Science-Literate Identities Among ENLACE Students

References

• Banilover, E., Cohen, C., Pasley, J., & Weiss, I. (2008). Effective science instruction: What does the research tell us? RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
   Google Scholar
• Banilover, E., Smith, P., Weiss, I., Malzahn, K., Campbell, K., & Weis, A. (2013). Report of the 2012 national survey of science and mathematics education. Horizon Research, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Black, L. (2004). Differential participation in whole-class discussions and the construction of marginalized identities. The Journal of Educational Enquiry, 5(1), 34–54.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buxton, C. A., & Lee, O. (2014). English language learners in science education. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 204–222). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Daehler, K. R., & Folsom, J. (2017). Making sense of science: Matter for teachers of grades 5–12 (2nd ed.). WestEd.
   Google Scholar
• Delpit, L. D. (2006). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council, Donovan, S., & Bransford, J. (2005). How students learn: Science in the classroom. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• ENLACE. (n.d.). Informational brochure. Las Cruces, NM: New Mexico State University.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2002). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2012). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (4th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, C. A., & Sleeter, C. A. (2009). Turning on learning: Five approaches for multicultural teaching plans for race, class, gender, and disability (5th ed.). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Greenleaf, C., Hanson, T., Herman, J., Litman, C., Madden, S., Rosen, R., … Silver, D. (2009). Integrating literacy and science instruction in high school biology: Impact on teacher practice, student engagement, and student achievement. National Science Foundation Research on Learning in Education Program. https://www2.wested.org/www-static/sli/downloads/nsf-final-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. (1988). On the language of physical science. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Registers of written English: Situational factors and linguistic features (pp. 162–178). Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5(2), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-5898(93)90026-7
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. C., Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2017). Visible learning for mathematics: What works best to optimize student learning. Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Shanahan, M. C. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 978–1003. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: Common errors and some comments on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horizon Research. (2000). Inside the classroom observation protocol.
   Google Scholar
• Hurstfield, J. (1978). ‘Internal’ colonialism: White, Black, and Chicano self-conceptions. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 1(1), 60–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.1978.9993221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intercultural Development Research Association [IDRA]. (2000). The ENLACE initiative: Strengthening communities, increasing opportunity, fostering success. http://www.idra.org/IDRA_Newsletter/January_2000_Bilingual_Education/The_ENLACE_Initiative/
   Google Scholar
• Kellogg Commission. (1999). Returning to our roots: The engaged institution. http://www.aplu.org/library/returning-to-our-roots-the-engaged-institution/file
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K., & Goodman, Y. (2011). Teaching strategies for ELL readers to revalue themselves as readers: Retrospective miscue analysis. In R. Meyer & K. Whitmore (Eds.), Reclaiming reading (pp. 99–110). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, O., Quinn, H., & Valdés, G. (2013). Science and language for English language learners in relation to next generation science standards and with implications for common core state standards for English arts and mathematics. Educational Researcher, 42(4), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13480524
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Lent, R. C. (2012). Overcoming textbook fatigue: 21st century tools to revitalize teaching and learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Megowan-Romanowicz, C. (2016). Whiteboarding: A tool for moving classroom discourse from answer-making to sense-making. The Physics Teacher, 54(2), 83–86. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4940170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercuri, S., & Mercuri, N. (2019). Scaffolding English language learners’ literacy development through a science inquiry approach. In L. de Oliveira, K. Obenchain, R. Kennedy, & A. Oliveira (Eds.), Teaching the content areas to English language learners in secondary schools (Vol. 17, pp. 231–245). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mertler, C. A., & Vannatta, R. A. (2010). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods: Practical application and interpretation (4th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oemig, P. A. (2018). Promoting science literate identities through the use of trade books. In T. Spuck, L. Jenkins, T. Rust, and R. Dou (Eds.), Best practices in STEM education: Innovative approaches from Einstein fellow alumni, 399–419. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Ogbu, J. (1994). Racial stratification and education in the United States: Why inequality persists. Teachers College Record, 96(2), 264–298. https://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, D. P., Moje, E., & Greenleaf, C. (2010). Literacy and science: Each in the service of the other. Science, 328(5977), 459–463. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement design and analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & MacCallum, R. C. (2003). Repeating Tom Swift’s electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics, 2(1), 13–32. http://quantpsy.org/pubs/preacher_maccallum_2003.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ross, A. A., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2010). Mixed methods research design: A comparison of prevalence in JRME and AERJ. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4(3), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.2010.4.3.233
   Google Scholar
• Ruíz, R. (1984). Orientations in language planning. Journal of the National Association of Bilingual Education, 8(2), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/08855072.1984.10668464
   Google Scholar
• Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2012). What is disciplinary literacy and why does it matter? Topics in Language Disorders, 32(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0b013e318244557a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spring, J. (1997). Deculturalization and the struggle for equality: A brief history of the education of dominated cultures in the United States (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Varelas, M. (Ed.). (2012). Identity construction and science education research: Learning, teaching, and being in multiple contexts. Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. (A. Kozulin, Trans.). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, I. R., Pasley, J. D., Smith, P. S., Banilower, E. R., & Heck, D. J. (2003). Looking inside the classroom: A study of K-12 mathematics and science education in the United States. Horizon Research.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wortham, S. (2006). Learning identity: The joint emergence of social identification and academic learning. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar