References
- *Acar, S., Sen, S., & Cayirdag, N. (2016). Consistency of the performance and nonperformance methods in gifted identification: A multilevel meta-analytic review. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(2), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216634438
- Ackerman, C. M. (1997). Identifying gifted adolescents using personality characteristics: Dabrowski’s overexcitabilities. Roeper Review, 19(4), 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199709553835
- *Alonso, E. (1999). A meta-analysis of the metacognition of gifted children [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Miami Institute of Psychology.
- American Psychological Association. (2008). Reporting standards for research in psychology: Why do we need them? What might they be? American Psychologist, 63(9), 839–851. https://doi.org/810.1037/0003-1066X.1063.1039.1839
- Asher, J. W. (1986). Conducting research with meta-analysis: A new direction for gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30(1), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628603000101
- Asher, J. W. (2003). Meta-analysis and gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320302700102
- Azarian, R. (2011). Potentials and limitations of comparative method in social science. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(4), 113–125.
- Bailar, J. C., III. (1997). The promise and problems of meta-analysis. New England Journal Medical, 337(8), 559–561. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199708213370810
- Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
- Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 50(4), 1088–1101. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533446
- Bégin, J., & Gagné, F. (1994). Predictors of attitudes toward gifted education: A review of the literature and a blueprint for future research. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 17(2), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235329401700206
- Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
- Carman, C. A. (2013). Comparing apples and oranges: Fifteen years of definitions of giftedness in research. Journal of Advanced Academics, 24(1), 52–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X12472602
- Cheung, M. W.-L., & Chan, W. (2005). Meta-analytic structural equation modeling: A two-stage approach. Psychological Methods, 10(1), 40–64. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.1.40
- Cochran, W. G. (1954). The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics, 10(1), 101–129. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001666
- Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (2009). Research synthesis as a scientific process. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (pp. 3–16). Russell Sage Foundation.
- Cooper, H., & Koenka, A. C. (2012). The overview of reviews: Unique challenges and opportunities when research syntheses are the principal elements of new integrative scholarship. American Psychologist, 67(6), 446–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027119
- Cooper, H. M. (2003). Editorial. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.3
- Dai, D. Y., Swanson, J. A., & Cheng, H. (2011). State of research on giftedness and gifted education: A survey of empirical studies published during 1998—2010 (April). Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(2), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986210397831
- Dickersin, K., Scherer, R., & Lefebvre, C. (1994). Systematic reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ, 309(6964), 1286–1291. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6972.126
- Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95(449), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2000.10473905
- Dabrowski, K (1964). Positive disintegration. Little Brown
- Egger, M., & Smith, G. D. (1998). Bias in location and selection of studies. BMJ, 316(7124), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7124.61
- Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315(7109), 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
- Feldman, D. H., & Goldsmith, L. T. (1986). Nature’s gambit: Child prodigies and the development of human potential. Basic Books.
- Francis, R., Hawes, D. J., & Abbott, M. (2016). Intellectual giftedness and psychopathology in children and adolescents: A systematic literature review. Exceptional Children, 82(3), 279–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915598779
- Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X005010003
- *Goldring, E. B. (1990). Assessing the status of information on classroom organizational frameworks for gifted students. Journal of Educational Research, 83(6), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1990.10885977
- Grant, E. S., & Calderbank-Batista, T. (2013). Network meta-analysis for complex social interventions: Problems and potential. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 4(4), 406–420. https://doi.org/10.5243/jsswr.2013.25
- Hardy, R. J., & Thompson, S. G. (1998). Detecting and describing heterogeneity in meta‐analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 17(8), 841–856. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-025819980430)17:8<841::AID-SIM781>30.CO;2D
- *Henfield, M. S., Woo, H., & Bang, N. M. (2017). Gifted ethnic minority students and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216674556
- Higgins, J. P., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1539–1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186
- Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S., (Eds.). (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011] www.handbook.cochrane.org
- Higgins, J. P. T., Green, S., Egger, M., & Moher, D. (2011). Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases. In J. P. T. Higgins & S. Green (Eds.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011] www.handbook.cochrane.org
- *Hodges, J., Tay, J., Maeda, Y., & Gentry, M. (2018). A meta-analysis of gifted and talented identification practices. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(2), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217752107
- *Hoge, R. D., & Renzulli, J. S. (1993). Exploring the link between giftedness and self-concept. Review of Educational Research, 63(4), 449–465. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543063004449
- Ioannidis, J. (2016). The mass production of redundant, misleading, and conflicted systematic reviews and meta‐analyses. The Milbank Quarterly, 94(3), 485–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12210
- Jolly, J. L., & Kettler, T. (2008). Gifted education research 1994–2003: A disconnect between priorities and practice. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 31(4), 427–446. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2008-792
- *Kent, S. D. (1994). The effects of acceleration on the social and emotional development of gifted elementary students: A meta-analysis. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Georgia.
- *Kim, M. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of enrichment programs on gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(2), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216630607
- Kulik, C. L. C., & Kulik, J. A. (1982). Effects of ability grouping on secondary school students: A meta-analysis of evaluation findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19(3), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312019003415
- Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. L. C. (1984). Effects of accelerated instruction on students. Review of Educational Research, 54(3), 409–425. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543054003409
- Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. L. C. (1992). Meta-analytic findings on grouping programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(2), 73–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629203600204
- Lakens, D., Hilgard, J., & Staaks, J. (2016). On the reproducibility of meta-analyses: Six practical recommendations. BMC Psychology, 4(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-016-0126-3
- Lawrence, B. K. (2009). Rural gifted education: A comprehensive literature review. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32(4), 461–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320903200402
- Leech, N. L., Collins, K. M., Jiao, Q. G., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2011). Mixed research in gifted education: A mixed research investigation of trends in the literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(6), 860–875. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353211425095
- *Litster, K., & Roberts, J. (2011). The self‐concepts and perceived competencies of gifted and non‐gifted students: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 11(2), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2010.01166.x
- Litster, K. M. (2007). The self-concepts of gifted and nongifted students: A meta-analysis. [Unpublished master dissertation]. University of Victoria.
- *Martin, L. T., Burns, R. M., & Schonlau, M. (2010). Mental disorders among gifted and nongifted youth: A selected review of the epidemiologic literature. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209352684
- Matthews, M. S. (2004). Leadership education for gifted and talented youth: A review of the literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28(1), 77–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320402800105
- Miller, K., & Cummings, G. (2009). Gifted and talented students’ career aspirations and influences: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 6(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.2202/1548-923X.1667
- Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., … Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
- Murad, M. H., Montori, V. M., Ioannidis, J. P., Jaeschke, R., Devereaux, P. J., Prasad, K., Neumann, I., Carrasco-Labra, A., Agoritsas, T., Hatala, R., Meade, M. O., Wyer, P., Cook, D. J., & Guyatt, G. (2014). How to read a systematic review and meta-analysis and apply the results to patient care: Users’ guides to the medical literature. Jama, 312(2), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.5559
- *Neber, H., Finsterwald, M., & Urban, N. (2001). Cooperative learning with gifted and high-achieving students: A review and meta-analyses of 12 studies. High Ability Studies, 12(2), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130120084339
- *Pang, S. (1998). The relationship between giftedness and self-concept: A meta-analysis of gifted research. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. California State University
- Parker, M. R., Jordan, K. R., Kirk, E. R., Aspiranti, K. B., & Bain, S. K. (2010). Publications in four gifted education journals from 2001 to 2006: An analysis of article types and authorship characteristics. Roeper Review, 32(3), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2010.485309
- Periathiruvadi, S., & Rinn, A. N. (2012). Technology in gifted education: A review of best practices and empirical research. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(2), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2012.10782601
- *Petersen, J. (2013). Gender differences in identification of gifted youth and in gifted program participation: A meta-analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(4), 342–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.07.002
- Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell.
- Pigott, T., & Moon, S. M. (2016). Introduction to the meta-analysis special issue. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(2), 79–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216634439
- Polanin, J. R., Hennessy, E. A., & Tanner-Smith, E. E. (2017). A review of meta-analysis packages in R. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 42(2), 206–242. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998616674315
- Rinn, A. N., & Bishop, J. (2015). Gifted adults: A systematic review and analysis of the literature. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(4), 213–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986215600795
- *Rodríguez Naveiras, E., Verche Borges, E., Hernández Lastiri, P., Montero López, R., & Borges Del Rosal, M. Á. (2019). Differences in working memory between gifted or talented students and community samples: A meta-analysis. Psicothema,31(3), 255–262. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2019.18
- Rosenthal, R. (1979). The “file drawer problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638–641. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638
- *Sak, U. (2004). A synthesis of research on psychological types of gifted adolescents. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 15(2), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2004-449
- Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Shadish, W. R., & Haddock, C. K. (2009). Combining estimates of effect size. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (pp. 257–277). Russell Sage Foundation.
- Sharpe, D. (1997). Of apples and oranges, file drawers and garbage: Why validity issues in meta-analysis will not go away. Clinical Psychology Review, 17(8), 881–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(97)00056-1
- Simon, R. (2000). Meta-analysis of clinical trials: Opportunities and limitations. In D. K. Stangl & D. A. Berry (Eds.), Meta-analysis in medicine and health policy (pp. 305–325). Marcel Dekker.
- Slavin, R. E. (1993). Ability grouping in the middle grades: Achievement effects and alternatives. The Elementary School Journal, 93(5), 535–552. https://doi.org/10.1086/461739
- *Snyder, K. E., Fong, C. J., Painter, J. K., Pittard, C. M., Barr, S. M., & Patall, E. A. (2019). Interventions for academically underachieving students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 28, 100294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100294
- Steblay, N. K., Dysart, J. E., & Wells, G. L. (2011). Seventy-two tests of the sequential lineup superiority effect: A meta-analysis and policy discussion. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17(1), 99–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021650
- Steenbergen-Hu, S., Makel, M. C., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2016). What one hundred years of research says about the effects of ability grouping and acceleration on K–12 students’ academic achievement: Findings of two second-order meta-analyses. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 849–899. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316675417
- *Steenbergen-Hu, S., & Moon, S. M. (2011). The effects of acceleration on high-ability learners: A meta-analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986210383155
- Steenbergen-Hu, S., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2016). How to conduct a good meta-analysis in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(2), 134–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216629545
- Steinbrook, R. (2006). Searching for the right search: Reaching the medical literature. New England Journal Medical, 354(1), 4–7. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp058128
- *Strelzow, L. A. (1995). A meta-analysis of the relationship between giftedness and life satisfaction. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of British Columbia.
- Stroup, D. F., Berlin, J. A., Morton, S. C., Olkin, I., Williamson, G. D., Rennie, D., Moher, D., Becker, B. J., Sipe, T. A., & Thacker, S. B. (2000). Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. Jama, 283(15), 2008–2012. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.15.2008
- Thompson, C. G., & von Gillern, S. (2020). Video-game based instruction for vocabulary acquisition with English language learners: A Bayesian meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 30, 100332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100332
- Valentine, J. C., Pigott, T. D., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010). How many studies do you need? A primer on statistical power for meta-analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 35(2), 215–247. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998609346961
- VanTassel-Baska, J. (2006). NAGC symposium: A report card on the state of research in the field of gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(4), 339–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620605000406
- *Vaughn, V. L., Feldhusen, J. F., & Asher, J. W. (1991). Meta-analyses and review of research on pull-out programs in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35(2), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629103500208
- Walker, E., Hernandez, A. V., & Kattan, M. W. (2008). Meta-analysis: Its strengths and limitations. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, 75(6), 431–435. https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.75.6.431
- *Wallace, T. A. (1990). The effects of enrichment on gifted students: A quantitative synthesis [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Illinois.
- Warne, R. T., Lazo, M., Ramos, T., & Ritter, N. (2012). Statistical methods used in gifted education journals, 2006–2010. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(3), 134–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212444122
- Weil, L. G., Fleming, S. M., Dumontheil, I., Kilford, E. J., Weil, R. S., Rees, G., Dolan, R. J., & Blakemore, S. J. (2013). The development of metacognitive ability in adolescence. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(1), 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.01.004
- White, S. L., Graham, L. J., & Blaas, S. (2018). Why do we know so little about the factors associated with gifted underachievement? A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 24, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.03.001
- Wiernik, B. M., & Dahlke, J. A. (2020). Obtaining unbiased results in meta-analysis: The importance of correcting for statistical artifacts. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(1), 94–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919885611
- Wilson, D. B. (2009). Systematic coding. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 159–176). Russell Sage Foundation.
- *Winkler, D., & Voight, A. (2016). Giftedness and overexcitability: Investigating the relationship using meta-analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(4), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216657588
- *Woo, H., Bang, N. M., Cauley, B., & Choi, N. (2017). A meta-analysis: School-based intervention programs targeting psychosocial factors for gifted racial/ethnic minority students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(3), 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353217717034