Regional Positioning and Identity Formation in East Asian Trade: Comparing China and India

References

• Amighini, A. A. (2012). China and India in the international fragmentation of automobile production. China Economic Review, 23, 325–341. doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2012.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. E. (1979). A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. American Economic Review, 69(1), 106–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariff, M., & Lim, C. C. (2006). ASEAN–India FTA: Issues and prospects. In N. Kumar, R. Sen, & M. Asher (Eds.), India–ASEAN economic relations: Meeting the challenges of globalization (pp. 69–92). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Athukorala, P.-C. (2005). Components trade and implications for Asian structural adjustment. In R. Garnaut & L. Song (Eds.), The China boom and its discontents (pp. 215–239). Canberra: Australian National University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baltagi, B. H., Egger, P., & Pfaffermayr, M. (2003). A generalized design for bilateral trade flow models. Economics Letter, 80(3), 391–397. doi: 10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00115-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, M., & Kouparitsas, M. A. (2006). What determines bilateral trade flows? NBER Working Paper No.12188. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Beeson, M., & Li, F. (2012). Charmed or alarmed? Reading China's regional relations. Journal of Contemporary China, 21(73), 35–51. doi: 10.1080/10670564.2012.627664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrand, J. H. (1985). The gravity equation in international trade: Some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(3), 474–481. doi: 10.2307/1925976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrand, J. H. (1989). The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and the factor-proportions theory of international trade. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 143–153. doi: 10.2307/1928061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrand, J. H. (1990). The Heckscher–Ohlin–Samuelson model, the Linder hypothesis and determinants of bilateral intra-industry trade. Economic Journal, 100, 1216–1229. doi: 10.2307/2233969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239–253. doi: 10.2307/2297111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byung-Joon, A. (2004). The rise of China and the future of East Asian integration. Asia-Pacific Review, 11(2), 18–35. doi: 10.1080/1343900042000292524
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. (2009). Inflow of foreign direct investment. In R. Garnaut, L. Song, & W. T. Woo (Eds.), China’s new place in a world in crisis: Economic, geopolitical and environmental dimensions (pp. 325–348). Canberra: ANU E Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cieslik, A. (2009). Bilateral trade volumes, the gravity equation and factor proportions. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 18(1), 37–59. doi: 10.1080/09638190902757400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deardorff, A. V. (1998). Determinants of bilateral trade: Does gravity work in a neoclassical world? In J. Frankel (Ed.), The regionalization of the world economy (pp. 7–32). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Debaere, P. (2003). Relative factor abundance and trade. Journal of Political Economy, 11(3), 589–610. doi: 10.1086/374179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devadason, E. S. (2011). Re-organization of intra-ASEAN5 trade flows: The “China factor”. Asian Economic Journal, 25(2), 129–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8381.2011.02058.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmonds, C., La Croix, S. J., & Yao, L. (2008). China trade: Busting gravity's bounds. Journal of Asian Economies, 19(5–6), 455–466. doi: 10.1016/j.asieco.2008.09.013
   Google Scholar
• Egger, P. (2000). A note on the proper econometric specification of the gravity equation. Economics Letters, 66(1), 25–31. doi: 10.1016/S0165-1765(99)00183-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egger, P., & Pfaffermayr, M. (2003). The proper panel econometric specification of the gravity equation: A three-way model with bilateral interaction effects. Empirical Economics, 28, 571–580. doi: 10.1007/s001810200146
   Google Scholar
• Egger, P., & Pfaffermayr, M. (2004). Distance, trade and FDI: A Hausman–Taylor SUR approach. Applied Economics, 19(2), 227–246. doi: 10.1002/jae.721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evenett, S. J., & Keller, W. (2002). On theories explaining the successes of the gravity equation. Journal of Political Economy, 110(2), 281–315. doi: 10.1086/338746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel, J., Stein, E., & Wei, S.-j. (1995). Trading blocs and the Americas: The natural, the unnatural and the supernatural. Journal of Development Economics, 47(1), 61–95. doi: 10.1016/0304-3878(95)00005-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaulier, G., Lemoine, F., & Unal-Kesenci, D. (2007a). China's integration in East Asia: production sharing, FDI and high-tech trade. Economic Change, 40, 27–63. doi: 10.1007/s10644-007-9013-5
   Google Scholar
• Gaulier, G., Lemoine, F., & Unal-Kesenci, D. (2007b). China's emergence and the reorganisation of trade flows in Asia. China Economic Review, 18, 209–243. doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2007.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, S., & Yamarik, S. (2004). Are regional trading arrangements trade creating? An application of extreme bounds analysis. Journal of International Economics, 63(2), 369–395. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1996(03)00058-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausman, J. A., & Taylor, W. E. (1981). Panel data and unobservable individual effect. Econometrica, 49, 1377–1398. doi: 10.2307/1911406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haveman, J., & Hummels, D. (2004). Alternative hypotheses and the volume of trade: The gravity equation and the extent of specialization. Canadian Journal of Economics, 37(1), 199–218. doi: 10.1111/j.0008-4085.2004.011_1.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helpman, E. (1981). International trade in the presence of product differentiation, economies of scale and monopolistic competition: A Chamberlin–Heckscher–Ohlin approach. Journal of International Economics, 11, 305–340. doi: 10.1016/0022-1996(81)90001-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helpman, E. (1984). A simple theory of international trade with multinational corporations. Journal of Political Economy, 92(3), 451–471. doi: 10.1086/261236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helpman, E. (1985). Multinational corporations and trade structure. Review of Economic Studies, 52, 443–457. doi: 10.2307/2297663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helpman, E. (1987). Imperfect competition and international trade: Evidence from fourteen industrial countries. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 1(1), 62–81. doi: 10.1016/0889-1583(87)90027-X
   Google Scholar
• Helpman, E. (1988). Imperfect competition and international trade: Evidence from fourteen industrial countries. In A. M. Spence & H. A. Hazard (Eds.), International competitiveness (pp. 197–220). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
   Google Scholar
• Helpman, E., & Krugman, P. (1985). Market structure and foreign trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, S. (2005). India's approach to ASEAN and its regional implications. In S.-H. Saw, L. Sheng, & K. W. Chin (Eds.), ASEAN–China relations: realities and prospects (pp. 128–150). Singapore: Institute of South East Asian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y. (2011). Will China become an engine of growth for the region? In L. S. Ho & J. Wong (Eds.), APEC and the rise of China (pp. 67–92). Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, L., & Markusen, J. (1988). Per-capita income as a determinant of trade. In R. Feenstra (Ed.), Empirical methods for international trade (pp. 89–109). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ka, Z. (2010). Multilateral versus bilateral and regional trade liberalization: Explaining China's pursuit of free trade agreements (FTAs). Journal of Contemporary China, 19(66), 635–652. doi: 10.1080/10670564.2010.485400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitano, M. (2011). China's foreign strategy. Asia-Pacific Review, 18(2), 37–59. doi: 10.1080/13439006.2011.630855
   Google Scholar
• Koukhartchouk, O., & Maurel, M. (2003). Russia's accession to the WTO: The potential for trade increase. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32(4), 599–825.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. R. (1979). Increasing returns, monopolistic competition and international trade. Journal of International Economics, 9, 469–479. doi: 10.1016/0022-1996(79)90017-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. R. (1980). Scale economies, product differentiation and the pattern of trade. American Economic Review, 70, 950–959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster, K. (1980). Intra-industry trade under perfect monopolistic competition. Journal of International Economics, 10, 151–175. doi: 10.1016/0022-1996(80)90052-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leal-Arcas, R. (2011). China's economic rise and regional trade. In L. S. Ho & J. Wong (Eds.), APEC and the rise of China (pp. 92–120). Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H.-H., Park, D., & Wang, J. (2011). The role of the People’s Republic of China in international fragmentation and production networks: An empirical investigation. ADB Working Paper Series No. 87. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Lemoine, F., & Unal-Kesenci, D. (2007). China and India in international trade: From laggards to leaders? CEPII Working Paper No. 2007-19. Paris: Centre d'Etudes Prospectives et d'Informations Internationales.
   Google Scholar
• Li, K., Song, L., & Zhao, X. (2007). Component trade and China's global economic integration. In R. Garnaut & L. Song (Eds.), China: Linking markets for growth (pp. 71–94). Canberra: ANU E Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X., Wang, C., & Wei, Y. (2001). Causal links between foreign direct investment and trade in China. China Economic Review, 12(2–3), 190–202. doi: 10.1016/S1043-951X(01)00050-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S., Robinson, S., & Thierfelder, K. (2008). Asian growth and trade poles: China and East and Southeast Asia. World Development, 36(2), 210–234. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, S. M., & Upadhyay, M. P. (2000). The effects of openness, trade orientation and human capital on total factor productivity. Journal of Development Economics, 63(2), 399–423. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3878(00)00112-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulapruk, P., & Coxhead, I. (2005, November 18). Competition and complementarity in Chinese and ASEAN manufacturing industries. Paper presented at the China Center for Economic Research (CCER), Peking University, Beijing. Retrieved from: http://www.aae.wisc.edu/coxhead/papers/gravity_wp-4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Noguchi, K. (2011). Bringing realism back in: Explaining China's strategic behaviour in the Asia Pacific. Asia-Pacific Review, 18(2), 60–85. doi: 10.1080/13439006.2011.640580
   Google Scholar
• Poyhonen, P. (1963). A tentative model for the volume of trade between countries. Weltwirtschafliches Archiv, 90(1), 93–99.
   Google Scholar
• Rojid, S. (2006). COMESA trade potential: A gravity approach. Applied Economics Letters, 13(14), 947–951. doi: 10.1080/13504850500426061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, K., Blomqvist, H., & Clark, C. (2012). Trade, technology and industrialization in the Asian states. Chapter 4 in Economic development in China, India and East Asia: Managing change in the twenty first century (pp. 73–130). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Seethi, K. M. (2009). Emerging India and China: Potentials and constraints. In P. E. Lam & T. W. Lim (Eds.), The rise of China and India: A new Asian drama (pp. 21–38). Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Serlenga, L., & Shin, Y. (2004). Gravity models of the intra-EU trade: Application of the Hausman–Taylor estimation in heterogeneous panels with common time-specific factors. ESE Discussion Papers No. 105. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh School of Economics, University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Sohn, C.-H. (2005). Does the gravity model explain South Korea's trade flows? Japanese Economic Review, 56(4), 417–430. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5876.2005.00338.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinbergen, J. (1962). Shaping the world economy: Suggestions for an international economic policy. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C., Wei, Y., & Liu, X. (2010). Determinants of bilateral trade flows in OECD countries: Evidence from gravity panel data models. The World Economy, 33(7), 894–915. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2009.01245.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wignaraja, G. (2011). The People’s Republic of China and India: Commercial policies in the giants. ADB Working Paper No. 83. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, J. (2013). A China-centric economic order in East Asia. Asia Pacific Business Review, 19(2), 286–296. doi: 10.1080/13602381.2012.739358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y. (2012). Understanding economic growth in China and India: A comparative study of selected issues. Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Xing, Y. (2012). Processing trade, exchange rates and China's bilateral trade balances. Journal of Asian Economics, 23, 540–547. doi: 10.1016/j.asieco.2012.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Yin, F., & Hamori, S. (2013). Globalization and economic growth in East Asia. In T. Kinkyo, Y. Matsubayashi, & S. Hamori (Eds.), Global linkages and economic rebalancing in East Asia (pp. 109–137). Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. (2005). An explanatory study of bilateral FDI relations: The case of China. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 3(2), 133–150. doi: 10.1080/14765280500120054
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., van Witteloostuijn, A., & Zhou, C. (2005). Chinese bilateral intra-industry trade: A panel data study for 50 countries in the 1992–2001 period. Review of World Economics, 141(3), 510–540. doi: 10.1007/s10290-005-0041-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, S. (2011). China's approaches toward regional cooperation in East Asia: Motivations and calculations. Journal of Contemporary China, 20(68), 53–67. doi: 10.1080/10670564.2011.520846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar