Focusing on the Positive: Self-Selected Relationship Strengths as an Indicator of Relationship Distress

References

• Balderrama-Durbin, C., Snyder, D. K., & Balsis, S. (2015). Tailoring assessment of relationship distress using the marital satisfaction inventory—brief form. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 4(3), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000042
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, M. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1997). A hierarchical model of love and its prediction of satisfaction in close relationships. In R. J. Sternberg & M. Hojjat (Eds.), Satisfaction in close relationships (pp. 79–101). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cordova, J. V., Scott, R. L., Dorian, M., Mirgain, S., Yaeger, D., & Groot, A. (2005). The marriage checkup: An indicated preventive intervention for treatment-avoidant couples at risk for marital deterioration. Behavior Therapy, 36(4), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80112-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordova, J. V. (2014). The Marriage Checkup practitioner’s guide: Promoting lifelong relationship health. American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Cordova, J. V., Fleming, C. J. E., Morrill, M. I., Hawrilenko, M., Sollenberger, J. W., Harp, A. G., Gray, T. D., Darling, E. V., Blair, J. M., Meade, A. E., & Wachs, K. (2014). The Marriage Checkup: A randomized controlled trial of annual relationship health checkups. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82(4), 592–604. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordova, J. V., & Scott, R. L. (2001). Intimacy: A behavioral interpretation. The Behavior Analyst, 24(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger, N. I. (2012). The neural bases of social pain: Evidence for shared representations with physical pain. Psychosomatic Medicine, 74(2), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0b013e3182464dd1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, R. A., Davey, M., & Davey, A. (2005). Gender-related predictors of change in marital satisfaction and marital conflict. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 33(1), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926180590889211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, T., Cordova, J., Hawrilenko, M., Dovala, T., & Sollenberger, J. (2018). The path of emotional least resistance: Developing theory based on the self-reported strengths of happy and distressed couples in the marriage checkup. Journal of Relationships Research, 9, E5. https://doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2018.4
   Google Scholar
• Hawrilenko, M., Gray, T. D., & Cordova, J. V. (2016). The heart of change: Acceptance and intimacy mediate treatment response in a brief couples intervention. Journal of Family Psychology: JFP: Journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 30(1), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. The American Psychologist, 60(6), 581–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581 16173891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joel, S., Eastwick, P. W., Allison, C. J., Arriaga, X. B., Baker, Z. G., Bar-Kalifa, E., Bergeron, S., Birnbaum, G. E., Brock, R. L., Brumbaugh, C. C., Carmichael, C. L., Chen, S., Clarke, J., Cobb, R. J., Coolsen, M. K., Davis, J., De Jong, D. C., Debrot, A., DeHaas, E. C., … Wolf, S. (2020). Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(32), 19061–19071. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1917036117
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. D., Lavner, J. A., Muise, A., Mund, M., Neyer, F. J., Park, Y., Harasymchuk, C., & Impett, E. A. (2022). Women and Men are the barometers of relationships: Testing the predictive power of women’s and men’s relationship satisfaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(33). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2209460119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurenceau, J. P., Barrett, L. F., & Rovine, M. J. (2005). The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: A daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology: JFP: Journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 19(2), 314–323. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leth-Nissen, A. B., Fentz, H. N., Trillingsgaard, T. L., & Stadler, G. (2023). Randomized controlled trial of the Marriage Checkup: Stress outcomes. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 49(1), 242–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12620 36525504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leth-Nissen, A. B., Fentz, H. N., Stadler, G., & Trillingsgaard, T. L. (2023). A randomized controlled trial of a 5-year marriage checkup booster session for a subsample of ­responder couples. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 49(1), 49–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12601 36153652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, A. E., Castellani, A. M., Herrington, R. L., Joseph, J. I., Doss, B. D., & Snyder, D. K. (2008). Predictors of intimacy in couples’ discussions of relationship injuries: an observational study. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.22.1.21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, H. T., Clark, M. S., & Holmes, J. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In D. J. Mashek & A. P. Aron (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 201–225). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In S. Duck, D. F. Hay, S. E. Hobfoll, W. Ickes, & B. M. Montgomery (Eds.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (pp. 367–389). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, L. B. (1983). Intimate strangers: Men and women together (1st ed.) Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, H., & Campbell, L. (2012). Day-to-Day Changes in Intimacy Predict Heightened relationship passion, sexual occurrence, and sexual satisfaction: A dyadic ­diary analysis. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(2), 224–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611416520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (1981). Selection by consequences. Science (New York, N.Y.), 213(4507), 501–504. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7244649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, D. K. (1997). Marital satisfaction inventory, revised (MSI- R): Manual. Western Psychological Services.
   Google Scholar
• Sukhanova, A., Pascoal, P. M., & Rosa, P. J. (2022). A behavioral approach to sexual function: testing a moderation mediation model with expression of feelings, sexual self-disclosure and gender. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 48(6), 607–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2022.2035867 35166643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trillingsgaard, T., Fentz, H. N., Hawrilenko, M., & Cordova, J. V. (2016). A randomized controlled trial of the Marriage Checkup adapted for private practice. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84(12), 1145–1152. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whisman, M. A., Snyder, D. K., & Beach, S. R. H. (2009). Screening for marital and relationship discord. Journal of Family Psychology: JFP: Journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 23(2), 247–254. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar