Passionate and opportune engagement to accomplish or achieve in talent domains leading to female eminence

References

• Albert, R. S. (1975). Observations and suggestions regarding giftedness, familial influence, and the achievement of eminence. Gifted Child Quarterly, 22(2), 201–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/001698627802200214
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, K., Noble, K., & Subotnik, R. (Eds.). (1996). Remarkable women-perspectives on female talent development. Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartley-Buntz, J., & Kronborg, L. (2018). Mathematically able female adolescents’ perceptions of acceleration in mathematics. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 27(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21505/ajge.2018.0004
   Google Scholar
• Belenky, M., Clinchy, B., Goldberger, N., & Tarule, J. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. (1985). Developing talent in young people. Ballantine Books.
   Google Scholar
• ConnectWeb. (2021). Who’s who of Australian women. Retrieved October 8, 2021, from https://connectweb-com-au.ap1.proxy.openathens.net/view-biography.aspx?pid=10313&p=WWAW
   Google Scholar
• Cornejo-Araya, C. A., & Kronborg, L. (2021). Inspirational teachers’ model: A constructivist grounded theory study in gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 44(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353221023595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1997). Talented teenagers – the roots of success and failure. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow. The psychology of engagement in everyday life. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• De Micheli, C., & Herd, M. (2004). Who’s who in Australia 2004. Crown Content.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, D., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Gardner, H. (1994). A framework for the study of creativity. In D. Feldman, M. Csikszentmihalyi, and H. Gardner (Eds.), Changing the World – A framework for the study of creativity. Praeger Publishers. pp. 1–45.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, D., & Goldsmith, L. (1991). Nature’s Gambit – child prodigies and the development of human potential. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goertzel, M., Goertzel, V., & Goertzel, T. (1978). Three hundred eminent personalities. Jossey-Bass Inc. Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Goertzel, V., & Goertzel, M. (1962). Cradles of eminence. Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, B., & Robinson Kurpius, S. (2004). Encouraging talented girls in math and science: Effects of a guidance intervention. High Ability Studies, 15(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1359813042000225357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronborg, L., (2008a). Talent development of eminent Australian women [Unpublished PhD Thesis]. Monash University.
   Google Scholar
• Kronborg, L. (2008b). Allies in the family contributing to the development of eminence inn women. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 17(2), 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Kronborg, L. (2009). Passionate engagement in domains contributes to eminent women’s talent development. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 18(1), 15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Kronborg, L. (2010). What contributes to talent development in eminent women? Gifted and Talented International, 25(2), 11–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2010.11673567
   Google Scholar
• Kronborg, L. (2021). Eminent women were once gifted girls: How to transform gifted potential into eminent talents. In R. Sternberg, and D. Ambrose (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness and talent. Palgrave MacMillan. pp. 215–233.
   Google Scholar
• Lovecky, D. (1995). Creative connections: Perspectives on female giftedness. Advanced Development Journal-Special Edition, 95–106.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, W. L. (2003). Social research methods – qualitative and quantitative approaches (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, K., Subotnik, R., & Arnold, K. (1999). To thine own self be true: A new model of female talent development. Roeper Review, 43(4), 140–149.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, K., Subotnik, R., & Arnold, K. (1996). A new model for adult talent development: A synthesis of perspectives from remarkable women. In K. Arnold, K. Noble, and R. Subotnik (Eds.), Remarkable women. Hampton Press. pp. 427–439.
   Google Scholar
• Preckel, F., Golle, J., Grabner, R., Jarvin, L., Kozbelt, A., Mullensiefen, D., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Schneider, W., Subotnik, R., Vock, M., & Worrell, F. C. (2020). Talent development in achievement domains: A psychological framework for within-and cross-domain research. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 15(3), 691–722. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619895030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reis, S. (1996). Older women’s reflections on eminence: Obstacles and opportunities. In K. Arnold, K. Noble, and R. Subotnik (Eds.), Remarkable women. Hampton Press. pp. 151.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scutt, J. (1997). The incredible woman – power and sexual politics (Vol. 2). Artemis Publishing Pty Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (1978). The eminent genius in history: The critical role of creative development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 22(2), 187–195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/001698627802200212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosniak, L. (1997). The tortoise, the hare, and the development of talent. In N. Colangelo, and G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed.). Allyn & Bacon pp. 211.
   Google Scholar
• Subotnik, R., Arnold, K., & Noble, K. (1995). Gifted is as gifted does but what does gifted do? Roeper Review, 18(1), 4–5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199509553688
   Google Scholar
• Subotnik, R., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers, A. (2003). The end of equality. Random House Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Tweedale, C., & Kronborg, L. (2015). What contributes to gifted adolescent females’ talent development at a high-achieving, secondary girls’ school? Gifted and Talented International, 30(1–2), 6–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2015.1137450
   Google Scholar
• Walters, J., & Gardner, H. (1986). The crystallizing experience: Discovering an intellectual gift. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yewchuk, C., & Edmunds, A. (1992). Social influences on the career development of eminent Canadians. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, and D. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent development:Proceedings of the H.B. and Jocelyn Wallace national research symposium on talent development. Trillium Press.
   Google Scholar