Factors influencing policymaker decision making in the behavioral health-related legislative process: A scoping review

References

• Anderson, S., Allen, P., Peckham, S., & Goodwin, N. (2008). Asking the right questions: Scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services. Health Research Policy and Systems, 6(1), 7. doi:10.1186/1478-4505-6-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arksey, H., & O’malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616
   Google Scholar
• Author(s). (2021).
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, E., & Cook, F. (1991). Congressional attitudes and voting behavior: An examination of support for social welfare. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 16(3), 375–392. doi:10.2307/440103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, L. (1991). Constituency opinion and congressional policy making: The Reagan defense buildup. The American Political Science Review, 85(2), 457–474. doi:10.2307/1963169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergan, D. E. (2009). Does grassroots lobbying work?: A field experiment measuring the effects of an e-mail lobbying campaign on legislative behavior. American Politics Research, 37(2), 327–352. doi:10.1177/1532673X08326967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergan, D. E., & Cole, R. T. (2015). Call your legislator: A field experimental study of the impact of a constituency mobilization campaign on legislative voting. Political Behavior, 37(1), 27–42. doi:10.1007/s11109-014-9277-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratton, K., & Haynie, K. (1999). Agenda-setting and legislative success in state legislatures: The effects of gender and race. The Journal of Politics, 61(3), 658–679. doi:10.2307/2647822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buse, K., Mays, N., & Walt, G. (2005). Making health policy. Maidenhead, United Kingdom: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D., & Nickerson, D. (2011). Can learning constituency opinion a?ect how legislators vote? Results from a field experiment. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 6(1), 55–83. doi:10.1561/100.00011019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y. L. (2019). Social construction, knowledge utilization, and the politics of poverty: A case study of Washington state’s general assistance reform. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 46(2), 75–100. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0kb316qw
   Google Scholar
• Chressanthis, G., Gilbert, K., & Grimes, P. (1991). Ideology constituent interests, and senatorial voting: The case of abortion. Social Science Quarterly, 72(3), 588–600. doi:10.2307/3552425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., De Guia, N., Ashley, M., Ferrence, R., Northrup, D., & Studlar, D. (2002). Predictors of Canadian legislators’ support for tobacco control policies. Social Science & Medicine, 55(6), 1069–1076. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00244-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commonwealth Fund. (2022). Behavioral health care in the United States: How it works and where it falls short. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/explainer/2022/sep/behavioral-health-care-us-how-it-works-where-it-falls-short#:~:text=At%20the%20federal%20level%2C%20the,2022%2C%20is%20a%20major%20grantmaker.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, E., Barry, R. A., & Glantz, S. (2016). E‐cigarette policymaking by local and state governments: 2009‐2014. The Milbank Quarterly, 94(3), 520–596. doi:10.1111/1468-0009.12212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, G., & Poole, K. (2002). On measuring partisanship in roll-call voting: The U.S. House of Representatives, 1877-1999. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 477–489. doi:10.2307/3088393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley, D. M., Connell, C. M., Noll, J., Green, L., Scott, T., & Giray, C. (2022). Legislating to prevent adverse childhood experiences: Growth and opportunities for evidence-based policymaking and prevention. Prevention Science, 23(2), 181–191. doi:10.1007/s11121-021-01292-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, R. H., Oleszek, W. J., Lee, F. E., & Schickler, E. (2013). Congress and its members (14th ed.). London, ENG: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dodson, E. A., Stamatakis, K. A., Chalifour, S., Haire-Joshu, D., McBride, T., & Brownson, R. C. (2013). State legislators’ work on public health-related issues: What influences priorities? Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 19(1), 25–29. doi:10.1097/PHH.0b013e318246475c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorfman, L., & Krasnow, I. (2014). Public health and media advocacy. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 293–306. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flagg, R. (2016). Medicaid expansion: A tale of two governors. Journal of Health Politics, Policy & Law, 41(5), 997–1031. doi:10.1215/03616878-3632243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gohmann, S. F., & Ohsfeldt, R. L. (1990). Predicting state abortion legislation from U.S. senate votes: The effects of apparent ideological shirking. The Review of Policy Research, 9(4), 749–762. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.1990.tb01076.x
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H. (2009). Translating research into public Policy. Journal of Public Health Policy, 30(S1), S16–20. doi:10.1057/jphp.2008.49
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hogan, R. (2008). Sex and the statehouse: The effects of gender on legislative roll‐call voting. Social Science Quarterly, 89(4), 955–968. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00593.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, L., Sweet, J., & Bauer, R. (2010). Advocacy 101: A step beyond complaining. How the individual practitioner can become involved and make a difference. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 24(3), 373–390. doi:10.1080/13854040903264154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, K., & Piot, P. (2012). Scientific evidence alone is not sufficient basis for health policy. British Medical Journal, 344(1), E1316. doi:10.1136/bmj.e1316
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kau, J., & Rubin, P. (1982). Congressmen, constituents, and contributors. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• LegiNation. (2020). About us. https://www.billtrack50.com/about-us
   Google Scholar
• Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 69. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, S. (1996). How do senators vote? Disentangling the role of voter preferences, party affiliation, and senate ideology. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 425–441. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2118205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark, T. L., Levit, K. R., Yee, T., & Chow, C. M. (2014). Spending on mental and substance use disorders projected to grow more slowly than all health spending through 2020. Health Affairs, 33(8), 1407–1415. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matschinger, H., & Angermeyer, M. (2004). The public’s preferences concerning the allocation of financial resources to health care: Results from a representative population survey in Germany. European Psychiatry, 19(8), 478–482. doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2004.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maust, D., Moniz, M., Zivin, K., Kales, H., & Davis, M. (2015). Attitudes about required coverage of mental health care in a U.S. national sample. Psychiatric Services, 66(10), 1101–1104. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201400387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayhew, D. R. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McSween, J. L. (2002). The role of group interest, identity, and stigma in determining mental health policy preferences. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 27(5), 773–800. doi:10.1215/03616878-27-5-773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mental Health in America [MHA]. (2021). Access to care data 2021. https://mhanational.org/issues/2021/mental-health-america-access-care-data
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, J. M., & Nyhan, B. (2017). The effects of congressional staff networks in the US House of Representatives. The Journal of Politics, 79(3), 745–761. doi:10.1086/690301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, S. (2022). Biden’s proposed budget includes funds to address disparities and mental health parity. Healthcare Finance. https://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/bidens-proposed-budget-includes-funds-address-disparities-and-mental-health-parity#:~:text=The%20budget%20also%20includes%20new,workforce%20development%20and%20service%20expansion.
   Google Scholar
• Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 143. doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors. (2012). Fact sheet on behavioral health conditions: Behavioral health disorders– All-encompassing condition. https://www.nasmhpd.org/sites/default/files/Public%20and%20Private%20Financing_Fct%20Sheets%20on%20Behavioral%20Health.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oldmixon, E., & Calfano, B. (2007). The religious dynamics of decision making on gay rights issues in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1993–2002. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 46(1), 55–70. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2007.00340.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., and Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ, 372(n71), 1–9. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71
   Google Scholar
• Page, B., & Shapiro, R. (1983). Effects of public opinion on policy. The American Political Science Review, 77(1), 175–190. doi:10.2307/1956018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. O., & Hassairi, N. (2021). What predicts legislative success of early care and education policies?: Applications of machine learniNg and natural language processing in a cross state early childhood policy analysis. PLoS One, 16(2), e0246730. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0246730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D., & Soares, C. B. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Implementation, 13(3), 141. doi:10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050
   Google Scholar
• Poggione, S. (2004). Exploring gender differences in state legislators’ policy preferences. Political Research Quarterly, 57(2), 305–314. doi:10.2307/3219873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purtle, J., Lê-Scherban, F., Wang, X., Shattuck, P. T., Proctor, E. K., & Brownson, R. C. (2018). Audience segmentation to disseminate behavioral health evidence to legislators: An empirical clustering analysis. Implementation Science: IS, 13, 121. doi:10.1186/s13012-018-0816-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchey, M., & Nicholson-Crotty, S. (2015). “Blue ribbon” commissions, interest groups, and the formulation of policy in the American states. Policy Studies Journal, 43(1), 70–92. doi:10.1111/psj.12091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocca, M., Sanchez, G., & Uscinski, J. (2008). Personal attributes and Latino voting behavior in Congress. Social Science Quarterly, 89(2), 392–405. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00538.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAMHSA. (2014a). Projections of national expenditures for treatment of mental and substance use disorders, 2010–2020. Rockville, MD: SAMHSA. HHS Publication No. SMA-14-4883. https://store.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/d7/priv/sma14-4883.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SAMHSA. (2014b). SAMHSA Behavioral health integration. https://www.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/samhsabehavioral-health-integration.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SAMHSA. (2021). Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States: Results from the 2020 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Rockville, MD: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, SAMHSA. HHS Publication No. PEP21 07-01-003, NSDUH Series H-56https://www.samhsa.gov/data/
   Google Scholar
• Sample, L., & Kadleck, C. (2008). Sex offender laws: Legislators’ accounts of the need for policy. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19(1), 40–62. doi:10.1177/0887403407308292
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1993). Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. The American Political Science Review, 87(2), 334–347. doi:10.2307/2939044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (2005). Deserving and entitled: Social constructions and public policy. Albany, NY: State University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Shor, B. (2018). Ideology, party, and opinion: Explaining individual legislator ACA implementation votes in the states. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 18(4), 371–394. doi:10.1177/1532440018786734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. M., Damschroder, L. J., Kim, S. Y. H., & Ubel, P. A. (2012). What’s it worth? Public willingness to pay to avoid mental illnesses compared with general medical illnesses. Psychiatric Services, 63(4), 319–324. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201000036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, J. M., & Groseclose, T. (2000). Estimating party influence in congressional roll-call voting. American Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 193–211. doi:10.2307/2669305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration [SAMHSA]. (2022). HHS announces nearly $35 million to strengthen mental health support for children and young adults. https://www.samhsa.gov/newsroom/press-announcements/20220309/hhs-announces-35-million-strengthen-mental-health
   Google Scholar
• Swers, M. (1998). Are women more likely to vote for women’s issue bills than their male colleagues? Legislative Studies Quarterly, 23(3), 435–448. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i218475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tung, G., Vernick, J., Stuart, E., & Webster, D. (2014). Political factors affecting the enactment of state-level clean indoor air laws. American Journal of Public Health, 104(6), e92–97. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallack, L., Woodruff, K., Dorfman, L., & Diaz, I. (1999). News for a change: An advocates’ guide to working with the media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Washington, E. (2008). Female socialization: How daughters affect their legislator fathers’ voting on women’s issues. The American Economic Review, 98(1), 311–332. doi:10.1257/aer.98.1.311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodruff, K., & Roberts, S. C. M. (2019). “Alcohol during pregnancy? Nobody does that anymore”: State legislators’ use of evidence in making policy on alcohol use in pregnancy. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 80(3), 380–388. doi:10.15288/jsad.2019.80.380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization [WHO]. (2008). MhGAP: Mental Health Gap Action Programme: Scaling up care for mental, neurological, and substance use disorders. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK310851/143
   Google Scholar
• Xu, W., Song, C., Li, Y., & Retchin, S. (2019). Cost-sharing disparities for out-of-network care for adults with behavioral health conditions. JAMA Network Open, 2(11), E1914554. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, J., Zhang, Y., & Polsky, D. (2017). Networks in ACA marketplaces are narrower for mental health care than for primary care. Health Affairs, 36(9), 1624–1631. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar