References
- Bertua, C., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2005). The predictive validity of cognitive ability tests: A UK meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(3), 387–409. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317905x26994
- Blum, D., & Holling, H. (2017). Spearman’s law of diminishing returns. A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 65, 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2017.07.004
- Brunner, M., & Süß, H.-M. (2005). Analyzing the reliability of multidimensional measures: An example from intelligence research. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(2), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164404268669
- Bucik, V., & Neubauer, A. C. (1996). Bimodality in the Berlin model of intelligence structure (BIS): A replication study. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(6), 987–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(96)00129-8
- Canivez, G. L., Watkins, M. W., James, T., Good, R., & James, K. (2014). Incremental validity of WISC-IV UK factor index scores with a referred Irish sample: Predicting performance on the WIAT-II UK. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 667–684. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12056
- Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.10.1017/cbo9780511571312
- Cho, S. H., Nijenhuis, J. T., van Vianen, A. E., Kim, H.-B., & Lee, K. H. (2010). The relationship between diverse components of intelligence and creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 44(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2010.tb01329.x
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
- Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Erlbaum.
- Coyle, T. R. (2015). Relations among general intelligence (g), aptitude tests, and GPA: Linear effects dominate. Intelligence, 53, 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.005
- Coyle, T. R. (2018). Non-g residuals of group factors predict ability tilt, college majors, and jobs: A non-g nexus. Intelligence, 67, 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2017.12.003
- Dana, J., & Dawes, R. (2007). Comment on Fiorello et al. “Interpreting intelligence test results for children with disabilities: Is global intelligence relevant?”. Applied Neuropsychology, 14(1), 21–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09084280701280379
- Deary, I. J., Egan, V., Gibson, G. J., Austin, E. J., Brand, C. R., & Kellaghan, T. (1996). Intelligence and the differentiation hypothesis. Intelligence, 23(2), 105–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0160-2896(96)90008-2
- Deary, I. J., Strand, S., Smith, P., & Fernandes, C. (2007). Intelligence and educational achievement. Intelligence, 35(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2006.02.001
- Facon, B. (2004). Are correlations between cognitive abilities highest in low-IQ groups during childhood? Intelligence, 32(4), 391–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2004.06.002
- Freund, P. A., & Holling, H. (2007). Creativity in the classroom: A multilevel analysis investigating the impact of creativity and reasoning ability on scholastic achievement. Creativity Research Journal, 20(3), 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802278776
- Freund, P. A., Holling, H., & Preckel, F. (2007). A multivariate, multilevel analysis of the relationship between cognitive abilities and scholastic achievement. Journal of Individual Differences, 28(4), 188–197. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.28.4.188
- Glutting, J. J., Watkins, M. W., Konold, T. R., & McDermott, P. A. (2006). Distinctions without a difference: The utility of observed versus latent factors from the WISC-IV in estimating reading and math achievement on the WIAT-II. The Journal of Special Education, 40(2), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669060400020101
- Gottfredson, L., & Saklofske, D. H. (2009). Intelligence: Foundations and issues in assessment. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 50(3), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016641
- Gottfredson, L. S., & Deary, I. J. (2004). Intelligence predicts health and longevity, but why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01301001.x
- Hartmann, P., & Nyborg, H. (2004). Spearman’s “Law of Diminishing Returns“: A critical eye on a century of methods, results, and current standing of the theory [Unpublished manuscript]. University of Aarhus, Aarhus.
- Hartmann, P., & Teasdale, T. W. (2004). A test of Spearman’s “law of diminishing returns” in two large samples of Danish military draftees. Intelligence, 32(5), 499–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2004.06.009
- Hodges, J., Tay, J., Maeda, Y., & Gentry, M. (2018). A meta-analysis of gifted and talented identification practices. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(2), 147–174. doi:10.1177/0016986217752107
- Jäger, A. O. (1984). Intelligenzstrukturforschung: Konkurrierende Modelle, neue Entwicklungen, Perspektiven [Intelligence structure research: Competing models, new developments, perspectives.]. Psychologische Rundschau, 35, 21-35.
- Jäger, A. O., Holling, H., Preckel, F., Schulze, R., Vock, M., Süß, H.-M., & Beauducel, A. (2005). Berliner Intelligenzstruktur-Test für Jugendliche: Begabungs- und Hochbegabungsdiagnostik (BIS-HB) [Berlin Structure-of-intelligence Test: Assessment of Cognitive Potential and Giftedness]. Hogrefe.
- Jäger, A. O., Holling, H., Preckel, F., Schulze, R., Vock, M., Süß, H.-M., & Beauducel, A. (2006). Berliner Intelligenzstruktur-Test für Jugendliche: Begabungs- und Hochbegabungsdiagnostik (BIS-HB) [Berlin structure of intelligence test for youth: Assessment of talent and giftedness]. Göttingen: Hogrefe. http://dx.doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.54.4.221
- Jauk, E., Benedek, M., Dunst, B., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). The relationship between intelligence and creativity: New support for the threshold hypothesis by means of empirical breakpoint detection. Intelligence, 41(4), 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.03.003
- Kim, K. H. (2005). Can only intelligent people be creative? A meta-analysis. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16(2–3), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2005-473
- Kuncel, N. R., Credé, M., & Thomas, L. L. (2016). The validity of self-reported grade point averages, class ranks, and test scores: A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075001063
- Kuncel, N. R., & Hezlett, S. A. (2010). Fact and fiction in cognitive ability testing for admissions and hiring decisions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(6), 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410389459
- Lohman, D. F., Gambrell, J., & Lakin, J. (2008). The commonality of extreme discrepancies in the ability profiles of academically gifted students. Psychology Science, 50(2), 269–282.
- Lohman, D. F., & Hagen, E. P. (2002). CogAT, form 6: Research handbook. Riverside Pub.
- Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2006). Study of mathematically precocious youth after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(4), 316–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00019.x
- Lynn, R. (1992). Does Spearman’s g Decline at High IQ levels? Some evidence from Scotland. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 153(2), 229–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1992.10753717
- Maas, C. J., & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1(3), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86
- Makel, M. C., Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., Putallaz, M., & Benbow, C. P. (2016). When lightning strikes twice: Profoundly gifted, profoundly accomplished. Psychological Science, 27(7), 1004–1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616644735
- McGill, R. J. (2015a). Incremental criterion validity of the WJ-III COG clinical clusters: Marginal predictive effects beyond the general factor. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 30(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573514553926
- McGill, R. J. (2015b). Spearman’s law of diminishing returns (SLODR): Examining effects at the level of prediction. Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Science, 3(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.15640/jpbs.v3n1a3
- McGill, R. J., & Busse, R. T. (2015). Incremental validity of the WJ III COG: Limited predictive effects beyond the GIA-E.. School Psychology Quarterly, 30(3), 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000094
- Molenaar, D., Dolan, C. V., Wicherts, J. M., & van der Maas, H. L. (2010). Modeling differentiation of cognitive abilities within the higher-order factor model using moderated factor analysis. Intelligence, 38(6), 611–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2010.09.002
- Murray, A. L., Dixon, H., & Johnson, W. (2013). Spearman’s law of diminishing returns: A statistical artifact? Intelligence, 41(5), 439–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.06.007
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus 7. Muthén & Muthén.
- Nettelbeck, T., & Wilson, C. (2005). Intelligence and IQ: What teachers should know. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 609–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500344696
- Ng, T. W. H., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 367–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00515.x
- Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2008). Ability differences among people who have commensurate degrees matter for scientific creativity. Psychological Science, 19(10), 957–961. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02182.x
- Plucker, J. A., & Esping, A. (Eds.). (2014). Human intelligence: Historical influences, current controversies, teaching resources. Human Intelligence. http://www.intelltheory.com
- Preckel, F., Golle, J., Grabner, R., Jarvin, L., Kozbelt, A., Müllensiefen, D., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Schneider, W., Subotnik, R., Vock, M., & Worrell, F. C. (2020). Talent development in achievement domains: A psychological framework for within- and cross-domain research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(3), 691–722. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619895030
- Preckel, F., Holling, H., & Wiese, M. (2006). Relationship of intelligence and creativity in gifted and non-gifted students: An investigation of threshold theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(1), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.06.022
- Preckel, F., Wermer, C., & Spinath, F. M. (2011). The interrelationship between speeded and unspeeded divergent thinking and reasoning, and the role of mental speed. Intelligence, 39(5), 378–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2011.06.007
- Reynolds, M. R. (2013). Interpreting the g loadings of intelligence test composite scores in light of Spearman’s law of diminishing returns.. School Psychology Quarterly, 28(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000013
- Robertson, K. F., Smeets, S., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2010). Beyond the threshold hypothesis: Even among the gifted and top math/science graduate students, cognitive abilities, vocational interests, and lifestyle preferences matter for career choice, performance, and persistence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(6), 346–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410391442
- Roth, B., Becker, N., Romeyke, S., Schäfer, S., Domnick, F., & Spinath, F. M. (2015). Intelligence and school grades: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 53, 118–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.09.002
- Saklofske, D. H., Yang, Z., Zhu, J., & Austin, E. J. (2008). Spearman’s law of diminishing returns in normative samples for the WISC-IV and WAIS-III. Journal of Individual Differences, 29(2), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.29.2.57
- Schoppe, K. J. (1975). Verbaler Kreativitäts-Test-VKT: Ein Verfahren zur Erfassung verbal-produktiver Kreativitätsmerkmale [Verbal creativity test VKT: A test for the assessment of verbal-productive creativity characteristics]. Verlag für Psychologie CJ Hogrefe.
- Sechrest, L. (1963). Incremental Validity : A Recommendation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 23(1), 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446302300113
- Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man. MacMillan.
- Steinmayr, R., Meißner, A., Weidinger, A. F., & Wirthwein, L. (2014). Academic achievement. Oxford Bibliographies Online Datasets. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199756810-
- Strenze, T. (2007). Intelligence and socioeconomic success: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal research. Intelligence, 35(5), 401–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2006.09.004
- Tewes, U., Rossmann, P., & Schallburger, U. (2000). Hamburg-Wechsler-Intelligenztest für Kinder – Dritte Auflage (HAWIK III) [Hamburg-Wechsler-Intelligence Test for Children - Third Edition (HAWIK III)]. Hogrefe.
- Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2009). Differentiation of cognitive abilities across the life span.. Developmental Psychology, 45(4), 1097–1118. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015864
- Urban, K. K., & Jellen, H. G. (1995). Test zum Schöpferischen Denken-Zeichnerisch (TSD-Z) [Test for Drawing Productiviy (TDP)]. Swets.
- Urbina, S. (2011). Tests of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg & S. B. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 20–38). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511977244.003
- Vock, M., Preckel, F., & Holling, H. (2011). Mental abilities and school achievement: A test of a mediation hypothesis. Intelligence, 39(5), 357–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2011.06.006
- Weiß, R. H. (2006). CFT 20-R: Grundintelligenztest Skala 2-Revision [CFT 20-R: Basic Intelligence Test Scale 2-Revision]. Hogrefe.
- Zaboski, B. A., Kranzler, J. H., & Gage, N. A. (2018). Meta-analysis of the relationship between academic achievement and broad abilities of the Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory. Journal of School Psychology, 71, 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.10.001