Fostering creativity using robotics among gifted primary school students

References

• Arch, J. A., & Coxon, S. (2016). Architecture: A nexus of creativity, math, and spatial ability. Gifted Child Today, 39(1), 31–39. doi:10.1177/1076217515613385
   Google Scholar
• BQA. (2018). Schools review reports – Hajer primary girls school. Retrieved from http://www.bqa.gov.bh/En/Reports/SchoolsReports/SchoolReport/Hajer%20PG%20%20En%20c3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Coxon, S. V. (2012a). The malleability of spatial ability under treatment of a FIRST LEGO league simulation. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35(3), 291–316. doi:10.1177/0162353212451788
   Google Scholar
• Coxon, S. V. (2012b). Developing creativity for future STEM innovation in young children. Monograph of the American Creativity Association Innovation by Design Conference, Philadelphia, PA: Drexel University.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, T. L. (2011). On the social and emotional lives of gifted children (4th ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G., Rimm, S., & Siegle, D. (2010). Education of the gifted and talented (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Eilers, S. (2016). The LEGO counting problem. The American Mathematical Monthly, 123(5), 415–426. doi:10.4169/amer.math.monthly.123.5.415 
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. (2013). Problems with standardized testing. Education.com Retrieved from http://www.education.com/reference/article/Ref_Test_ Problems_Seven/
   Google Scholar
• Greeter, D. D., Golder, J. E., & Nordin, T. A. (2002). Creating engineers for the future. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 1–7).Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Grubbs, M. (2013). Robotics intrigue middle school students and build STEM skills. Technology & Engineering Teacher, 72(6), 12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H. (2017). The torrance tests of creative thinking - Figural or verbal: Which one should we use? Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 4(2), 302–321. doi:10.1515/ctra-2017-0015
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H., & Coxon, S. (2016). Fostering creativity using robotics among students in STEM fields to reverse the creativity crisis. In M. K. Demetrikopoulos & J. L. Pecore (Eds.), Interplay of creativity and giftedness in science (pp. 351–365). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H., & Coxon, S. V. (2013). The creativity crisis, possible causes, and what schools can do about it. In J. B. Jones & L. J. Flint (Eds.), The creative imperative: School librarians and teachers cultivating curiosity together (pp. 53–70). Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Krauss, J., & Boss, S. (2013). Thinking through project-based learning: Guiding deeper inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, J., Buss, A., Gamboa, R., Mitchell, M., Fashola, O. S., Hubert, T., & Almughyirah, S. (2016). Using robotics and game design to enhance children’s self-efficacy, STEM attitudes, and computational thinking skills. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 25, 860–876. doi:10.1007/s10956-016-9628-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, K. B. (2007). Lessons learned about educating the gifted and talented: A synthesis of the research on educational practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 382–396. doi:10.1177/0016986207306324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, V. (2012). Time on testing: 738 minutes in 3 weeks. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ answer-sheet/wp/2012/11/11/time-on-testing-738-minutes-in-3-weeks/
   Google Scholar
• Swiatek, M. A. (2007). The talent search model: Past, present, and future. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 320–329. doi:10.1177/0016986207306318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Benseville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• VanTassel-Baska, J. (2005). Domain-specific giftedness: Applications in school and life. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 358–376). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• VanTassel-Baska, J., Avery, L. D., Hughes, C. E., & Little, C. A. (2000). An evaluation of the implementation of curriculum innovation: The impact of William and Mary units on schools. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 244–272. doi:10.1177/016235320002300201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, F. E. (1993). Creativity assessment packet examiner’s manual. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
   Google Scholar
• Yuen, T. T., Boecking, M., Stone, J., Tiger, E. P., Gomez, A., & Guillen, A. (2014). Group tasks, activities, dynamics, and interactions in collaborative robotics projects with elementary and middle school children. Journal of STEM Education Innovations and Research, 15(1), 39–45.
   Google Scholar
• Zubaidah, S., Fuad, N., Mahanal, S., & Suarsini, E. (2017). Improving creative thinking skills of students through differentiated science inquiry integrated with mind map. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(4), 77–91.
   Google Scholar