Choices gifted women made in education, personal life, and career: A qualitative study in the Netherlands

References

• Alvesson, M., & Skoldberg, K. (1994). Tolkning och reflektion. Vetenskapsfilosofioch kvalitativ metod [Interpretation and reflection: philosophy of science and qualitative method]. Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, J., Schorer, J., Lemez, S., & Wattie, N. (2019). Understanding high achievement: The case for eminence. Frontiers in Phychology, 10(1927), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01927
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biles, S. (2016). Courage to soar. Zondervan.
   Google Scholar
• Blaikie, N. (2009). Designing social research. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Blinkhorn, S. (2005). A gender bender. Nature, 438(7064), 31–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/438031a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, L., Assouline, S., & Stanley, J. (1990). Five years of early entrants: Predicting successful achievement in college. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34(4), 138–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629003400402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceci, S., & Williams, W. (2011). Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(8), 3157–3162. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014871108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, S. (2019). Introduction to the special issue on coaching elite performers. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 71(2), 63–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/cpb0000140
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2007). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cravens, H. (1992). A scientific project locked in time: The Terman genetic studies of genius, 1920-1950s. American Psychologist, 47(2), 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.2.183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, A., & Gadde, L. (2002). Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research, 55(7), 553–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00195-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckworth, A., Peterson, C., Matthews, M., & Kelly, D. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 92(6), 1087–1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dykiert, D., Gale, C., & Deary, I. (2009). Are apparent sex differences in mean IQ scores created in part by sample restriction and increased male variance? Intelligence, 37(1), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2008.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. (2011). Understanding women’s achievement choices: Looking back and looking forward. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35(3), 510–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684311414829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fossey, E., Harvey, C., McDermott, F., & Davidson, L. (2002). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36(6), 717–732. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredericks, J., Alfeld, C., & Eccles, J. (2010). Developing and fostering passion in academic and non-academic domains. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209352683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froiland, M., & Worrel, F. (2016). Intrinsic motivation, learning goals, engagement, and achievement in a diverse high school. Psychology in the Schools, 53(3), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaerlan-Price, E., Wardman, J., & Bruce, T. (2021). Welcome to the table: A Bourdieusian take on gifted New Zealand young women. Education Sciences, 11(3), 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, F. (2009). Building gifts into talents: Detailed overview of the DMGT 2.0. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287583969_Building_gifts_into_talents_Detailed_overview_of_the_DMGT_20
   Google Scholar
• Gajda, A., Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. (2017). Creativity and academic achievement: A metanalysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(2), 269–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, T., McEwen, A., & Knipe, D. (1997). Science education policy: A survey of the participation of sixth-form pupils in science and other subjects over a 10-year period, 1985-1995. Research Papers in Education: Policy and Practice, 12(2), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267152970120202
   Google Scholar
• Gevaert, T. (2018). Ben ik slim (genoeg)? Echte meiden zijn stoer, kritisch, slim en vrouwelijk [Am I smart (enough)? Real girls are bold, have criticism, are smart and feminine]. Thesis Echa Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gladwell, M. (2011). Outliers: The story of success. Little, Brown & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, M. (1989). The pursuit of excellence or the search for intimacy? The forced-choice dilemma of gifted youth. Roeper Review, 11(4), 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783198909553207
   Google Scholar
• Hollinger, C., & Fleming, E. (1992). A longitudinal examination of life choices of gifted and talented young women 1. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(4), 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629203600407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houkema, D., Janssen, Y., & Steenbergen-Penterman, N. (2018). Passend onderwijs voor begaafde leerlingen binnen samenwerkingsverbanden: Rapportage van een inventariserend onderzoek [suited education for gifted students within cooperatives: Report on an inventory research]. https://talentstimuleren.nl/beleid/passendonderwijs/publicatie/4467-passend-onderwijs-voor. Inspectie van het Onderwijs (2018).https://www.onderwijsinspectie.nl/documenten/rapporten/2018/04/11/rapport-de-staat-van-het-onderwijs
   Google Scholar
• Hull, K. (2018). Well-being: Comparing the Netherlands to the USA. https://dutchreview.com/culture/society/well-being-comparing-the-netherlands-to-theusa/
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, J., & Linn, M. (2006). Gender similarities in mathematics and science. Science, 314(5799), 599–600. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1132154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jen, E., & Moon, S. M. (2015). Retrospective perceptions of graduates of a self-contained program in Taiwan for high school students talented in STEM. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(4), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986215598001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, B. (1985). Smart girls, gifted women: Special guidance concerns. Roeper Review, 8(1), 30–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783198509552923
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, B., & McKay, R. (2014). Smart girls in the twenty-first century. Great Potential Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, B., & Sodano, S. (2003). Career assessment with intellectually gifted students. Journal of Career Assessment, 11(2), 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072703011002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, B., Vuyk, A., & Rea, C. (2012). Gendered practices in the education of gifted girls and boys. Psychology in the Schools, 49(7), 647–656. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khilji, S., & Pumroy, K. (2019). We are strong and we are resilient: Career experiences of women engineers. Gender, Work, and Organization, 26(7), 1032–1052. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kommer, D. (2006). Boys and girls together: A case for creating gender friendly middle school classrooms. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 79(6), 247–251. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/TCHS.79.6.247-251
   Google Scholar
• Kornborg, L. (2021). Eminent women were once gifted girls: How to transform gifted potential into eminent talents. In J. Sternberg & D. Ambrose (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness and talent (pp. 215–233). Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Lange de, J. (2015). De Nederlandse cultuur vanuit een buitenlands perspectief: Een onderzoek naar het beeld van de Nederlandse cultuur vanuit het perspectief van de westerse expat [Dutch culture from a foreign perspective. Researching the image of the Dutch culture, seen from the perspective of a western expat] (Master thesis). European studies in culture and identity, UVA.
   Google Scholar
• Leslie, S., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., & Freeland, E. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 347(6219), 262–265. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtman, M. (2010). Qualitative research in education: A user’s guide (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lubinski, D., Benbow, C., & Kell, H. (2014). Life paths and accomplishments of mathematically precocious males and females four decades later. Psychological Science, 25(12), 2217–2232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614551371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maree, J. (2019). Self- and career construction counseling for a gifted young woman in search of meaning and purpose. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 19(2), 217–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-018-9377-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matheis, S., Keller, L., Kronborg, L., Schmitt, M., & Preckel, F. (2019). Do stereotypes strike twice? Giftedness and gender stereotypes in pre-service teachers’ beliefs about student characteristics in Australia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 48(2), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2019.1576029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCardle, L., Young, B., & Baker, J. (2019). Self-regulated learning and expertise development in sport: Current status, challenges and future opportunities. International Review of Sports and Exercise Psychology, 12(1), 112–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2017.1381141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie, N., & Knipe, S. (2006). Research dilemmas: Paradigms, methods and methodology. Issues in Educational Research, 16(2), 193–205.
   Google Scholar
• Menezes, L., & Kelliher, C. (2016). Flexible working, individual performance and employee attitudes: Comparing formal and informal arrangements. Human Resource Management, 56(6), 1051–1070. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niepel, C., Stadler, M., & Greiff, S. (2019). Seeing is believing: Diversity in STEM is related to mathematics self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(6), 1119–1130. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsewski, P., Shaw, B., Kulieke, M., & Willis, G. (1990). Predictors of achievement in mathematics for gifted males and females. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34(2), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629003400203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, B. (2012). Grounded theory method (GTM) and the abductive research strategy (ARS): A critical analysis of their differences. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 15(5), 417–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2011.607003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira Da Costa, M. (2019). Theories de intelligence: Concepts et evaluations du haut potential [Theories of intelligence: Concepts and evaluations of high potential]. Neuropsychiatrie de lénfance et de ládolescence, 62(3), 152–157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurenf.2019.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. (2019). Presenting a qualitative study: A reviewer’s perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(3), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219844789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollet, E., & Schnell, T. (2017). Brilliant: But what for? Meaning and subjective well-being in the lives of intellectually gifted and academically high-achieving Adults. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(5), 1459–1484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9783-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, S. (1998). Work left undone: Choices and compromises of talented females. Creative Learning Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reis, S. (2003). Gifted girls, twenty-five years later: Hopes realized and new challenges found. Roeper Review, 25(4), 154–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190309554220
   Google Scholar
• Reis, S., & Hollinger, M. (2021). Creative productive eminence in talented women: Beliefs, motivation, and drive to create. Gifted and Talented International, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2021.1947161
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. (2005). The three ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In J. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 217–245). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J., & Reis, S. (2014). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for talent development. Prufrock Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J., Smith, L., & Reis, S. (1983). Curriculum compacting: An essential strategy for working with gifted students. Gifted Education International, 1(2), 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142948300100212
   Google Scholar
• Rimm, S. (2005). Winning girls, winning women. Gifted Education International, 19(3), 258–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142940501900309
   Google Scholar
• Rimm, S. (2014). Jane wins again: Can successful women have it all? A fifteen year follow-up. Great Potential Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, K. (2007). Lessons learned about educating the gifted and talented: A synthesis of the research on educational practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(4), 382–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207306324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford, A. (2020). Doing science, doing gender: Using history in present. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 40(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneeweis, N., & Zweimuller, M. (2012). Girls, girls, girls: Gender composition and female school choice. Economics of Education Review, 31(4), 482–500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skelton, C., Francis, B., & Read, B. (2010). Brains before beauty? High achieving girls, schools and gender identities. Educational Studies, 36(2), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690903162366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, C., Spencer, S., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 379–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(02)80009-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R., & Davidson, J. (2005). Conceptions of giftedness. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tweedale, C., & Kronborg, L. (2015). What contributes to gifted adolescent females’ talent development at high-achieving, secondary girls’ school? Gifted and Talented International, 30(1–2), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2015.1137450
   Google Scholar
• Ugulu, I. (2020). Gifted students’ attitudes towards science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(1–3), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.31901/24566322.2020/28.1-3.1088
   Google Scholar
• VanTassel-Baska, J. (2019). Are we differentiating effectively for the gifted or not? A commentary on differentiated curriculum use in schools. Gifted Child Today, 42(3), 165–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217519842626
   Google Scholar
• Vogl, K., & Prekel, F. (2014). Full-time ability grouping of gifted students: Impacts on social self-concept and school-related attitudes. Gifted Child Quarterly 2014, 58(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986213513795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vötter, B., & Schnell, T. (2019). Bringing giftedness to bear: Generativity, meaningfulness, and self-control as resources for a happy life among gifted adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01972
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willard-Holt, C. (2008). “You could be doing brain surgery”: Gifted girls becoming teachers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(4), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986208321807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S., Wilson, M., & Baker, J. (2019). Parental sport achievement and the development of athlete expertise. European Journal of Sport Science, 19(5), 661–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2018.1551424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2020). The global gender gap report 2020. https://www.weforum.org/reports/gender-gap-2020-report-100-years-pay-equality
   Google Scholar
• Worrell, F., Subotnik, R., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Dixson, D. (2019). Gifted students. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 551–576. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yewchuk, C., Ӓystӧ, S., & Schlosser, G. (2001). Attribution of career facilitators by eminent women from Canada and Finland. High Ability Studies, 12(1), 89–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130124367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, H. P., & Jen, E. (2019). The gender role and career self-efficacy of gifted girls in STEM areas. High Ability Studies, 23(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2019.1705767
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, A., Stoeger, H., & Vialle, W. (2012). Giftedness and gifted education: The need for a paradigm change. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(4), 194–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212456070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar