References
- Allen, E. J., & Weber, R. K. (2012). Graduate student searching proficiencies in the selection of qualitative and quantitative journal references. Journal of AcademicLibrarianship, 38(3), 130–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2012.02.007.
- Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
- Ascough, R. S. (2011). Learning (about) outcomes: How the focus on assessment can help overall course design. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 41(2), 44–61.
- Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL). (2016). Framework for information literacy for higher education. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/issues/infolit/Framework_ILHE.pdf
- Bates, T. (2015). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. Retrieved from https://opentextbc.ca/teachinginadigitalage/
- Battersby, M. (1999). So what's a learning outcome anyway? Vancouver, BC: Centre for Curriculum, Transfer, and Technology. (ERIC Document 430611)
- Blaikie, N. (2009). Designing social research. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
- Blummer, B., Kenton, J. M., & Song, L. (2010). The design and assessment of a proposed library training unit for education graduate students. InternetReference Services Quarterly, 15(4), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2010.526491.
- Breen, J. (2007). The researcher ‘in the middle’: Negotiating the insider/outsider dichotomy. Australian Community Psychologist, (19)1, 163–174.
- Bussell, H., Hagman, J., & Guder, C. S. (2017). Research needs and learning format preferences of graduate students at a large public university: An exploratory study. College & Research Libraries, 78(7), 978. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.7.978.
- Butcher, N., & Hoosen, S. (2014). A guide to quality in post-traditional online higher education. Dallas, TX: Academic Partnerships.
- Chu, S. K., & Law, N. (2007). Development of information search expertise: Postgraduates’ knowledge of searching skills. Portal:Libraries and the Academy, 7(3), 295–316. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2007.0028.
- Conway, K. (2011). How prepared are students for postgraduate study? A comparison of the information literacy skills of commencing undergraduate and postgraduate information studies students at Curtin University. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 42(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2011.10722218.
- Council of Ontario Universities (COU). (2011). Ensuring the value of university degrees in Ontario: A guide to learning outcomes, degree level expectations, and the quality assurance process in Ontario. Retrieved from http://www.cou.on.ca/publications/reports/pdfs/ensuring-the-value-of-university-degrees-in-ontario
- Critz, L., Axford, M., Baer, W. M., Doty, C., Lowe, H., & Renfro, C. (2012). Development of the graduate library user education series. Reference Services Review, 40(4), 530–542. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00907321211277341. https://doi.org/10.1108/00907321211277341.
- Fleming-May, R., & Yuro, L. (2009). From student to scholar: The academic library and social sciences PhD students' transformation. Portal:Libraries and the Academy, 9(2), 199–221. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.0.0040.
- Fong, B. L., Wang, M., White, K., & Tipton, R. (2016). Assessing and serving the workshop needs of graduate students. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(5), 569–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.06.003.
- Ford, E., Izumi, B., Lottes, J., & Richardson, D. (2015). Badge it! A collaborative learning outcomes based approach to integrating information literacy badges within disciplinary curriculum. Reference Services Review, 43(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-07-2014-0026.
- George, C., Bright, A., Hurlbert, T., Linke, E., St. Clair, G., & Stein, J. (2006). Scholarly use of information: Graduate students’ information seeking behaviour. Information Research, 11(4), 1–14. Retrieved from http://InformationR.net/ir/11-4/paper272.html.
- Gibbs, D., Boettcher, J., Hollingsworth, J., & Slania, H. (2012). Assessing the research needs of graduate students at Georgetown University. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 38(5), 268–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2012.07.002.
- Gibbs, G. (2013). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Oxford: Further Education Unit, Oxford Polytechnic. Retrieved from https://thoughtsmostlyaboutlearning.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/learning-by-doing-graham-gibbs.pdf
- Goff, L., Potter, M. K., Pierre, E., Carey, T., Gullage, A., Kustra, E., & Raffoul, J. (2015). Learning outcomes assessment: A practitioner's handbook. Toronto: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.
- Harden, R. M. (2001). Curriculum mapping: A tool for transparent and authentic teaching and learning. Medical Teacher, 23(2):123–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590120036547.
- Harkins, M. J., Rodrigues, D. B., & Orlov, S. (2011). ‘Where to start?’ Considerations for faculty and librarians in delivering information literacy instruction for graduate students. Practical AcademicLibrarianship:International Journal of the SLA, 1(1), 28–50.
- Harrington, M. R. (2009). Information literacy and research-intensive graduate students: Enhancing the role of research librarians. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 28(4), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639260903272778.
- Harris, C. S. (2011). The case for partnering doctoral students with librarians: A synthesis of the literatures. Library Review, 60(7), 599–620. https://doi.org/10.1108/00242531111153614.
- Kuhlthau, C. C. (2004). Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information services. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
- Lam, B. H., & Tsui, K. T. (2016). Curriculum mapping as deliberation–examining the alignment of subject learning outcomes and course curricula. Studies in Higher Education, 41(8), 1371–1388. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.968539.
- Ministry of Advanced Education and Skills Development. (2016). Published college program standards. Retrieved from http://www.tcu.gov.on.ca/pepg/audiences/colleges/progstan/index.html
- Monroe-Gulick, A., & Petr, J. (2012). Incoming graduate students in the social sciences: How much do they really know about library research? Portal:Libraries and the Academy, 12(3), 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2012.0032.
- Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Pogorskiy, E. (2015). Using personalisation to improve the effectiveness of global educational projects. E-Learning andDigital Media, 12(1):57–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753014558378.
- Roszkowski, B., & Reynolds, G. (2013). Assessing, analyzing, and adapting: Improving a graduate student instruction program through needs assessment. Behavioral & Social SciencesLibrarian, 32(4), 224–239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639269.2013. 837798. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639269.2013.837798.
- Student2Scholar Team from Western University, University of Toronto, and Queen's University. (2015). Student2Scholar: Academic literacies and research skills modules. Retrieved from www.student2scholar.org
- Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- Zhao, J. C. (2015). Making information literacy instruction relevant: A needs assessment approach at McGill University. Science and Technology Library, 34(3), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2015.1089815.