Becoming an expert by experience: An analysis of service users’ learning process

References

• Arnstein, S. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216–224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, S. E., & Edwards, R. (2012). How many qualitative interviews is enough. National Center for Research Methods. Retrieved from http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2273/4/how_many_interviews.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, M. (2009). Authoritative consumers or experts by experience? User groups in health and social care. In R. Simmons, M. Powell, & I. Greener (Eds.), The consumer in public services. Choice, values and difference (pp. 219–234). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, T., & Tursting, K. (2005). Beyond communities of practice: Language power and social context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. La Salle, IL: Open Court Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. (2009). Differentiated consumers? A differentiated view from a service user perspective. In R. Simmons, M. Powell, & I. Greener (Eds.), The consumer in public services. Choice, values and difference (pp. 197–218). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P., & Carr, S. (Eds.). (2012). Social care, service users and user involvement. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P., & Croft, S. (1993). Citizen involvement: A practical guide for change. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P., & Croft, S. (2004). Service users and practitioners reunited: The key component for social work reform. British Journal of Social Work, 34(1), 53–68. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billig, M. (1996). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical view of social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, D., & Harris, M. (2009). The challenge of co-production. How equal partnerships between professionals and the public are crucial to improving public services. Discussion paper. London, UK: New Economics Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.nesta.org.uk/library/documents/Co-production-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, Q. (2012). Putting our mark on things: The identity work of user participation in public services. Critical Social Policy. doi:10.1177/0261018312468306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brafield, H., & Eckersley, T. (2008). Service user involvement: Reaching the hard reach in supported housing. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, V., & Lambert, J. (2013). Collective learning for transformational change: A guide to collaborative action. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, M. (2011). Should I stay or should i go? Practical, ethical and political challenges to ‘Service User’ participation within social work research. Qualitative Social Work, 10(2), 224–243. doi:10.1177/1473325010362000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, E. S. (2010). Enactments of Expertise. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 17–32. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H. (2006). Two approaches to the study of Experts’ characteristics. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, R. R. Hoffman, & P. J. Feltovich (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 21–30). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H. M., & Evans, R. (2007). Rethinking expertise. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connor, D. M. (2007). A new ladder of citizen participation. National Civic Review, 77(3), 249–257. doi:10.1002/ncr.4100770309
   Google Scholar
• Cree, V. E., & Davis, A. (2007). Social work: Voices from the inside. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A. (2009). Development of professional expertise: Towards measurement of expert performance and design of optimal learning environments. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., Whyte, J., & Ward, P. (2007). Expert performance in nursing: Reviewing research on expertise in nursing within the framework of the expert-performance approach. Advances in Nursing Science, 30, E58–E71. doi:10.1097/00012272-200701000-00014
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Esterling, K. M. (2004). Political economy of expertise: Information and efficiency in American national politics. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farrow, K., & Fillingham, J. (2011). Promises and pitfalls: Involving service users and carers in social work manager education. Social Work Education, 14, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Forland, G., & Ringsberg, K. (2011). “I hope I haven’t run over you”: A case study of user participation in practice. Health Education Journal, 70(2), 160–169. doi:10.1177/0017896910373033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gergen, M. M., & Gergen, K. J. (2000). Qualitative inquiry: Tensions and transformations. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1025–1046). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Klein, G. (2009). Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. A Failure to Disagree. American Psychologist, 64(6), 515–526. doi:10.1037/a0016755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnieli-Miller, O., Strier, R., & Pessach, L. (2009). Power relations in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 19(2), 279–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiental learning: Experience as the source of the learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kvarnström, S., Willumsen, E., Andersson-Gäre, B., & Hedberg, B. (2012). How service users perceive the concept of participation, specifically in interprofessional practice. British Journal of Social Work, 42(1), 129–146. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcr049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leamy, M., Bird, V., Le Boutillier, C., Williams, J., & Slade, M. (2011). Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: Systematic review and narrative synthesis. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 199, 445–452. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.110.083733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomax, R., Jones, K., Leigh, S., & Gay, C. (2010). Surviving your social work placement. Basingstoke, UK: Palgarve Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, H. (2009). What´s a name: ´Client, patient, customer, consumer, expert by experience, service user—What’s next? British Journal of Social Work, 39, 1101–1117. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcm155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton, D. (2010). Identifying learning in interprofessional discourse: The development of an analytical protocol. In H. Daniels, A. Edwards, Y. Engeström, T. Gallagher, & S. R. Ludvigsen (Eds.), Activity theory in practice. Promoting learning across boundaries and agencies (pp. 90–103). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Needham, C., & Carr, S. (2009). Co-production: An emerging evidence base for adult social care transformation. SCIE research briefing 31. London, UK: Social Care Institute for Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Noorani, T. (2013). Service user involvement, authority and the “expert-by-experience” in mental health. Journal of Political Power, 6(1), 49–68.
   Google Scholar
• Peltola, S., & Vesala, K. M. (2013). Constructing entrepreneurial orientation in a selling context: The qualitative attitude approach. Poznan University of Economics Review, 13(1), 26–47.
   Google Scholar
• Repper, J., & Carter, T. (2011). A review of the literature on peer support in mental health services. Journal of Mental Health, 20(4), 392–411. doi:10.3109/09638237.2011.583947
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, K., & Webber, M. (2013). Models and effectiveness of service user and carer involvement in social work education: A literature review. British Journal of Social Work, 43(5), 925–944. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcs025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, P., Locke, M., & Dawson, J. (1997). Consumerism or democracy: User involvement in the control of voluntary organisations. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rocha, E. M. (1997). A ladder of empowerment. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 17(1), 31–44. doi:10.1177/0739456X9701700104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo, J. (2012). Survivor-controlled research: A new foundation for thinking about psychiatry and mental health. Forum Qualitative Social Research, 13(1), Art. 8. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:014-fqs120187
   Google Scholar
• Russo, J., & Beresford, P. (2015). Between exclusion and colonisation: Seeking a place for mad people’s knowledge in academia Disability & Society, 30(1), 153–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, R., Birchall, J., & Prout, A. (2012). User involvement in public services: “Choice about voice.” Public Policy and Administration, 27(1), 3–29. doi:10.1177/0952076710384903
   Google Scholar
• Skilton, C. (2011). Involving experts by experience in assessing students’ readiness to practice. Social Work Education, 30(3), 299–311. doi:10.1080/02615479.2010.482982
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (1990). Cooperative learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Tanner, D. (2009). Modernisation and the delivery of user-centred services. In J. Harris & V. White (Eds.), Modernising social work. Critical considerations (pp. 107–126). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M., & Beresford, P. (2005). User controlled research. Its meanings and potential. Final report. Shaping Our Lives and the Centre for Citizen Participation, Burnel University.
   Google Scholar
• Vesala, K. M., & Rantanen, T. (2007). Laadullinen asennetutkimus: Lähtökohtia, periaatteita, mahdollisuuksia [Qualitative attitude approach: Departure points, principles, possibilities]. In K. M. Vesala & T. Rantanen (Eds.), Argumentaatio ja tulkinta. Laadullisen asennetutkimuksen lähestymistapa (pp. 11–61). Helsinki, Finland: Gaudeamus.
   Google Scholar
• Wallcraft, J. (2009). From activist to researcher and part-way back. In A. Sweeney, P. Beresford, A. Faulkner, M. Nettle, & D. Rose (Eds.), This is survivor research (pp. 132–139). Ross-on-Wye, UK: PCCS Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wallcraft, J., Fleischmann, P., & Schofield, P. (2012). The involvement of users and carers in social work education: A practice benchmarking study. Workforce Development: Report 54. London, UK: Social care institute for excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Wallcraft, J., Schrank, B., & Amering, M. (2009). Handbook of service user involvement in mental health research. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & sons.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, J. (2007). Service user and carer participation in social work. Exeter, UK: Learning Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, S. (2008). Modelling service user participation in social care. Journal of Social Work, 8(3), 269–290. doi:10.1177/1468017808091040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–246. doi:10.1177/135050840072002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J., Leamy, M., Bird, V., Harding, C., Larsen, J., Le Boutillier, C., … Slade, M. (2012). Measures of the recovery orientation of mental health services: Systematic review. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 47(11), 1827–1835. doi:10.1007/s00127-012-0484-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar