Evaluating the Criteria for Selection of Web Resources for Academic Pursuit

References

• Alguliyev, R. M., Nabibayova, G. C., & Abdullayeva, S. R. (2020). Evaluation of websites by many criteria using the algorithm for pairwise comparison of alternatives. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications, 12(6), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijisa.2020.06.05
   Google Scholar
• Cuan-Baltazar, J. Y.,Muñoz-Perez, M. J.,Robledo-Vega, C.,Pérez-Zepeda, M. F., &Soto-Vega, E. (2020). Misinformation of COVID-19 on the Internet: Infodemiology Study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 6(2), e18444. https://doi.org/10.2196/18444
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Currie, L., Devlin, F., Emde, J., & Graves, K. (2010). Undergraduate search strategies and evaluation criteria. New Library World, 111(3/4), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074801011027628
   Google Scholar
• Emde, J., Currie, L., Devlin, F.A., Graves, K. 2008. Is “Good Enough” OK? Undergraduate Search Behavior in Google and in a Library Database. Paper presented at the Eighth Annual Brick and Click Library Symposium, Northwest Missouri State University, Maryville, MO. http://hdl.handle.net/1808/3869
   Google Scholar
• Fatema, K., Nasreen, S., Parvez, M. S., & Rahaman, M. A. (2020). Impact of using the internet on students: A sociological analysis at Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman science and technology University, Gopalganj, Bangladesh. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 08(12), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2020.812007
   Google Scholar
• Hong, J., & Jo, I. (2017). Undergraduate Students’ Use of Online Information in World Geography: Source Types and Selection Criteria. RIGEO, 7(2), 171–189. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1157790.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. Y., Paik, W., & Joo, S. (2012). Information resource selection of undergraduate students in academic search tasks. Information Research, 17(1), 511. https://www.informationr.net/ir/17-1/paper511.html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Song, S., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Linguistic features and consumer credibility judgment of online health information. iSchools. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/109674.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, A., Willyard, J., Platt, C. A., & Parsons, M. (2006). Exploring web usage and selection criteria among male and female Students. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3), 258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00258.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh, D., Fisher, J. H., Provencher, S., Liang, Z., Ryerson, C. J., & Weatherald, J. (2022). A systematic evaluation of the quality, accuracy, and reliability of internet websites about pulmonary arterial hypertension. Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 19(8), 1404–1413. https://doi.org/10.1513/annalsats.202103-325oc
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sbaffi, L., & Rowley, J. (2017). Trust and credibility in web-based health information: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(6), e218. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelly, G. B., Cashman, T. J., Gunter, G. A., & Gunter, R. E. (2006). Teachers discovery computers: Integrating technology and digital media in the classroom. Thomson Course Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, X., Cheung, C. M., & Lee, M. K. (2012). What leads students to adopt information from Wikipedia? An empirical investigation into the role of trust and information usefulness. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 502–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01335.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storino, A., Castillo-Angeles, M., Watkins, A. A., Vargas, C., Mancias, J. D., Bullock, A., Demirjian, A., Moser, A. J., & Kent, T. S. (2016). Assessing the accuracy and readability of online health information for patients with pancreatic cancer. JAMA Surgery, 151(9), 831–837. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, A., Cunningham, A., Hutchings, H., Harris, D., Evans, M., & Harji, D. (2022). Quality of internet information to aid patient decision making in locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer. The Surgeon, 20(6), e382–e391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2021.12.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, I., & Joo, S. (2009). Selection of information sources: Accessibility of and familiarity with sources, and types of tasks. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 46(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2009.1450460215
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., & Kim, Y. (2022). Consumers’ evaluation of web-based health information quality: Meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(4), e36463. https://doi.org/10.2196/36463
   Google Scholar