.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beghetto, R. A. (2016). Creative learning: A fresh look. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15(1), 6–23. doi:10.1891/1945-8959.15.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beghetto, R. A., & Karwowski, M. (2018). Educational consequences of creativity: A creative learning perspective. Creativity: Theories, Research, Applications, 5(2), 146–154. doi:10.1515/ctra-2018-0011
   Google Scholar
• Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies, 25(1), 53–69. doi:10.1080/13598139.2014.905247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besançon, M. (2013). Creativity, giftedness, and education. Gifted and Talented International, 28(1–2), 149–161. doi:10.1080/15332276.2013.11678410
   Google Scholar
• Blaich, C., & Wise, K. (2011, January). From gathering to using assessment results: Lessons fromthe Wabash national study (NILOA Occasional Paper no. 8). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/OccasionalPaper8.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, N. A. (2010). College diversity experiences and cognitive development: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 80(1), 4–33. doi:10.3102/0034654309352495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, N. A. (2011). Promoting participation in a diverse democracy: A meta-analysis of college diversity experiences and civic engagement. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 29–68. doi:10.3102/0034654310383047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, N. A. (2013). How much diversity is enough? The curvilinear relationship between college diversity interactions and first-year student outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 54(8), 874–894. doi:10.1007/s11162-013-9300-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrckaLorenz, A., Ribera, T., Kinzie, J., & Cole, E. (2012). Examining effective faculty practice: Teaching clarity and student engagement. To Improve the Academy, 31, 1–18. doi:10.1002/j.2334-4822.2012.tb00679.x
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. T. (1989). Creativity: What are we to measure? In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–32). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrge, C., & Tang, C. (2015). Embodied creativity training: Effects on creative self-efficacy and creative production. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 16, 51–61. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2015.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabrera, A. F., Crissman, J. L., Bernal, E. M., Nora, A., Terenzini, P. T., & Pascarella, E. T. (2002). Collaborative learning: Its impact on college students’ development and diversity. Journal of College Student Development, 43(1), 20–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabrera, A. F., Nora, A., Terenzini, P. T., Pascarella, E. T., & Hagedorn, L. S. (1999). Campus racial climate and the adjustment of students to college: A comparison between white students and African-American students. Journal of Higher Education, 70, 134–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, K., Blumberg, F., & Auld, D. P. (2010). The relationship between motivation, learning strategies and choice of environment whether traditional or including an online component. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 349–364. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00993.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner, T. S., DeYoung, C. G., & Silvia, P. J. (2018). Everday creative activity as a path to flourishing. The Journal of Postive Psychology, 13(2), 181–189. doi:10.1080/17439760.2016.1257049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A. J. (2000). Fostering creativity in engineering undergraduates. High Ability Studies, 11(2), 207–219. doi:10.1080/13598130020001223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowe, A., Dirks, C., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2008). Biology in Bloom: Implementing Bloom’s taxonomy to enhance student learning in biology. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 7, 368–381. doi:10.1187/cbe.08-05-0024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G. (2004). Creativity is forever (5th ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• DeHaan, R. L. (2009). Teaching creativity and inventive problem solving in science. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 8, 172–181. doi:10.1187/cbe.08-12-0081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denson, N. (2009). Do curricular and cocurricular diversity activities influence racial bias? A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 805–838. doi:10.3102/0034654309331551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denson, N., & Chang, M. J. (2009). Racial diversity matters: The impact of diversity-related student engagement and institutional context. American Educational Research Journal, 46(2), 322–353. doi:10.3102/0002831208323278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dohn, J., Pepper, D. W., & Sandgren, E. (2005). Creating innovative curricula: Developing new programs with new paradigms. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(2), 233–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumford, A. D., Cogswell, C. A., & Miller, A. L. (2016). The who, what, and where of learning strategies. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 16(1), 72–88.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Flowers, L. A., & Pascarella, E. T. (2003). Cognitive effects of college: Differences between African American and Caucasian students. Research in Higher Education, 44(1), 21–49. doi:10.1023/A:1021313511802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fosnacht, K., Sarraf, S., Howe, E., & Peck, L. (2017). How important are high response rates for college surveys? The Review of Higher Education, 40(2), 245–265. doi:10.1353/rhe.2017.0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadja, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Karwowski, M. (2017). Exploring creative learning in the classroom: A multi-method approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 250–267. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2017.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gajda, A., Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2017). Creativity and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109, 269–299. doi:10.1037/edu0000133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodsell, A. S. (1992). Collaborative learning: A sourcebook for higher education. University Park, PA: National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Gurin, P., Dey, E. L., Hurtado, S., & Gurin, G. (2002). Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Review, 72(3), 330–367. doi:10.17763/haer.72.3.01151786u134n051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, D. F. (2010). Creativity in college classrooms. In R. A. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 380–393). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., & de Bruin, L. R. (2018). Secondary school creativity, teacher practice and STEAM education: An international study. Journal of Educational Change, 19(2), 153–179. doi:10.1007/s10833-017-9311-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayek, J. C., Carini, R. M., O’Day, P. T., & Kuh, G. D. (2002). Triumph or tragedy: Comparing student engagement levels of members of Greek-letter organizations and other students. Journal of College Student Development, 43(5), 643–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessey, B. A. (2005). Motivation and classroom climate: Promoting creativity in gifted children. Gifted and Talented International, 20(1), 41–46. doi:10.1080/15332276.2005.11673057
   Google Scholar
• Hummell, L. (2006). Synetics for creative thinking in technology education. The Technology Teacher, 66(3), 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, B. A., Birdnow, M., Hallaert, J., Alexander, K., Malmsten, R., Stull, O., … Claiborn, G. J. (2017). Creativity and innovation in Iceland: Individual, environmental, and cultural variables. Gifted and Talented International, 32, 27–43. doi:10.1080/15332276.2017.1397903
   Google Scholar
• Kohl, P. B., Kuo, V., Kowalski, S., & Kowalski, F. (2011). Promoting and assessing creativity and innovation in physics undergraduates. Physics Education Research Conference, 1413, 39–42. doi:10.1063/1.3679988
   Google Scholar
• Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D., & Hall, J. E. (1993). Cultural perspectives in student affairs work. In G. D. Kuh (Ed.), Cultural perspectives in student affairs work (pp. 1–20). Washington, DC: American College Personnel Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D. (1993). In their own words: What students learn outside the classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 277–304. doi:10.3102/00028312030002277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D. (2001). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties. Bloomington: Indiana University, Center for Postsecondary Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D. (2009). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. In R. M. Gonyea & G. D. Kuh (Eds.), Special issue: Using NSSE in institutional research (pp. 5–20). New Directions for Institutional Research. doi:10.1002/ir.283
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D., & Hu, S. (2001). The effects of student-faculty interaction in the 1990s. Review of Higher Education, 24(3), 309–332. doi:10.1353/rhe.2001.0005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D., Pace, C., & Vesper, N. (1997). The development of process indicators to estimate student gains associated with good practices in undergraduate education. Research in Higher Education, 38(4), 435–454. doi:10.1023/A:1024962526492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, A. D., & Miller, A. L. (2014). Lower response rates on alumni surveys might not mean lower response representativeness. Educational Research Quarterly, 37(3), 38–51.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, K. W., Ng, M. C. F., & Lee, P. Y. (2009). Rethinking the creativity training in design education: A study of creative-thinking tools for facilitating creativity development of design students. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 8(1), 71–84. doi:10.1386/adch.8.1.71_1
   Google Scholar
• Lau, L. K. (2003). Institutional factors affecting student retention. Education, 124(1), 126–136.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, A., & Smith, D. (1993). Defining higher order thinking. Theory Into Practice, 32(3), 131–137. doi:10.1080/00405849309543588
   Google Scholar
• Loes, C., Pascarella, E., & Umbach, P. (2012). Effects of diversity experiences on critical thinking skills: Who benefits? The Journal of Higher Education, 83(1), 1–25. doi:10.1353/jhe.2012.0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maker, C. J., Jo, S., & Muammar, O. M. (2008). Development of creativity: The influence of varying levels of implementation of the DISCOVER curriculum model, a non-traditional pedagogical approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(4), 402–417. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2008.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayhew, M. J., Rockenbach, A. N., Bowman, N. A., Seifert, T. A., Wolniak, G. C., Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2016). How college affects students: 21st century evidence that higher education works. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, A. C., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2013). Student engagement: Bridging research and practice to improve the quality of undergraduate education. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 28, pp. 47–92). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5836-0_2
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2001). Research in education: A conceptual introduction. New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. L. (2012). Investigating social desirability bias in student self-report surveys. Educational Research Quarterly, 36(1), 30–47.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. L. (2016). Connecting creativity and giftedness: Do high-ability populations have an advantage? In G. Moneta & J. Rogaten (Eds.), Psychology of creativity: Cognitive, emotional, and social processes (pp. 83–98). New York, NY: Nova Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. L. (2018). The role of creative coursework in skill development for university seniors. Global Education Review, 5(1), 88–107.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. L., & Dumford, A. D. (2016). Creative cognitive processes in higher education. Journal of Creative Behavior, 50(4), 282–297. doi:10.1002/jocb.77
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, A. L., & Dumford, A. D. (2018). Do high achieving students benefit from Honors College participation? A look at student engagement for first-year students and seniors. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 41(3), 217–241. doi:10.1177/0162353218781753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, A. L., Sarraf, S. A., Dumford, A. D., & Rocconi, L. M. (2016). Construct validity of NSSE engagement indicators (NSSE Psychometric Portfolio Report). Bloomington: Center for Postsecondary Research, Indiana University, School of Education. Retrieved from http://nsse.indiana.edu/pdf/psychometric_portfolio/Validity_ConstructValidity_FactorAnalysis_2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. L., & Smith, V. A. (2017). Academic majors and creativity: Are there differences for high ability college students? Gifted and Talented International, 32(1), 44–58. doi:10.1080/15332276.2018.1435355
   Google Scholar
• National Survey of Student Engagement. (2018). NSSE Conceptual Framework (2013) (NSSE Psychometric Portfolio Report). Bloomington: Center for Postsecondary Research, Indiana University, School of Education. Retrieved from http://nsse.indiana.edu/html/psychometric_portfolio.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Nelson Laird, T. F. (2005). College students’ experiences with diversity and their effects on academic self-confidence, social agency, and disposition toward critical thinking. Research in Higher Education, 46(4), 365–387. doi:10.1007/s11162-005-2966-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson Laird, T. F., Shoup, R., & Kuh, G. D. (2005, May). Measuring deep approaches to learning using the National Survey of Student Engagement. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Institutional Research. Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, J. J., & Long, B. C. (1996). Creativity and perceived stress of female music therapists and hobbyists. Creativity Research Journal, 9(1), 1–10. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj0901_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NSSE 2016 overview. (2016). Bloomington: Center for Postsecondary Research, Indiana University, School of Education. Retrieved from http://nsse.indiana.edu/2016_Institutional_Report/pdf/NSSE_Overview_2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• NSSE 2017 overview. (2017). Bloomington: Center for Postsecondary Research, Indiana University, School of Education. Retrieved from http://nsse.indiana.edu/2017_Institutional_Report/pdf/NSSE_Overview_2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ormrod, J. E. (2011). Human learning (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Pace, C. R. (1980). Measuring the quality of student effort. Current Issues in Higher Education, 2, 10–16.
   Google Scholar
• Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: Volume 2. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Paulus, P. B., Kohn, N. W., & Arditti, L. E. (2011). Effects of quantity and quality instructions on brainstorming. Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(1), 38–46. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01083.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, G. R. (1991). The effects of background, coursework, and involvement on students’ grades and satisfaction. Research in Higher Education, 32(1), 16–30. doi:10.1007/BF00992830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, G. R. (1995). The relationship between self-reports of college experiences and achievement test scores. Research in Higher Education, 36(1), 1–22. doi:10.1007/BF02207764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407. doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. A. (1998). Beware of simple conclusions: The case for content generality of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 179–182. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1102_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. A., & Beghetto, R. A. (2004). Why creativity is domain general, why it looks domain specific, and why the distinction does not matter. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 153–167). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. A., & Dow, G. T. (2010). Attitude change as the precursor to creativity enhancement. In R. A. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 362–379). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pyryt, M. C. (1999). Effectiveness of training children’s divergent thinking: A meta-analytic review. In A. S. Fishkin, B. Cramond, & P. Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds.), Investigating creativity in youth: Research and methods (pp. 351–365). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
   Google Scholar
• Quaye, S. J., & Harper, S. R. (2015). Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reese, S. A. (2015). Online learning environments in higher education: Connectivism vs. dissociation. Education and Information Technologies, 20(3), 579–588. doi:10.1007/s10639-013-9303-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 51–92). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rietzschel, E. F., Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2014). Effects of problem scope and creativity instructions on idea generation and selection. Creativity Research Journal, 26(2), 185–191. doi:10.1080/10400419.2014.901084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter, S. M., & Mostert, N. (2017). Enhancement of creative thinking skills using a cognitive- based creativity training. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 1(3), 243–253. doi:10.1007/s41465-016-0002-3
   Google Scholar
• Rocconi, L. M., Lambert, A. D., McCormick, A. C., & Sarraf, S. A. (2013). Making college count: An examination of quantitative reasoning activities in higher education. Numeracy, 6(2), 1–20. doi:10.5038/1936-4660.6.2.10
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 361–388. doi:10.1080/10400410409534549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 87–101. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00831.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K. L. R., Michael, W. B., & Hocevar, D. (1990). Performance on creativity measures with examination-taking instructions intended to induce high or low levels of test anxiety. Creativity Research Journal, 3(4), 265–280. doi:10.1080/10400419009534360
   Google Scholar
• Steen, L. A. (2001). Mathematics and democracy: The case for quantitative literacy. Princeton, NY: Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2010). Teaching for creativity. In R. A. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 394–414). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Syer, C. A., Chichekian, T., Shore, B., & Aulls, M. W. (2013). Learning “to do” and learning “about” inquiry at the same time: Different outcomes in valuing the importance of various intellectual tasks in planning, enacting, and evaluating an inquiry curriculum. Instructional Science, 41, 521–537. doi:10.1007/s11251-012-9242-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Ulger, K. (2016). The creative training in the visual arts education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 73–87. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2015.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umbach, P. D., & Wawrzynski, M. R. (2005). Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 153–184. doi:10.1007/s11162-004-1598-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermetten, Y. J., Lodewijks, H. G., & Vermunt, J. D. (1999). Consistency and variability of learning strategies in different university courses. Higher Education, 37(1), 1–21. doi:10.1023/A:1003573727713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. D. (1996). Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: A phenomenographic analysis. Higher Education, 31(1), 25–50. doi:10.1007/BF00129106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkwein, J., & Carbone, D. (1994). The impact of departmental research and teaching climates on undergraduate growth and satisfaction. Journal of Higher Education, 65(2), 147–167. doi:10.2307/2943921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, R. E. (2003). Designing problems to promote higher-order thinking. New Directions for Teaching & Learning, 2003(95), 25–31. doi:10.1002/tl.109
   Google Scholar
• Whitt, E. J., Edison, M., Pascarella, E. T., Nora, A., & Terenzini, P. T. (1999). Interactions with peers and objective and self-reported cognitive outcomes across 3 years of college. Journal of College Student Development, 40(1), 61–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, J. L. M. (2010). Modeling quantitative literacy. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(2), 267–290. doi:10.1177/0013164409344506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar