Viral Advertising: A Field Experiment on Viral Intentions and Purchase Intentions

REFERENCES

• Aaker, J., and A. Smith. 2010. The dragonfly effect. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Akar, E., and B. Topçu. 2011. An examination of the factors influencing consumers’ attitudes toward social media marketing. Journal of Internet Commerce 10:35–67. doi:10.1080/15332861.2011.558456.
   Google Scholar
• Alden, D. L., W. D. Hoyer, and C. Lee. 1993. Identifying global and culture-specific dimensions of humor in advertising: A multinational analysis. Journal of Marketing 57:64–75. doi:10.2307/1252027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P., M. Gopinath, and P. U. Nyer. 1999. The role of emotions in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 27:184–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barasch, A., and J. Berger. 2014. Broadcasting and narrowcasting: How audience size affects what people share. Journal of Marketing Research 51:286–99. doi:10.1509/jmr.13.0238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., and D. A. Kenny. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51:1173–82. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J., and K. L. Milkman. 2012. What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research 49:192–205. doi:10.1509/jmr.10.0353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biehal, G., D. Stephens, and E. Curlo. 1992. Attitude toward the ad and brand choice. Journal of Advertising 21:19–37. doi:10.1080/00913367.1992.10673373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botha, E., and M. Reyneke. 2013. To share or not to share: The role of content and emotion in viral marketing. Journal of Public Affairs 13 (2): 160–71. doi:10.1002/pa.1471.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. R., R. K. Bhadury, and N. K. Pope. 2010. The impact of comedic violence on viral advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising 39 (1): 49–66. doi:10.2753/joa0091-3367390104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., and R. Cudeck. 1992. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods Research 21:230–58. doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, T., and H.-M. Lee. 2014. Why do we share? The impact of viral videos dramatized to sell: How microfilm advertising works. Journal of Advertising Research 54:292–303. doi:10.2501/jar-54-3-292-303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, P., L. Greenacre, and L. Freeman. 2014. Referral types and peer activation: Who to ask? Journal of Marketing Management 30:295–311. doi:10.1080/0267257x.2013.811282.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, H.-C., Y.-C. Hsieh, Y.-H. Kao, and M. Lee. 2007. The determinants of email receivers’ disseminating behaviors on the Internet. Journal of Advertising Research 47:524–34. doi:10.2501/s0021849907070547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, S.-C. 2011. Viral advertising in social media: Participation in Facebook groups and responses among college-aged users. Journal of Interactive Advertising 12:30–43. doi:10.1080/15252019.2011.10722189.
   Google Scholar
• Churchill, G. A., and G. P. Moschis. 1979. Television and interpersonal influences on adolescent consumer learning. Journal of Consumer Research 6:23–35. doi:10.1086/208745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cline, T. W., M. B. Altsech, and J. J. Kellaris. 2003. When does humor enhance or inhibit ad responses? The moderating role of the need for humor. Journal of Advertising 32:31–45. doi:10.1080/00913367.2003.10639134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, D., and C. Fill. 2008. Evaluating viral marketing: Isolating the key criteria. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 26:743–58. doi:10.1108/02634500810916690.
   Google Scholar
• Datta, P. R., D. N. Chowdhury, and B. R. Chakraborty. 2005. Viral marketing: New form of word-of-mouth through Internet. The Business Review 3:69–75.
   Google Scholar
• Dobele, A., D. Toleman, and M. Beverland. 2005. Controlled infection! Spreading the brand message through viral marketing. Business Horizons 48:143–49.
   Google Scholar
• Dobele, A., A. Lindgreen, M. Beverland, J. Vanhamme, and R. van Wijk. 2007. Why pass on viral messages? Because they connect emotionally. Business Horizons 50:291–304.
   Google Scholar
• De Gregorio, F., and Y. Sung. 2010. Understanding attitudes toward and behaviors in response to product placement: A consumer socialization framework. Journal of Advertising 39:83–96. doi:10.2753/joa0091-3367390106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckler, P., and P. Bolls. 2011. Spreading the virus: Emotional tone of viral advertising and its effect on forwarding intentions and attitudes. Journal of Interactive Advertising 11:1–11. doi:10.1080/15252019.2011.10722180.
   Google Scholar
• Edell, J. A., and M. C. Burke. 1987. The power of feelings in understanding advertising effects. The Journal of Consumer Research 14:421–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fattah, H. M. 2000. Viral marketing is nothing new. Technology Marketing Intelligence 20:1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. 1975. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Grifoni, P., A. D'Andrea, and F. Ferri. 2013. An integrated framework for on-line viral marketing campaign planning. International Business Research 6:22–32. doi:10.5539/ibr.v6n1p22.
   Google Scholar
• Goodey, C., and R. East. 2008. Testing the market maven concept. Journal of Marketing Management 24:265–82. doi:10.1362/026725708x306095.
   Google Scholar
• Henke, L. L. 2013. Breaking through the clutter: The impact of emotions and flow on viral marketing. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal 17:111–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hinz, O., B. Skiera, C. Barrot, and J. U. Becker. 2011. Seeding strategies for viral marketing: An empirical comparison. Journal of Marketing 75:55–71. doi:10.1509/jm.10.0088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horovitz, B. 2009. Pistachio industry hopes risqué ad campaign goes viral. USA Today, October 5.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., and P. M. Bentler. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternative. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6:1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby, J., and P. Marsden. 2006. Connected marketing. The viral, buzz and word of mouth revolution. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Korgaonkar, P. K., E. J. Karson, and I. Akaah. 1997. Direct marketing advertising: the assents, the dissents, and the ambivalents. Journal of Advertising Research 37:41–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korgaonkar, P. K., and L. D. Wolin. 1999. A multivariate analysis of web usage. Journal of Advertising Research 39:53–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laczniak, R. N., and L. Carlson. 1989. Examining the influence of attitude-toward-the-ad on brand attitudes. Journal of Business Research 19:303–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libai, B., E. Muller, and R. Peres. 2013. Decomposing the value of word-of-mouth seeding programs: Acceleration versus expansion. Journal of Marketing Research 50:161–76. doi:10.1509/jmr.11.0305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, F., H. Cheng, and J. Li. 2009. Consumer responses to sex appeal advertising: A cross-cultural study. International Marketing Review 26:501–20. doi:10.1108/02651330910972002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu-Thompkins, Y. 2012. Seeding viral content: The role of message and network factors. Journal of Advertising Research 53:465–78. doi:10.2501/jar-52-4-465-478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovett, R. P., R. Peres, and R. Shachar. 2013. On brands and word of mouth. Journal of Marketing Research 50:427–44. doi:10.1509/jmr.11.0458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, S. B., and R. J. Lutz. 1989. An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of Marketing 53:48–65. doi:10.2307/1251413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, S. B., R. J. Lutz, and G. E. Belch. 1986. The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research 23:130–43. doi:10.2307/3151660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxham, J. G., and R. G. Netemeyer. 2002. A longitudinal study of complaining customers’ evaluations of multiple service failures and recovery efforts. Journal of Marketing 66:57–71. doi:10.1509/jmkg.66.4.57.18512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, A. A., and J. C. Olson. 1981. Are product a beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitude. Journal of Marketing Research 18:318–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muehling, D. D., and M. McCann. 1993. Attitude toward the ad: A review. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 15:25–58. doi:10.1080/10641734.1993.10505002.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson-Field, K. 2013. Viral marketing: The science of sharing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petrescu, M., and P. K. Korgaonkar. 2011. Viral advertising: Definitional review and synthesis. Journal of Internet Commerce 10:208–26. doi:10.1080/15332861.2011.596007.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, J. E., R. Lewis, L. Mobilio, D. Perry, and N. Raman. 2004. Viral marketing or electronic word-of-mouth advertising: Examining consumer responses and motivations to pass along e-mail. Journal of Advertising Research 44:333–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer, J., S. D. Rappaport, T. Hall, and R. Barocci. 2007. Online advertising playbook: Proven strategies and tested tactics from the Advertising Research Foundation. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, L., and G. J. Golan. 2006. From subservient chickens to brawny men: A comparison of viral advertising to television advertising. Journal of Interactive Advertising 6:30–38. doi:10.1080/15252019.2006.10722116.
   Google Scholar
• Rappaport, S. D. 2014. Lessons learned from 197 metrics, 150 studies, and 12 essays: A field guide to digital metrics. Journal of Advertising Research 54:110–18. doi:10.2501/jar-54-1-110-118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichert, T., M. S. Latour, and J. B. Ford. 2011. The naked truth: Revealing the affinity for graphic sexual appeals in advertising. Journal of Advertising Research 51:436–48. doi:10.2501/jar-51-2-436-448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze, C., L. Schöler, and B. Skiera. 2014. Not all fun and games: Viral marketing for utilitarian products. Journal of Marketing 78:1–19. doi:10.1509/jm.11.0528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, C., D. M. Klein, and J. Bryant. 1990. Consumer response to humor in advertising: A series of field studies using behavioral observation. Journal of Consumer Research 16:498–501. doi:10.1086/209235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimp, T. A., S. L. Wood, and L. Smarandescu. 2007. Self-generated advertisements: Testimonials and the perils of consumer exaggeration. Journal of Advertising Research 47:453–61. doi:10.2501/s002184990707047x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukla, T. 2010. Factors affecting ‘Internet marketing’ campaigns with reference to viral and permission marketing. The IUP Journal of Management Research 9:26–37.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, G. J. 2007. i-Branding: Developing the Internet as a branding tool. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 25:544–62.
   Google Scholar
• Stanbouli, K. 2003. Marketing viral et publicité. Revue Française du Marketing 192/193:97–106.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, D. G., J. E. Lewin, and D. Strutton. 2011. Friends, fans, and followers: Do ads work on social networks? How gender and age shape receptivity. Journal of Advertising Research 51:258–75. doi:10.2501/jar-51-1-258-275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tellis, G. J. 2004. Effective advertising: Understanding when, how, and why advertising works. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Truong, H. 2010. The top ten successful viral ads of all time by AdAge. http://www.thedigiwave.com/2010/11/top-ten-viral-ads-of-all-time.html (accessed March 11, 2011)
   Google Scholar
• Valos, M. J., M. T. Ewing, and I. H. Powell. 2010. Practitioner prognostications on the future of online marketing. Journal of Marketing Management 26:361–76. doi:10.1080/02672571003594762.
   Google Scholar
• Vázquez-Casielles, R., L. S. Álvarez, and A. B. del Río Lanza. 2013. The word of mouth dynamic: How positive (and negative) WOM drives purchase probability: An analysis of interpersonal and non-interpersonal factors. Journal of Advertising Research 53:43–60. doi:10.2501/jar-53-1-043-060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollmer, C., and G. Precourt. 2008. Always on. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberger, M. G., and C. S. Gulas. 1992. The impact of humor in advertising: A review. Journal of Advertising 21:35–59. doi:10.1080/00913367.1992.10673384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welker, C. B. 2002. The paradigm of viral communication. Information Services and Use 22:3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, Q., W. Zhuang, and M. K. Hsu. 2014. Using social networking sites: What is the big attraction? Exploring a mediated moderation relationship. Journal of Internet Commerce 13:45–64. doi:10.1080/15332861.2014.898441.
   Google Scholar