The “d” in the Peterson Proactive Developmental Attention (PPDA) model: A lens for understanding and supporting underachievers

References

• Badger, J. R., Howarth, B. C., Svirko, E., & Mellanby, J. (2022). Underachievement at school relative to potential: Links between reasoning, phonological decoding, short-term memory, and complex grammar. Educational Psychology, 42(8), 952–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2022.2115978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brendtro, L. K., & Mitchell, M. L. (2015). Deep brain learning: Evidence-based essentials in education, treatment, and youth development. Starr Commonwealth.
   Google Scholar
• Breunlin, D. C., Schwartz, R. C., & MacKune-Karrer, B. (1992). Metaframeworks. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Broderick, P. C., & Blewitt, P. (2010). The life span: Human development for helping professionals (3rd ed. ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, J. H. (1992). They can but they don’t. Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Desmet, O. (2020). The achievement motivation enhancement model: Evaluating an affective intervention to resolve underachievement (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University Graduate School).
   Google Scholar
• Desmet, O. A., & Pereira, O. A. (2021). Gifted boys’ perceptions of their academic underachievement. Gifted Education International, 38(2), 229–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294211050294
   Google Scholar
• Desmet, O. A., Pereira, N., & Peterson, J. S. (2020). Telling a tale: How underachievement develops in gifted girls. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(2), 8599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219888633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, A. L., & Tucker, C. (2008). Every student matters: Enhancing strengths-based school counseling through the application of mattering. Professional School Counseling, 12(2), 23–126. https://doi.org/10.5330/PSC.n.2010-12.123
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gagne, F. (2013). The DMGT: Changes within, beneath, and beyond. Talent Development & Excellence, 5(1), 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Gaspard, H., Wille, E., Wormington, S. V., & Hulleman, C. S. (2019). How are upper secondary school students’ expectancy-value profiles associated with achievement and university STEM major? A cross-domain comparison. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilar-Corbi, R., Veas, A., Miñano, P., & Castejón, J.-L. (2019). Differences in personal, famiklial, social, and school factors between underachieving and non0underachiving gifted secondary students. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2367. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilman, B. J., & Peters, D. (2018). Finding and serving twice-exceptional students: Using triaged comprehensive assessment and protections of the law. In S. B. Kaufman (Ed.), Twice-exceptional: Supporting and educating bright and creative students with learning difficulties (Kindle ed., pp. 19–47). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hébert, T. P., & Olenchak, F. R. (2000). Mentors for gifted underachieving males: Developing potential and realizing promise. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(3), 196–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620004400307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. L., & Jung, J. Y. (2022). The identification of gifted underachievement: Validity evidence for the commonly used methods. British. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 1133–1159. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jen, E., Gentry, M., & Moon, S. M. (2017). High-ability students’ perspectives on an affective curriculum in a diverse, university-based summer residential enrichment program. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(4), 328–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217722839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jen, E., Wu, J., & Gentry, M. (2016). Social and affective concerns high-ability adolescents indicate they would like to discuss with a caring adult: Implications for educators. Journal of Advanced Academics, 27(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X15621904
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P. (2003). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (8th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, J. Y., Jackson, R. L., Townend, G., & McGregor, M. (2022). Equity in gifted education: The importance of definitions and a focus on underachieving gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 66(2), 149–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211037945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanevsky, L., & Keighley, T. (2003). To produce or not to produce? Understanding boredom and the honor in underachievement. Roeper Review, 26(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190309554235
   Google Scholar
• Lamarche-Bisson, D. (2002). Learning styles: What are they? How can they help? World and I, 17(9), 276–285.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, R. N., & Reschly, A. L. (2013). Re-examining gifted underachievement and dropout through the lens of student engagement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36(2), 220–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353213480864
   Google Scholar
• Lau, K.-L., & Chan, D. W. (2001). Identification of underachievers in Hong Kong: Do different methods select different underachievers? Educational Studies, 27(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690120050419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandel, H. P., & Marcus, S. I. (1995). Could do better. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2003). The structure and function of academic self-concept in gifted and general education samples. Roeper Review, 25(2), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190309554200
   Google Scholar
• McCoach, D. B., Siegle, D., & Rubenstein, L. D. (2020). Pay attention to inattention: Exploring ADHD symptoms in a sample of underachieving gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(2), 100–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219901320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGoron, L. (2022). Parents’ alarmingly high rates of anxiety, depression during pandemic has direct effect on kids. Wayne State University (businessmirror.com.ph).
   Google Scholar
• Mendaglio, S., & Peterson, J. S. (Eds.). (2007). Models of counseling gifted children, adolescents, and young adults. Prufrock.
   Google Scholar
• Morisano, D., & Shore, B. M. (2010). Can personal goal setting tap the potential of the gifted underachiever? Roeper Review, 32(4), 249–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2010.508156
   Google Scholar
• Obergriesser, S., & Stoeger, H. (2015). The role of emotions, motivation, and learning behavior in underachievement and results of an intervention. High Ability Studies, 26(1), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1043003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, S. J. (2022). The challenges of achieving equity within public school gifted and talented programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 66(2), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211002535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. P. (2023). A counselor educator situates two seminal studies in the cultural values and underrepresentation literature 30 years later. SENG Journal: Exploring the Psychology of Giftedness 2(1), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.25774/xcet-3v14
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. S. (1998). Six exceptional young women at risk. Reclaiming Children & Youth, 6(4), 233–238.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. S. (2000). A follow-up study of one group of achievers and underachieves four years after high school graduation. Roeper Review, 33(4), 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190009554041
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. S. (2001). Successful adults who were once adolescent underachievers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45(4), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620104500402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. S. (2002). A longitudinal study of post-high-school development in gifted individuals at risk for poor educational outcomes. Journal for Secondary Gifted Education, 14(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2002-384
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. S. (2012). The asset–burden paradox of giftedness: A 15-year phenomenological, longitudinal case study. Roeper Review, 34(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2012.715336
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. S. (2013). School counselors’ experiences with a summer group curriculum for high-potential children from low-income families: A qualitative study. Professional School Counseling, 16(3), 194–204. https://doi.org/10.5330/PSC.n.2013-16.194
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. S. (2014). Giftedness, trauma, and development: A longitudinal case study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37(4), 295–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353214552564
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. S. (2018). Personal/Social counseling and mental health concerns. In S. M. Wood & J. S. Peterson (Eds.), Counseling Gifted Students: A Guide for School Counselors (pp. 139–156). https://doi.org/10.1891/9780826136558.0009
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. S. (2020). Get gifted students talking. Free Spirit/Teacher Created Materials.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. S., & Colangelo, N. (1996). Gifted achievers and underachievers: A comparison of patterns found in school files. Journal of Counseling and Development, 74(4), 399–407. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1996.tb01886.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. S., & Jen, E. (2018). The Peterson Proactive Developmental Attention (PPDA) model: Nurturing the rest of the whole gifted child. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 41(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353218763874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. S., & Lorimer, M. R. (2011). Student response to a small-group affective curriculum in a school for gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(3), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986211412770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. S., & Lorimer, M. R. (2012). Small-group affective curriculum for gifted students: A longitudinal study of teacher-facilitators. Roeper Review, 34(3), 158–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2012.686423
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. S., & Peters, D. (2021). Bright, complex kids. Free Spirit/Teacher Created Materials.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. S., & Ray, K. E. (2006). Bullying and the gifted: Victims, perpetrators, prevalence, and effect. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(2), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620605000206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. S., & Wachter Morris, C. A. (2010). Understanding and responding to concerns related to giftedness: A study of CACREP-accredited programs. Journal for Education of the Gifted, 33(3), 163–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235321003300302
   Google Scholar
• Piechowski, M. M. (2013). A bird who can soar”: Overexcitabilities in the gifted. In C. S. Neville, M. M. Piechowski, & S. S. Tolan (Eds.), Off the charts: Asynchrony and the gifted child (pp. 99–122). Royal Fireworks Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos, A., Lavrijsen, J., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Sypré, S., & Verschueren, K. (2022). Motivational pathways underlying gifted underachievement: Trajectory classes, longitudinal outcomes, and predicting factors. Gifted Child Quarterly, 67(3), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.0016/9862221132279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go? The gifted child quarterly, 44(3), 152–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimm, S. (2009). Underachievement. In V. B. Kerr (Ed.), Encyclopedia of giftedness, creativity, and talent (pp. 911–914).
   Google Scholar
• Rimm, S. B. (2008). Underachievement syndrome: A psychological defensive pattern. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psycho-educational theory, research, and best practices (pp. 139–160). Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchotte, J. A., & Graefe, A. K. (2017). An alternate path: The experience of high-potential individuals who left school. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(4), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217722615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samardzija, N., & Peterson, J. S. (2015). Learning styles and classroom preferences of gifted eighth graders: A qualitative study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 38(3), 233–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353215592498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuurmans, I. K., Tamayo Martinez, N., Blok, E., Hillegers, M. H., Ikram, M. A., Luik, A. I., & Cecil, C. A. (2022). Child mental health problems as a risk factor for academic underachievement: A multi‐informant, population‐based study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 145(6), 578–590. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serafini, G., Parmigian, B., Amerio, A., Aguglia, A., Sher, L., & Amore, M. (2020). The psychological impact of COVID-19 on the mental health in the general population. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 529-535(8), 531–537. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcaa201
   Google Scholar
• Siegle, D., & McCoach, B. (2018). Underachievement and the gifted child. In S. I. Pfeiffer, E. Shaunessy-Dedrick, & M. Foley-Nicpon (Eds.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 559–573). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000038-036
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, L. K. (2013). Asynchronous development: Theoretical Bases and current applications. In C. S. Neville, M. M. Piechowski, & S. S. Tolan (Eds.), Off the charts: Asynchrony and the gifted child (pp. 18–47). Royal Fireworks.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, K. E., & Worthington, S. V. (2020). Gifted underachievement and achievement motivation: The promise of breaking silos. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(2), 63–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698622099179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenbergen-Hu, S., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Calvert, E. (2020). The effectiveness of current interventions to reverse the underachievement of gifted students: Findings of a metanalysis and systematic review. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(2), 132–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220908601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenberghs, N., Lavrijsen, J., Soenens, B., & Verschueren, K. (2021). Peer effects on engagement and disengagement: Differential contributions from friends, popular peers, and the entire class. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.726815
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, K., & Fu, G. (2016). Underachievement in gifted students: A case study of three college physics students in Taiwan. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(4), 688–695. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040405
   Google Scholar
• Weiler, L. M., Chesmore, A. A., Pryce, J., Haddock, S. A., & Rhodes, T. (2019). Mentor response to youth academic support–seeking behavior: Does attunement matter? Youth & Society, 51(4), 548–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X17697235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S. L. J., Graham, L. J., & Blaas, S. (2018). Why do we know so little about the factors associated with gifted underachievement? A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 24, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.101016/j.edurev.2018.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yermish, A. (2010). Cheetahs on the couch: Issues affecting the therapeutic working alliance with clients who are cognitively gifted ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts School of Professional Psychology,
   Google Scholar