Circle the Wagons & Bust Out the Big Guns! Tame the “Wild West” of Distance Librarianship Using Quality Matters^TM Benchmarks

REFERENCES

• Allen, I.E., & Seaman, J. (2011, November). Going the distance: Online education in the United States, 2011. Retrieved from www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/goingthedistance.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Amante, M., Extremeño, A., & da Costa, A. (2013). Modelling variables that contribute to faculty willingness to collaborate with librarians: The case of the University Institute of Lisbon (ISCTE-IUL), Portugal. Journal of Librarianship & Information Science, 45(2), 91–102. doi: 10.1177/0961000612457105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belzowski, N.F., Ladwig, J., & Miller, T. (2013). Crafting identity, collaboration, and relevance for academic librarians using communities of practice. Collaborative Librarianship, 5(1), 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Bento, R.F., & White, L.F. (2010). Quality measures that matter. Issues in Informing Science & Information Technology, 7, 761–72.
   Google Scholar
• Bickner, C. (2002). Why web standards matter. Library Journal, 127(12), 26.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, A. (2012). A LibGuides presence in a Blackboard environment. Reference Services Review, 40(3), 449–468. doi: 10.1108/00907321211254698
   Google Scholar
• Bowles-Terry, M., Hensley, M., and Hinchliffe, L. (2010). Best practices for online video tutorials in academic libraries. Communications in Information Literacy, 4(1), 17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Blummer, B.A., & Kritskaya, O. (2009). Best practices for creating an online tutorial: A literature review. Journal of Web Librarianship, 3(3), 199–216.
   Google Scholar
• Coonin, B., & Hines, S. (2012). Reference services for distant students with disabilities. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 17(1), 7–12. doi: 10.1080/10875301.2012.652039
   Google Scholar
• Dewald, N.H. (1999). Web-based library instruction: What is good pedagogy? Information Technology & Libraries, 18(1), 26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz-Uhler, B., Fisher, A., & Han, A. (2008). Designing online courses to promote student retention. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 36(1), 105–112.
   Google Scholar
• Fichter, D. (2013). Making your website accessible. Online Searcher, 37(4), 73–76.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, B.A. (2012). Instructional design basics. In S. Alman, C. Tomer, & M.L. Lincoln (Eds.), Designing online learning: A primer for librarians (pp. 1–11). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, B.A., & King, D.K. (2011). Quality Matters[TM] accessibility survey: Institutional practices and policies for online courses. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED520903)
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, C. (2011). Web accessibility, libraries, and the law. Information Technology & Libraries, 30(1), 34–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaphery, J., & White, E. (2012). Library use of web-based research guides. Information Technology & Libraries, 31(1), 21–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giesecke, J. (2011). Finding the right metaphor: Restructuring, realigning, and repackaging today's research libraries. Journal of Library Administration, 51(1), 54–65. doi: 10.1080/01930826.2011.531641
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, P.A., & Dunning, P. (2012). Creating quality online course design through a peer-reviewed assessment. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18(1), 209–228.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, A.C., & Westbrock, T. (2010). Reaching out with LibGuides: Establishing a working set of best practices. Journal of Library Administration, 50(5/6), 638–656. doi: 10.1080/01930826.2010.488941
   Google Scholar
• Judd, C., & Montgomery, N. (2009). LibGuides and librarians: Connecting content and community. Kentucky Libraries, 73(3), 14–17.
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, L (2012). Student assessment in online learning. In S. Alman, C. Tomer, & M.L. Lincoln (Eds.), Designing online learning: A primer for librarians (pp. 37–51). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, D.H. (2006). Blackboard on a shoestring: Tying courses to sources. Journal of Library Administration, 45(1/2), 245–265. doi: 10.1300/J111v45n01_14
   Google Scholar
• Little, B. (2009). The use of standards for peer review of online nursing courses: A pilot study. Journal of Nursing Education, 48(7), 411–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzetti, J. (2004). Sophisticated, rigorous quality assurance program designed for your institution. Distance Education Report, 8(15), 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• MarylandOnline. (2013). Quality Matters. Retrieved from https://www.qualitymatters.org
   Google Scholar
• McMullin, R., & Hutton, J. (2010). Web subject guides: Virtual connections across the university community. Journal of Library Administration, 50(7/8), 789–797. doi: 10.1080/01930826.2010.488972
   Google Scholar
• Mestre, L.S. (2010). Matching up learning styles with learning objects: What's effective? Journal of Library Administration, 50(7/8), 808–829. doi: 10.1080/01930826.2010.488975
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, S.F., & Campbell, N. (2012). Commitment and trust in librarian-faculty relationships: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 38(1), 13–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickens-French, K., & McDonald, K. (2012). Changing trenches, changing tactics: A library's frontline redesign in a new CMS. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 7(1/2), 53–72. doi: 10.1080/1533290X.2012.705613
   Google Scholar
• Pollacia, L., & McCallister, T. (2009). Using Web 2.0 technologies to meet Quality Matters (QM) requirements. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 155–164.
   Google Scholar
• Providenti, M., & Zai III, R. (2007). Web accessibility at academic libraries: standards, legislation, and enforcement. Library Hi Tech, 25(4), 494–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley-Huff, D.A. (2012). Web accessibility and universal design. Library Technology Reports, 48(7), 29–35.
   Google Scholar
• Schmetzke, A., & Comeaux, D. (2009). Accessibility trends among academic library and library school web sites in the USA and Canada. Journal of Access Services, 6(1/2), 137–152.
   Google Scholar
• Shepley, S.E. (2009). Building a virtual campus: Librarians as collaborators in online course development and learning. Journal of Library Administration, 49(1/2), 89–95. doi: 10.1080/01930820802312821
   Google Scholar
• Su, S., & Kuo, J. (2010). Design & development of web-based information literacy tutorials. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 10(36), 320–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swan, K., Matthews, D., Bogle, L., Boles, E., & Day, S. (2012). Linking online course design and implementation to learning outcomes: A design experiment. Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 81–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tempelman-Kluit, N., & E. Ehrenberg, E. (2003). Library instruction and online tutorials: Developing best practices for streaming desktop video capture. Feliciter, 49(2), 89–90.
   Google Scholar
• Tripathi, M., & Jeevan, V.J. (2009). Quality assurance in distance learning libraries. Quality Assurance in Education: An International Perspective, 17(1), 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Tumbleson, B.E., & Burke, J. (2013). Embedding librarianship in learning management systems: A how-to-do-it manual for librarians. Chicago: Neal-Schuman.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H. (2008). Benchmarks and quality assurance for online course development in higher education. US-China Education Review, 5(3) 31–34.
   Google Scholar
• Zabel, D., Shank, J.D., & Bell, S. (2011). Blended librarianship: [Re]Envisioning the role of librarian as educator in the digital information age. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 51(2), 105–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar