A strengths model and violence risk assessment with individuals not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder (NCRMD) in Canada

References

• Abbiati, M., Azzola, A., Palix, J., Gasser, J., & Moulin, V. (2017). Validity and predictive accuracy of the structured assessment of protective factors for violence risk in criminal forensic evaluations: A swiss cross-validation retrospective study. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(4), 493–510. doi:10.1177/0093854816677565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alder, J. (2017). Protective factors: Bridging the gap between recovery and risk of violence assessment. Mental Health Practice, 21(3), 15–18. doi:10.7748/mhp.2017.e1216
   Google Scholar
• Barnao, M., & Ward, T. (2015). Sailing uncharted seas without a compass: A review of interventions in forensic mental health. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 22, 77–86. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2015.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookstein, D. M., Daffern, M., Ogloff, J. R., Campbell, R. E., & Chu, C. M. (2020). Predictive validity of the HCR-20V3 in a sample of Australian forensic psychiatric patients. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 1–18. doi:10.1080/13218719.2020.1775152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, C., Martin, K., & Marshall, L. (2019). Do review tribunals consider protective factors in their decisions about patients found not criminally responsible? The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 30(5), 894–907. doi:10.1080/14789949.2019.1650097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criminal Code (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46). Retrieved from https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/section-16.html.
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, A. G., Nicholls, T. L., Seto, M. C., Charette, Y., Côté, G., & Caulet, M. (2015). The national trajectory project of individuals found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder in Canada. Part 2: The people behind the label. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 60(3), 106–116. doi:10.1177/070674371506000305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2009). Guidelines for the assessment of protective factors for violence risk. English Version. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Forum Educatief.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries Robbé, M., & de Vogel, V. (2013). Protective factors for violence risk: Bringing balance to risk assessment. In C. Logan & L. Johnstone (Eds.), Managing clinical risk: A guide to effective practice (pp. 293–310). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries Robbé, M. (2014). Protective factors: Validation of the structured assessment of protective factors for violence risk in forensic psychiatry. [Sl: Sn]Utrecht, The Netherlands: Van der Hoeven Kliniek.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries Robbé, M., de Vogel, V., & De Spa, E. (2011). Protective factors for violence risk in forensic psychiatric patients: A retrospective validation study of the SAPROF. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10(3), 178–186. doi:10.1080/14999013.2011.600232
   Google Scholar
• de Vries Robbé, M., de Vogel, V., & Douglas, K. S. (2013). Risk factors and protective factors: A two-sided dynamic approach to violence risk assessment. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 24(4), 440–457. doi:10.1080/14789949.2013.818162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries Robbé, M., de Vogel, V., Douglas, K. S., & Nijman, H. L. (2015). Changes in dynamic risk and protective factors for violence during inpatient forensic psychiatric treatment: Predicting reductions in postdischarge community recidivism. Law and Human Behavior, 39(1), 53–61. doi:10.1037/lhb0000089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries Robbé, M., & Willis, G. M. (2017). Assessment of protective factors in clinical practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 32, 55–63. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2016.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Guy, L. S., Reeves, K. A., & Weir, J. (2005). HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme: Overview and annotated bibliography. Retrieved from https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1362&context=psych_cmhsr
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, T., Pugh, J., Singh, I., Savulescu, J., & Fazel, S. (2017). Risk assessment tools in criminal justice and forensic psychiatry: The need for better data. European Psychiatry, 42, 134–137. doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.12.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazel, S., Singh, J. P., Doll, H., & Grann, M. (2012). Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence and antisocial behaviour in 73 samples involving 24 827 people: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, 345(sep21 1), e6323–e6323. doi:10.1136/bmj.e6323
   Google Scholar
• Fukui, S., Goscha, R., Rapp, C. A., Mabry, A., Liddy, P., & Marty, D. (2012). Strengths model case management fidelity scores and client outcomes. Psychiatric Services, 63(7), 708–710. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201100373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, M. (2017). In defence of actuarialism: Interrogating the logic of risk in social work practice. Journal of Social Work Practice, 31(4), 395–410. doi:10.4324/9780429485411-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, S. D., Douglas, K. S., & Guy, L. S. (2016). The structured professional judgment approach to violence risk assessment: Origins, nature, and advances. In D. P. Boer (Ed.), The Wiley handbook on the theories, assessment and treatment of sexual offending (pp. 643–666). New York, NY: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781118574003.wattso030
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. D., & Logan, C. (2011). Formulation of violence risk using evidence-based assessments: The structured professional judgment approach. Forensic Case Formulation, 81–106. doi:10.1002/9781119977018.ch4
   Google Scholar
• Helmus, L. M., & Quinsey, V. L. (2020). Predicting violent reoffending with the VRAG‐R: Overview, controversies, and future directions for actuarial risk scales. In J. S. Wormith, L. A. Craig, & T. E. Hogue (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of what works in violence risk management: Theory, research and practice (pp. 119–144). Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9781119315933.ch6
   Google Scholar
• Hilton, N. Z., Simpson, A. I., & Ham, E. (2016). The increasing influence of risk assessment on forensic patient review board decisions. Psychological Services, 13(3), 223. doi:10.1037/ser0000068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashiwagi, H., Kikuchi, A., Koyama, M., Saito, D., & Hirabayashi, N. (2018). Strength-based assessment for future violence risk: A retrospective validation study of the structured assessment of protective factors for violence risk (SAPROF) Japanese version in forensic psychiatric inpatients. Annals of General Psychiatry, 17(1), 5. doi:10.1186/s12991-018-0175-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lacroix, R., O’Shaughnessy, R., McNiel, D. E., & Binder, R. L. (2017). Controversies concerning the Canadian not criminally responsible reform act. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 45(1), 44–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Large, M., & Nielssen, O. (2017). The limitations and future of violence risk assessment. World Psychiatry, 16(1), 25–26. doi:10.1002/wps.20394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingston, J. D., Crocker, A. G., Nicholls, T. L., & Seto, M. C. (2016). Forensic mental health tribunals: A qualitative study of participants’ experiences and views. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 22(2), 173–184. Martin, K., & Martin, E. (2016). Factors influencing treatment team recommendations to review tribunals for forensic psychiatric patients. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 34(4), 551–563. doi:10.1002/bsl.2244doi:10.1037/law0000084
   Google Scholar
• Oziel, S., Marshall, L. A., & Day, D. M. (2020). Validating the SAPROF with forensic mental health patients. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 31(5), 667–698. doi:10.1080/14789949.2020.1785525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penney, S. R., Marshall, L., & Simpson, A. I. (2018). A prospective study of pathways to hospital readmission in Canadian forensic psychiatric patients. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 29(3), 368–386. doi:10.1080/14789949.2017.1395061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramesh, T., Igoumenou, A., Montes, M. V., & Fazel, S. (2018). Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence in forensic psychiatric hospitals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Psychiatry, 52, 47–53. doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, C. A., & Goscha, R. J. (2012). The strengths model: A recovery-oriented approach to mental health services. New York, USA: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp, C. A., & Sullivan, W. P. (2014). The strengths model: Birth to toddlerhood. Advances in Social Work, 15(1), 129–142. doi:10.18060/16643
   Google Scholar
• Rettenberger, M., Rice, M. E., Harris, G. T., & Eher, R. (2017). Actuarial risk assessment of sexual offenders: The psychometric properties of the sex offender risk appraisal guide (SORAG). Psychological Assessment, 29(6), 624–638. doi:10.1037/pas0000390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29(5), 615–620. doi:10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, S. M., & Sullivan, D. (2017). Covert and implicit influences on the interpretation of violence risk instruments. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 24(2), 292–301. doi:10.1080/13218719.2016.1197817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J. P. (2013). Predictive validity performance indicators in violence risk assessment: A methodological primer. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 31(1), 8–22. doi:10.1002/bsl.2052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J. P., Desmarais, S. L., & Van Dorn, R. A. (2013). Measurement of predictive validity in violence risk assessment studies: A second-order systematic review. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 31(1), 55–73. doi:10.1002/bsl.2053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szmukler, G., Everitt, B., & Leese, M. (2012). Risk assessment and receiver operating characteristic curves. Psychological Medicine, 42(5), 895–898. doi:10.1017/s003329171100208x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse, S., Tsoi, E. W., Hamilton, B., O’Hagan, M., Shepherd, G., Slade, M., … Petrakis, M. (2016). Uses of strength-based interventions for people with serious mental illness: A critical review. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 62(3), 281–291. doi:10.1177/0020764015623970
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanamaker, K. A., Jones, N. J., & Brown, S. L. (2018). Strengths-based assessments for use with forensic populations: A critical review. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 17(2), 202–221. doi:10.1080/14999013.2018.1451414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. M., Nicholls, T. L., Charette, Y., Seto, M. C., & Crocker, A. G. (2016). Factors associated with review board dispositions following re‐hospitalization among discharged persons found not criminally responsible. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 34(2–3), 278–294. doi:10.1002/bsl.2220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, H. (2013). Strengths-based approach for mental health recovery. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 7(2), 5–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar