332
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Exploring Worksheets and Attendance-taking as Gatekeeping Features in a Gateway Course for Latinx STEM Majors

ORCID Icon, , &

References

  • Acevedo-Gil, N., Santos, R. E., Alonso, L., & Solorzano, D. G. (2015). Latinas/os in community college developmental education: Increasing moments of academic and interpersonal validation. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 14(2), 101–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192715572893
  • Adiredja, A. P., & Andrews-Larson, C. (2017). Taking the sociopolitical turn in postsecondary mathematics education research. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 3(3), 444–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-017-0054-5
  • Agar, M. (2004). We have met the other and we’re all nonlinear: Ethnography as a nonlinear dynamic system. Complexity, 10(2), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/cplx.20054
  • Alcocer, L. F., & Martinez, A. (2018). Mentoring Hispanic students: A literature review. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 17(4), 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192717705700
  • Andrietti, V., & Velasco, C. (2015). Lecture attendance, study time, and academic performance: A panel data study. The Journal of Economic Education, 46(3), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2015.1040182
  • Asera, R. (2001). Calculus and community: A history of the emerging scholars program. College Entrance Examination Board.
  • Battey, D., & Leyva, L. A. (2016). A framework for understanding whiteness in mathematics education. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 9(2), 49–80.
  • Bhattacharya, N., Sánchez Ordaz, A., Mosqueda, E., & Cooper, C. (2020). Redesigning the gateway college algebra course with inclusive and asset-based pedagogy: Rethinking “servingness” at a Hispanic serving institution. In G. A. Garcia (Ed.), Hispanic Serving Institutions (HSIs) in practice: Defining “servingness” at HSIs (pp. 97-116). Information Age.
  • Brown, S., Santiago, D., Ceja, B., Martinez, J., & Cisneros, G. (2020, May 6). Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs) and the changing landscape [Webinar]. Excelencia in Education. https://www.edexcelencia.org/hispanic-serving-institutions-hsis-and-changing-landscape
  • Brusi, R., Portnoy, A., & Toro, N. (2013). Student engagement and completion in precalculus mega section: Efficiently assisting student engagement and completion with communications and information technology. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, 14(1), 20–25.
  • Burke, C., Luu, R., Lai, A., Hsiao, V., Cheung, E., Tamashiro, D., & Ashcroft, J. (2020). Making STEM equitable: An active learning approach to closing the achievement gap. International Journal of Active Learning, 5(2), 71–85. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/218451/
  • Callahan, K. M. (2008). Academic-centered peer interactions and retention in undergraduate mathematics programs. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 10(3), 361–389. https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.10.3.f
  • Campbell, A. (2015). Exploring boot camps for ‘gatekeeper’ service courses in math. Pythagoras, 36(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v36i2.298
  • Clair, K. L. S. (1999). A case against compulsory class attendance policies in higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 23(3), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022942400812
  • Clump, M. A., Bauer, H., & Whiteleather, A. (2003). To attend or not to attend: Is that a good question? Journal of Instructional Psychology, 30(3), 220.
  • Cohen, R., & Kelly, A. M. (2019). Community college chemistry course taking and STEM academic persistence. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00586
  • Cooper, C., & Woodward, J. (2011). Predicting student success in precalculus. In Proceedings of the INTED 5th International Technology, Education and Development, 3, 5398-5401. https://library.iated.org/view/COOPER2011PRE
  • Credé, M., Roch, S. G., & Kieszczynka, U. M. (2010). Class attendance in college: A meta-analytic review of the relationship of class attendance with grades and student characteristics. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 272–295. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310362998
  • Cruz, C., Rajpal, G., Lecocke, M., Martines, I., & Lurie, A. (2021). Peer coaching program development: A framework of first-year Latina/o student persistence pursuing STEM pathways at a Hispanic serving institution. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 20(4), 365–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192719867096
  • Dagley, M., Georgiopoulos, M., Reece, A., & Young, C. (2016). Increasing retention and graduation rates through a STEM learning community. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 18(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115584746
  • Drane, D., Smith, H. D., Light, G., Pinto, L., & Swarat, S. (2005). The gateway science workshop program: Enhancing student performance and retention in the sciences through peer-facilitated discussion. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(3), 337–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-005-7199-8
  • Duncan, H., & Dick, T. (2000). Collaborative workshops and student academic performance in introductory college math courses: A study of a Treisman model math excel program. School Science and Math, 100(7), 365–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb18178.x
  • Duncan, H., & Dick, T. (2000). Collaborative workshops and student academic performance in introductory college math courses: A study of a Treisman model math excel program. School Science and Math,100(7), 365–373.
  • Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press.
  • Ferrare, J. J. (2019). A multi-institutional analysis of instructional beliefs and practices in gateway courses to the sciences. CBE- Life Sciences Education, 18(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-12-0257
  • Ferrare, J. J., & Miller, J. M. (2020). Making sense of persistence in scientific purgatory: A multi-institutional analysis of instructors in introductory science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) courses. The Journal of Higher Education, 91(1), 113–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2019.1602392
  • Flanders, G. R. (2017). The effect of gateway course completion on freshman college student retention. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 19(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115611396
  • Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
  • Fry, R., & Lopez, M. H. (2012). Hispanic student enrollments reach new highs in 2011: Now the largest minority group on four-year college campuses. Pew Research Hispanic Center.
  • Fullilove, R. E., & Treisman, P. U. (1990). Math achievement among African American undergraduates at the University of California, Berkeley: An evaluation of the math workshop program. The Journal of Negro Education, 59(3), 463–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/2295577
  • Garcia, G. A., Núñez, A. M., & Sansone, V. A. (2019). Toward a multidimensional conceptual framework for understanding “servingness” in Hispanic-serving institutions: A synthesis of the research. Review of Educational Research, 89(5), 745–784. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319864591
  • Gardner, J. N. Institute for Excellence in Undergraduate Education. (2018). Gateways to completion: Overview, evidence of strength of components & summary of outcomes to date. https://www.jngi.org/gateways-to-completion
  • Gasiewski, J. A., Eagan, M. K., Garcia, G. A., Hurtado, S., & Chang, M. J. (2012). From gatekeeping to engagement: A multicontextual, mixed method study of student academic engagement in introductory STEM courses. Research in Higher Education, 53(2), 229–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9247-y
  • Geisinger, B. N., & Raman, D. R. (2013). Why they leave: Understanding student attrition from engineering majors. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(4), 914. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.865.9462&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  • Guijt, I. (2010). Accountability and learning: Exploding the myth of incompatibility between accountability and learning. In J. Ubels, N. A. Acquaye-Baddoo, & A. Fowler (Eds.), Capacity development in practice (pp. 277–291). Earthscan.
  • Gump, S. E. (2005). The cost of cutting class: Attendance as a predictor of success. College Teaching, 53(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.53.1.21-26
  • Hassel, H., & Lourey, J. (2005). The dea(r)th of student responsibility. College Teaching, 53(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.53.1.2-13
  • Higbee, J. L., & Fayon, A. K. (2006). Attendance policies in developmental education courses: Promoting involvement or undermining students’ autonomy? Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 22(2), 71–77.
  • Iloh, C., & Tierney, W. (2014). Using ethnography to understand twenty-first century college life. Human Affairs, 24(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-014-0203-3
  • Kasturiarachi, A. B. (1997). Promoting excellence in undergraduate math through workshops based on collaborative learning. Problems, Resources, and Issues in Math Undergraduate Studies, 7(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511979708965856
  • Kendall, K. D., & Schussler, E. E. (2013). Evolving impressions: Undergraduate perceptions of graduate teaching assistants and faculty members over a semester. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12(1), 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-07-0110
  • Koch, A. K. (2017a). It’s about the gateway courses: Defining and contextualizing the issue. New Directions for Higher Education, 2017(180), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.20257
  • Koch, A. K. (2017b, May). Many thousands failed: A wakeup call to history educators. Perspectives on History, 55(5), 18–19.
  • Kokkelenberg, E. C., & Sinha, E. (2010). Who succeeds in STEM studies? An analysis of Binghamton University undergraduate students. Economics of Education Review, 29(6), 935–946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.06.016
  • Lam, P. C., Srivatsan, T., Doverspike, D., Vesalo, J., & Mawasha, P. R. (2005). A ten-year assessment of the pre-engineering program for under-represented, low income and/or first generation college students at the University of Akron. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 6(3), 14–20. https://www.jstem.org/jstem/index.php/JSTEM/article/view/1281
  • Leyva, L. A., McNeill, R. T., Marshall, B. L., & Guzmán, O. A. (2021a). “It seems like they purposefully try to make as many kids drop”: An analysis of logics and mechanisms of racial-gendered inequality in introductory mathematics instruction. The Journal of Higher Education, 92(5), 784–814. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2021.1879586
  • Leyva, L. A., Quea, R., Weber, K., Battey, D., & López, D. (2021b). Detailing racialized and gendered mechanisms of undergraduate precalculus and calculus classroom instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 39(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2020.1849218
  • Liou-Mark, J., Dreyfuss, A. E., & Younge, L. (2010). Peer assisted learning workshops in precalculus: An approach to increasing student success. Mathematics & Computer Education, 44(3), 249–259.
  • Macfarlane, B. (2013). The surveillance of learning: A critical analysis of university attendance policies. Higher Education Quarterly, 67(4), 358–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12016
  • Matthews, R. S., & Newman, S. (2017). Chief academic officers and gateway courses: Keys to institutional retention and persistence agendas. New Directions for Higher Education, 2017(180), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.20262
  • Misseyanni, A., Papadopoulou, P., Marouli, C., and Lytras, M. D. (Eds.). (2018). Active learning strategies in higher education. United Kingdom: Emerald Publishing Limited.
  • Musoba, G. D., & Krichevskiy, D. (2014). Early coursework and college experience predictors of persistence at a Hispanic-serving institution. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 13(1), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192713513463
  • O’Connell, S. (2020). A qualitative exploration of pell grant-eligible Latino male students’ perceptions of their experiences and engagement in a first-year college program. Journal of Latinos and Education. (ahead-of-print), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348431.2020.1794877
  • Ojeda, L., Flores, L. Y., Meza, R. R., & Morales, A. (2011). Culturally competent qualitativeresearch with Latino immigrants. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 33(2), 184–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986311402626
  • Oppland-Cordell, S. B. (2014). Urban Latina/o undergraduate students’ negotiations of identities and participation in an emerging scholars calculus I workshop. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 7(1), 19–54. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1085785
  • Oppland-Cordell, S., & Martin, D. B. (2015). Identity, power, and shifting participation in a mathematics workshop: Latin@ students’ negotiation of self and success. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27(1), 21–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-014-0127-6
  • Oppland-Cordell, S., & Martin, D. B. (2015). Identity, power, and shifting participation in a mathematics workshop: Latin@ students’ negotiation of self and success. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27(1), 21–49.
  • Peralta, C., Caspary, M., & Boothe, D. (2013). Success factors impacting Latina/o persistence in higher education leading to STEM opportunities. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 8(4), 905–918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9520-9
  • Pino, N. W., Martinez-Ramos, G. P., & Smith, W. L. (2012). Latinos, the academic ethic, and the transition to college. Journal of Latinos and Education, 11(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348431.2012.631437
  • Premraj, D., Rudi Thompson, R., Hughes, L., & Adams, J. (2019). Key factors influencing retention rates among historically underrepresented student groups in STEM fields. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory, & Practice, 23(2), 457–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025119848763
  • President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.
  • Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
  • Rocha, D., & Orraca-Romano, P. P. (2018). Estudiantes de educación superior transfronterizos: Residir en México y estudiar en Estados Unidos. Frontera Norte, 30(59), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.17428/rfn.v30i59.880
  • Saldaña, J. (2016). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (3rd. ed.). SAGE.
  • Santiago, D., Taylor, M., & Calderón Galdeano, E. (May 2016). From capacity to success: HSIs, Title V, and Latino students. Retrieved from Excelencia in Education website: https://www.edexcelencia.org/research/publications/capacity-success-hsis-title-v-and-latino-students.
  • Sithole, A., Chiyaka, E. T., McCarthy, P., Mupinga, D. M., Bucklein, B. K., & Kibirige, J. (2017). Student attraction, persistence and retention in STEM programs: Successes and continuing challenges. Higher Education Studies, 7(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v7n1p46
  • Stinson, D. W. (2004). Math as “gate-keeper” (?): Three theoretical perspectives that aim toward empowering all children with a key to the gate. Math Educator, 14(1), 8–18. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/msit_facpub/19/
  • Toumasis, C. (1995). Concept worksheet: An important tool for learning. The Math Teacher, 88(2), 98–100. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.88.2.0098
  • U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2020, June). Table 322.30: Bachelor’s degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions, by race/ethnicity and field of study: 2017-18 and 2018-19. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d20/tables/dt20_322.30.asp
  • Wu, X., Deshler, J., & Fuller, E. (2018). The effects of different versions of a gateway STEM course on student attitudes and beliefs. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0141-4

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.