Would You Watch It? Creating Effective and Engaging Video Tutorials

REFERENCES

• About. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.powtoon.com/about/
   Google Scholar
• Advanced encoding settings. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/1722171?hl=en
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, M.E. (2013, May). Give me five! e.learning age, 16–18.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles-Terry, M., Hensley, M.K., & Hinchliffe, L.J. (2010). Best practices for online video tutorials in academic libraries. Communications in Information Literacy, 4(1), 17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbard, D.A., & Peters, C. (2008). Web accessibility: A tutorial for university faculty. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 22, 143–164.
   Google Scholar
• Brown-Sica, M., Sobel, K., & Pan, D. (2009). Learning for all: Teaching students, faculty, and staff with screencasting. Public Services Quarterly, 5(2), 81–97. doi: 10.1080/15228950902805282
   Google Scholar
• Calk, R., Alt, K., Mills, S.K., & Oliver, R. (2007). The effective delivery of a streaming video course lecture. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 16(1), 81–93.
   Google Scholar
• Creating accessible Flash content. (2013 Retrieved from http://webaim.org/techniques/flash/
   Google Scholar
• Dirksen, J. (2012). Design for how people learn. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.
   Google Scholar
• Ekart, D. (2012). Extensibility. Computers in Libraries, 32(2), 38–39.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, L. (2011Choosing the best screen resolution for your screencasts [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://blogs.telestream.net/screenflow/2011/04/choosing-the-best-screen-resolution-for-your-screencasts/
   Google Scholar
• Farkas, M. (2009). Your desktop: The movie. American Libraries, 40(11), 33.
   Google Scholar
• Goodfellow, J., Sich, D., & Torabi, N. (2013, March). Librarians on YouTube: Using online video tutorials to teach various aspects of the information search process. Paper presented at the Technology in Education Symposium at Western. Retrieved from http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&context=ties
   Google Scholar
• Green, K.R., Pinder-Grover, T., & Millunchick, J.M. (2012). Impact of screencast technology: Connecting the perception of usefulness and the reality of performance. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 717–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halls, J. (2010). Shooting web video for training. T+D, 64(5), 76–77.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, G.S., & Proulx, M. (2005). Creating professional-quality training videos. Intercom, 52(2), 18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Heffernan, S. (2012). Building an HTML5 video player. Streaming Media, 9(1), 166–169.
   Google Scholar
• Hogarth, K., & Luke, B. (2010). Transitioning from dependent to more independent learners: Using video tutorials as a means of helping students help themselves. Paper presented at the 2010 AFAANZ Conference, Christchurch, New Zealand. Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/63209/2/63209.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jawaid, M., & Ashraf, J. (2012). Initial experience of eLearning research module in undergraduate medical curriculum of Dow University of Health Sciences: Development and students perceptions. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 28(3), 591–596.
   Google Scholar
• Kafadarova, N., & Stoyanova-Petrova, S. (2013). Some practical considerations in mLearning content development. In Proceedings of the 7th International Technology, Education and Development Conference 4th–6th March 2013, Valencia, Spain, 4743–4748. Retrieved from http://www.nanoskills.eu/fileadmin/project_results/Papers/528_INTED2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kroski, E. (2009). That's infotainment! School Library Journal, 55(2), 40.
   Google Scholar
• Kwong, V. (2008). Enhance library services and free/open source tools. Chinese Librarianship: An International Electronic Journal, 25, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Lipkowitz, G. (2013). Lights, camera, action. T+D, 67(4), 26–28.
   Google Scholar
• Lippincott, J.K. (2005). Net generation students and libraries. EDUCAUSE Review, 40(2), 56–66. Retrieved from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0523.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Majekodunmi, N., & Murnaghan, K. (2012). “In our own words”: Creating videos as teaching and learning tools. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library & Information Practice & Research, 7(2), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer R. (2009). Multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McMahon, F. (2012Mobile TV heads toward 16:9 aspect ratio [Web log post]. Broadcast Engineering Blog. Retrieved from http://broadcastengineering.com/blog/mobile-tv-heads-toward-169-aspect-ratio
   Google Scholar
• Mestre, L.S. (2010). Matching up learning styles with learning objects: What's effective? Journal of Library Administration, 50(7/8), 808–829.
   Google Scholar
• Mestre, L.S. (2012). Student preference for tutorial design: A usability study. Reference Services Review, 40(2), 258–276.
   Google Scholar
• Oud, J. (2011). Improving screencast accessibility for people with disabilities: Guidelines and techniques. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 16(3), 129–144. doi: 10.1080/10875301.2011.602304
   Google Scholar
• Our team. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://blog.wideo.co/our-team/
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, M. (2009, May). A library of learning. E.Learning Age, 12–13.
   Google Scholar
• Price, J.B. (2010). Screencasting on a shoestring: Using Jing. Reference Librarian, 51(3), 237–244. doi: 10.1080/02763871003792030
   Google Scholar
• Reyna, J., & Stanford, C. (2009). Use of slidecasts in higher education settings: A pilot project. In Same Places, Different Spaces: Proceedings ascilite Auckland 2009, 839–841. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/auckland09/procs/reyna-2-poster.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, D.E., Langan, K., Leatherman, C.C., & Walters, J.L. (2013). Assessing the effectiveness of online information literacy tutorials for Millennial undergraduates. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 20(3/4), 327–351.
   Google Scholar
• Saines, S. (2011). Circulation—the making of: Library videos and the real world. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(6), 532–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seminole State College of Florida. (2013). Educational programs scorecard: Enrollment by campus. Retrieved from http://www.seminolestate.edu/media/ir/research-data/enrollments_byacadgrp-9–13.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Spitalnik, I. (2013). The power of cartoon marketing. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
   Google Scholar
• Tekinarslan, E. (2013). Effects of screencasting on the Turkish undergraduate students’ achievement and knowledge acquisitions in spreadsheet applications. Journal of Information Technology Education, 12, 271–282.
   Google Scholar
• Tewell, E. (2010). Video tutorials in academic art libraries: A content analysis and review. Art Documentation: Bulletin of the Art Libraries Society of North America, 29(2), 53–61.
   Google Scholar
• Top 10 desktop, tablet & console screen resolutions from Dec 2012 to Nov 2013. (2013). Retrieved from http://gs.statcounter.com/#resolution-ww-monthly-201212–201311-bar
   Google Scholar
• Video compression guidelines. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://vimeo.com/help/compression
   Google Scholar
• Welton, D.G. (2013). Best exposure: YouTube or Vimeo? Videomaker, 28(2), 51.
   Google Scholar
• Wentz, B., Jaeger, P., & Lazar, J. (2011). Retrofitting accessibility: The legal inequality of after-the-fact online access for persons with disabilities in the United States. First Monday, 16(11). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3666/3077
   Google Scholar
• Yu, C., Jannasch-Pennell, A., DiGangi, S., & Kaprolet, C. (2009). An exploratory crossover study of learner perceptions of use of audio in multimedia-based tutorials. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40(1), 23–46. doi: 10.2190/EC.40.1.b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar