Autonomy and Dyadic Coping: A Self-Determination Approach to Relationship Quality

References

• Anderson, J. R. (2020). Inviting autonomy back to the table: The importance of autonomy for healthy relationship functioning. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 46(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bader, E., & Pearson, P. (2013). In quest of the mythical mate: A developmental approach to diagnosis and treatment in couples therapy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Badr, H., Carmack, C. L., Kashy, D. A., Cristofanilli, M., & Revenson, T. A. (2010). Dyadic coping in metastatic breast cancer. Health Psychology: Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 29(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. The American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.44.9.1175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839x.00024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banthia, R., Malcarne, V. L., Varni, J. W., Ko, C. M., Sadler, G. R., & Greenbergs, H. L. (2003). The effects of dyadic strength and coping styles on psychological distress in couples faced with prostate cancer. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 26(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021743005541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Zur, H., Gilbar, O., & Lev, S. (2001). Coping with breast cancer: Patient, spouse, and dyad models. Psychosomatic Medicine, 63(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-200101000-00004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benyamini, Y., Gozlan, M., & Kokia, E. (2009). Women’s and men’s perceptions of infertility and their associations with psychological adjustment: A dyadic approach. British Journal of Health Psychology, 14(Pt 1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910708x279288
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berghuis, J. P., & Stanton, A. L. (2002). Adjustment to a dyadic stressor: A longitudinal study of coping and depressive symptoms in infertile couples over an insemination attempt. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70(2), 433–438. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022006x.70.2.433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenmann, G. (1997a). Dyadic coping-a systematic-transactional view of stress and coping among couples: Theory and empirical findings. European Review of Applied Psychology, 47, 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1300/J087v27n03_12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenmann, G. (1997b). Dyadisches Coping: theoretischer und empirischer Stand. Zeitschrift Für Familienforschung, 9, 7–25. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/29166/ssoar-zff-1997-2-bodenmann-dyadisches_coping.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y&lnkname=ssoar-zff-1997-2-bodenmann-dyadisches_coping.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bodenmann, G. (2005). Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In T. A. Rvenson, K. Kayser, & G. Bodenmann (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping. (pp. 33–49). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bodenmann, G., Meuwly, N., Bradbury, T. N., Gmelch, S., & Ledermann, T. (2010). Stress, anger, and verbal aggression in intimate relationships: Moderating effects of individual and dyadic coping. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(3), 408–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510361616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenmann, G., Meuwly, N., & Kayser, K. (2011). Two conceptualizations of dyadic coping and their potential for predicting relationship quality and individual well-being. European Psychologist, 16(4), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenmann, G., Pihet, S., & Kayser, K. (2006). The relationship between dyadic coping and marital quality: A 2-year longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology: JFP: Journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 20(3), 485–493. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.20.3.485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury, T. N., & Karney, B. R. (2014). Intimate relationships. W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bradford, K. (2012). Assessing readiness for couple therapy: The stages of relationship change questionnaire. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38(3), 486–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2010.00211.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2016). Amazon’s mechanical turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chirkov, V., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y., & Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falconier, M. K., Jackson, J. B., Hilpert, P., & Bodenmann, G. (2015). Dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 42, 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funk, J. L., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index. Journal of Family Psychology: JFP: Journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 21(4), 572–583. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaine, G. S., & La Guardia, J. G. (2009). The unique contributions of motivations to maintain a relationship and motivations toward relational activities to relationship well-being. Motivation and Emotion, 33(2), 184–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gestsdóttir, G., & Lerner, R. M. (2008). Positive development in adolescence: The development and role of intentional self regulation. Human Development, 51(3), 202–224. https://doi.org/10.1159/000135757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadden, B. W., Rodriguez, L. M., Knee, C. R., & Porter, B. (2015). Relationship autonomy and support provision in romantic relationships. Motivation and Emotion, 39(3), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9455-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halford, K. W. (2001). Brief therapy for couples: Helping partners help themselves. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halford, K. W., Moore, E., Wilson, K. L., Farrugia, C., & Dyer, C. (2004). Benefits of flexible delivery relationship education: An evaluation of the couple CARE program. Family Relations, 53(5), 469–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0197-6664.2004.00055.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzberg, P. Y. (2013). Coping in relationships: The interplay between individual and dyadic coping and their effects on relationship satisfaction. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 26(2), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2012.655726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. D., & Bradbury, T. N. (2015). Contributions of social learning theory to the promotion of healthy relationships: Asset or liability? Journal of Family Theory & Review, 7(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.118.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayser, K. (2005). Enhancing dyadic coping during a time of crisis: A theory-based intervention with breast cancer patients and their partners. In T. A. Revenson, K. Kayser, & G. Bodenmann (Eds.), Decade of behavior. Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping. (pp. 175–194). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Knee, C. R., Hadden, B. W., Porter, B., & Rodriguez, L. M. (2013). Self-determination theory and romantic relationship processes. Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 17(4), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313498000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knee, C. R., Lonsbary, C., Canevello, A., & Patrick, H. (2005). Self-determination and conflict in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 997–1009. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knee, C. R., Patrick, H., Vietor, N. A., Nanayakkara, A., & Neighbors, C. (2002). Self-determination as growth motivation in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(5), 609–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8542-6_7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Guardia, J. G., & Patrick, H. (2008). Self-determination theory as a fundamental theory of close relationships. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Guardia, J. G., Ryan, R. M., Couchman, C. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Within-person variation in security of attachment: a self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(3), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.3.367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leak, G. K., & Cooney, R. R. (2001). Self-determination, attachment styles, and well-being in adult romantic relationships. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 25, 55–62. Retrieved from https://doi.org/http://selfdeterminationtheory.org/SDT/documents/2001_LeakCooney_RRSP.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, R. M. (1982). Children and adolescents as producers of their own development. Developmental Review, 2(4), 342–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(82)90018-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. F. (2013). Attachment, autonomy, and emotional reliance: A multilevel model. Journal of Counseling & Development, 91(3), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2013.00098.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, M. V., Peterson, B. D., Almeida, V., Mesquita-Guimarães, J., & Costa, M. E. (2014). Dyadic dynamics of perceived social support in couples facing infertility. Human Reproduction, 29(1), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, M. M., Geldhof, G. J., Cameron, C. E., & Wanless, S. B. (2015). Development and self-regulation. In W. F. Overton & P. C. Molenaar (Eds.), Theory and method: Vol. 1. The handbook of child psychology and developmental science. (7th ed., pp. 523–565). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. (2017). Mplus (pp. 507–518). Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Niemiec, C. P. (2010). Contextual supports for autonomy and the development of high-quality relationships following mutual self-disclosure [Doctoral dissertation]. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, University of Rochester (Publication No. 3982).
   Google Scholar
• Olafsen, A. H., Deci, E. L., & Halvari, H. (2018). Basic psychological needs and work motivation: A longitudinal test of directionality. Motivation and Emotion, 42(2), 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-017-9646-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papp, L. M., & Witt, N. L. (2010). Romantic partners’ individual coping strategies and dyadic coping: Implications for relationship functioning. Journal of Family Psychology: JFP: Journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 24(5), 551–559. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick, H., Knee, C. R., Canevello, A., & Lonsbary, C. (2007). The role of need fulfillment in relationship functioning and well-being: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(3), 434–457. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, B. D., Newton, C. R., Rosen, K. H., & Schulman, R. S. (2006). Coping processes of couples experiencing infertility. Family Relations, 55(2), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17413729.2006.00372.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, B. D., Pirritano, M., Block, J. M., & Schmidt, L. (2011). Marital benefit and coping strategies in men and women undergoing unsuccessful fertility treatments over a 5-year period. Fertility and Sterility, 95(5), 1759–1763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rankin‐Esquer, L. A., Burnett, C. K., Baucom, D. H., & Epstein, N. (1997). Autonomy and relatedness in marital functioning. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 23(2), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1997.tb00242.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. (2014). Understanding motivation and emotion. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Regan, T. W., Lambert, S. D., Kelly, B., McElduff, P., Girgis, A., Kayser, K., & Turner, J. (2014). Cross-sectional relationships between dyadic coping and anxiety, depression, and relationship satisfaction for patients with prostate cancer and their spouses. Patient Education and Counseling, 96(1), 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revenson, T. A., Kayser, K. E., & Bodenmann, G. E. (2005). Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping. American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Rottmann, N., Hansen, D. G., Larsen, P. V., Nicolaisen, A., Flyger, H., Johansen, C., & Hagedoorn, M. (2015). Dyadic coping within couples dealing with breast cancer: A longitudinal, population-based study. Health Psychology : official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 34(5), 486–495. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will? Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1557–1586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00420.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Self-determination theory and the role of basic psychological needs in personality and the organization of behavior. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 3, 654–678. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444318111.ch8
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2014). Autonomy and need satisfaction in close relationships: Relationships. In N. Weinstein (Ed.), Human motivation and interpersonal relationships: Theory, research, and application. (pp. 53–73). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development and wellness. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schnarch, D., & Regas, S. (2012). The crucible differentiation scale: Assessing differentiation in human relationships. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38(4), 639–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00259.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2004). Long-term effects of spousal support on coping with cancer after surgery. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(5), 716–732. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.23.5.716.50746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokol, B. W., Hammond, S., Kuebli, J., & Sweetman, L. (2015). The development of agency. In W. F. Overton & P. C. Molenaar (Eds.), Theory and method: Vol. 1. Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (7th ed., pp. 284–322). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, S., Whitton, S., Sadberry, S., Clements, M., & Markman, H. (2006). Sacrifice as a predictor of marital outcomes. Family Process, 45(3), 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2006.00171.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traa, M. J., De Vries, J., Bodenmann, G., & Den Oudsten, B. L. (2015). Dyadic coping and relationship functioning in couples coping with cancer: A systematic review. British Journal of Health Psychology, 20(1), 85–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, J. L., & Vaux, A. (1993). Social support network orientation: The role of adult attachment style. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 12(3), 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1993.12.3.354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein, N., Przybylski, A. K., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). The index of autonomous functioning: Development of a scale of human autonomy. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(4), 397–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein, N. (2014). Human motivation and interpersonal relationships: Theory, research, and application. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 222–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessling, K. S., Huber, J., & Netzer, O. (2017). Mturk character misrepresentation: Assessment and solutions. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(1), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitton, S., Stanley, S., & Markman, H. (2007). If I help my partner, will it hurt me? Perceptions of sacrifice in romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26(1), 64–91. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2007.26.1.64
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar