6,386
Views
61
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Impact of Anthropomorphism on Consumers’ Purchase Decision in Chatbot Commerce

References

  • Addady, M. 2016. ‘TacoBot’ is the newest way to order taco bell. https://fortune.com/2016/04/06/tacobot-taco-bell/ (accessed January 5, 2020).
  • Aggarwal, P., and A. L. McGill. 2007. Is that car smiling at me? Schema congruity as a basis for evaluating anthropomorphized products. Journal of Consumer Research 34 (4):468–79. doi:10.1086/518544.
  • Aggarwal, P., and A. L. McGill. 2012. When brands seem human, do humans act like brands? Automatic behavioral priming effects of brand anthropomorphism. Journal of Consumer Research 39 (2):307–23. doi:10.1086/662614.
  • Anderson, J. C., and D. W. Gerbing. 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103 (3):411–23. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411.
  • Araujo, T. 2018. Living up to the chatbot hype: The influence of anthropomorphic design cues and communicative agency framing on conversational agent and company perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior 85:183–9. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.051.
  • Arnold, A. 2018. How chatbots feed into millennials’ need for instant gratification. https://www.forbes.com/sites/andrewarnold/2018/01/27/how-chatbots-feed-into-millennials-need-for-instant-gratification/?sh=79a719ac3675 (accessed October 31, 2020).
  • Asquith, M. 2019. Rule-based vs AI Chatbots. https://www.hubtype.com/blog/rule-based-vs-ai-chatbots/ (accessed January 4, 2020).
  • Bucher, B. 2020. Messaging app usage statistics around the world. https://www.messengerpeople.com/global-messenger-usage-statistics/ (accessed April 5, 2020).
  • Çelik, H. E., and V. Yilmaz. 2011. Extending the technology acceptance model for adoption of e-shopping by consumers in Turkey. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 12 (2):152.
  • CGS. 2019. CGS survey reveals consumers prefer a hybrid AI/human approach to customer service. Is there chatbot fatigue? https://www.cgsinc.com/en/resources/2019-CGS-Customer-Service-Chatbots-Channels-Survey (accessed October 31, 2020).
  • Chen, R. 2013. Member use of social networking sites—an empirical examination. Decision Support Systems 54 (3):1219–27. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.10.028.
  • Cheung, C. M., P. Y. Chiu, and M. K. Lee. 2011. Online social networks: Why do students use facebook? Computers in Human Behavior 27 (4):1337–43. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.028.
  • Choi, Y. K., G. E. Miracle, and F. Biocca. 2001. The effects of anthropomorphic agents on advertising effectiveness and the mediating role of presence. Journal of Interactive Advertising 2 (1):19–32. doi:10.1080/15252019.2001.10722055.
  • Corritore, C. L., B. Kracher, and S. Wiedenbeck. 2003. On-line trust: Concepts, evolving themes, a model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 58 (6):737–58. doi:10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00041-7.
  • Cyr, D., M. Head, H. Larios, and B. Pan. 2009. Exploring human images in website design: A multi-method approach. MIS Quarterly 33 (3):539–66.
  • Davis, F. D., R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw. 1992. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 22 (14):1111–32. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x.
  • Elprama, B. V. S. A., I. El Makrini, and A. Jacobs. 2016. Acceptance of collaborative robots by factory workers: A pilot study on the importance of social cues of anthropomorphic robots. In 25th IEEE International symposium on robot and human interactive communication. New York, NY.
  • Epley, N., A. Waytz, and J. T. Cacioppo. 2007. On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review 114 (4):864–86. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864.
  • Fornell, C., and D. F. Larcker. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1):39–50. doi:10.1177/002224378101800104.
  • Foye, L. 2017. Chatbots, a game changer for banking & healthcare, saving $8 billion annually by 2022. https://www.juniperresearch.com/press/press-releases/chatbots-a-game-changer-for-banking-healthcare (accessed October 31, 2020)
  • Fulk, J., C. W. Steinfield, J. Schmitz, and J. G. Power. 1987. A social information processing model of media use in organizations. Communication Research 14 (5):529–52. doi:10.1177/009365087014005005.
  • Gefen, D., and D. W. Straub. 2004. Consumer trust in B2C e-commerce and the importance of social presence: Experiments in e-products and e-services. Omega 32 (6):407–24. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2004.01.006.
  • Gilliland, N. 2016. Domino’s introduces ‘Dom the Pizza Bot’ for Facebook messenger. https://econsultancy.com/domino-s-introduces-dom-the-pizza-bot-for-facebook-messenger/ (accessed January 5, 2020)
  • Gong, L. 2008. How social is social responses to computers? The function of the degree of anthropomorphism in computer representations. Computers in Human Behavior 24 (4):1494–509. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.05.007.
  • Grabner-Kräuter, S., and E. A. Kaluscha. 2003. Empirical research in on-line trust: A review and critical assessment. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 58 (6):783–812. doi:10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00043-0.
  • Guo, Y., and S. Barnes. 2011. Purchase behavior in virtual worlds: An empirical investigation in Second Life. Information & Management 48 (7):303–12.
  • Hair, J. F., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson. 2009. Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Hamari, J. 2015. Why do people buy virtual goods? Attitude toward virtual good purchases versus game enjoyment. International Journal of Information Management 35 (3):299–308. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.01.007.
  • Han, M. 2019. Instant messaging chat bot: Your new best friend? In Smart marketing with the internet of things, ed. B. Barbosa, S. Filipe, C. A. Santos and D. Simões, 199–220. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  • Hassanein, K., and M. Head. 2005. The impact of infusing social presence in the web interface: An investigation across product types. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 10 (2):31–55. doi:10.2753/JEC1086-4415100202.
  • Head, M. M., Y. Yuan, and N. Archer. 2001. Building trust in e-commerce: A theoretical framework. In Proceedings of the second world congress on the management of electronic commerce, 17–9. Hamilton, Canada.
  • Heerink, M., B. Kröse, V. Evers, and B. Wielinga. 2008. The influence of social presence on acceptance of a companion robot by older people. The Journal of Pysical Agents 2 :33–40.
  • Horzyk, A., S. Magierski, and G. Miklaszewski. 2009. An intelligent internet shop-assistant recognizing a customer personality for improving man-machine interactions. In Recent advances in intelligent information systems, 3–26. Warsaw: EXIT.
  • Hsu, C. L., and J. C. C. Lin. 2015. What drives purchase intention for paid mobile apps?–An expectation confirmation model with perceived value. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 14 (1):46–57. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2014.11.003.
  • Hsu, C. L., and H. P. Lu. 2004. Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Information & Management 41 (7):853–68.
  • Jin, S. A. A. 2010. The effects of incorporating a virtual agent in a computer-aided test designed for stress management education: The mediating role of enjoyment. Computers in Human Behavior 26 (3):443–51. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.12.003.
  • Jones, K. S. 1994. Natural language processing: A historical review. In Current issues in computational linguistics: In honour of Don Walker, 3–16. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Jung, Y. 2008. Influence of sense of presence on intention to participate in a virtual community. In Proceedings of the 41st annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008), 325. Waikoloa, HI: IEEE.
  • Kanda, T., T. Hirano, D. Eaton, and H. Ishiguro. 2004. Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: A field trial. Human-Computer Interaction 19 (1):61–84. doi:10.1207/s15327051hci1901&2_4.
  • Karimov, F. P., and M. Brengman. 2011. Adoption of social media by online retailers: Assessment of current practices and future directions. International Journal of E-Entrepreneurship and Innovation 2 (1):26–45. doi:10.4018/jeei.2011010103.
  • Keeling, K.,. P. McGoldrick, and S. Beatty. 2010. Avatars as salespeople: Communication style, trust, and intentions. Journal of Business Research 63 (8):793–800. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.12.015.
  • Kerly, A., P. Hall, and S. Bull. 2007. Bringing chat bots into education: Towards natural language negotiation of open learner models. Knowledge-Based Systems 20 (2):177–85. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2006.11.014.
  • Klein, A., and V. M. Sharma. 2018. German Millennials’ decision-making styles and their intention to participate in online group buying. Journal of Internet Commerce 17 (4):383–417. doi:10.1080/15332861.2018.1463804.
  • Koufaris, M. 2002. Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Information Systems Research 13 (2):205–23. doi:10.1287/isre.13.2.205.83.
  • Kumar, N., and I. Benbasat. 2002. Para-social presence and communication capabilities of a web site: A theoretical perspective. E-Service 1 (3):5–24.
  • Laksmidewi, D., H. Susianto, and A. Z. Afiff. 2017. Anthropomorphism in advertising: The effect of anthropomorphic product demonstration on consumer purchase intention. Asian Academy of Management Journal 22 (1):1–25. doi:10.21315/aamj2017.22.1.1.
  • Lam, L. W. 2012. Impact of competitiveness on salespeople’s commitment and performance. Journal of Business Research 65 (9):1328–34. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.026.
  • Lee, H. G., S. Chung, and W. H. Lee. 2013. Presence in virtual golf simulators: The effects of presence on perceived enjoyment, perceived value, and behavioral intention. New Media & Society 15 (6):930–46.
  • Lee, K. M., W. Peng, S. A. Jin, and C. Yan. 2006. Can robots manifest personality?: An empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human–robot interaction. Journal of Communication 56 (4):754–72. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00318.x.
  • Leite, I., C. Martinho, A. Pereira, and A. Paiva. 2009. As time goes by: Long-term evaluation of social presence in robotic companions. In RO-MAN 2009-The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 669–74. New York, NY: IEEE.
  • Lin, K. Y., and H. P. Lu. 2011. Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Computers in Human Behavior 27 (3):1152–61. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.009.
  • Lu, B., W. Fan, and M. Zhou. 2016. Social presence, trust, and social commerce purchase intention: An empirical research. Computers in Human Behavior 56:225–37. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.057.
  • Messina, C. 2015. Conversational commerce. https://medium.com/chris-messina/conversational-commerce-92e0bccfc3ff (accessed December 26, 2019).
  • Mikalef, P., M. Giannakos, and A. Pateli. 2013. Shopping and word-of-mouth intentions on social media. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 8 (1):5–34. doi:10.4067/S0718-18762013000100003.
  • Moon, Y. 2002. Personalization and personality: Some effects of customizing message style based on consumer personality. Journal of Consumer Psychology 12 (4):313–25. doi:10.1207/15327660260382351.
  • Morning Consult. 2017. Mobile communication preference of internet users in the United States. https://morningconsult.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/170806_crosstabs_Brands_v1_TB.pdf (accessed October 30, 2020).
  • Murphy, B. 2017. Millennials and Gen Z would rather text each other than do this, according to a new study. https://www.inc.com/bill-murphy-jr/millennials-gen-z-prefer-texting-to-human-conversations-new-study-says-plus-5-other-findings.html (accessed December 31, 2019)
  • Nass, C., and Y. Moon. 2000. Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues 56 (1):81–103. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00153.
  • Neilson. 2019. Q1 Neilson total audience report. https://s3.amazonaws.com/media.mediapost.com/uploads/NielsenTotalAudienceReportQ12019.pdf (accessed October 30, 2020).
  • Nowak, K., and F. Biocca. 2003. Understanding the influence of agency and anthropomorphism on copresence, social presence and physical presence with virtual humans. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 12 (5):481–94. doi:10.1162/105474603322761289.
  • Nowak, K. L., and C. Rauh. 2008. Choose your “buddy icon” carefully: The influence of avatar androgyny, anthropomorphism and credibility in online interactions. Computers in Human Behavior 24 (4):1473–93. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.05.005.
  • Ogonowski, A., A. Montandon, E. Botha, and M. Reyneke. 2014. Should new online stores invest in social presence elements? The effect of social presence on initial trust formation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 21 (4):482–91. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.03.004.
  • Park, B. W., and K. C. Lee. 2010. Effects of knowledge sharing and social presence on the intention to continuously use social networking sites: The case of twitter in Korea. In International conference on U-and E-service, science and technology, 60–9. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Pew Research Center. 2019. Demographics of Internet and Home Broadband Usage in the United States. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/internet-broadband/ (accessed October 31, 2020)
  • Powers, A., and S. Kiesler. 2006. The advisor robot: Tracing people’s mental model from a robot’s physical attributes. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction, 218–25. Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Qiu, L., and I. Benbasat. 2009. Evaluating anthropomorphic product recommendation agents: A social relationship perspective to designing information systems. Journal of Management Information Systems 25 (4):145–82. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222250405.
  • Rafaeli, S., and A. Noy. 2005. Social presence: Influence on bidders in internet auctions. Electronic Markets 15 (2):158–75. doi:10.1080/10196780500083886.
  • Rawlins, L. K. 2016. Facebook chat bots to replace call centres. iTWeb. http://www.itweb.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=151,438 (accessed August 08, 2018)
  • Rouibah, K., P. B. Lowry, and Y. Hwang. 2016. The effects of perceived enjoyment and perceived risks on trust formation and intentions to use online payment systems: New perspectives from an Arab country. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 19 :33–43. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2016.07.001.
  • Salem, M., F. Eyssel, K. Rohlfing, S. Kopp, and F. Joublin. 2013. To err is human (-like): Effects of robot gesture on perceived anthropomorphism and likability. International Journal of Social Robotics 5 (3):313–23. doi:10.1007/s12369-013-0196-9.
  • Sharma, S., and R. E. Crossler. 2014. Intention to engage in social commerce: Uses and gratifications approach. Twentieth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Savannah. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ac5b/c6c62087517103181c040ac7b283e45a7954.pdf (accessed January 09, 2020).
  • Shawar, B. A., and E. Atwell. 2007. Chat bots: Are they really useful? LDV Forum 22 (1):29–49.
  • Shen, J. 2012. Social comparison, social presence, and enjoyment in the acceptance of social shopping websites. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 13 (3):198.
  • Shiau, W. L., and M. M. Luo. 2013. Continuance intention of blog users: The impact of perceived enjoyment, habit, user involvement and blogging time. Behaviour & Information Technology 32 (6):570–83.
  • Sivaramakrishnan, S., F. Wan, and Z. Tang. 2007. Giving an “e‐human touch” to e‐tailing: The moderating roles of static information quantity and consumption motive in the effectiveness of an anthropomorphic information agent. Journal of Interactive Marketing 21 (1):60–75. doi:10.1002/dir.20075.
  • Steinbrück, U., H. Schaumburg, S. Duda, and T. Krüger. 2002. A picture says more than a thousand words: Photographs as trust builders in e-commerce websites. In CHI'02 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, 748–9. Minneapolis, MN.
  • Stinnett, R., E. Hardy, and R. Waters. 2013. Who are we? The impacts of anthropomorphism and the humanization of nonprofits on brand personality. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing 10 (1):31–48. doi:10.1007/s12208-012-0087-z.
  • Sundar, S. S. 2004. Loyalty to computer terminals: Is it anthropomorphism or consistency? Behaviour & Information Technology 23 (2):107–18.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., L. S. Fidell, and J. B. Ullman. 2007. Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 5). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Takeuchi, A., and T. Naito. 1995. Situated facial displays: Towards social interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 450–5. New York, NY: ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
  • Tam, K. P., S. L. Lee, and M. M. Chao. 2013. Saving Mr. Nature: Anthropomorphism enhances connectedness to and protectiveness toward nature. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49 (3):514–21. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.001.
  • Teo, T., and J. Noyes. 2011. An assessment of the influence of perceived enjoyment and attitude on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education 57 (2):1645–53. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.002.
  • Trivedi, J. 2019. Examining the customer experience of using banking Chatbots and its impact on brand love: The moderating role of perceived risk. Journal of Internet Commerce 18 (1):91–111. doi:10.1080/15332861.2019.1567188.
  • Turban, E., J. Outland, D. King, J. K. Lee, T. P. Liang, and D. C. Turban. 2018. Intelligent (smart) E-commerce. In Electronic Commerce 2018, 249–83. Cham: Springer.
  • Van der Heijden, H.,. T. Verhagen, and M. Creemers. 2003. Understanding online purchase intentions: Contributions from technology and trust perspectives. European Journal of Information Systems 12 (1):41–8. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000445.
  • Verhagen, T., J. Van Nes, F. Feldberg, and W. Van Dolen. 2014. Virtual customer service agents: Using social presence and personalization to shape online service encounters. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19 (3):529–45. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12066.
  • Verto analytics. 2017. Multitasking and mobile apps: New ways to measure consumer behavior. https://insights.vertoanalytics.com/multitasking-and-mobile-apps-new-ways-to-measure-consumer-behavior (accessed June 9, 2019).
  • Waytz, A., J. Heafner, and N. Epley. 2014. The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 52:113–7. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.01.005.
  • Weisberg, J., D. Te’eni, and L. Arman. 2011. Past purchase and intention to purchase in e‐commerce. Internet Research 21 (1):82–96. doi:10.1108/10662241111104893.
  • Wölfl, S., and J. Feste. 2018. Do you trust me? Facial width-to-height ratio of website avatars and intention to purchase from online store. Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). San Francisco, CA.
  • Wölfl, S., J. M. Feste, and L. D. K. Peters. 2019. Is somebody there? Anthropomorphic website design and intention to purchase from online stores. Twenty-Fifth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Cancun, Mexico.
  • Worldpay. 2018. Consumer data: How consumers use and perceive messaging and chatbots in eCommerce. http://info.vantiv.com/rs/048-BUR-972/images/783-004-vantiv-messaging-and-chat-bots-aug-2018.pdf (accessed October 31, 2020).
  • Wright, L. B., J. C. Haug, and A. Huckabee. 2019. Blueprint for retail website design: Attracting and retaining millennial online shoppers. Journal of Internet Commerce 18 (2):170–96. doi:10.1080/15332861.2019.1584844.
  • Yee, N., J. N. Bailenson, and K. Rickertsen. 2007. A meta-analysis of the impact of the inclusion and realism of human-like faces on user experiences in interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 1–10. San Jose, CA. doi:10.1145/1240624.1240626.
  • Yoo, Y., and M. Alavi. 2001. Media and group cohesion: Relative influences on social presence, task participation, and group consensus. MIS Quarterly 25 (3):371–90. doi:10.2307/3250922.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.